Current Events > Cops shot unarmed 16 year old in court.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
UnfairRepresent 01/22/18 2:54:12 PM #101:	r4X0r posted... Bishop9800 posted... darkjedilink posted... Liberals can't process the concept of criminals actually being responsible for the crimes they commit. So what is Roy Moore's excuse? What crime did he commit? Statutory rape --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:894573625] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>r4X0r posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bishop9800 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Liberals can't process the concept of criminals actually being responsible for the crimes they commit. </quote> So what is Roy Moore's excuse?</quote> What crime did he commit?</quote> Statutory rape</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#102	Post #102 was unavailable or deleted.
ChromaticAngel 01/22/18 2:54:20 PM #103:	UnfairRepresent posted... ChromaticAngel posted... "rape is legal as long as you can silence the person you rape long enough" It's not that rape is legal, it's that the accusation can no longer be objectively investigated in a court of law. Is the statue of limitations argument. I see both sides of it myself. While the idea of people getting away with crimes is henious, the idea of someone going to prison for stealing a loaf of bread 45 years ago is absurd. you are comparing stealing a loaf of bread to rape --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>ChromaticAngel posted [p:894573637] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ChromaticAngel posted...</cite> <quote> "rape is legal as long as you can silence the person you rape long enough"</quote> It's not that rape is legal, it's that the accusation can no longer be objectively investigated in a court of law. Is the statue of limitations argument. I see both sides of it myself. While the idea of people getting away with crimes is henious, the idea of someone going to prison for stealing a loaf of bread 45 years ago is absurd.</quote> you are comparing stealing a loaf of bread to rape</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
r4X0r 01/22/18 2:55:11 PM #104:	Bishop9800 posted... HypnoCoosh posted... Bishop9800 posted... darkjedilink posted... Liberals can't process the concept of criminals actually being responsible for the crimes they commit. So what is Roy Moore's excuse? statue of limitations are a thing So the statue of limitations is the reason why he can't take responsibility or the crime? What crime? --- Professionals are predictable- it's the amateurs who are dangerous. <cite>r4X0r posted [p:894573687] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bishop9800 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HypnoCoosh posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bishop9800 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Liberals can't process the concept of criminals actually being responsible for the crimes they commit. </quote> So what is Roy Moore's excuse?</quote> statue of limitations are a thing</quote> So the statue of limitations is the reason why he can't take responsibility or the crime?</quote> What crime?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pinky0926 01/22/18 2:55:12 PM #105:	Keith Ferrell, executive vice president for the police union that represents the deputy, said the deputy was "violently attacked by multiple people" and had visible injuries including cuts, abrasions, and a possible black eye. He said the deputy was in a "fight for his life" when he opened fire. They actually expect people to believe this Worse, people actually believe this --- CE's Resident Scotsman. http://i.imgur.com/ILz2ZbV.jpg <cite>pinky0926 posted [p:894573688] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><quote>Keith Ferrell, executive vice president for the police union that represents the deputy, said the deputy was "violently attacked by multiple people" and had visible injuries including cuts, abrasions, and a possible black eye. He said the deputy was in a "fight for his life" when he opened fire.</quote> They actually expect people to believe this Worse, people actually believe this</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 01/22/18 2:55:51 PM #106:	ChromaticAngel posted... you are comparing stealing a loaf of bread to rape You are either incapable or too lazy to comprehend the point. The logic is what is being questioned not the crime. At what point is something far enough in the past that it can't be reasonably used as something to be investigated legally? --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:894573734] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>ChromaticAngel posted...</cite> <quote> you are comparing stealing a loaf of bread to rape</quote> You are either incapable or too lazy to comprehend the point. The logic is what is being questioned not the crime. At what point is something far enough in the past that it can't be reasonably used as something to be investigated legally?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#107	Post #107 was unavailable or deleted.
Bishop9800 01/22/18 2:57:34 PM #108:	r4X0r posted... Bishop9800 posted... HypnoCoosh posted... Bishop9800 posted... darkjedilink posted... Liberals can't process the concept of criminals actually being responsible for the crimes they commit. So what is Roy Moore's excuse? statue of limitations are a thing So the statue of limitations is the reason why he can't take responsibility or the crime? What crime? UnfairRepresent posted... Statutory rape --- I don't have to insult you. I have proven that you are a hypocrite and a fool. That's not insulting you, that's exposing you. PSN-Bishop9800 <cite>Bishop9800 posted [p:894573832] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>r4X0r posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bishop9800 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HypnoCoosh posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bishop9800 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Liberals can't process the concept of criminals actually being responsible for the crimes they commit. </quote> So what is Roy Moore's excuse?</quote> statue of limitations are a thing</quote> So the statue of limitations is the reason why he can't take responsibility or the crime?</quote> What crime?</quote> <cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>Statutory rape </quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AverageCEgal 01/22/18 2:57:58 PM #109:	you should get sources instead of assuming things based on a biased article posted by someone who encourages arguing for their armusement <cite>AverageCEgal posted [p:894573861] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote>you should get sources instead of assuming things based on a biased article posted by someone who encourages arguing for their armusement</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ChromaticAngel 01/22/18 2:59:40 PM #110:	UnfairRepresent posted... ChromaticAngel posted... you are comparing stealing a loaf of bread to rape You are either incapable or too lazy to comprehend the point. The logic is what is being questioned not the crime. At what point is something far enough in the past that it can't be reasonably used as something to be investigated legally? They literally sent a Nazi to Nuremberg for a trial in 2017 "How long until you can't investigate something?" the answer is never. "How long until you shouldn't investigate something?" is a better question to ask and the answer should change depending on what the something is. A theft of bread doesn't merit a long limit. Rape isn't something that should expire, especially when the victim is also a child. --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>ChromaticAngel posted [p:894573968] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ChromaticAngel posted...</cite> <quote> you are comparing stealing a loaf of bread to rape</quote> You are either incapable or too lazy to comprehend the point. The logic is what is being questioned not the crime. At what point is something far enough in the past that it can't be reasonably used as something to be investigated legally?</quote> They literally sent a Nazi to Nuremberg for a trial in 2017 "How long until you can't investigate something?" the answer is never. "How long until you shouldn't investigate something?" is a better question to ask and the answer should change depending on what the something is. A theft of bread doesn't merit a long limit. Rape isn't something that should expire, especially when the victim is also a child.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#111	Post #111 was unavailable or deleted.
#112	Post #112 was unavailable or deleted.
#113	Post #113 was unavailable or deleted.
Axiom 01/22/18 3:02:25 PM #114:	cjsdowg posted... "At some point as the hearing was concluding, there was an altercation that ensued involving the deputy and some of the family members," Minerd said. He added later the boy also was involved. Suspicious as fuck. The fact he fired a single shot makes it sound like he fucked up and accidentally fired his gun <cite>Axiom posted [p:894574148] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>cjsdowg posted...</cite> <quote>"At some point as the hearing was concluding, there was an altercation that ensued involving the deputy and some of the family members," Minerd said. He added later the boy also was involved. </quote> Suspicious as fuck. The fact he fired a single shot makes it sound like he fucked up and accidentally fired his gun</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 01/22/18 3:02:44 PM #115:	ChromaticAngel posted... They literally sent a Nazi to Nuremberg for a trial in 2017 Which made no sense IMO. They actually had to get a team of doctors to assess if he was even mentally capable of comprehening prison. But that's another story, ChromaticAngel posted... "How long until you can't investigate something?" the answer is never. That's quite a short-sighted answer. You've just placed the Sword of Damocles above every single person of note in the western world. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:894574169] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>ChromaticAngel posted...</cite> <quote> They literally sent a Nazi to Nuremberg for a trial in 2017</quote> Which made no sense IMO. They actually had to get a team of doctors to assess if he was even mentally capable of comprehening prison. But that's another story, <cite>ChromaticAngel posted...</cite> <quote> "How long until you can't investigate something?" the answer is never.</quote> That's quite a short-sighted answer. You've just placed the Sword of Damocles above every single person of note in the western world.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#116	Post #116 was unavailable or deleted.
#117	Post #117 was unavailable or deleted.
#118	Post #118 was unavailable or deleted.
#119	Post #119 was unavailable or deleted.
#120	Post #120 was unavailable or deleted.
Kineth 01/22/18 3:07:03 PM #121:	_Goggalor_ posted... Kineth posted... _Goggalor_ posted... Kineth posted... _Goggalor_ posted... There's no point arguing with you. You hadn't even started so I don't know why you're trying to project an assumed air of superiority. You're A. Too emotionally invested to be bipartisan, and B. Not knowledgeable about fighting/conflict and wouldn't understand how a seemingly simple attack can turn deadly. Odd, have you ever had a straight up meat and potatoes political discussion with me where you don't talk about liberals and SJWs and just talk about the issues? Because you're literally making shit up. I'm not emotionally invested in the kid's death. I'm talking about possible alternatives to handling a situation, which has nothing to do with emotions. And no, I'm aware how things can get shaky real quick in a fight. That doesn't eliminate other possible ways of handling the scenario. The kid would have been in handcuffs and, once again, unarmed. I would like to think that cops are confident enough in their ability, that they don't need to rely on deadly force for a fight with a teenager that's likely a 1/3 of their size. But treating this situation like no one was around that could have possibly called someone OR jumped in and helped? Yes, it absolutely can eliminate other options. Join a damn gym and learn a thing or two. Also, 1 kid=/= entire mob. lol.. for someone who talks big, you sure run away from arguments fast. Because I don't care about you or your uninformed opinions. You seem to care enough to have formed your own uninformed opinion on me. Hilarious that you were talking about me being emotional, btw. Maybe when you get out of your emotions, you can engage in hypotheticals without being dismissive and petulant. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:894574416] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>_Goggalor_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Goggalor_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Goggalor_ posted...</cite> <quote>There's no point arguing with you.</quote> You hadn't even started so I don't know why you're trying to project an assumed air of superiority. <quote>You're A. Too emotionally invested to be bipartisan, and B. Not knowledgeable about fighting/conflict and wouldn't understand how a seemingly simple attack can turn deadly.</quote> Odd, have you ever had a straight up meat and potatoes political discussion with me where you don't talk about liberals and SJWs and just talk about the issues? Because you're literally making shit up. I'm not emotionally invested in the kid's death. I'm talking about possible alternatives to handling a situation, which has nothing to do with emotions. And no, I'm aware how things can get shaky real quick in a fight. That doesn't eliminate other possible ways of handling the scenario. The kid would have been in handcuffs and, once again, unarmed. I would like to think that cops are confident enough in their ability, that they don't need to rely on deadly force for a fight with a teenager that's likely a 1/3 of their size. But treating this situation like no one was around that could have possibly called someone OR jumped in and helped?</quote> Yes, it absolutely can eliminate other options. Join a damn gym and learn a thing or two. Also, 1 kid=/= entire mob.</quote> lol.. for someone who talks big, you sure run away from arguments fast.</quote> Because I don't care about you or your uninformed opinions.</quote> You seem to care enough to have formed your own uninformed opinion on me. Hilarious that you were talking about me being emotional, btw. Maybe when you get out of your emotions, you can engage in hypotheticals without being dismissive and petulant.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ChromaticAngel 01/22/18 3:08:00 PM #122:	UnfairRepresent posted... That's quite a short-sighted answer. You've just placed the Sword of Damocles above every single person of note in the western world. I don't care? --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>ChromaticAngel posted [p:894574483] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>That's quite a short-sighted answer. You've just placed the Sword of Damocles above every single person of note in the western world.</quote> I don't care?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 01/22/18 3:09:20 PM #123:	chrono625 posted... Kineth posted... Zikten posted... to make it clear. I think the reason he shot the boy was cause of the factor of the rest of the family. if it had been one on one maybe he could have found another way. but he had several people attacking him, and I doubt he has action movie level martial arts training. the only way he could shut that shit down was to use his gun and end it. when he shot, the rest of them probably stopped and cowered. problem solved. I saw this in another link and it sounded like if I remember right, the boy got mad that the cop hit his mom. but he only did it cause he was being attacked by her, and other people. and then the boy leapt onto the cop. so the cop used his gun. if anyone is to blame for his death it's his mom. hopefully she feels guilty for the rest of her life for starting that fight that pulled in her son, and got him killed. It's not often, but that's a good post from you Zikten. So you agree this was justified? What the fuck does that even matter? I wasn't talking about execution being justified, I was talking about how it possibly could have been avoided and how it might not have been necessary in the first place. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:894574567] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>chrono625 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote>to make it clear. I think the reason he shot the boy was cause of the factor of the rest of the family. if it had been one on one maybe he could have found another way. but he had several people attacking him, and I doubt he has action movie level martial arts training. the only way he could shut that shit down was to use his gun and end it. when he shot, the rest of them probably stopped and cowered. problem solved. I saw this in another link and it sounded like if I remember right, the boy got mad that the cop hit his mom. but he only did it cause he was being attacked by her, and other people. and then the boy leapt onto the cop. so the cop used his gun. if anyone is to blame for his death it's his mom. hopefully she feels guilty for the rest of her life for starting that fight that pulled in her son, and got him killed.</quote> It's not often, but that's a good post from you Zikten.</quote> So you agree this was justified?</quote> What the fuck does that even matter? I wasn't talking about execution being justified, I was talking about how it possibly could have been avoided and how it might not have been necessary in the first place.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrBobGray 01/22/18 3:10:58 PM #124:	Cop cant detain a 16 year old and instead shoots him to death. And like always we have a bunch of Mary Sues defending the cop like they can do no wrong. What is wrong with you people? --- Do you have Prince Albert in a can? <cite>MrBobGray posted [p:894574686] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote>Cop cant detain a 16 year old and instead shoots him to death. And like always we have a bunch of Mary Sues defending the cop like they can do no wrong. What is wrong with you people?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/22/18 3:13:17 PM #125:	Kineth posted... chrono625 posted... Kineth posted... Zikten posted... to make it clear. I think the reason he shot the boy was cause of the factor of the rest of the family. if it had been one on one maybe he could have found another way. but he had several people attacking him, and I doubt he has action movie level martial arts training. the only way he could shut that shit down was to use his gun and end it. when he shot, the rest of them probably stopped and cowered. problem solved. I saw this in another link and it sounded like if I remember right, the boy got mad that the cop hit his mom. but he only did it cause he was being attacked by her, and other people. and then the boy leapt onto the cop. so the cop used his gun. if anyone is to blame for his death it's his mom. hopefully she feels guilty for the rest of her life for starting that fight that pulled in her son, and got him killed. It's not often, but that's a good post from you Zikten. So you agree this was justified? What the fuck does that even matter? I wasn't talking about execution being justified, I was talking about how it possibly could have been avoided and how it might not have been necessary in the first place. It could have been avoided by an entire family having enough respect for the law, society, and other people to not assault an armed police officer. It WOULD have been avoided if the teen was smart enough to not break the law in the first place. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:894574830] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>chrono625 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote>to make it clear. I think the reason he shot the boy was cause of the factor of the rest of the family. if it had been one on one maybe he could have found another way. but he had several people attacking him, and I doubt he has action movie level martial arts training. the only way he could shut that shit down was to use his gun and end it. when he shot, the rest of them probably stopped and cowered. problem solved. I saw this in another link and it sounded like if I remember right, the boy got mad that the cop hit his mom. but he only did it cause he was being attacked by her, and other people. and then the boy leapt onto the cop. so the cop used his gun. if anyone is to blame for his death it's his mom. hopefully she feels guilty for the rest of her life for starting that fight that pulled in her son, and got him killed.</quote> It's not often, but that's a good post from you Zikten.</quote> So you agree this was justified?</quote> What the fuck does that even matter? I wasn't talking about execution being justified, I was talking about how it possibly could have been avoided and how it might not have been necessary in the first place.</quote> It could have been avoided by an entire family having enough respect for the law, society, and other people to not assault an armed police officer. It WOULD have been avoided if the teen was smart enough to not break the law in the first place.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#126	Post #126 was unavailable or deleted.
darkjedilink 01/22/18 3:14:13 PM #127:	MrBobGray posted... Cop cant detain a 16 year old and instead shoots him to death. And like always we have a bunch of Mary Sues defending the cop like they can do no wrong. What is wrong with you people? You think you could detain a 16hyear old while his entire family is physically attacking you? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:894574894] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>MrBobGray posted...</cite> <quote>Cop cant detain a 16 year old and instead shoots him to death. And like always we have a bunch of Mary Sues defending the cop like they can do no wrong. What is wrong with you people?</quote> You think you could detain a 16hyear old while his entire family is physically attacking you?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrBobGray 01/22/18 3:14:19 PM #128:	darkjedilink posted... Kineth posted... chrono625 posted... Kineth posted... Zikten posted... to make it clear. I think the reason he shot the boy was cause of the factor of the rest of the family. if it had been one on one maybe he could have found another way. but he had several people attacking him, and I doubt he has action movie level martial arts training. the only way he could shut that shit down was to use his gun and end it. when he shot, the rest of them probably stopped and cowered. problem solved. I saw this in another link and it sounded like if I remember right, the boy got mad that the cop hit his mom. but he only did it cause he was being attacked by her, and other people. and then the boy leapt onto the cop. so the cop used his gun. if anyone is to blame for his death it's his mom. hopefully she feels guilty for the rest of her life for starting that fight that pulled in her son, and got him killed. It's not often, but that's a good post from you Zikten. So you agree this was justified? What the fuck does that even matter? I wasn't talking about execution being justified, I was talking about how it possibly could have been avoided and how it might not have been necessary in the first place. It could have been avoided by an entire family having enough respect for the law, society, and other people to not assault an armed police officer. It WOULD have been avoided if the teen was smart enough to not break the law in the first place. Great, another victim blamer. --- Do you have Prince Albert in a can? <cite>MrBobGray posted [p:894574901] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>chrono625 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zikten posted...</cite> <quote>to make it clear. I think the reason he shot the boy was cause of the factor of the rest of the family. if it had been one on one maybe he could have found another way. but he had several people attacking him, and I doubt he has action movie level martial arts training. the only way he could shut that shit down was to use his gun and end it. when he shot, the rest of them probably stopped and cowered. problem solved. I saw this in another link and it sounded like if I remember right, the boy got mad that the cop hit his mom. but he only did it cause he was being attacked by her, and other people. and then the boy leapt onto the cop. so the cop used his gun. if anyone is to blame for his death it's his mom. hopefully she feels guilty for the rest of her life for starting that fight that pulled in her son, and got him killed.</quote> It's not often, but that's a good post from you Zikten.</quote> So you agree this was justified?</quote> What the fuck does that even matter? I wasn't talking about execution being justified, I was talking about how it possibly could have been avoided and how it might not have been necessary in the first place.</quote> It could have been avoided by an entire family having enough respect for the law, society, and other people to not assault an armed police officer. It WOULD have been avoided if the teen was smart enough to not break the law in the first place.</quote> Great, another victim blamer.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
orcus_snake 01/22/18 3:15:47 PM #129:	Kineth posted... metralo posted... america is like a weird third world country where the police have free reign to do whatever the fuck they want but for some reason its citizens defend their every move It is pretty dystopian. No, a dystopian America would be where cops are ACTUALLy in charge, theya re just bumbling bufoons and people just enjoy to take it in the ass, that is THE one first world problem that is actually a problem. --- "Warwick are you jungling" "No I'm standing by the wolves because I miss my family" <cite>orcus_snake posted [p:894574991] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>metralo posted...</cite> <quote>america is like a weird third world country where the police have free reign to do whatever the fuck they want but for some reason its citizens defend their every move</quote> It is pretty dystopian.</quote> No, a dystopian America would be where cops are ACTUALLy in charge, theya re just bumbling bufoons and people just enjoy to take it in the ass, that is THE one first world problem that is actually a problem.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nicklebro 01/22/18 3:16:19 PM #130:	pinky0926 posted... Keith Ferrell, executive vice president for the police union that represents the deputy, said the deputy was "violently attacked by multiple people" and had visible injuries including cuts, abrasions, and a possible black eye. He said the deputy was in a "fight for his life" when he opened fire. They actually expect people to believe this Worse, people actually believe this Its Trayvon all over again. --- Now you can't call me a sigless user. <cite>nicklebro posted [p:894575018] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>pinky0926 posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Keith Ferrell, executive vice president for the police union that represents the deputy, said the deputy was "violently attacked by multiple people" and had visible injuries including cuts, abrasions, and a possible black eye. He said the deputy was in a "fight for his life" when he opened fire.</quote> They actually expect people to believe this Worse, people actually believe this</quote> Its Trayvon all over again.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 01/22/18 3:18:58 PM #131:	nicklebro posted... pinky0926 posted... Keith Ferrell, executive vice president for the police union that represents the deputy, said the deputy was "violently attacked by multiple people" and had visible injuries including cuts, abrasions, and a possible black eye. He said the deputy was in a "fight for his life" when he opened fire. They actually expect people to believe this Worse, people actually believe this Its Trayvon all over again. This post is ironic for so many reasons --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:894575204] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pinky0926 posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Keith Ferrell, executive vice president for the police union that represents the deputy, said the deputy was "violently attacked by multiple people" and had visible injuries including cuts, abrasions, and a possible black eye. He said the deputy was in a "fight for his life" when he opened fire.</quote> They actually expect people to believe this Worse, people actually believe this</quote> Its Trayvon all over again.</quote> This post is ironic for so many reasons</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 01/22/18 3:20:12 PM #132:	orcus_snake posted... Kineth posted... metralo posted... america is like a weird third world country where the police have free reign to do whatever the fuck they want but for some reason its citizens defend their every move It is pretty dystopian. No, a dystopian America would be where cops are ACTUALLy in charge, theya re just bumbling bufoons and people just enjoy to take it in the ass, that is THE one first world problem that is actually a problem. Eh, cops being used as an extension of the oppressive power structure qualifies as that imo. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:894575275] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>orcus_snake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>metralo posted...</cite> <quote>america is like a weird third world country where the police have free reign to do whatever the fuck they want but for some reason its citizens defend their every move</quote> It is pretty dystopian.</quote> No, a dystopian America would be where cops are ACTUALLy in charge, theya re just bumbling bufoons and people just enjoy to take it in the ass, that is THE one first world problem that is actually a problem.</quote> Eh, cops being used as an extension of the oppressive power structure qualifies as that imo.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrBobGray 01/22/18 3:20:55 PM #133:	darkjedilink posted... MrBobGray posted... Cop cant detain a 16 year old and instead shoots him to death. And like always we have a bunch of Mary Sues defending the cop like they can do no wrong. What is wrong with you people? You think you could detain a 16hyear old while his entire family is physically attacking you? That didnt happen, and even so, his entire family was his mother. --- Do you have Prince Albert in a can? <cite>MrBobGray posted [p:894575326] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MrBobGray posted...</cite> <quote>Cop cant detain a 16 year old and instead shoots him to death. And like always we have a bunch of Mary Sues defending the cop like they can do no wrong. What is wrong with you people?</quote> You think you could detain a 16hyear old while his entire family is physically attacking you?</quote> That didnt happen, and even so, his entire family was his mother.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#134	Post #134 was unavailable or deleted.
#135	Post #135 was unavailable or deleted.
Axiom 01/22/18 3:28:11 PM #136:	DuranOfForcena posted... where are you getting this from? the article says "some of his family members". "some" doesn't mean "one". GregShmedley posted... Source? http://radio.wosu.org/post/franklin-county-sheriff-identifies-deputy-who-shot-16-year-old-boy#stream/0 http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180120/attorney-captures-aftermath-of-fatal-courthouse-shooting-on-cellphone Both of these articles indicate it was just the mother and the teen <cite>Axiom posted [p:894575803] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>DuranOfForcena posted...</cite> <quote>where are you getting this from? the article says "some of his family members". "some" doesn't mean "one".</quote> <cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote>Source?</quote> http://radio.wosu.org/post/franklin-county-sheriff-identifies-deputy-who-shot-16-year-old-boy#stream/0 http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180120/attorney-captures-aftermath-of-fatal-courthouse-shooting-on-cellphone Both of these articles indicate it was just the mother and the teen</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrBobGray 01/22/18 3:29:56 PM #137:	Axiom posted... DuranOfForcena posted... where are you getting this from? the article says "some of his family members". "some" doesn't mean "one". GregShmedley posted... Source? http://radio.wosu.org/post/franklin-county-sheriff-identifies-deputy-who-shot-16-year-old-boy#stream/0 http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180120/attorney-captures-aftermath-of-fatal-courthouse-shooting-on-cellphone Both of these articles indicate it was just the mother and the teen And his grandmother was watching the entire time as well. --- Do you have Prince Albert in a can? <cite>MrBobGray posted [p:894575900] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>Axiom posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DuranOfForcena posted...</cite> <quote>where are you getting this from? the article says "some of his family members". "some" doesn't mean "one".</quote> <cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote>Source?</quote> http://radio.wosu.org/post/franklin-county-sheriff-identifies-deputy-who-shot-16-year-old-boy#stream/0 http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180120/attorney-captures-aftermath-of-fatal-courthouse-shooting-on-cellphone Both of these articles indicate it was just the mother and the teen</quote> And his grandmother was watching the entire time as well.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AverageCEgal 01/22/18 3:30:12 PM #138:	the first links to this other one by the same site http://radio.wosu.org/post/sixteen-year-old-boy-killed-franklin-county-deputy-courthouse#stream/0 and says "The deputy was knocked to the ground as part of that altercation where he came under attack from some of the folks that were involved, family members, and one shot was fired," and then the second one has a image of the boy after he got shot and nothing of the altercation <cite>AverageCEgal posted [p:894575923] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote>the first links to this other one by the same site http://radio.wosu.org/post/sixteen-year-old-boy-killed-franklin-county-deputy-courthouse#stream/0 and says "The deputy was knocked to the ground as part of that altercation where he came under attack from some of the folks that were involved, family members, and one shot was fired," and then the second one has a image of the boy after he got shot and nothing of the altercation</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AverageCEgal 01/22/18 3:31:50 PM #139:	oh no wait theres more text but it just talks about the video after the fight <cite>AverageCEgal posted [p:894576023] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote>oh no wait theres more text but it just talks about the video after the fight</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#140	Post #140 was unavailable or deleted.
Axiom 01/22/18 3:32:20 PM #141:	AverageCEgal posted... the first links to this other one by the same site http://radio.wosu.org/post/sixteen-year-old-boy-killed-franklin-county-deputy-courthouse#stream/0 and says "The deputy was knocked to the ground as part of that altercation where he came under attack from some of the folks that were involved, family members, and one shot was fired," and then the second one has a image of the boy after he got shot and nothing of the altercation That article is also older. News organizations typically provide more details as they come forward <cite>Axiom posted [p:894576053] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>AverageCEgal posted...</cite> <quote>the first links to this other one by the same site http://radio.wosu.org/post/sixteen-year-old-boy-killed-franklin-county-deputy-courthouse#stream/0 and says "The deputy was knocked to the ground as part of that altercation where he came under attack from some of the folks that were involved, family members, and one shot was fired," and then the second one has a image of the boy after he got shot and nothing of the altercation</quote> That article is also older. News organizations typically provide more details as they come forward</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Axiom 01/22/18 3:33:03 PM #142:	DuranOfForcena posted... Axiom posted... DuranOfForcena posted... where are you getting this from? the article says "some of his family members". "some" doesn't mean "one". GregShmedley posted... Source? http://radio.wosu.org/post/franklin-county-sheriff-identifies-deputy-who-shot-16-year-old-boy#stream/0 http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180120/attorney-captures-aftermath-of-fatal-courthouse-shooting-on-cellphone Both of these articles indicate it was just the mother and the teen your first link explicitly states in the second sentence, "On Wednesday afternoon, Deputy Richard Scarborough became involved in a fight with Haynes and members of Haynes family in the Franklin County courthouse, " members being plural. and your second link is behind a paywall. Authorities say that Haynes and his mother became "very agitative and disruptive" and were escorted out of the courtroom. An altercation broke out between Scarborough, Haynes and his mother, during which Scarborough was somehow knocked to the ground where he came under attack. According to Haynes' family members, Scarborough allegedly grabbed Haynes mother, at which point Haynes attempted to defend her. <cite>Axiom posted [p:894576100] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>DuranOfForcena posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Axiom posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DuranOfForcena posted...</cite> <quote>where are you getting this from? the article says "some of his family members". "some" doesn't mean "one".</quote> <cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote>Source?</quote> http://radio.wosu.org/post/franklin-county-sheriff-identifies-deputy-who-shot-16-year-old-boy#stream/0 http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180120/attorney-captures-aftermath-of-fatal-courthouse-shooting-on-cellphone Both of these articles indicate it was just the mother and the teen</quote> your first link explicitly states in the second sentence, "On Wednesday afternoon, Deputy Richard Scarborough became involved in a fight with Haynes and members of Haynes family in the Franklin County courthouse, " members being plural. and your second link is behind a paywall.</quote> Authorities say that Haynes and his mother became "very agitative and disruptive" and were escorted out of the courtroom. An altercation broke out between Scarborough, Haynes and his mother, during which Scarborough was somehow knocked to the ground where he came under attack. According to Haynes' family members, Scarborough allegedly grabbed Haynes mother, at which point Haynes attempted to defend her.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AverageCEgal 01/22/18 3:33:48 PM #143:	oh ok According to Chief Rick Minerd, of the Sheriff's Office investigative subdivision, video released from the courthouse shows the lobby outside the courtroom and of the elevator but doesnt provide a view of the fight itself. from the updated one ther's a video of ths post fight but like not of the fight istlsef <cite>AverageCEgal posted [p:894576162] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote>oh ok According to Chief Rick Minerd, of the Sheriff's Office investigative subdivision, video released from the courthouse shows the lobby outside the courtroom and of the elevator but doesnt provide a view of the fight itself. from the updated one ther's a video of ths post fight but like not of the fight istlsef</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#144	Post #144 was unavailable or deleted.
AverageCEgal 01/22/18 3:34:57 PM #145:	oh the article keeps linking to other articles to backup its points this is annoying can they not do that <cite>AverageCEgal posted [p:894576224] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote>oh the article keeps linking to other articles to backup its points this is annoying can they not do that</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Axiom 01/22/18 3:35:12 PM #146:	DuranOfForcena posted... Axiom posted... DuranOfForcena posted... Axiom posted... DuranOfForcena posted... where are you getting this from? the article says "some of his family members". "some" doesn't mean "one". GregShmedley posted... Source? http://radio.wosu.org/post/franklin-county-sheriff-identifies-deputy-who-shot-16-year-old-boy#stream/0 http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180120/attorney-captures-aftermath-of-fatal-courthouse-shooting-on-cellphone Both of these articles indicate it was just the mother and the teen your first link explicitly states in the second sentence, "On Wednesday afternoon, Deputy Richard Scarborough became involved in a fight with Haynes and members of Haynes family in the Franklin County courthouse, " members being plural. and your second link is behind a paywall. Authorities say that Haynes and his mother became "very agitative and disruptive" and were escorted out of the courtroom. An altercation broke out between Scarborough, Haynes and his mother, during which Scarborough was somehow knocked to the ground where he came under attack. According to Haynes' family members, Scarborough allegedly grabbed Haynes mother, at which point Haynes attempted to defend her. "On Wednesday afternoon, Deputy Richard Scarborough became involved in a fight with Haynes and members* of Haynes family in the Franklin County courthouse, "* Are you seriously arguing in favor of the cops while at the same time dismissing their account of what happened <cite>Axiom posted [p:894576236] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>DuranOfForcena posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Axiom posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DuranOfForcena posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Axiom posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DuranOfForcena posted...</cite> <quote>where are you getting this from? the article says "some of his family members". "some" doesn't mean "one".</quote> <cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote>Source?</quote> http://radio.wosu.org/post/franklin-county-sheriff-identifies-deputy-who-shot-16-year-old-boy#stream/0 http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180120/attorney-captures-aftermath-of-fatal-courthouse-shooting-on-cellphone Both of these articles indicate it was just the mother and the teen</quote> your first link explicitly states in the second sentence, "On Wednesday afternoon, Deputy Richard Scarborough became involved in a fight with Haynes and members of Haynes family in the Franklin County courthouse, " members being plural. and your second link is behind a paywall.</quote> Authorities say that Haynes and his mother became "very agitative and disruptive" and were escorted out of the courtroom. An altercation broke out between Scarborough, Haynes and his mother, during which Scarborough was somehow knocked to the ground where he came under attack. According to Haynes' family members, Scarborough allegedly grabbed Haynes mother, at which point Haynes attempted to defend her.</quote> "On Wednesday afternoon, Deputy Richard Scarborough became involved in a fight with Haynes and <cite>members </cite>of Haynes family in the Franklin County courthouse, "</quote> Are you seriously arguing in favor of the cops while at the same time dismissing their account of what happened</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#147	Post #147 was unavailable or deleted.
#148	Post #148 was unavailable or deleted.
The Admiral 01/22/18 3:37:11 PM #149:	GregShmedley posted... pinky0926 posted... Keith Ferrell, executive vice president for the police union that represents the deputy, said the deputy was "violently attacked by multiple people" and had visible injuries including cuts, abrasions, and a possible black eye. He said the deputy was in a "fight for his life" when he opened fire. They actually expect people to believe this Worse, people actually believe this What's so hard to believe about it? Nothing, I believe it completely. Certain people choose not to because it hurts their victim narrative and anti-responsibility mindset. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:894576371] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>GregShmedley posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pinky0926 posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Keith Ferrell, executive vice president for the police union that represents the deputy, said the deputy was "violently attacked by multiple people" and had visible injuries including cuts, abrasions, and a possible black eye. He said the deputy was in a "fight for his life" when he opened fire.</quote> They actually expect people to believe this Worse, people actually believe this</quote> What's so hard to believe about it?</quote> Nothing, I believe it completely. Certain people choose not to because it hurts their victim narrative and anti-responsibility mindset.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Alois_Hunter 01/22/18 3:45:06 PM #150:	Kineth posted... DuranOfForcena posted... poor kid no one should have to fear for their lives every time they attack a cop while being arraigned on weapons charges I think it's mostly the fact that the kid did not have a weapon and could have been restrained (and deservedly roughed up) without lethal force. What happened to a fucking police baton? liberals fucked those up too when they cried over cops using batons to restrain Rodney King. <cite>Alois_Hunter posted [p:894576835] in Cops shot ... [t:76230547]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DuranOfForcena posted...</cite> <quote>poor kid no one should have to fear for their lives every time they attack a cop while being arraigned on weapons charges</quote> I think it's mostly the fact that the kid did not have a weapon and could have been restrained (and deservedly roughed up) without lethal force. What happened to a fucking police baton?</quote> liberals fucked those up too when they cried over cops using batons to restrain Rodney King.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Current Events > Cops shot unarmed 16 year old in court. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Cops shot unarmed 16 year old in court.