Poll of the Day > Which browser do you use?

Topic List	Page List: 1
PlayStationV 12/19/17 6:05:00 AM #1:	Browser Firefox Chrome Safari Internet ExpLOLrer Opera Netscape Other: ??? View Results vote --- Portuguese is the best language in the world. <cite>PlayStationV posted [p:892490739] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote> Browser Firefox Chrome Safari Internet ExpLOLrer Opera Netscape Other: ??? View Results vote</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Foppe 12/19/17 6:07:59 AM #2:	Sleipner. --- GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC <cite>Foppe posted [p:892490779] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Sleipner.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Third_Eye 12/19/17 6:15:04 AM #3:	SRWare Iron german version of chrome that has a bunch of tracking stuff removed <cite>Third_Eye posted [p:892490910] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>SRWare Iron german version of chrome that has a bunch of tracking stuff removed</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
miki_sauvester 12/19/17 6:22:19 AM #4:	switched to chrome after firefox when sjw <cite>miki_sauvester posted [p:892491039] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>switched to chrome after firefox when sjw</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Entity13 12/19/17 7:04:38 AM #5:	miki_sauvester posted... switched to chrome after firefox when sjw I switched to Chrome when Firefox became an unstable mess that updated to new versions more often than was worthwhile, and never seemed to stay fully compatible with Flash (at least on the computer I used at the time). Chrome has its own problems, but they pale in comparison to those from Firefox when I left that browser behind. --- http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb179/EntityXIII/entityfn7.jpg <cite>Entity13 posted [p:892491798] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote><cite>miki_sauvester posted...</cite> <quote>switched to chrome after firefox when sjw</quote> I switched to Chrome when Firefox became an unstable mess that updated to new versions more often than was worthwhile, and never seemed to stay fully compatible with Flash (at least on the computer I used at the time). Chrome has its own problems, but they pale in comparison to those from Firefox when I left that browser behind.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 12/19/17 7:08:03 AM #6:	Safari and Puffin on my phone, Edge on desktop... --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:892491884] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Safari and Puffin on my phone, Edge on desktop...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RomanGhost 12/19/17 7:13:21 AM #7:	Chrome. Anyone who doesn't is doing the Internet wrong. --- Now playing: Candy crush/Hatoful boyfriend/Everlasting summer/Always remember me/Time tenshi/Emily is away/Rabi-ribi <cite>RomanGhost posted [p:892492001] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Chrome. Anyone who doesn't is doing the Internet wrong.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hyyr 12/19/17 7:18:17 AM #8:	Firefox, although I don't know why. It has been a mess for years now. <cite>Hyyr posted [p:892492102] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Firefox, although I don't know why. It has been a mess for years now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kind9 12/19/17 7:20:48 AM #9:	Firefox. Anyone who thinks it's a horrible mess is doing the internet wrong. --- http://i.imgur.com/NkZUeFd.gif <cite>kind9 posted [p:892492164] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Firefox. Anyone who thinks it's a horrible mess is doing the internet wrong.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheWorstPoster 12/19/17 9:44:49 AM #10:	miki_sauvester posted... switched to pale moon after firefox when sjw <cite>TheWorstPoster posted [p:892496604] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote><cite>miki_sauvester posted...</cite> <quote>switched to pale moon after firefox when sjw</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
luigi13579 12/19/17 10:37:23 AM #11:	Firefox. Third_Eye posted... SRWare Iron That's still a thing? I figured it'd be defunct. <cite>luigi13579 posted [p:892498781] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Firefox. <cite>Third_Eye posted...</cite> <quote>SRWare Iron </quote> That's still a thing? I figured it'd be defunct.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gguirao 12/19/17 12:29:39 PM #12:	Google Chrome. --- Donald J. Trump--proof against government intelligence. <cite>gguirao posted [p:892504393] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Google Chrome.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wwinterj25 12/19/17 12:32:17 PM #13:	Chrome. Used to use Firefox until it hit the shitter. --- One who knows nothing can understand nothing. http://psnprofiles.com/wwinterj - http://i.imgur.com/kDysIcd.gif <cite>wwinterj25 posted [p:892504533] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Chrome. Used to use Firefox until it hit the shitter.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WarGreymon77 12/19/17 10:43:14 PM #14:	Currently using SeaMonkey 2.46. Third_Eye posted... SRWare Iron german version of chrome that has a bunch of tracking stuff removed This is my backup browser, for certain HTML5 bullshit that's not enabled on SeaMonkey on XP. --- Creator of the NEW Digimon: Digital Monsters community board! https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1430-digimon-digital-monsters News on Tri Dubs! <cite>WarGreymon77 posted [p:892539611] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Currently using SeaMonkey 2.46. <cite>Third_Eye posted...</cite> <quote>SRWare Iron german version of chrome that has a bunch of tracking stuff removed</quote> This is my backup browser, for certain HTML5 bullshit that's not enabled on SeaMonkey on XP.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Alexandra_Trent 12/19/17 10:46:38 PM #15:	Chrome. Zero problems with this one. --- "Ladies don't start fights, but they can finish them." -Marie, Aristocats <cite>Alexandra_Trent posted [p:892539787] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Chrome. Zero problems with this one.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
aHappySacka 12/19/17 10:48:02 PM #16:	Staying on Firefox v56.0.2 since Quantum isn't really compatible with the theme I like using. Tried Chrome but wasn't too impressed with how it sucked up system resources and it shrinks multiple tabs into unreadable slivers if you have too many open. --- You are now blinking and breathing manually. http://i.imgur.com/91NC0Cb.gifv <cite>aHappySacka posted [p:892539869] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Staying on Firefox v56.0.2 since Quantum isn't really compatible with the theme I like using. Tried Chrome but wasn't too impressed with how it sucked up system resources and it shrinks multiple tabs into unreadable slivers if you have too many open.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Yopster 12/19/17 11:23:02 PM #17:	Waterfox --- Lubricant? I've been using it as hair gel >.>-BTB When in doubt whip it out. <cite>Yopster posted [p:892541697] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Waterfox</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 12/19/17 11:33:02 PM #18:	Firefox for now, but I haven't updated and probably need to find a new browser before I get malware. Fucking ridiculous that it's so much to ask for JUST SECURITY UPDATES AND NOTHING ELSE. Mozilla, Microsoft, etc... all pull this shit and fuck up user interface for shit and giggles and I'm getting fed up w/ it. aHappySacka posted... Staying on Firefox v56.0.2 since Quantum isn't really compatible with the theme I like using. Yeah, that's the version I'm on. So that's the last non-Quantum (ie, not shit) version of FF? <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:892542154] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Firefox for now, but I haven't updated and probably need to find a new browser before I get malware. Fucking ridiculous that it's so much to ask for JUST SECURITY UPDATES AND NOTHING ELSE. Mozilla, Microsoft, etc... all pull this shit and fuck up user interface for shit and giggles and I'm getting fed up w/ it. <cite>aHappySacka posted...</cite> <quote>Staying on Firefox v56.0.2 since Quantum isn't really compatible with the theme I like using.</quote> Yeah, that's the version I'm on. So that's the last non-Quantum (ie, not shit) version of FF?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
aHappySacka 12/19/17 11:39:45 PM #19:	streamofthesky posted... Yeah, that's the version I'm on. So that's the last non-Quantum (ie, not shit) version of FF? Yeppers --- You are now blinking and breathing manually. http://i.imgur.com/91NC0Cb.gifv <cite>aHappySacka posted [p:892542480] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah, that's the version I'm on. So that's the last non-Quantum (ie, not shit) version of FF?</quote> Yeppers</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kind9 12/20/17 4:06:27 AM #20:	What's so bad about firefox quantum? --- http://i.imgur.com/NkZUeFd.gif <cite>kind9 posted [p:892551545] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>What's so bad about firefox quantum?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lil69Leo 12/20/17 4:20:33 AM #21:	Been a long time firefox user till the last update broke everything, and changed everything. Now I use chrome. <cite>Lil69Leo posted [p:892551866] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Been a long time firefox user till the last update broke everything, and changed everything. Now I use chrome.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 12/20/17 11:16:39 AM #22:	kind9 posted... What's so bad about firefox quantum? It broke roughly 80% of the existing extensions. http://www.fudzilla.com/news/44779-firefox-to-stop-supporting-legacy-add-ons When the one browser used specifically for its ability to be heavily customized loses that ability, what's the point? <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:892564204] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote><cite>kind9 posted...</cite> <quote>What's so bad about firefox quantum?</quote> It broke roughly 80% of the existing extensions. http://www.fudzilla.com/news/44779-firefox-to-stop-supporting-legacy-add-ons When the one browser used specifically for its ability to be heavily customized loses that ability, what's the point?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kind9 12/20/17 11:22:18 AM #23:	Fair enough, but I don't think it's mozilla's responsibility to maintain compatibility with 3rd party extensions. The developers of those extensions have the responsibility to keep up to date if something breaks. Give it time and your extensions, if they are worth a damn, will be updated. I use ublock, noscript, and stylish and they're working fine now. I'm more curious about the other complaints about the UI changing and being ugly. I am on Linux so it may be different but quantum looks almost exactly the same as the previous version. I actually like it more so I'm just kind of dumbfounded about these complaints. --- http://i.imgur.com/NkZUeFd.gif <cite>kind9 posted [p:892564536] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Fair enough, but I don't think it's mozilla's responsibility to maintain compatibility with 3rd party extensions. The developers of those extensions have the responsibility to keep up to date if something breaks. Give it time and your extensions, if they are worth a damn, will be updated. I use ublock, noscript, and stylish and they're working fine now. I'm more curious about the other complaints about the UI changing and being ugly. I am on Linux so it may be different but quantum looks almost exactly the same as the previous version. I actually like it more so I'm just kind of dumbfounded about these complaints.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 12/20/17 11:27:46 AM #24:	kind9 posted... The developers of those extensions have the responsibility to keep up to date. Give it time and your extensions, if they are worth a damn, will be updated. The backend has been gutted so badly that the needed APIs don't exist for such things as UI tweaks, cookie manipulation, and download management, all of which worked reasonably well in FF56. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:892564859] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote><cite>kind9 posted...</cite> <quote>The developers of those extensions have the responsibility to keep up to date. Give it time and your extensions, if they are worth a damn, will be updated.</quote> The backend has been gutted so badly that the needed APIs don't exist for such things as UI tweaks, cookie manipulation, and download management, all of which worked reasonably well in FF56.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kind9 12/20/17 11:31:29 AM #25:	Questionmarktarius posted... kind9 posted... The developers of those extensions have the responsibility to keep up to date. Give it time and your extensions, if they are worth a damn, will be updated. The backend has been gutted so badly that the needed APIs don't exist for such things as UI tweaks, cookie manipulation, and download management, all of which worked reasonably well in FF56. Gutted, as in removed completely? Are you sure the API hasn't just changed? If they actually removed those things then that's pretty fucking stupid on Mozilla's part. --- http://i.imgur.com/NkZUeFd.gif <cite>kind9 posted [p:892565042] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>kind9 posted...</cite> <quote>The developers of those extensions have the responsibility to keep up to date. Give it time and your extensions, if they are worth a damn, will be updated.</quote> The backend has been gutted so badly that the needed APIs don't exist for such things as UI tweaks, cookie manipulation, and download management, all of which worked reasonably well in FF56.</quote> Gutted, as in removed completely? Are you sure the API hasn't just changed? If they actually removed those things then that's pretty fucking stupid on Mozilla's part.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SilverClock 12/20/17 11:33:43 AM #26:	Vivaldi. I recently switched from Chrome. I use my TV as a monitor and I didn't like how if I typed it would autofill with sites in my history that I didn't necessarily want other people in my room seeing if you catch my drift :D Vivaldi has an option to disable that. You can also stack tabs, split your view to have multiple tabs in one window, use Chrome extensions, adjust the default size and scale of things, a download manager, search options and history with f2, and assign mouse gestures to a bunch of different actions. Also no user data is collected by the browser or sent to other parties, including Google. You can also take a snapshot of what you're viewing or adjust it on the fly to a selected area. It's pretty much Chrome, but with more features. So far so good, for me personally. I've had it for about a month now. --- 3DS FC: 5327-2159-0942 IGN: Ryan <cite>SilverClock posted [p:892565183] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>Vivaldi. I recently switched from Chrome. I use my TV as a monitor and I didn't like how if I typed it would autofill with sites in my history that I didn't necessarily want other people in my room seeing if you catch my drift :D Vivaldi has an option to disable that. You can also stack tabs, split your view to have multiple tabs in one window, use Chrome extensions, adjust the default size and scale of things, a download manager, search options and history with f2, and assign mouse gestures to a bunch of different actions. Also no user data is collected by the browser or sent to other parties, including Google. You can also take a snapshot of what you're viewing or adjust it on the fly to a selected area. It's pretty much Chrome, but with more features. So far so good, for me personally. I've had it for about a month now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 12/20/17 11:34:48 AM #27:	kind9 posted... Questionmarktarius posted... kind9 posted... The developers of those extensions have the responsibility to keep up to date. Give it time and your extensions, if they are worth a damn, will be updated. The backend has been gutted so badly that the needed APIs don't exist for such things as UI tweaks, cookie manipulation, and download management, all of which worked reasonably well in FF56. Gutted, as in removed completely? Are you sure the API hasn't just changed? If they actually removed those things then that's pretty fucking stupid on Mozilla's part. https://www.downthemall.net/re-downthemall-and-webextensions-or-why-why-i-am-done-with-mozilla/ <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:892565259] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote><cite>kind9 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>kind9 posted...</cite> <quote>The developers of those extensions have the responsibility to keep up to date. Give it time and your extensions, if they are worth a damn, will be updated.</quote> The backend has been gutted so badly that the needed APIs don't exist for such things as UI tweaks, cookie manipulation, and download management, all of which worked reasonably well in FF56.</quote> Gutted, as in removed completely? Are you sure the API hasn't just changed? If they actually removed those things then that's pretty fucking stupid on Mozilla's part.</quote> https://www.downthemall.net/re-downthemall-and-webextensions-or-why-why-i-am-done-with-mozilla/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dikitain 12/20/17 11:39:23 AM #28:	kind9 posted... Questionmarktarius posted... kind9 posted... The developers of those extensions have the responsibility to keep up to date. Give it time and your extensions, if they are worth a damn, will be updated. The backend has been gutted so badly that the needed APIs don't exist for such things as UI tweaks, cookie manipulation, and download management, all of which worked reasonably well in FF56. Gutted, as in removed completely? Are you sure the API hasn't just changed? If they actually removed those things then that's pretty fucking stupid on Mozilla's part. The new one uses a WebExtensions SDK (the same thing used for plugin support in Chrome and Opera), whereas the old one used an Add-Ons SDK. It gets kind of complicated to explain, but basically anything that would change core functionality of the browser is not allowed in WebExtensions (but was allowed in Add-Ons). In one sense, it is sort of fixing a security loophole. However, it also greatly limits what you can do with plugins. --- I am a senior software engineer. If you see me post here, I am tired of writing TPS reports. <cite>Dikitain posted [p:892565512] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote><cite>kind9 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>kind9 posted...</cite> <quote>The developers of those extensions have the responsibility to keep up to date. Give it time and your extensions, if they are worth a damn, will be updated.</quote> The backend has been gutted so badly that the needed APIs don't exist for such things as UI tweaks, cookie manipulation, and download management, all of which worked reasonably well in FF56.</quote> Gutted, as in removed completely? Are you sure the API hasn't just changed? If they actually removed those things then that's pretty fucking stupid on Mozilla's part.</quote> The new one uses a WebExtensions SDK (the same thing used for plugin support in Chrome and Opera), whereas the old one used an Add-Ons SDK. It gets kind of complicated to explain, but basically anything that would change core functionality of the browser is not allowed in WebExtensions (but was allowed in Add-Ons). In one sense, it is sort of fixing a security loophole. However, it also greatly limits what you can do with plugins.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kind9 12/20/17 11:59:13 AM #29:	In that case I guess those complaints are understandable. Luckily none of the extensions I use are broken so I just have no reason to complain. To me it's still the same browser on the surface. --- http://i.imgur.com/NkZUeFd.gif <cite>kind9 posted [p:892566566] in Which brow... [t:76114910]...</cite> <quote>In that case I guess those complaints are understandable. Luckily none of the extensions I use are broken so I just have no reason to complain. To me it's still the same browser on the surface.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > Which browser do you use? (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Which browser do you use?