Current Events > south park: "evolution explains everything"

Topic List	Page List: 1
ManLink4321 10/22/17 1:49:11 PM #1:	does it? --- The Hero of Hyrule. <cite>ManLink4321 posted [p:888916169] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote>does it?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ArchiePeck 10/22/17 1:57:05 PM #2:	It does not explain EVERYTHING, no. For a start it doesn't cover how life actually began from the atoms that existed on earth. It certainly lends lots and lots of peer reviewed evidence as to the origins of all living species, however. The only reason to deny that would be pathetic religious pandering because your religion claims a different origin. <cite>ArchiePeck posted [p:888916587] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote>It does not explain EVERYTHING, no. For a start it doesn't cover how life actually began from the atoms that existed on earth. It certainly lends lots and lots of peer reviewed evidence as to the origins of all living species, however. The only reason to deny that would be pathetic religious pandering because your religion claims a different origin.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NibeIungsnarf 10/22/17 1:58:27 PM #3:	Evolution explains everything it seeks to explain. <cite>NibeIungsnarf posted [p:888916648] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote>Evolution explains everything it seeks to explain.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AlisLandale 10/22/17 2:00:39 PM #4:	Evolution never explained why all the characters were named after weapons. --- Currently Binging: Ghost in the Shell - Stand Alone Complex http://i.imgtc.com/YQId2Bz.png <cite>AlisLandale posted [p:888916756] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote>Evolution never explained why all the characters were named after weapons.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sutree 10/22/17 2:21:38 PM #5:	Can evolution explain why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch? --- It's just that bird law in this country-- it's not governed by reason http://i.imgur.com/J0qoWIu.jpg <cite>sutree posted [p:888917919] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote>Can evolution explain why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 10/22/17 2:25:20 PM #6:	sutree posted... Can evolution explain why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch? Science --- Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020 IGN: Vanessa <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:888918120] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>sutree posted...</cite> <quote>Can evolution explain why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch?</quote> Science</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ManLink4321 10/22/17 2:57:22 PM #7:	ArchiePeck posted... It does not explain EVERYTHING, no. For a start it doesn't cover how life actually began from the atoms that existed on earth. It certainly lends lots and lots of peer reviewed evidence as to the origins of all living species, however. The only reason to deny that would be pathetic religious pandering because your religion claims a different origin. What about all of the scientific evidence shown over the last 60 or so years that evolutionists have ignored that actually shows that we didn't evolve from a universal common ancestor? --- The Hero of Hyrule. <cite>ManLink4321 posted [p:888919911] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>ArchiePeck posted...</cite> <quote>It does not explain EVERYTHING, no. For a start it doesn't cover how life actually began from the atoms that existed on earth. It certainly lends lots and lots of peer reviewed evidence as to the origins of all living species, however. The only reason to deny that would be pathetic religious pandering because your religion claims a different origin.</quote> What about all of the scientific evidence shown over the last 60 or so years that evolutionists have ignored that actually shows that we didn't evolve from a universal common ancestor?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#8	Post #8 was unavailable or deleted.
UnfairRepresent 10/22/17 3:14:22 PM #9:	ManLink4321 posted... What about all of the scientific evidence shown over the last 60 or so years that evolutionists have ignored that actually shows that we didn't evolve from a universal common ancestor? --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:888920810] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>ManLink4321 posted...</cite> <quote> What about all of the scientific evidence shown over the last 60 or so years that evolutionists have ignored that actually shows that we didn't evolve from a universal common ancestor?</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ManLink4321 10/22/17 3:48:09 PM #10:	dolomedes posted... ManLink4321 posted... What about all of the scientific evidence shown over the last 60 or so years that evolutionists have ignored that actually shows that we didn't evolve from a universal common ancestor? lol post some of that "scientific evidence" plz Explain how cells could've arisen through evolution solely by random mutation and natural selection. --- The Hero of Hyrule. <cite>ManLink4321 posted [p:888922689] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>dolomedes posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ManLink4321 posted...</cite> <quote>What about all of the scientific evidence shown over the last 60 or so years that evolutionists have ignored that actually shows that we didn't evolve from a universal common ancestor?</quote> lol post some of that "scientific evidence" plz</quote> Explain how cells could've arisen through evolution solely by random mutation and natural selection.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ArchiePeck 10/22/17 3:49:29 PM #11:	ManLink4321 posted... ArchiePeck posted... It does not explain EVERYTHING, no. For a start it doesn't cover how life actually began from the atoms that existed on earth. It certainly lends lots and lots of peer reviewed evidence as to the origins of all living species, however. The only reason to deny that would be pathetic religious pandering because your religion claims a different origin. What about all of the scientific evidence shown over the last 60 or so years that evolutionists have ignored that actually shows that we didn't evolve from a universal common ancestor? Could you please post links to some peer reviewed evidence of this nature. I'd be interested in reading it. <cite>ArchiePeck posted [p:888922763] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>ManLink4321 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ArchiePeck posted...</cite> <quote>It does not explain EVERYTHING, no. For a start it doesn't cover how life actually began from the atoms that existed on earth. It certainly lends lots and lots of peer reviewed evidence as to the origins of all living species, however. The only reason to deny that would be pathetic religious pandering because your religion claims a different origin.</quote> What about all of the scientific evidence shown over the last 60 or so years that evolutionists have ignored that actually shows that we didn't evolve from a universal common ancestor?</quote> Could you please post links to some peer reviewed evidence of this nature. I'd be interested in reading it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ManLink4321 10/22/17 3:55:37 PM #12:	ArchiePeck posted... ManLink4321 posted... ArchiePeck posted... It does not explain EVERYTHING, no. For a start it doesn't cover how life actually began from the atoms that existed on earth. It certainly lends lots and lots of peer reviewed evidence as to the origins of all living species, however. The only reason to deny that would be pathetic religious pandering because your religion claims a different origin. What about all of the scientific evidence shown over the last 60 or so years that evolutionists have ignored that actually shows that we didn't evolve from a universal common ancestor? Could you please post links to some peer reviewed evidence of this nature. I'd be interested in reading it. Abate, Tom. 2001. Genome Discovery Shocks Scientists. San Francisco Chronicle (February 11). Ayala, Francisco J. 1978. The Mechanisms of Evolution. Scientific American 239:56-69. Benton, Michael J. (editor). 1993. The Fossil Record 2. Chapman & Hall, London. Benton, Mike. 1984. Is a Dog More Like a Lizard or a Chicken? New Scientist 103:18-19. Bethell, Tom. 2001. A Map to Nowhere. American Spectator 34 (no. 3):51-56 Brand, Leonard. 1997. Faith, Reason, and Earth History. Andrews University Press, Berrien Springs, MI. Cairns-Smith, A. G. 1985. Seven Clues to the Origin of Life: A Scientific Detective Story. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Cantrell, Michael A. and others. 2001. An Ancient Retrovirus-like Element Contains Hot Spots for SINE Insertion. Genetics 158:769-777. Carroll, Robert L. 1988. Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York. Clemens, William A. and others. 1989. Biogeography and the Phylogeny of the Metatheria. In D. W. Walton and B. J. Richardson (editors). Fauna of Australia Volume 1B Mammalia, pp. 527-548. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra. Davis, Percival and Dean Kenyon (editors). 1993. Of Pandas and People, second edition. Haughton Publishing Co., Dallas. Denton, Michael. 1986. Evolution: A Theory in Crisis. Adler & Adler, Bethesda, MD. ________ . 1998. Nature's Destiny. Free Press, New York. Dohle, Wolfgang. 1988. Review of Lovtrup, Darwinism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 1:283-285. Ducrocq, S. and others. 1992. First fossil marsupial from South Asia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 12:395-399. Fallow, J. O. 1997. Dinosaurs and Geologic Time. In J. O. Fallow and M. K. Brett-Surman (editors). The Complete Dinosaur, pp. 107-111. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. Fastovsky, David E. and David B. Weishampel. 1996. The Evolution and Extinction of the Dinosaurs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Feduccia, Alan. 1996. The Origin and Evolution of Birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. Frey, E. and others. 1997. Gliding mechanism in the Late Permian reptile Coelurosauravus. Science 275:1450-1452. Gibson, L. James. 1994. Pseudogenes and Origins. Origins 21:91-108. Gish, Duane. 1993. Creation Scientists Answer Their Critics. Institute for Creation Research, El Cajon, CA. Grasse, Pierre-P. 1977. Evolution of Living Organisms. Academic Press, New York. Gura, Trisha. 2000. Bones, molecules . . . or both? Nature 406:230-233. Haney, Daniel Q. Researchers Question Report on Genes. Washington Post (August 23, 2001). Hillis, David M. 1999. SINEs of the perfect character. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96:9979-9981. Hoyle, Sir Fred. 1999. Mathematics of Evolution. Acorn Enterprises, Memphis, TN. --- The Hero of Hyrule. <cite>ManLink4321 posted [p:888923133] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>ArchiePeck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ManLink4321 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ArchiePeck posted...</cite> <quote>It does not explain EVERYTHING, no. For a start it doesn't cover how life actually began from the atoms that existed on earth. It certainly lends lots and lots of peer reviewed evidence as to the origins of all living species, however. The only reason to deny that would be pathetic religious pandering because your religion claims a different origin.</quote> What about all of the scientific evidence shown over the last 60 or so years that evolutionists have ignored that actually shows that we didn't evolve from a universal common ancestor?</quote> Could you please post links to some peer reviewed evidence of this nature. I'd be interested in reading it.</quote> Abate, Tom. 2001. Genome Discovery Shocks Scientists. San Francisco Chronicle (February 11). Ayala, Francisco J. 1978. The Mechanisms of Evolution. Scientific American 239:56-69. Benton, Michael J. (editor). 1993. The Fossil Record 2. Chapman & Hall, London. Benton, Mike. 1984. Is a Dog More Like a Lizard or a Chicken? New Scientist 103:18-19. Bethell, Tom. 2001. A Map to Nowhere. American Spectator 34 (no. 3):51-56 Brand, Leonard. 1997. Faith, Reason, and Earth History. Andrews University Press, Berrien Springs, MI. Cairns-Smith, A. G. 1985. Seven Clues to the Origin of Life: A Scientific Detective Story. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Cantrell, Michael A. and others. 2001. An Ancient Retrovirus-like Element Contains Hot Spots for SINE Insertion. Genetics 158:769-777. Carroll, Robert L. 1988. Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York. Clemens, William A. and others. 1989. Biogeography and the Phylogeny of the Metatheria. In D. W. Walton and B. J. Richardson (editors). Fauna of Australia Volume 1B Mammalia, pp. 527-548. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra. Davis, Percival and Dean Kenyon (editors). 1993. Of Pandas and People, second edition. Haughton Publishing Co., Dallas. Denton, Michael. 1986. Evolution: A Theory in Crisis. Adler & Adler, Bethesda, MD. ________ . 1998. Nature's Destiny. Free Press, New York. Dohle, Wolfgang. 1988. Review of Lovtrup, Darwinism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 1:283-285. Ducrocq, S. and others. 1992. First fossil marsupial from South Asia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 12:395-399. Fallow, J. O. 1997. Dinosaurs and Geologic Time. In J. O. Fallow and M. K. Brett-Surman (editors). The Complete Dinosaur, pp. 107-111. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. Fastovsky, David E. and David B. Weishampel. 1996. The Evolution and Extinction of the Dinosaurs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Feduccia, Alan. 1996. The Origin and Evolution of Birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. Frey, E. and others. 1997. Gliding mechanism in the Late Permian reptile Coelurosauravus. Science 275:1450-1452. Gibson, L. James. 1994. Pseudogenes and Origins. Origins 21:91-108. Gish, Duane. 1993. Creation Scientists Answer Their Critics. Institute for Creation Research, El Cajon, CA. Grasse, Pierre-P. 1977. Evolution of Living Organisms. Academic Press, New York. Gura, Trisha. 2000. Bones, molecules . . . or both? Nature 406:230-233. Haney, Daniel Q. Researchers Question Report on Genes. Washington Post (August 23, 2001). Hillis, David M. 1999. SINEs of the perfect character. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96:9979-9981. Hoyle, Sir Fred. 1999. Mathematics of Evolution. Acorn Enterprises, Memphis, TN.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shadowplay 10/22/17 4:01:29 PM #13:	ManLink4321 posted... I'm gonna go off on a limb here and assume that those articles just say that life developed multiple times on earth, not that evolution is wrong. Also TC,if you're curious about how life could have developed, you should read The Vital Question by Nick Lane. --- I make a topic in Final Fantasy 12 to ask if Tifa! They said no Tifa. Hardness gone!-gandob <cite>Shadowplay posted [p:888923483] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>ManLink4321 posted...</cite> I'm gonna go off on a limb here and assume that those articles just say that life developed multiple times on earth, not that evolution is wrong. Also TC,if you're curious about how life could have developed, you should read The Vital Question by Nick Lane.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ManLink4321 10/22/17 4:04:07 PM #14:	Shadowplay posted... ManLink4321 posted... I'm gonna go off on a limb here and assume that those articles just say that life developed multiple times on earth, not that evolution is wrong. Also TC,if you're curious about how life could have developed, you should read The Vital Question by Nick Lane. I'll consider reading it once abiogenesis actually has support for it, and not tabloid journalism. --- The Hero of Hyrule. <cite>ManLink4321 posted [p:888923647] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>Shadowplay posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ManLink4321 posted...</cite> I'm gonna go off on a limb here and assume that those articles just say that life developed multiple times on earth, not that evolution is wrong. Also TC,if you're curious about how life could have developed, you should read The Vital Question by Nick Lane.</quote> I'll consider reading it once abiogenesis actually has support for it, and not tabloid journalism.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 10/22/17 4:04:16 PM #15:	ArchiePeck posted... The only reason to deny that would be pathetic religious pandering because your religion claims a different origin. https://tinyurl.com/nw3swtm I saw this the other day. --- http://i.imgur.com/BBcZDLJ.png <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:888923657] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>ArchiePeck posted...</cite> <quote>The only reason to deny that would be pathetic religious pandering because your religion claims a different origin.</quote> https://tinyurl.com/nw3swtm I saw this the other day.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSJ4Broly 10/22/17 4:07:55 PM #16:	Evolution is the answer to how instead of why. <cite>SSJ4Broly posted [p:888923872] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote>Evolution is the answer to how instead of why.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 10/22/17 4:16:28 PM #17:	ManLink4321 posted... You literally copied and pasted that list from this link: https://www.trueorigin.org/theobald1g.php I doubt if you've read a single thing on that list. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:888924381] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>ManLink4321 posted...</cite> You literally copied and pasted that list from this link: https://www.trueorigin.org/theobald1g.php I doubt if you've read a single thing on that list.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ArchiePeck 10/22/17 4:17:38 PM #18:	COVxy posted... ManLink4321 posted... You literally copied and pasted that list from this link: https://www.trueorigin.org/theobald1g.php I doubt if you've read a single thing on that list. LMAO <cite>ArchiePeck posted [p:888924481] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ManLink4321 posted...</cite> You literally copied and pasted that list from this link: https://www.trueorigin.org/theobald1g.php I doubt if you've read a single thing on that list.</quote> LMAO</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vertania 10/22/17 4:21:42 PM #19:	COVxy posted... You literally copied and pasted that list from this link: https://www.trueorigin.org/theobald1g.php I doubt if you've read a single thing on that list. lol Also doesn't help that the most recent article from the list is 16 years old. <cite>Vertania posted [p:888924727] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote>You literally copied and pasted that list from this link: https://www.trueorigin.org/theobald1g.php I doubt if you've read a single thing on that list.</quote> lol Also doesn't help that the most recent article from the list is 16 years old.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ManLink4321 10/22/17 5:08:03 PM #20:	COVxy posted... ManLink4321 posted... You literally copied and pasted that list from this link: https://www.trueorigin.org/theobald1g.php I doubt if you've read a single thing on that list. I've read everything on that list. That's why I posted it. --- The Hero of Hyrule. <cite>ManLink4321 posted [p:888927769] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ManLink4321 posted...</cite> You literally copied and pasted that list from this link: https://www.trueorigin.org/theobald1g.php I doubt if you've read a single thing on that list.</quote> I've read everything on that list. That's why I posted it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ManLink4321 10/22/17 5:08:41 PM #21:	Vertania posted... COVxy posted... You literally copied and pasted that list from this link: https://www.trueorigin.org/theobald1g.php I doubt if you've read a single thing on that list. lol Also doesn't help that the most recent article from the list is 16 years old. Yet, it stands as fact for literally everyone who reads it. --- The Hero of Hyrule. <cite>ManLink4321 posted [p:888927819] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vertania posted...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote>You literally copied and pasted that list from this link: https://www.trueorigin.org/theobald1g.php I doubt if you've read a single thing on that list.</quote> lol Also doesn't help that the most recent article from the list is 16 years old.</quote> Yet, it stands as fact for literally everyone who reads it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cherrys2000 10/22/17 5:18:23 PM #22:	When did South Park ever say that? <cite>Cherrys2000 posted [p:888928391] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote>When did South Park ever say that?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shadowplay 10/22/17 7:01:12 PM #23:	ManLink4321 posted... Shadowplay posted... ManLink4321 posted... I'm gonna go off on a limb here and assume that those articles just say that life developed multiple times on earth, not that evolution is wrong. Also TC,if you're curious about how life could have developed, you should read The Vital Question by Nick Lane. I'll consider reading it once abiogenesis actually has support for it, and not tabloid journalism. Also, I'm not saying that evolution is wrong; we already know it isn't. That's one of the main focuses of the book. It explains how a hydrothermal alkaline vent could have created a natural proton gradient that served as an abiotic precursor to the proton gradient that we see in living cells. Or to put it more simply, there's none of that primordial soup crap. In fact, the book is quite dismissive of it. --- I make a topic in Final Fantasy 12 to ask if Tifa! They said no Tifa. Hardness gone!-gandob <cite>Shadowplay posted [p:888934564] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>ManLink4321 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Shadowplay posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ManLink4321 posted...</cite> I'm gonna go off on a limb here and assume that those articles just say that life developed multiple times on earth, not that evolution is wrong. Also TC,if you're curious about how life could have developed, you should read The Vital Question by Nick Lane.</quote> I'll consider reading it once abiogenesis actually has support for it, and not tabloid journalism. Also, I'm not saying that evolution is wrong; we already know it isn't.</quote> That's one of the main focuses of the book. It explains how a hydrothermal alkaline vent could have created a natural proton gradient that served as an abiotic precursor to the proton gradient that we see in living cells. Or to put it more simply, there's none of that primordial soup crap. In fact, the book is quite dismissive of it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ManLink4321 10/22/17 7:09:25 PM #24:	Shadowplay posted... ManLink4321 posted... Shadowplay posted... ManLink4321 posted... I'm gonna go off on a limb here and assume that those articles just say that life developed multiple times on earth, not that evolution is wrong. Also TC,if you're curious about how life could have developed, you should read The Vital Question by Nick Lane. I'll consider reading it once abiogenesis actually has support for it, and not tabloid journalism. Also, I'm not saying that evolution is wrong; we already know it isn't. That's one of the main focuses of the book. It explains how a hydrothermal alkaline vent could have created a natural proton gradient that served as an abiotic precursor to the proton gradient that we see in living cells. Or to put it more simply, there's none of that primordial soup crap. In fact, the book is quite dismissive of it. I'll check it out next month. --- The Hero of Hyrule. <cite>ManLink4321 posted [p:888935092] in south park... [t:75907339]...</cite> <quote><cite>Shadowplay posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ManLink4321 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Shadowplay posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ManLink4321 posted...</cite> I'm gonna go off on a limb here and assume that those articles just say that life developed multiple times on earth, not that evolution is wrong. Also TC,if you're curious about how life could have developed, you should read The Vital Question by Nick Lane.</quote> I'll consider reading it once abiogenesis actually has support for it, and not tabloid journalism. Also, I'm not saying that evolution is wrong; we already know it isn't.</quote> That's one of the main focuses of the book. It explains how a hydrothermal alkaline vent could have created a natural proton gradient that served as an abiotic precursor to the proton gradient that we see in living cells. Or to put it more simply, there's none of that primordial soup crap. In fact, the book is quite dismissive of it.</quote> I'll check it out next month.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > south park: "evolution explains everything" (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > south park: "evolution explains everything"