Current Events > ''Guns don't kill people, People kill people''

(+) Yeah! (+)

according to that dumbshit logic, maybe we should give all citizens missile launchers, grenades, Apache helicopters with 10,000 rounds rapid-fire gatling guns too cos after all, these are all harmless weapons.

It's ok, right? Cos it aint these weapons' fault.

It all depends on who's wielding them, right?

Hey, let's give this bazooka to that mentally stable average-looking peaceful-loving person. Nothing can go wrong, cos he's not mentally ill or anything!

Grenades don't kill people, bruh. Nukes don't kill people, bruh.

''Look mama, I'm holding this M60 50-inch machinegun! But don't be afraid! Guns don't kill people, remember! Only people kill people. And I won't kill you, I promise!''

what amazing logic you guys have.

Get.
Butt hurt more.
---

You aren't making any sense. What amazing logic you have. Brilliant. Truly.
---

explain your logic of 'guns don't kill people' then. Go on.

We shouldn't have any problem with North Korea getting nukes. Nuclear Weapons don't kill people on their own!

But on the other hand, drugs DO kill people, not the person doing them.
---

this is one of the dumbest topics ive seen

why did i even click on it?
---

Mackorov posted...

explain your logic of 'guns don't kill people' then. Go on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seH3bsymNJ4
---

"I know, I'll have a rabid emotion breakdown with nothing but false equivalencies and somehow I'll insist that people answer to me on them keeping already hard won Constitutional Rights."

To reiterate; get butt hurt more so.
---

It's funny but I've never once seen a single poster on CE try to make a defensive argument on their stance on lax gun laws.
All I see are ''haha butthurt'' , ''<insert meme>'', ''you <insert mockery term>'', ''haha bait topic'', ''<insert another irrelevant comment>''

Mackorov posted...

It's funny but I've never once seen a single poster on CE try to make a defensive argument on their stance on lax gun laws.
All I see are ''haha butthurt'' , ''<insert meme>'', ''you <insert mockery term>'', ''haha bait topic'', ''<insert another irrelevant comment>''

Your argument is that of a child. You're not even making an argument other than "wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh guns".

I gave you a video of your kind of people trying to make the same claim. Try watching it.
---

Maybe because my stance on gun rights doesn't boil down to a simple 7 word phrase. You're not trying to have us defend gun rights, you're trying to have us defend a phrase in it's most literal of interpretations.
---

ArchiePeck posted...

We shouldn't have any problem with North Korea getting nukes. Nuclear Weapons don't kill people on their own!

NK in this analogy is like a 3rd striker somehow out on parole because the prisons are full. Of course we don't want them getting a gun. Or a nuke.

And I don't see you arguing deproliferation for the U.S.
---

@Balrog0

tagging you because you might enjoy this topic seeing as yesterday you thought TC's argument is deep and sophisticated

FLUFFYGERM posted...

@Balrog0

tagging you because you might enjoy this topic seeing as yesterday you thought TC's argument is deep and sophisticated

it is compared to the opposition, you've proved that to me
---

Notice how tc won't reply now.
---

Balrog0 posted...

FLUFFYGERM posted...

@Balrog0

tagging you because you might enjoy this topic seeing as yesterday you thought TC's argument is deep and sophisticated

it is compared to the opposition, you've proved that to me

sorry kid, not wasting time engaging with false equivalencies and childish positions doesn't make your view deep or sophisticated at all

yeah, not engaging in the logical conclusion of your own sound bite style arguments really shows how adult and mature you guys are
---

Balrog0 posted...

logical conclusion

Wanna run through the logical conclusion of your anti-gun arguments? (Assuming you'd be willing to post your anti-gun arguments.)
---

Anarchy_Juiblex posted...

Wanna run through the logical conclusion of your anti-gun arguments? (Assuming you'd be willing to post your anti-gun arguments.)

No, not really. I'm not anti-gun, I literally just posted in another topic that I didn't think enhanced gun control would stop mass shooting (though it would stop other types of gun violence).

FLUFFYGERM is butthurt because I used the nuclear suitcase argument when he made a topic called "taking away people's rights won't stop mass killings" which is obviously false. And if you're intellectually honest about that position, you would be okay with nuclear weapons in civilian hands unless you really do think that taking away rights (to nuclear arms in that case) would stop mass killings. Or do you disagree with that?
---

I actually know you don't because I saw you say in another topic you knew that it would but you're ok with the trade off and compared it to the 4th amendment. Seems like we are on the same page.
---

@Mackorov cmon TC, don't be scared.
---

Balrog is literally fuming right now roflmao

To stop a bad guy with a gun we need good guys with guns
---

f u r i o u s
---

Guns don't kill people. Uh-uh.

I kill people. With guns.

*akwardly rolls out of topic*
---

OpheliaAdenade posted...

But on the other hand, drugs DO kill people, not the person doing them.

false people abuse it
safe drug use education is the solution not banning drugs
---

Well, technically, the bullet kills the person, not the gun. :P
---

make private bullet making illegal and make bullets cost 100 dolllars each problem solved
---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBS9AHilxg0
---

You should have told me to bring skiing equipment, TC.
---

The logic is indeed stupid

"Soldiers don't kill people, the governments who wage the wars kill people!"

You have to be extremely inept to use it as an actual argument
---

That's not a slippery slope that's a sheer cliff

Mackorov posted...

It's funny but I've never once seen a single poster on CE try to make a defensive argument on their stance on lax gun laws.
All I see are ''haha butthurt'' , ''<insert meme>'', ''you <insert mockery term>'', ''haha bait topic'', ''<insert another irrelevant comment>''

You're literally saying we should give nukes to everyone and insulting people before they could even respond

Most people won't put up with such stupidity
---

Pfft, everyone knows it is the bullet that does the actual killing. Ban bullets!
---

Rexdragon125 posted...

That's not a slippery slope that's a sheer cliff

My bad. I'll bring rappelling equipment next time.
---

Notice how again, @Mackorov is too scared and afraid to come up with any real logic in his own topic. Fricking. Hilarious.
---

I love how the topic creator had an insane meltdown, it's like his tiny mind is about to explode.

Can someone find him a "safe space" cause he seems to really need one.
---