Current Events > Should Furry smut be categorized as bestiality?

Topic List	Page List: 1
DesuDeku 09/24/17 11:54:07 PM #1:	Should Furry smut be categorized as bestiality? Yes No View Results They're animals. --- https://i.imgur.com/QqE3IAr.jpg Samus Returns <cite>DesuDeku posted [p:887238232] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote> Should Furry smut be categorized as bestiality? Yes No View Results They're animals.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ProtoManSPx 09/25/17 12:00:04 AM #2:	It's a step in that direction but not straight up bestility. <cite>ProtoManSPx posted [p:887238514] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>It's a step in that direction but not straight up bestility.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nightmare_Luna 09/25/17 12:01:10 AM #3:	Should stealing things in GTA be categorized as theft? --- "That's not a character, that's a set of bondage gear that can cast Ice 2." Vento Aureo 469 <cite>Nightmare_Luna posted [p:887238557] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>Should stealing things in GTA be categorized as theft?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FreedomEtrtment 09/25/17 12:16:02 AM #4:	This is what loli idiots sound like <cite>FreedomEtrtment posted [p:887239220] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>This is what loli idiots sound like</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Skye Reynolds 09/25/17 12:31:51 AM #5:	I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal. <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:887239938] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HashtagTartarus 09/25/17 8:46:03 PM #6:	Nope --- https://puu.sh/tsvPi/2281d37d96.png https://puu.sh/vbW49/579c34013a.png <cite>HashtagTartarus posted [p:887289014] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>Nope</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FreedomEtrtment 09/25/17 10:25:20 PM #7:	lol biased TC only bumps the other one and not this one. <cite>FreedomEtrtment posted [p:887295107] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>lol biased TC only bumps the other one and not this one.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Squidkids 09/25/17 10:42:31 PM #8:	FreedomEtrtment posted... lol biased TC only bumps the other one and not this one. how can the tc be bised over his own smut >.> --- Be a team player, guard those super jump rings. See a team member inking a wall to swim up on? ink with them. Ink your foes into ash. http://tinyurl.com/z7hbzrr <cite>Squidkids posted [p:887296086] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>lol biased TC only bumps the other one and not this one.</quote> how can the tc be bised over his own smut >.></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DesuDeku 09/25/17 11:34:54 PM #9:	FreedomEtrtment posted... lol biased TC only bumps the other one and not this one. I bumped the other one a minute after HashtagTartarus posted here. --- https://i.imgur.com/QqE3IAr.jpg Samus Returns <cite>DesuDeku posted [p:887299150] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>lol biased TC only bumps the other one and not this one.</quote> I bumped the other one a minute after HashtagTartarus posted here.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DesuDeku 09/25/17 11:39:42 PM #10:	Skye Reynolds posted... I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal. But they're a different species, not real, but still not human. --- https://i.imgur.com/QqE3IAr.jpg Samus Returns <cite>DesuDeku posted [p:887299416] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>Skye Reynolds posted...</cite> <quote>I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal.</quote> But they're a different species, not real, but still not human.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HashtagTartarus 09/26/17 1:41:57 AM #11:	DesuDeku posted... Skye Reynolds posted... I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal. But they're a different species, not real, but still not human. But not less than human. --- https://puu.sh/tsvPi/2281d37d96.png https://puu.sh/vbW49/579c34013a.png <cite>HashtagTartarus posted [p:887304557] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>DesuDeku posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Skye Reynolds posted...</cite> <quote>I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal.</quote> But they're a different species, not real, but still not human.</quote> But not less than human.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DesuDeku 09/26/17 2:03:04 AM #12:	HashtagTartarus posted... DesuDeku posted... Skye Reynolds posted... I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal. But they're a different species, not real, but still not human. But not less than human. I'm not saying that it would be illegal since anthros are able to consent (if they were real), I'm just saying that it would be bestiality since they're part animal. --- https://i.imgur.com/QqE3IAr.jpg Samus Returns <cite>DesuDeku posted [p:887305274] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>HashtagTartarus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DesuDeku posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Skye Reynolds posted...</cite> <quote>I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal.</quote> But they're a different species, not real, but still not human.</quote> But not less than human.</quote> I'm not saying that it would be illegal since anthros are able to consent (if they were real), I'm just saying that it would be bestiality since they're part animal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
legendarylemur 09/26/17 2:03:42 AM #13:	All furries should be revoked the right to use water. --- "Iwata was awesome" - Mr. Nintendo dinglebutt <cite>legendarylemur posted [p:887305290] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>All furries should be revoked the right to use water.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Squidkids 09/26/17 2:06:32 AM #14:	legendarylemur posted... All furries should be revoked the right to use water. that's cruel and unusual punishment --- Be a team player, guard those super jump rings. See a team member inking a wall to swim up on? ink with them. Ink your foes into ash. http://tinyurl.com/z7hbzrr <cite>Squidkids posted [p:887305371] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>legendarylemur posted...</cite> <quote>All furries should be revoked the right to use water.</quote> that's cruel and unusual punishment</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
legendarylemur 09/26/17 2:07:32 AM #15:	Squidkids posted... legendarylemur posted... All furries should be revoked the right to use water. that's cruel and unusual punishment Good --- "Iwata was awesome" - Mr. Nintendo dinglebutt <cite>legendarylemur posted [p:887305398] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>Squidkids posted...</cite> <quote><cite>legendarylemur posted...</cite> <quote>All furries should be revoked the right to use water.</quote> that's cruel and unusual punishment</quote> Good</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MabusIncarnate 09/26/17 2:08:23 AM #16:	It's perfectly okay to be turned on by animated children - love CE pedo defenders --- Ten million dollars on a losing campaign Twenty million starving and writhing in pain <cite>MabusIncarnate posted [p:887305422] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>It's perfectly okay to be turned on by animated children - love CE pedo defenders</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WilliamPorygon 09/26/17 2:10:47 AM #17:	1) Ferals are animals. 2) Anthros are part-animal. 3) But humans are also a type of animal. 4) They're all fictional anyway. 5) Who gives a fuck --- Love dolphins and whales? Come hang out at Cetacea Cove! https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1404-cetacea-cove <cite>WilliamPorygon posted [p:887305510] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>1) Ferals are animals. 2) Anthros are part-animal. 3) But humans are also a type of animal. 4) They're all fictional anyway. 5) Who gives a fuck</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DesuDeku 09/26/17 3:09:27 AM #18:	WilliamPorygon posted... 2) Anthros are part-animal. 3) But humans are also a type of animal. They're a different species. --- https://i.imgur.com/QqE3IAr.jpg Samus Returns <cite>DesuDeku posted [p:887307088] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>WilliamPorygon posted...</cite> <quote>2) Anthros are part-animal. 3) But humans are also a type of animal.</quote> They're a different species.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
cjsdowg 09/26/17 3:16:30 AM #19:	DesuDeku posted... WilliamPorygon posted... 2) Anthros are part-animal. 3) But humans are also a type of animal. They're a different species. I guess you think is wrong too... lol --- Bender: Well, everybody, I just saved a turtle. What have you done with your lives? <cite>cjsdowg posted [p:887307282] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>DesuDeku posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WilliamPorygon posted...</cite> <quote>2) Anthros are part-animal. 3) But humans are also a type of animal.</quote> They're a different species.</quote> I guess you think is wrong too... lol </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cookie Bag 09/26/17 3:17:32 AM #20:	FreedomEtrtment posted... This is what loli idiots sound like except there's the difference where lolis, even while fictional are still fucking humans --- http://i.imgur.com/XvQcHbm.gif <cite>Cookie Bag posted [p:887307306] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>This is what loli idiots sound like</quote> except there's the difference where lolis, even while fictional are still fucking humans</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
legendarylemur 09/26/17 3:38:00 AM #21:	cjsdowg posted... DesuDeku posted... WilliamPorygon posted... 2) Anthros are part-animal. 3) But humans are also a type of animal. They're a different species. I guess you think is wrong too... lol Cats and dogs, living together, MASS HYSTERIA --- "Iwata was awesome" - Mr. Nintendo dinglebutt <cite>legendarylemur posted [p:887307736] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>cjsdowg posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DesuDeku posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WilliamPorygon posted...</cite> <quote>2) Anthros are part-animal. 3) But humans are also a type of animal.</quote> They're a different species.</quote> I guess you think is wrong too... lol </quote> Cats and dogs, living together, MASS HYSTERIA</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DesuDeku 09/26/17 5:30:04 AM #22:	legendarylemur posted... cjsdowg posted... DesuDeku posted... WilliamPorygon posted... 2) Anthros are part-animal. 3) But humans are also a type of animal. They're a different species. I guess you think is wrong too... lol Cats and dogs, living together, MASS HYSTERIA There's a difference between living together and fucking. No one cares if a cat and dog fucks each other since they're both animals that can't give consent. Even if an anthro is real and they give consent (which is totally fine), its still bestiality since they're a different species. --- https://i.imgur.com/QqE3IAr.jpg Samus Returns <cite>DesuDeku posted [p:887309668] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>legendarylemur posted...</cite> <quote><cite>cjsdowg posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DesuDeku posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WilliamPorygon posted...</cite> <quote>2) Anthros are part-animal. 3) But humans are also a type of animal.</quote> They're a different species.</quote> I guess you think is wrong too... lol </quote> Cats and dogs, living together, MASS HYSTERIA</quote> There's a difference between living together and fucking. No one cares if a cat and dog fucks each other since they're both animals that can't give consent. Even if an anthro is real and they give consent (which is totally fine), its still bestiality since they're a different species.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SkittyOnWailord 09/26/17 5:44:53 AM #23:	DesuDeku posted... Even if an anthro is real and they give consent (which is totally fine), its still bestiality since they're a different species. Not being human isn't the reason bestiality is illegal. --- I'm here! I'm furry! I'll try not to shed! =^_^= i7 5820K\|Rampage V Extreme\|32GB DDR4 Ripjaws 4\|2xSLI GTX 980ti Lightning LE\|HAF 932\|Samsung 50inch 4K\|HTC Vive <cite>SkittyOnWailord posted [p:887309923] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>DesuDeku posted...</cite> <quote>Even if an anthro is real and they give consent (which is totally fine), its still bestiality since they're a different species.</quote> Not being human isn't the reason bestiality is illegal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WilliamPorygon 09/26/17 5:54:54 AM #24:	Well, the image site I frequent uses this definition for "bestiality"... Sexual activity between feral and non-feral characters (including human, anthro, taur, naga, etc.). Note that for tagging purposes, human-like intelligence (sapience) does not determine whether or not a character is feral, it is entirely related to their physical form. In other words, if a human transformed into a wolf and starts having sex with a feral wolf, it is not considered bestiality (but it is considered feral_on_feral). ...which is pretty much the definition I go with. --- Love dolphins and whales? Come hang out at Cetacea Cove! https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1404-cetacea-cove <cite>WilliamPorygon posted [p:887310105] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>Well, the image site I frequent uses this definition for "bestiality"... <quote>Sexual activity between feral and non-feral characters (including human, anthro, taur, naga, etc.). Note that for tagging purposes, human-like intelligence (sapience) does not determine whether or not a character is feral, it is entirely related to their physical form. In other words, if a human transformed into a wolf and starts having sex with a feral wolf, it is not considered bestiality (but it is considered feral_on_feral).</quote> ...which is pretty much the definition I go with.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HashtagTartarus 09/26/17 10:36:16 AM #25:	A definition like that works well for a site with a "tag what you see" policy, since intelligence isn't obvious just by looking at it. In reality, I think the definition is far muddier, and tied to intelligence more than anything physical. After all, the main ethical issue concerning this subject is of consent, and consent is not necessarily visible in a single illustration. --- https://puu.sh/tsvPi/2281d37d96.png https://puu.sh/vbW49/579c34013a.png <cite>HashtagTartarus posted [p:887318225] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>A definition like that works well for a site with a "tag what you see" policy, since intelligence isn't obvious just by looking at it. In reality, I think the definition is far muddier, and tied to intelligence more than anything physical. After all, the main ethical issue concerning this subject is of consent, and consent is not necessarily visible in a single illustration.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#26	Post #26 was unavailable or deleted.
DesuDeku 09/26/17 12:27:33 PM #27:	SkittyOnWailord posted... DesuDeku posted... Even if an anthro is real and they give consent (which is totally fine), its still bestiality since they're a different species. Not being human isn't the reason bestiality is illegal. And like I said, having sex with an anthro (if they were real) would be totally fine (and legal) since they can give consent unlike actual animals. I'm just saying that it would still be bestiality (a form of bestiality that would probably be legal) since they're a different species. --- https://i.imgur.com/QqE3IAr.jpg Samus Returns <cite>DesuDeku posted [p:887324037] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>SkittyOnWailord posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DesuDeku posted...</cite> <quote>Even if an anthro is real and they give consent (which is totally fine), its still bestiality since they're a different species.</quote> Not being human isn't the reason bestiality is illegal.</quote> And like I said, having sex with an anthro (if they were real) would be totally fine (and legal) since they can give consent unlike actual animals. I'm just saying that it would still be bestiality (a form of bestiality that would probably be legal) since they're a different species.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Skye Reynolds 09/26/17 1:29:28 PM #28:	DesuDeku posted... Skye Reynolds posted... I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal. But they're a different species, not real, but still not human. Is it bestiality when Lois Lane makes love to Superman? They're different species. <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:887327395] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>DesuDeku posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Skye Reynolds posted...</cite> <quote>I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal.</quote> But they're a different species, not real, but still not human.</quote> Is it bestiality when Lois Lane makes love to Superman? They're different species.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DesuDeku 09/26/17 1:33:57 PM #29:	Skye Reynolds posted... DesuDeku posted... Skye Reynolds posted... I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal. But they're a different species, not real, but still not human. Is it bestiality when Lois Lane makes love to Superman? They're different species. Technically. --- https://i.imgur.com/QqE3IAr.jpg Samus Returns <cite>DesuDeku posted [p:887327641] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>Skye Reynolds posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DesuDeku posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Skye Reynolds posted...</cite> <quote>I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal.</quote> But they're a different species, not real, but still not human.</quote> Is it bestiality when Lois Lane makes love to Superman? They're different species.</quote> Technically.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KILBOTz 09/26/17 1:43:39 PM #30:	It should be bestiality but only if one of the participants identifies as a non-human species and one of the participants identifies as a human. If the participants like dressing up and fucking but are humans, not bestiality. If they furries are all identifying as non-human it is not bestiality, because we never throw dogs in jail for humping a cat. --- http://i.imgur.com/O3syCWD.gif http://i.imgur.com/k3YiBdG.gif <cite>KILBOTz posted [p:887328157] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>It should be bestiality but only if one of the participants identifies as a non-human species and one of the participants identifies as a human. If the participants like dressing up and fucking but are humans, not bestiality. If they furries are all identifying as non-human it is not bestiality, because we never throw dogs in jail for humping a cat.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Skye Reynolds 09/26/17 5:49:06 PM #31:	DesuDeku posted... Skye Reynolds posted... DesuDeku posted... Skye Reynolds posted... I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal. But they're a different species, not real, but still not human. Is it bestiality when Lois Lane makes love to Superman? They're different species. Technically. Don't mind me, just posting beast smut. <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:887343388] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>DesuDeku posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Skye Reynolds posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DesuDeku posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Skye Reynolds posted...</cite> <quote>I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal.</quote> But they're a different species, not real, but still not human.</quote> Is it bestiality when Lois Lane makes love to Superman? They're different species.</quote> Technically.</quote> Don't mind me, just posting beast smut.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FreedomEtrtment 09/26/17 6:17:20 PM #32:	Asherlee10 posted... Nightmare_Luna posted... Should stealing things in GTA be categorized as theft? This isn't exactly an accurate comparison. I'm assuming we are talking about Furry Porn vs Beastiality Porn. Actions in GTA remaining a video game and would have no weight in the real world. Furry Porn and Beastiality Porn are both porn. I'm not sure that making animal figures a little bit more human-like suddenly makes Furry Porn not closely related to Beastiality Porn. Why does porn have more weight in the real world than a video game? Assuming the beastiality porn doesn't have an actual animal in it <cite>FreedomEtrtment posted [p:887345065] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nightmare_Luna posted...</cite> <quote>Should stealing things in GTA be categorized as theft?</quote> This isn't exactly an accurate comparison. I'm assuming we are talking about Furry Porn vs Beastiality Porn. Actions in GTA remaining a video game and would have no weight in the real world. Furry Porn and Beastiality Porn are both porn. I'm not sure that making animal figures a little bit more human-like suddenly makes Furry Porn not closely related to Beastiality Porn.</quote> Why does porn have more weight in the real world than a video game? Assuming the beastiality porn doesn't have an actual animal in it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DesuDeku 09/26/17 6:30:02 PM #33:	Skye Reynolds posted... DesuDeku posted... Skye Reynolds posted... DesuDeku posted... Skye Reynolds posted... I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal. But they're a different species, not real, but still not human. Is it bestiality when Lois Lane makes love to Superman? They're different species. Technically. Don't mind me, just posting beast smut. Its a hard pill to swallow, but I'm glad you accepted it. --- https://i.imgur.com/QqE3IAr.jpg Samus Returns <cite>DesuDeku posted [p:887345788] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>Skye Reynolds posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DesuDeku posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Skye Reynolds posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DesuDeku posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Skye Reynolds posted...</cite> <quote>I don't think so. They're (typically) depicted as sapient and they're as much humanoid as they are animal.</quote> But they're a different species, not real, but still not human.</quote> Is it bestiality when Lois Lane makes love to Superman? They're different species.</quote> Technically.</quote> Don't mind me, just posting beast smut.</quote> Its a hard pill to swallow, but I'm glad you accepted it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Skye Reynolds 09/26/17 7:56:55 PM #34:	posting more beast <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:887350750] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>posting more beast </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mist_Turnips 09/26/17 8:05:23 PM #35:	FreedomEtrtment posted... This is what loli idiots sound like MabusIncarnate posted... It's perfectly okay to be turned on by animated children - love CE pedo defenders Wait, am I missing something here? Why do the angry Fluffy Fuckers keep deflecting to loli shit? --- "They say if you don't hide your belly button, lightning could take it away from you! What would happen if it did?" http://i.imgur.com/G74y2NJ.png <cite>Mist_Turnips posted [p:887351198] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>This is what loli idiots sound like</quote> <cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote>It's perfectly okay to be turned on by animated children - love CE pedo defenders</quote> Wait, am I missing something here? Why do the angry Fluffy Fuckers keep deflecting to loli shit?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DesuDeku 09/26/17 9:31:24 PM #36:	Mist_Turnips posted... FreedomEtrtment posted... This is what loli idiots sound like MabusIncarnate posted... It's perfectly okay to be turned on by animated children - love CE pedo defenders Wait, am I missing something here? Why do the angry Fluffy Fuckers keep deflecting to loli shit? People deflect when they can't handle the truth. Besides, I already have another poll for lolis. --- https://i.imgur.com/QqE3IAr.jpg Samus Returns <cite>DesuDeku posted [p:887356246] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mist_Turnips posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>This is what loli idiots sound like</quote> <cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote>It's perfectly okay to be turned on by animated children - love CE pedo defenders</quote> Wait, am I missing something here? Why do the angry Fluffy Fuckers keep deflecting to loli shit?</quote> People deflect when they can't handle the truth. Besides, I already have another poll for lolis.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FreedomEtrtment 09/26/17 9:37:40 PM #37:	Mist_Turnips posted... FreedomEtrtment posted... This is what loli idiots sound like MabusIncarnate posted... It's perfectly okay to be turned on by animated children - love CE pedo defenders Wait, am I missing something here? Why do the angry Fluffy Fuckers keep deflecting to loli shit? You missed the point entirely. I was saying equating lolis to actual children is as stupid looking as equating furries to beastiality. However if you actually think furry is beastiality but you like loli, that's even more hilarious. <cite>FreedomEtrtment posted [p:887356672] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mist_Turnips posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>This is what loli idiots sound like</quote> <cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote>It's perfectly okay to be turned on by animated children - love CE pedo defenders</quote> Wait, am I missing something here? Why do the angry Fluffy Fuckers keep deflecting to loli shit?</quote> You missed the point entirely. I was saying equating lolis to actual children is as stupid looking as equating furries to beastiality. However if you actually think furry is beastiality but you like loli, that's even more hilarious.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HashtagTartarus 09/26/17 9:46:09 PM #38:	FreedomEtrtment posted... Mist_Turnips posted... FreedomEtrtment posted... This is what loli idiots sound like MabusIncarnate posted... It's perfectly okay to be turned on by animated children - love CE pedo defenders Wait, am I missing something here? Why do the angry Fluffy Fuckers keep deflecting to loli shit? You missed the point entirely. I was saying equating lolis to actual children is as stupid looking as equating furries to beastiality. However if you actually think furry is beastiality but you like loli, that's even more hilarious. What is this dogshit? One fetish per topic, please. --- https://puu.sh/tsvPi/2281d37d96.png https://puu.sh/vbW49/579c34013a.png <cite>HashtagTartarus posted [p:887357202] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mist_Turnips posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>This is what loli idiots sound like</quote> <cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote>It's perfectly okay to be turned on by animated children - love CE pedo defenders</quote> Wait, am I missing something here? Why do the angry Fluffy Fuckers keep deflecting to loli shit?</quote> You missed the point entirely. I was saying equating lolis to actual children is as stupid looking as equating furries to beastiality. However if you actually think furry is beastiality but you like loli, that's even more hilarious.</quote> What is this dogshit? One fetish per topic, please.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FreedomEtrtment 09/26/17 10:07:46 PM #39:	HashtagTartarus posted... FreedomEtrtment posted... Mist_Turnips posted... FreedomEtrtment posted... This is what loli idiots sound like MabusIncarnate posted... It's perfectly okay to be turned on by animated children - love CE pedo defenders Wait, am I missing something here? Why do the angry Fluffy Fuckers keep deflecting to loli shit? You missed the point entirely. I was saying equating lolis to actual children is as stupid looking as equating furries to beastiality. However if you actually think furry is beastiality but you like loli, that's even more hilarious. What is this dogshit? One fetish per topic, please. I'm not sure what you're so mad about. I was saying furries shouldn't be equated to beastiality like he was doing (despite him being a loli lover who would definitely object to being called a pedophile lol) and you're a furry. Are you actually mad that I didn't equate furries with beastiality? Since you known for feeling some type of way towards real animals too you might just be mad at that <cite>FreedomEtrtment posted [p:887358516] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>HashtagTartarus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mist_Turnips posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>This is what loli idiots sound like</quote> <cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote>It's perfectly okay to be turned on by animated children - love CE pedo defenders</quote> Wait, am I missing something here? Why do the angry Fluffy Fuckers keep deflecting to loli shit?</quote> You missed the point entirely. I was saying equating lolis to actual children is as stupid looking as equating furries to beastiality. However if you actually think furry is beastiality but you like loli, that's even more hilarious.</quote> What is this dogshit? One fetish per topic, please.</quote> I'm not sure what you're so mad about. I was saying furries shouldn't be equated to beastiality like he was doing (despite him being a loli lover who would definitely object to being called a pedophile lol) and you're a furry. Are you actually mad that I didn't equate furries with beastiality? Since you known for feeling some type of way towards real animals too you might just be mad at that</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmk 09/26/17 10:22:24 PM #40:	Furry shouldn't be called bestiality because that completely flies in the face of the understood meaning and connotations of bestiality and the only people who want to call furry "bestiality" are one or more of the following: 1) Dorks with a hateboner for furries 2) People with no respect for the value of words having meaning 3) Contrarians who just want to be really anal about things and argue on the internet about dumb crap --- I am snazzier, hot, hot rant. Warily slight as. Croak rush, OK? Weirder, almighty make out. ::) <cite>Tmk posted [p:887359386] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>Furry shouldn't be called bestiality because that completely flies in the face of the understood meaning and connotations of bestiality and the only people who want to call furry "bestiality" are one or more of the following: 1) Dorks with a hateboner for furries 2) People with no respect for the value of words having meaning 3) Contrarians who just want to be really anal about things and argue on the internet about dumb crap</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DesuDeku 09/26/17 10:53:23 PM #41:	FreedomEtrtment posted... (despite him being a loli lover who would definitely object to being called a pedophile lol) Who are you calling a loli lover exactly? Just wanna make sure. --- https://i.imgur.com/QqE3IAr.jpg Samus Returns <cite>DesuDeku posted [p:887361062] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>(despite him being a loli lover who would definitely object to being called a pedophile lol)</quote> Who are you calling a loli lover exactly? Just wanna make sure.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#42	Post #42 was unavailable or deleted.
FreedomEtrtment 09/27/17 3:05:36 PM #43:	DesuDeku posted... FreedomEtrtment posted... (despite him being a loli lover who would definitely object to being called a pedophile lol) Who are you calling a loli lover exactly? Just wanna make sure. Mist Asherlee10 posted... FreedomEtrtment posted... Asherlee10 posted... Nightmare_Luna posted... Should stealing things in GTA be categorized as theft? This isn't exactly an accurate comparison. I'm assuming we are talking about Furry Porn vs Beastiality Porn. Actions in GTA remaining a video game and would have no weight in the real world. Furry Porn and Beastiality Porn are both porn. I'm not sure that making animal figures a little bit more human-like suddenly makes Furry Porn not closely related to Beastiality Porn. Why does porn have more weight in the real world than a video game? Assuming the beastiality porn doesn't have an actual animal in it Because the actions in a video game remain in a video game. Theft in a video game does not equate to theft in person. Porn is porn in both virtual realities and in person. Uh, no. Porn isn't porn in virtual reality. It's sex. Porn is a visual representation of sex and a violent video game is a visual and interactive representation of violence. So there's actually more connection with a violent video game with violence than porn is with sex. <cite>FreedomEtrtment posted [p:887396685] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote><cite>DesuDeku posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote>(despite him being a loli lover who would definitely object to being called a pedophile lol)</quote> Who are you calling a loli lover exactly? Just wanna make sure.</quote> Mist <cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FreedomEtrtment posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nightmare_Luna posted...</cite> <quote>Should stealing things in GTA be categorized as theft?</quote> This isn't exactly an accurate comparison. I'm assuming we are talking about Furry Porn vs Beastiality Porn. Actions in GTA remaining a video game and would have no weight in the real world. Furry Porn and Beastiality Porn are both porn. I'm not sure that making animal figures a little bit more human-like suddenly makes Furry Porn not closely related to Beastiality Porn.</quote> Why does porn have more weight in the real world than a video game? Assuming the beastiality porn doesn't have an actual animal in it</quote> Because the actions in a video game remain in a video game. Theft in a video game does not equate to theft in person. Porn is porn in both virtual realities and in person.</quote> Uh, no. Porn isn't porn in virtual reality. It's sex. Porn is a visual representation of sex and a violent video game is a visual and interactive representation of violence. So there's actually more connection with a violent video game with violence than porn is with sex.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mist_Turnips 09/27/17 4:57:20 PM #44:	What? I'm just wondering what back story im apparently missing in the topic, ClopsMcgee. --- "They say if you don't hide your belly button, lightning could take it away from you! What would happen if it did?" http://i.imgur.com/G74y2NJ.png <cite>Mist_Turnips posted [p:887402916] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>What? I'm just wondering what back story im apparently missing in the topic, ClopsMcgee.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DesuDeku 09/28/17 11:19:40 PM #45:	bump. --- https://i.imgur.com/QqE3IAr.jpg Samus Returns <cite>DesuDeku posted [p:887485370] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>bump.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HashtagTartarus 09/30/17 6:59:49 PM #46:	Bomp --- https://puu.sh/tsvPi/2281d37d96.png https://puu.sh/vbW49/579c34013a.png <cite>HashtagTartarus posted [p:887573281] in Should Fur... [t:75811390]...</cite> <quote>Bomp</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Should Furry smut be categorized as bestiality? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Should Furry smut be categorized as bestiality?