Current Events > White House officials have been using private emails.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
iPhone_7 09/24/17 8:21:18 PM #1:	http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/24/jared-kushner-private-email-white-house-243071 Unknown whether they shared classified information, perhaps an investigation is needed and all the emails turned over to investigators. --- Sig User Logic http://i.imgur.com/lA5fm7w.jpg <cite>iPhone_7 posted [p:887224297] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/24/jared-kushner-private-email-white-house-243071 Unknown whether they shared classified information, perhaps an investigation is needed and all the emails turned over to investigators.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 09/24/17 8:45:33 PM #2:	iPhone_7 posted... http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/24/jared-kushner-private-email-white-house-243071 Unknown whether they shared classified information, perhaps an investigation is needed and all the emails turned over to investigators. As Hillary Clinton said, why does it matter? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:887225860] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>iPhone_7 posted...</cite> <quote>http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/24/jared-kushner-private-email-white-house-243071 Unknown whether they shared classified information, perhaps an investigation is needed and all the emails turned over to investigators.</quote> As Hillary Clinton said, why does it matter?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bio1590 09/24/17 8:46:03 PM #3:	darkjedilink posted... iPhone_7 posted... http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/24/jared-kushner-private-email-white-house-243071 Unknown whether they shared classified information, perhaps an investigation is needed and all the emails turned over to investigators. As Hillary Clinton said, why does it matter? B-B-B-But Hillary! --- http://i.imgur.com/bbRWLI8.gif https://i.imgur.com/A0BErSV.jpg <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:887225886] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>iPhone_7 posted...</cite> <quote>http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/24/jared-kushner-private-email-white-house-243071 Unknown whether they shared classified information, perhaps an investigation is needed and all the emails turned over to investigators.</quote> As Hillary Clinton said, why does it matter?</quote> B-B-B-But Hillary!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
John_Galt 09/24/17 8:47:17 PM #4:	Like Bernie said, nobody cares about the damn emails --- Who is John Galt? <cite>John_Galt posted [p:887225969] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>Like Bernie said, nobody cares about the damn emails</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BLAKUboy 09/24/17 8:52:22 PM #5:	As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for. --- Aeris dies if she takes more damage than her current HP - Panthera http://signavatar.com/26999_s.png <cite>BLAKUboy posted [p:887226331] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 09/24/17 8:53:01 PM #6:	Lock them up! --- Posted with GameRaven 3.2.2 <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:887226370] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>Lock them up!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AlternativeFAQS 09/24/17 8:53:34 PM #7:	buttery males <cite>AlternativeFAQS posted [p:887226400] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>buttery males</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mustachedmystic 09/24/17 8:58:25 PM #8:	darkjedilink posted... iPhone_7 posted... http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/24/jared-kushner-private-email-white-house-243071 Unknown whether they shared classified information, perhaps an investigation is needed and all the emails turned over to investigators. As Hillary Clinton said, why does it matter? It probably doesn't, although it is another example of Trump/Republicans being hypocritical ass hats who aren't any better than those they criticize. --- Guns; freedom you can hold in your hand. Sampson, Terrordactyl <cite>mustachedmystic posted [p:887226666] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>iPhone_7 posted...</cite> <quote>http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/24/jared-kushner-private-email-white-house-243071 Unknown whether they shared classified information, perhaps an investigation is needed and all the emails turned over to investigators.</quote> As Hillary Clinton said, why does it matter?</quote> It probably doesn't, although it is another example of Trump/Republicans being hypocritical ass hats who aren't any better than those they criticize.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 09/24/17 9:01:33 PM #9:	BLAKUboy posted... As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:887226849] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote>As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
the_rowan 09/24/17 9:02:21 PM #10:	Using a private server for state email is not illegal in any way whatsoever. It's specifically the transmission of classified information over non-official channels that Hillary was suspected of which would have been criminal. --- "That is why war is so tragic. To win means to make victims of your opponents and give birth to hatred." - Kratos Aurion, Tales of Symphonia <cite>the_rowan posted [p:887226899] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>Using a private server for state email is not illegal in any way whatsoever. It's specifically the transmission of classified information over non-official channels that Hillary was suspected of which would have been criminal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
StucklnMyPants 09/24/17 9:06:22 PM #11:	Wipe it? Like with a cloth? --- Rage, rage against the dying of the light. <cite>StucklnMyPants posted [p:887227152] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>Wipe it? Like with a cloth?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 09/24/17 9:08:08 PM #12:	What do we know about the emails? Were they marked with the "[C]" symbol to convey classified information, like the emails Hillary destroyed? Are the emails personal in nature? Context is important. If they're actually sending classified information, then yeah that's a massive issue. If they're talking about personal and private issues, then I don't see the problem. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:887227260] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>What do we know about the emails? Were they marked with the "[C]" symbol to convey classified information, like the emails Hillary destroyed? Are the emails personal in nature? Context is important. If they're actually sending classified information, then yeah that's a massive issue. If they're talking about personal and private issues, then I don't see the problem.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
0AbsoluteZero0 09/24/17 9:08:28 PM #13:	Kineth posted... BLAKUboy posted... As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for. This. Conservative hypocrisy at its finest --- -The Admirable <cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted [p:887227277] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote>As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for.</quote></quote> This. Conservative hypocrisy at its finest</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 09/24/17 9:11:07 PM #14:	0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Kineth posted... BLAKUboy posted... As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for. This. Conservative hypocrisy at its finest If that's the finest example of conservative hypocrisy it only speaks of the infallible nature of conservatism. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:887227455] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote>As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for.</quote></quote> This. Conservative hypocrisy at its finest</quote> If that's the finest example of conservative hypocrisy it only speaks of the infallible nature of conservatism.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CarlGrimes 09/24/17 9:14:45 PM #15:	BLAKUboy posted... As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for. You mean like the left that suddenly cares now but didn't when their people did it? They set the precedent. --- You'll get a funeral if you don't wise up and call me....Carl Poppa. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9aM9Ch97U8 <cite>CarlGrimes posted [p:887227676] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote>As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for.</quote> You mean like the left that suddenly cares now but didn't when their people did it? They set the precedent.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mistere Man 09/24/17 9:16:08 PM #16:	0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Kineth posted... BLAKUboy posted... As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for. This. Conservative hypocrisy at its finest There is no indication that Kushner has shared any sensitive or classified material on his private account, or that he relies on his private email account more than his official White House account to conduct government business. Aides say he prefers to call or text over using email. --- Water+Fall=Radiation. <cite>Mistere Man posted [p:887227779] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote>As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for.</quote></quote> This. Conservative hypocrisy at its finest</quote> There is no indication that Kushner has shared any sensitive or classified material on his private account, or that he relies on his private email account more than his official White House account to conduct government business. Aides say he prefers to call or text over using email.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BLAKUboy 09/24/17 9:17:15 PM #17:	CarlGrimes posted... You mean like the left that suddenly cares now but didn't when their people did it? Funny, because all I see is people bringing up conservative hypocrisy. And of course conservatives being hypocrites. No one cares about the emails. --- Aeris dies if she takes more damage than her current HP - Panthera http://signavatar.com/26999_s.png <cite>BLAKUboy posted [p:887227852] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>CarlGrimes posted...</cite> <quote>You mean like the left that suddenly cares now but didn't when their people did it?</quote> Funny, because all I see is people bringing up conservative hypocrisy. And of course conservatives being hypocrites. No one cares about the emails.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 09/24/17 9:18:18 PM #18:	CarlGrimes posted... BLAKUboy posted... As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for. You mean like the left that suddenly cares now but didn't when their people did it? They set the precedent. To be fair, there's not really a precedent until a judge higher than a trial judge makes a ruling. Comey and Lynch being a corrupt lackeys doesn't really carry water in legal precedents. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:887227915] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>CarlGrimes posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote>As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for.</quote> You mean like the left that suddenly cares now but didn't when their people did it? They set the precedent.</quote> To be fair, there's not really a precedent until a judge higher than a trial judge makes a ruling. Comey and Lynch being a corrupt lackeys doesn't really carry water in legal precedents.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 09/24/17 10:00:50 PM #19:	Nomadic View posted... 0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Kineth posted... BLAKUboy posted... As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for. This. Conservative hypocrisy at its finest If that's the finest example of conservative hypocrisy it only speaks of the infallible nature of conservatism. Surely you aren't suggesting that there's nothing hypocritical about this. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:887230962] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote>As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for.</quote></quote> This. Conservative hypocrisy at its finest</quote> If that's the finest example of conservative hypocrisy it only speaks of the infallible nature of conservatism.</quote> Surely you aren't suggesting that there's nothing hypocritical about this.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 09/24/17 10:03:45 PM #20:	Kineth posted... Nomadic View posted... 0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Kineth posted... BLAKUboy posted... As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for. This. Conservative hypocrisy at its finest If that's the finest example of conservative hypocrisy it only speaks of the infallible nature of conservatism. Surely you aren't suggesting that there's nothing hypocritical about this. At the moment, no, there isn't. That can change as facts emerge. Simply having a gmail doesn't mean they're sending confidential information or sensitive government information. That is the major and key difference between this and the Hillary email scandal. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:887231177] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote>As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for.</quote></quote> This. Conservative hypocrisy at its finest</quote> If that's the finest example of conservative hypocrisy it only speaks of the infallible nature of conservatism.</quote> Surely you aren't suggesting that there's nothing hypocritical about this.</quote> At the moment, no, there isn't. That can change as facts emerge. Simply having a gmail doesn't mean they're sending confidential information or sensitive government information. That is the major and key difference between this and the Hillary email scandal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hollow_shrine 09/24/17 10:08:43 PM #21:	Over sixty-percent of the 2015-2016 presidential campaign news coverage was devoted to emails, private servers, and Hillary Clinton's usage of them. From those priorities alone we can assume the continued use of private email servers by white house officials, some of whom actually are under investigation for potential criminal dealings with foreign powers and obstruction of justice, is deserving of every bit as much attention and bombast. You don't want to undersell this. You'll be hearing about this for the next seventeen months. --- https://i.imgtc.com/zyQ3oRW.jpg 15 Transwomen of color have been murdered since 1/1/2017 <cite>hollow_shrine posted [p:887231519] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>Over sixty-percent of the 2015-2016 presidential campaign news coverage was devoted to emails, private servers, and Hillary Clinton's usage of them. From those priorities alone we can assume the continued use of private email servers by white house officials, some of whom actually are under investigation for potential criminal dealings with foreign powers and obstruction of justice, is deserving of every bit as much attention and bombast. You don't want to undersell this. You'll be hearing about this for the next seventeen months.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 09/24/17 10:10:16 PM #22:	Nomadic View posted... At the moment, no, there isn't. That can change as facts emerge. Simply having a gmail doesn't mean they're sending confidential information or sensitive government information. That is the major and key difference between this and the Hillary email scandal. The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, especially if we're to go by the 50,000 hearings over Clinton's emails. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:887231609] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>At the moment, no, there isn't. That can change as facts emerge. Simply having a gmail doesn't mean they're sending confidential information or sensitive government information. That is the major and key difference between this and the Hillary email scandal.</quote> The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, especially if we're to go by the 50,000 hearings over Clinton's emails.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smashingpmkns 09/24/17 10:10:41 PM #23:	Republicans being hypocrites is nothing new. They'll just deflect more and pretend like they're right. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.2.2 <cite>Smashingpmkns posted [p:887231637] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>Republicans being hypocrites is nothing new. They'll just deflect more and pretend like they're right.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 09/24/17 10:12:19 PM #24:	Kineth posted... Nomadic View posted... At the moment, no, there isn't. That can change as facts emerge. Simply having a gmail doesn't mean they're sending confidential information or sensitive government information. That is the major and key difference between this and the Hillary email scandal. The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, especially if we're to go by the 50,000 hearings over Clinton's emails. Sure. I agree with you. But right now there is no evidence. The presumption is innocence. It's the state's burden to bring evidence. Right now there is none. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:887231766] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>At the moment, no, there isn't. That can change as facts emerge. Simply having a gmail doesn't mean they're sending confidential information or sensitive government information. That is the major and key difference between this and the Hillary email scandal.</quote> The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, especially if we're to go by the 50,000 hearings over Clinton's emails.</quote> Sure. I agree with you. But right now there is no evidence. The presumption is innocence. It's the state's burden to bring evidence. Right now there is none.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 09/24/17 10:12:43 PM #25:	Nomadic View posted... Were they marked with the "[C]" symbol to convey classified information, like the emails Hillary destroyed? How do you know what they said if they were destroyed? --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:887231800] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Were they marked with the "[C]" symbol to convey classified information, like the emails Hillary destroyed?</quote> How do you know what they said if they were destroyed?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hollow_shrine 09/24/17 10:13:17 PM #26:	Hmm. Condi Rice didn't disclose any of her state department's emails from her tenure as secretary of state. Does anyone think there could be a story here? --- https://i.imgtc.com/zyQ3oRW.jpg 15 Transwomen of color have been murdered since 1/1/2017 <cite>hollow_shrine posted [p:887231852] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>Hmm. Condi Rice didn't disclose any of her state department's emails from her tenure as secretary of state. Does anyone think there could be a story here?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 09/24/17 10:13:40 PM #27:	Anteaterking posted... Nomadic View posted... Were they marked with the "[C]" symbol to convey classified information, like the emails Hillary destroyed? How do you know what they said if they were destroyed? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIh-CadZweI --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:887231888] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anteaterking posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Were they marked with the "[C]" symbol to convey classified information, like the emails Hillary destroyed?</quote> How do you know what they said if they were destroyed?</quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIh-CadZweI</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 09/24/17 10:16:24 PM #28:	Nomadic View posted... Sure. I agree with you. But right now there is no evidence. The presumption is innocence. It's the state's burden to bring evidence. Right now there is none. This would appear to be selective application of the law and you're not even being discreet about your bias. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:887232116] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Sure. I agree with you. But right now there is no evidence. The presumption is innocence. It's the state's burden to bring evidence. Right now there is none.</quote> This would appear to be selective application of the law and you're not even being discreet about your bias.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 09/24/17 10:16:45 PM #29:	Nomadic View posted... Anteaterking posted... Nomadic View posted... Were they marked with the "[C]" symbol to convey classified information, like the emails Hillary destroyed? How do you know what they said if they were destroyed? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIh-CadZweI I can't watch a 15 minute video. --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:887232146] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anteaterking posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Were they marked with the "[C]" symbol to convey classified information, like the emails Hillary destroyed?</quote> How do you know what they said if they were destroyed?</quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIh-CadZweI</quote> I can't watch a 15 minute video.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 09/24/17 10:20:07 PM #30:	Kineth posted... Nomadic View posted... Sure. I agree with you. But right now there is no evidence. The presumption is innocence. It's the state's burden to bring evidence. Right now there is none. This would appear to be selective application of the law and you're not even being discreet about your bias. Selective application? The fuck do you possibly understand about law? --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:887232404] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Sure. I agree with you. But right now there is no evidence. The presumption is innocence. It's the state's burden to bring evidence. Right now there is none.</quote> This would appear to be selective application of the law and you're not even being discreet about your bias.</quote> Selective application? The fuck do you possibly understand about law?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hollow_shrine 09/24/17 10:22:10 PM #31:	Anteaterking posted... Nomadic View posted... Were they marked with the "[C]" symbol to convey classified information, like the emails Hillary destroyed? How do you know what they said if they were destroyed? It's even more complicated. As those emails were being reviewed, different intelligence agencies had differing opinions on what should or shouldn't be classified based on how they got the information. If you were a more secretive intel agency, any information you received from a sensitive and protected source would be classified to protect the identity of the informant. If another less secretive agency were to independently acquire the same information in the course of an investigation that didn't potentially compromise an asset, they would rightfully leave them unclassified. In the case of Clinton's emails, the emails being contained information that had the feuding intelligence agencies retroactively classifying or declassifying documents because they disagreed with how the other agency was handling their information. TLDR: Some of those items were well-circulated well before the investigation got their content reviewed and some of these agencies decided they should be privileged information. This apparently comes up a lot anytime a former intelligence agent or high-level state official writes a memoir and wants to include a memo or letter. There have been attempts (or just gut reactions, really) to reclassify letters and memos years after they'd already been published to the general public. There are serious communication issues here. Thing is, that's kind of by design. --- https://i.imgtc.com/zyQ3oRW.jpg 15 Transwomen of color have been murdered since 1/1/2017 <cite>hollow_shrine posted [p:887232574] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anteaterking posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Were they marked with the "[C]" symbol to convey classified information, like the emails Hillary destroyed?</quote> How do you know what they said if they were destroyed?</quote> It's even more complicated. As those emails were being reviewed, different intelligence agencies had differing opinions on what should or shouldn't be classified based on how they got the information. If you were a more secretive intel agency, any information you received from a sensitive and protected source would be classified to protect the identity of the informant. If another less secretive agency were to independently acquire the same information in the course of an investigation that didn't potentially compromise an asset, they would rightfully leave them unclassified. In the case of Clinton's emails, the emails being contained information that had the feuding intelligence agencies retroactively classifying or declassifying documents because they disagreed with how the other agency was handling their information. TLDR: Some of those items were well-circulated well before the investigation got their content reviewed and some of these agencies decided they should be privileged information. This apparently comes up a lot anytime a former intelligence agent or high-level state official writes a memoir and wants to include a memo or letter. There have been attempts (or just gut reactions, really) to reclassify letters and memos years after they'd already been published to the general public. There are serious communication issues here. Thing is, that's kind of by design.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 09/24/17 10:24:08 PM #32:	Nomadic View posted... Kineth posted... Nomadic View posted... Sure. I agree with you. But right now there is no evidence. The presumption is innocence. It's the state's burden to bring evidence. Right now there is none. This would appear to be selective application of the law and you're not even being discreet about your bias. Selective application? The fuck do you possibly understand about law? Well I'm applying to law school for one thing and my great great grandfather was the first black US Marshall west of the Mississippi and my grandfather was the warden of the biggest prison in Wisconsin for 2 decades. But yeah, what do I know about law. Fuck you dude. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:887232737] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Sure. I agree with you. But right now there is no evidence. The presumption is innocence. It's the state's burden to bring evidence. Right now there is none.</quote> This would appear to be selective application of the law and you're not even being discreet about your bias.</quote> Selective application? The fuck do you possibly understand about law?</quote> Well I'm applying to law school for one thing and my great great grandfather was the first black US Marshall west of the Mississippi and my grandfather was the warden of the biggest prison in Wisconsin for 2 decades. But yeah, what do I know about law. Fuck you dude.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 09/24/17 10:27:17 PM #33:	Awesome accomplishments for your relatives. The fuck do you know about law? grats on applying to law school though! --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:887233024] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>Awesome accomplishments for your relatives. The fuck do you know about law? grats on applying to law school though!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 09/24/17 10:28:55 PM #34:	hollow_shrine posted... Anteaterking posted... Nomadic View posted... Were they marked with the "[C]" symbol to convey classified information, like the emails Hillary destroyed? How do you know what they said if they were destroyed? It's even more complicated. As those emails were being reviewed, different intelligence agencies had differing opinions on what should or shouldn't be classified based on how they got the information. If you were a more secretive intel agency, any information you received from a sensitive and protected source would be classified to protect the identity of the informant. If another less secretive agency were to independently acquire the same information in the course of an investigation that didn't potentially compromise an asset, they would rightfully leave them unclassified. In the case of Clinton's emails, the emails being contained information that had the feuding intelligence agencies retroactively classifying or declassifying documents because they disagreed with how the other agency was handling their information. TLDR: Some of those items were well-circulated well before the investigation got their content reviewed and some of these agencies decided they should be privileged information. This apparently comes up a lot anytime a former intelligence agent or high-level state official writes a memoir and wants to include a memo or letter. There have been attempts (or just gut reactions, really) to reclassify letters and memos years after they'd already been published to the general public. There are serious communication issues here. Thing is, that's kind of by design. Right, I know that some things are classified in some sources after being published unclassified in others. There's also the fact that some of the emails in question were improperly classified, in that they contained classified information but didn't properly add the classification banners at the top and bottom of the email. --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:887233152] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>hollow_shrine posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anteaterking posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Were they marked with the "[C]" symbol to convey classified information, like the emails Hillary destroyed?</quote> How do you know what they said if they were destroyed?</quote> It's even more complicated. As those emails were being reviewed, different intelligence agencies had differing opinions on what should or shouldn't be classified based on how they got the information. If you were a more secretive intel agency, any information you received from a sensitive and protected source would be classified to protect the identity of the informant. If another less secretive agency were to independently acquire the same information in the course of an investigation that didn't potentially compromise an asset, they would rightfully leave them unclassified. In the case of Clinton's emails, the emails being contained information that had the feuding intelligence agencies retroactively classifying or declassifying documents because they disagreed with how the other agency was handling their information. TLDR: Some of those items were well-circulated well before the investigation got their content reviewed and some of these agencies decided they should be privileged information. This apparently comes up a lot anytime a former intelligence agent or high-level state official writes a memoir and wants to include a memo or letter. There have been attempts (or just gut reactions, really) to reclassify letters and memos years after they'd already been published to the general public. There are serious communication issues here. Thing is, that's kind of by design.</quote> Right, I know that some things are classified in some sources after being published unclassified in others. There's also the fact that some of the emails in question were improperly classified, in that they contained classified information but didn't properly add the classification banners at the top and bottom of the email.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OpheliaAdenade 09/24/17 10:29:35 PM #35:	Kineth posted... BLAKUboy posted... As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for. --- http://imgur.com/Q6Qj55q <cite>OpheliaAdenade posted [p:887233186] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote>As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for.</quote></quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
evosthunder 09/24/17 10:31:10 PM #36:	OpheliaAdenade posted... Kineth posted... BLAKUboy posted... As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for. --- Not gaming lately. Focused on amateur art: http://evosthunder.deviantart.com/ <cite>evosthunder posted [p:887233288] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>OpheliaAdenade posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote>As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for.</quote></quote></quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
D-Lo_BrownTown 09/24/17 10:33:49 PM #37:	BLAKUboy posted... As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for. You're all a bunch of damn hypocrites. All the liberals kept acting like it was no big fucking deal back when Hillary did it. --- http://i.imgur.com/DKL8I5X.jpg https://i.imgtc.com/3XrMwRd.jpg https://i.imgtc.com/DJ9SEeJ.jpg <cite>D-Lo_BrownTown posted [p:887233450] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote>As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for.</quote> You're all a bunch of damn hypocrites. All the liberals kept acting like it was no big fucking deal back when Hillary did it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bloodychess 09/24/17 10:33:59 PM #38:	0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Kineth posted... BLAKUboy posted... As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for. This. Conservative hypocrisy at its finest The fact that neither side can admit their hypocrisy is absolutely delicious --- Sweet dreams are made of cheese Who am I to diss a brie? <cite>Bloodychess posted [p:887233463] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote>As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for.</quote></quote> This. Conservative hypocrisy at its finest</quote> The fact that neither side can admit their hypocrisy is absolutely delicious</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 09/24/17 10:44:29 PM #39:	D-Lo_BrownTown posted... BLAKUboy posted... As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for. You're all a bunch of damn hypocrites. All the liberals kept acting like it was no big fucking deal back when Hillary did it. Plenty of liberals said what Hillary did was reckless and dumb. It was still a deal, just not compared to how much coverage it got. And it becomes more of a deal now that there's precedent. --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:887234231] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>D-Lo_BrownTown posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote>As always, conservatives magically don't care when it's their people doing the things they crucify the left for.</quote> You're all a bunch of damn hypocrites. All the liberals kept acting like it was no big fucking deal back when Hillary did it.</quote> Plenty of liberals said what Hillary did was reckless and dumb. It was still a deal, just not compared to how much coverage it got. And it becomes more of a deal now that there's precedent.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 09/24/17 11:09:53 PM #40:	Nomadic View posted... Awesome accomplishments for your relatives. The fuck do you know about law? grats on applying to law school though! I'm sorry, but do you really want me to type out a fucking thesis for you? --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:887235939] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Awesome accomplishments for your relatives. The fuck do you know about law? grats on applying to law school though!</quote> I'm sorry, but do you really want me to type out a fucking thesis for you?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lordsai 09/24/17 11:18:50 PM #41:	Stfu about the damn emails. <cite>Lordsai posted [p:887236479] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>Stfu about the damn emails.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 09/24/17 11:20:43 PM #42:	Kineth posted... Nomadic View posted... Awesome accomplishments for your relatives. The fuck do you know about law? grats on applying to law school though! I'm sorry, but do you really want me to type out a fucking thesis for you? That'd be awesome, but just some personal qualifications that have legal merit would be sufficient. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:887236584] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Awesome accomplishments for your relatives. The fuck do you know about law? grats on applying to law school though!</quote> I'm sorry, but do you really want me to type out a fucking thesis for you?</quote> That'd be awesome, but just some personal qualifications that have legal merit would be sufficient.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 09/24/17 11:24:01 PM #43:	I'm not posting my resume on here and I don't see how a rent-a-cop thinks they're in a position to pretend like they know shit about actual court room procedures. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:887236744] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>I'm not posting my resume on here and I don't see how a rent-a-cop thinks they're in a position to pretend like they know shit about actual court room procedures.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 09/24/17 11:40:45 PM #44:	XD -I have seven years of law enforcement experience -280 hours of in service training -BS degree in Criminal Justice (summa cum laude) -one year of law school (currently a 2L) Yeah, I have some knowledge of "actual court room procedures." Have you taken your LSAT yet? If you haven't started studying yet go here: https://www.velocitylsat.com/ It's awesome. He makes it really interesting. There's a few of his free videos up on youtube so you can check it out and see if that style is right for you. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:887237588] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>XD -I have seven years of law enforcement experience -280 hours of in service training -BS degree in Criminal Justice (summa cum laude) -one year of law school (currently a 2L) Yeah, I have some knowledge of "actual court room procedures." Have you taken your LSAT yet? If you haven't started studying yet go here: https://www.velocitylsat.com/ It's awesome. He makes it really interesting. There's a few of his free videos up on youtube so you can check it out and see if that style is right for you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sativa_Rose 09/24/17 11:43:09 PM #45:	Lol. But does the kid have access to classified info like Hillary did? --- I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister. <cite>Sativa_Rose posted [p:887237697] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>Lol. But does the kid have access to classified info like Hillary did?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 09/24/17 11:57:46 PM #46:	the_rowan posted... Using a private server for state email is not illegal in any way whatsoever. It's specifically the transmission of classified information over non-official channels that Hillary was found to have happened over a hundred times and is illegal. ftfy --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:887238415] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>the_rowan posted...</cite> <quote>Using a private server for state email is not illegal in any way whatsoever. It's specifically the transmission of classified information over non-official channels that Hillary was found to have happened over a hundred times and is illegal.</quote> ftfy</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 09/24/17 11:59:44 PM #47:	Lmao this topic People gotta find better shit to do with their free time --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:887238499] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote>Lmao this topic People gotta find better shit to do with their free time</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 09/26/17 7:52:15 AM #48:	Nomadic View posted... XD -I have seven years of law enforcement experience -280 hours of in service training -BS degree in Criminal Justice (summa cum laude) -one year of law school (currently a 2L) Yeah, I have some knowledge of "actual court room procedures." Have you taken your LSAT yet? If you haven't started studying yet go here: https://www.velocitylsat.com/ It's awesome. He makes it really interesting. There's a few of his free videos up on youtube so you can check it out and see if that style is right for you. Hmm. Well you definitely continue to surprise me. So what was present in Hillary's case that isn't in Trump's case? --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:887312368] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>XD -I have seven years of law enforcement experience -280 hours of in service training -BS degree in Criminal Justice (summa cum laude) -one year of law school (currently a 2L) Yeah, I have some knowledge of "actual court room procedures." Have you taken your LSAT yet? If you haven't started studying yet go here: https://www.velocitylsat.com/ It's awesome. He makes it really interesting. There's a few of his free videos up on youtube so you can check it out and see if that style is right for you.</quote> Hmm. Well you definitely continue to surprise me. So what was present in Hillary's case that isn't in Trump's case?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DifferentialEquation 09/26/17 8:04:02 AM #49:	Kineth posted... Well I'm applying to law school for one thing and my great great grandfather was the first black US Marshall west of the Mississippi and my grandfather was the warden of the biggest prison in Wisconsin for 2 decades. Lol, so you despise and oppose law enforcement... unless they're your relatives, they're of course the very few exceptions, right? I'm sure they're the two good people in all of law enforcement. --- "If the day does not require an AK, it is good." The Great Warrior Poet, Ice Cube <cite>DifferentialEquation posted [p:887312677] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote>Well I'm applying to law school for one thing and my great great grandfather was the first black US Marshall west of the Mississippi and my grandfather was the warden of the biggest prison in Wisconsin for 2 decades.</quote> Lol, so you despise and oppose law enforcement... unless they're your relatives, they're of course the very few exceptions, right? I'm sure they're the two good people in all of law enforcement.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
QassTank 09/26/17 8:12:23 AM #50:	Kineth posted... So what was present in Hillary's case that isn't in Trump's case? I think a key difference is that her emails got deleted when they were requested by the relevant authorities. This suggested that there was wrongdoing, because why would you try to cover it up otherwise? --- John 6:53 Jesus promoting cannibalism. AssultTank at work! Work PC 1 account. <cite>QassTank posted [p:887312892] in White Hous... [t:75810610]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote>So what was present in Hillary's case that isn't in Trump's case?</quote> I think a key difference is that her emails got deleted when they were requested by the relevant authorities. This suggested that there was wrongdoing, because why would you try to cover it up otherwise?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > White House officials have been using private emails. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > White House officials have been using private emails.