Topic List |
Page List:
1 |
---|---|
luigi13579 08/17/17 4:27:26 PM #1: |
Norbert Blum claims that he has proven that P != NP.
https://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/2017/08/15/on-norbert-blums-claimed-proof-that-p-does-not-equal-np/ The proof: https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.03486 stackexchange discussion: https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/38803/is-norbert-blums-2017-proof-that-p-ne-np-correct/ I'm not totally up on what this would mean. From my understanding, there are certain applications of computer science that rely on the assumption that P != NP, such as modern cryptography algorithms. If the opposite were the case (i.e. P = NP), this would potentially allow these algorithms to be cracked (although there may be weaknesses in these algorithms anyway), which would have major implications for cyber security, so we can rest a bit easier in that regard. More widely, I think it would mean that many common problems cannot be solved efficiently, so attention could be directed elsewhere. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Giant_Aspirin 08/17/17 4:29:29 PM #2: |
i graduated with a degree in CS&E and i have no idea wtf those guys are talking about in that discussion
--- Now Playing: Nier: Automata (PC) (~);} - Get out the pans, don't just stand there dreamin' - {;(~) ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
luigi13579 08/17/17 4:36:58 PM #3: |
Giant_Aspirin posted...
i graduated with a degree in CS&E and i have no idea wtf those guys are talking about in that discussion I get some parts, but there's no way I could follow the whole thing through step by step. Like, the boolean algebra isn't too bad. I'm a bit rusty though, so I'd need to brush up on it. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Topic List |
Page List:
1 |