Current Events > President Trump is now directly implicated in trying to cover up the Russia

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Malcolm_Caradoc 08/01/17 6:49:54 PM #52:	kenio8187 posted... Does anyone really think that idiot could hide a Russian collusion? Look, Russia VERY likely interfered. So did Britain, and China, and any other big super power. They probably interfere all the time in each others affairs. But I do also highly doubt Trump was in collusion with Russia for it. Pretty sure it's just something Russia did on its own. What the HELL are you talking about --- M. <cite>Malcolm_Caradoc posted [p:884010695] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>kenio8187 posted...</cite> <quote>Does anyone really think that idiot could hide a Russian collusion? Look, Russia VERY likely interfered. So did Britain, and China, and any other big super power. They probably interfere all the time in each others affairs. But I do also highly doubt Trump was in collusion with Russia for it. Pretty sure it's just something Russia did on its own.</quote> What the HELL are you talking about</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NadYobWoc 08/01/17 6:50:13 PM #53:	kenio8187 posted... Does anyone really think that idiot could hide a Russian collusion? Look, Russia VERY likely interfered. So did Britain, and China, and any other big super power. They probably interfere all the time in each others affairs. But I do also highly doubt Trump was in collusion with Russia for it. Pretty sure it's just something Russia did on its own. Then you arent paying attention, at all. --- Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene <cite>NadYobWoc posted [p:884010713] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>kenio8187 posted...</cite> <quote>Does anyone really think that idiot could hide a Russian collusion? Look, Russia VERY likely interfered. So did Britain, and China, and any other big super power. They probably interfere all the time in each others affairs. But I do also highly doubt Trump was in collusion with Russia for it. Pretty sure it's just something Russia did on its own.</quote> Then you arent paying attention, at all.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 08/01/17 6:50:35 PM #54:	OpheliaAdenade posted... s0nicfan posted... So they admit trump helped his son craft his response to the meeting. That's bad. That still didn't mean he was colluding with the Russian government during the election. Unless the "Russia scandal" is now anything with the word Russia in it. How much smoke does there have to be before you'll notice there is a fire here? It's been almost 8 months of "ha we got him!" followed by nothing. How many times does the boy have to cry wolf before you notice there's nothing there? --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:884010734] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>OpheliaAdenade posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote>So they admit trump helped his son craft his response to the meeting. That's bad. That still didn't mean he was colluding with the Russian government during the election. Unless the "Russia scandal" is now anything with the word Russia in it. </quote> How much smoke does there have to be before you'll notice there is a fire here?</quote> It's been almost 8 months of "ha we got him!" followed by nothing. How many times does the boy have to cry wolf before you notice there's nothing there?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NadYobWoc 08/01/17 6:50:52 PM #55:	Sephiroth1288 posted... Doom_Art posted... Sephiroth1288 posted... Find us some smoke first, not meaningless crap like this. This is lookin pretty smoky already. The fact that you think it's meaningless does not make it so. Telling your kid how to handle the press is not smoke. Holy shit, if you people cared this much about possible coverups then Hillary would be in jail 10 years ago The world must look so simple when you ignore all context. --- Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene <cite>NadYobWoc posted [p:884010753] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote>Find us some smoke first, not meaningless crap like this. </quote> This is lookin pretty smoky already. The fact that you think it's meaningless does not make it so.</quote> Telling your kid how to handle the press is not smoke. Holy shit, if you people cared this much about possible coverups then Hillary would be in jail 10 years ago</quote> The world must look so simple when you ignore all context.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 08/01/17 6:51:13 PM #56:	s0nicfan posted... Anteaterking posted... s0nicfan posted... Anteaterking posted... s0nicfan posted... Doom_Art posted... @s0nicfan posted... and this time, this time, he's totally going to get indicted. The other hundred times were just practice. i mean it's foolish of us to call anything at this early stage but "he did something illegal but he can probably get away with it" is a rather bad defense. The defense is "the boy has cried wolf too many times". We've done this song and dance over and over and over in the last 6 months and I have no faith that what the WaPo is reporting on is any more legit than every OTHER time they claimed he was definitively linked to Russia. The White House confirmed the contents of the story. Not according to that article. Have they released a statement since? http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/sanders-trump-worked-on-son-statement-russia-lawyer So they admit trump helped his son craft his response to the meeting. That's bad. That still didn't mean he was colluding with the Russian government during the election. Unless the "Russia scandal" is now anything with the word Russia in it. The article in the original post doesn't claim that Trump himself colluded with the Russian government during the election. And everything around the Trump campaign's interactions with Russians is the "Russia scandal", even if at no point there is enough evidence to tie Trump specifically to the Kremlin. --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:884010776] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anteaterking posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anteaterking posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote>and this time, this time, he's totally going to get indicted. The other hundred times were just practice.</quote> i mean it's foolish of us to call anything at this early stage but "he did something illegal but he can probably get away with it" is a rather bad defense.</quote> The defense is "the boy has cried wolf too many times". We've done this song and dance over and over and over in the last 6 months and I have no faith that what the WaPo is reporting on is any more legit than every OTHER time they claimed he was definitively linked to Russia.</quote> The White House confirmed the contents of the story.</quote> Not according to that article. Have they released a statement since?</quote> http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/sanders-trump-worked-on-son-statement-russia-lawyer</quote> So they admit trump helped his son craft his response to the meeting. That's bad. That still didn't mean he was colluding with the Russian government during the election. Unless the "Russia scandal" is now anything with the word Russia in it.</quote> The article in the original post doesn't claim that Trump himself colluded with the Russian government during the election. And everything around the Trump campaign's interactions with Russians is the "Russia scandal", even if at no point there is enough evidence to tie Trump specifically to the Kremlin.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 08/01/17 6:51:18 PM #57:	kenio8187 posted... So did Britain, and China You're "whatabout-ing" right now kenio8187 posted... But I do also highly doubt Trump was in collusion with Russia for it. Pretty sure it's just something Russia did on its own. i mean that doesn't explain the weird links to his campaign or the bizarre pro-russia policy changes after Trump got the nomination --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 http://i.imgur.com/mPvcy.png <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:884010779] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>kenio8187 posted...</cite> <quote>So did Britain, and China</quote> You're "whatabout-ing" right now <cite>kenio8187 posted...</cite> <quote>But I do also highly doubt Trump was in collusion with Russia for it. Pretty sure it's just something Russia did on its own. </quote> i mean that doesn't explain the weird links to his campaign or the bizarre pro-russia policy changes after Trump got the nomination</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 08/01/17 6:51:53 PM #58:	Sephiroth1288 posted... Holy shit, if you people cared this much about possible coverups then Hillary would be in jail 10 years ago literally but hillary --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 http://i.imgur.com/mPvcy.png <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:884010806] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote>Holy shit, if you people cared this much about possible coverups then Hillary would be in jail 10 years ago </quote> literally but hillary</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vindris_SNH 08/01/17 6:52:47 PM #59:	UnholyMudcrab posted... Vindris_SNH posted... Still waiting for actual evidence. And we're still waiting for you guys to figure out how investigations work. Probably gonna be a long wait. Still waiting. --- glitteringfairy: Just build the damn wall ThyCorndog: and how exactly will that stop the mexican space program from orbital dropping illegal immigrants? <cite>Vindris_SNH posted [p:884010853] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnholyMudcrab posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vindris_SNH posted...</cite> <quote>Still waiting for actual evidence.</quote> And we're still waiting for you guys to figure out how investigations work. Probably gonna be a long wait.</quote> Still waiting.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Malcolm_Caradoc 08/01/17 6:53:38 PM #60:	Yo I dont know what you redhats are smoking it's pretty obvious trump and putin were on the same page and junior's email even confirmed it. Lol. Remember when Trump straight up ASKED Russia to release hilldog's missing emails?? --- M. <cite>Malcolm_Caradoc posted [p:884010898] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote>Yo I dont know what you redhats are smoking it's pretty obvious trump and putin were on the same page and junior's email even confirmed it. Lol. Remember when Trump straight up ASKED Russia to release hilldog's missing emails??</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#61	Post #61 was unavailable or deleted.
Malcolm_Caradoc 08/01/17 6:55:38 PM #62:	Did you guys read Bill Browder's testimony on russia th other day? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/534864/ --- M. <cite>Malcolm_Caradoc posted [p:884011008] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote>Did you guys read Bill Browder's testimony on russia th other day? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/534864/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sephiroth1288 08/01/17 6:56:42 PM #63:	NadYobWoc posted... The world must look so simple when you ignore all context. Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC? --- The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience. Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248 <cite>Sephiroth1288 posted [p:884011069] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote>The world must look so simple when you ignore all context.</quote> Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Monday 08/01/17 6:57:34 PM #64:	here's how bernie can still win: --- http://i.imgur.com/xufaPCs.gif https://i.imgtc.com/iz1Ql9V.jpg https://i.imgtc.com/HJrfmRk.jpg http://i.imgur.com/KRQrSDs.jpg <cite>Monday posted [p:884011122] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote>here's how bernie can still win:</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VectorChaos 08/01/17 6:57:46 PM #65:	The literal day before he leaves office at the end of his presidency, they'll still be putting out articles saying "guys it's really really really really really really really really really happening this time for sure we got him! Can we impeach in less than 24 hours?!" --- PSN VectorChaos http://i.imgur.com/ftMERkZ.jpg XBL Vector Chaos http://i.imgur.com/10hWZ95.png http://i.imgur.com/MZMOLx0.jpg http://i.imgur.com/R2jRl8F.jpg <cite>VectorChaos posted [p:884011131] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote>The literal day before he leaves office at the end of his presidency, they'll still be putting out articles saying "guys it's really really really really really really really really really happening this time for sure we got him! Can we impeach in less than 24 hours?!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
daftpunk_mk5 08/01/17 6:58:30 PM #66:	Swagnificent119 posted... Washington post leaves topic --- Some say that his voice can only be heard by cats, and that he has two sets of knees... all we know is, he's called the Stig. <cite>daftpunk_mk5 posted [p:884011163] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>Swagnificent119 posted...</cite> <quote>Washington post leaves topic</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NadYobWoc 08/01/17 6:58:31 PM #67:	Sephiroth1288 posted... NadYobWoc posted... The world must look so simple when you ignore all context. Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC? Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful. --- Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene <cite>NadYobWoc posted [p:884011164] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote>The world must look so simple when you ignore all context.</quote> Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC?</quote> Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Malcolm_Caradoc 08/01/17 6:59:32 PM #68:	kenio8187 posted... Doom_Art posted... You're "whatabout-ing" right now I'm not whatabout-ing. That would imply that I'm trying to bring attention to them too. What I'm saying is that Russia interfering is just to be expected. Our world is so interconnected nowadays, that it should just be assumed all great powers are always interfering at all times. No sorry Russia's interference was on a different plane than anything seen before and they're doing it in other countries too like in France with that Macron hack they posted on 4chan. Youre not some anti-globalist shill who trying to equivocate for the sake of some anti Europe agenda are you? --- M. <cite>Malcolm_Caradoc posted [p:884011221] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>kenio8187 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>You're "whatabout-ing" right now</quote> I'm not whatabout-ing. That would imply that I'm trying to bring attention to them too. What I'm saying is that Russia interfering is just to be expected. Our world is so interconnected nowadays, that it should just be assumed all great powers are always interfering at all times.</quote> No sorry Russia's interference was on a different plane than anything seen before and they're doing it in other countries too like in France with that Macron hack they posted on 4chan. Youre not some anti-globalist shill who trying to equivocate for the sake of some anti Europe agenda are you?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sephiroth1288 08/01/17 6:59:39 PM #69:	NadYobWoc posted... Sephiroth1288 posted... NadYobWoc posted... The world must look so simple when you ignore all context. Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC? Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful. Delusion? Ok, please present the evidence that Trump colluded with Russia to mess with our election. If you can't, I'm afraid you're the deluded one, champ. --- The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience. Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248 <cite>Sephiroth1288 posted [p:884011227] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote>The world must look so simple when you ignore all context.</quote> Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC?</quote> Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful.</quote> Delusion? Ok, please present the evidence that Trump colluded with Russia to mess with our election. If you can't, I'm afraid you're the deluded one, champ.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Malcolm_Caradoc 08/01/17 7:01:49 PM #70:	Sephiroth1288 posted... NadYobWoc posted... The world must look so simple when you ignore all context. Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC? LOL you dont give up. Your man Trump is working hand in glove with Fox News to advance bullshit seth rich conspiracies and you retreat to wapo asking dnc for comment on a story. --- M. <cite>Malcolm_Caradoc posted [p:884011344] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote>The world must look so simple when you ignore all context.</quote> Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC?</quote> LOL you dont give up. Your man Trump is working hand in glove with Fox News to advance bullshit seth rich conspiracies and you retreat to wapo asking dnc for comment on a story.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Malcolm_Caradoc 08/01/17 7:03:46 PM #71:	Sephiroth1288 posted... NadYobWoc posted... Sephiroth1288 posted... NadYobWoc posted... The world must look so simple when you ignore all context. Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC? Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful. Delusion? Ok, please present the evidence that Trump colluded with Russia to mess with our election. If you can't, I'm afraid you're the deluded one, champ. This topic is the latest in a running tally of evidence --- M. <cite>Malcolm_Caradoc posted [p:884011452] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote>The world must look so simple when you ignore all context.</quote> Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC?</quote> Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful.</quote> Delusion? Ok, please present the evidence that Trump colluded with Russia to mess with our election. If you can't, I'm afraid you're the deluded one, champ.</quote> This topic is the latest in a running tally of evidence</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NadYobWoc 08/01/17 7:09:27 PM #72:	Sephiroth1288 posted... NadYobWoc posted... Sephiroth1288 posted... NadYobWoc posted... The world must look so simple when you ignore all context. Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC? Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful. Delusion? Ok, please present the evidence that Trump colluded with Russia to mess with our election. If you can't, I'm afraid you're the deluded one, champ. A literal no you won't change anything. I hope youre able to handle whats coming, for your sake. --- Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene <cite>NadYobWoc posted [p:884011762] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote>The world must look so simple when you ignore all context.</quote> Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC?</quote> Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful.</quote> Delusion? Ok, please present the evidence that Trump colluded with Russia to mess with our election. If you can't, I'm afraid you're the deluded one, champ.</quote> A literal no you won't change anything. I hope youre able to handle whats coming, for your sake.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 08/01/17 7:09:47 PM #73:	NadYobWoc posted... Sephiroth1288 posted... NadYobWoc posted... The world must look so simple when you ignore all context. Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC? Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful. "Trump has no chance of winning the presidency." --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:884011776] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote>The world must look so simple when you ignore all context.</quote> Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC?</quote> Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful.</quote> "Trump has no chance of winning the presidency."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sephiroth1288 08/01/17 7:13:23 PM #74:	Malcolm_Caradoc posted... This topic is the latest in a running tally of evidence Evidence? I thought it was just smoke! Get your lies straight next time you're gonna post, k? --- The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience. Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248 <cite>Sephiroth1288 posted [p:884011981] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>Malcolm_Caradoc posted...</cite> <quote>This topic is the latest in a running tally of evidence</quote> Evidence? I thought it was just smoke! Get your lies straight next time you're gonna post, k?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NadYobWoc 08/01/17 7:16:37 PM #75:	s0nicfan posted... NadYobWoc posted... Sephiroth1288 posted... NadYobWoc posted... The world must look so simple when you ignore all context. Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC? Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful. "Trump has no chance of winning the presidency." "No one in Trump's campaign ever spoke to the Russians." --- Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene <cite>NadYobWoc posted [p:884012158] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote>The world must look so simple when you ignore all context.</quote> Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC?</quote> Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful.</quote> "Trump has no chance of winning the presidency."</quote> "No one in Trump's campaign ever spoke to the Russians."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NadYobWoc 08/01/17 7:17:27 PM #76:	Sephiroth1288 posted... Malcolm_Caradoc posted... This topic is the latest in a running tally of evidence Evidence? I thought it was just smoke! Get your lies straight next time you're gonna post, k? Smoke is evidence. Evidence isn't proof. This is basic stuff. --- Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene <cite>NadYobWoc posted [p:884012221] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Malcolm_Caradoc posted...</cite> <quote>This topic is the latest in a running tally of evidence</quote> Evidence? I thought it was just smoke! Get your lies straight next time you're gonna post, k?</quote> Smoke is evidence. Evidence isn't proof. This is basic stuff.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
whitelytning 08/01/17 7:17:38 PM #77:	Support trump and trash the Post all you want but putting your head in the sand about how the administration is actively trying to deceive us all is pathetic. They are lying to us all about information that either is or isn't important. Whether something happened or not, the fact that they can't tell us the truth is a problem no matter what political party you belong to. --- ************************************************ http://i.imgur.com/iZdWIKJ.jpg <cite>whitelytning posted [p:884012232] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote>Support trump and trash the Post all you want but putting your head in the sand about how the administration is actively trying to deceive us all is pathetic. They are lying to us all about information that either is or isn't important. Whether something happened or not, the fact that they can't tell us the truth is a problem no matter what political party you belong to.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NadYobWoc 08/01/17 7:21:00 PM #78:	whitelytning posted... Support trump and trash the Post all you want but putting your head in the sand about how the administration is actively trying to deceive us all is pathetic. They are lying to us all about information that either is or isn't important. Whether something happened or not, the fact that they can't tell us the truth is a problem no matter what political party you belong to. Trump cultists are traitors --- Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene <cite>NadYobWoc posted [p:884012396] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>whitelytning posted...</cite> <quote>Support trump and trash the Post all you want but putting your head in the sand about how the administration is actively trying to deceive us all is pathetic. They are lying to us all about information that either is or isn't important. Whether something happened or not, the fact that they can't tell us the truth is a problem no matter what political party you belong to.</quote> Trump cultists are traitors</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 08/01/17 7:21:28 PM #79:	NadYobWoc posted... s0nicfan posted... NadYobWoc posted... Sephiroth1288 posted... NadYobWoc posted... The world must look so simple when you ignore all context. Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC? Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful. "Trump has no chance of winning the presidency." "No one in Trump's campaign ever spoke to the Russians." Plenty of ppl in his campaign have spoken to Russians. Unfortunately that isn't the same as colluding with the Russian government. If your expectation is that any day now he'll be impeached, you're in for a long slow painful remaining 3 years. --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:884012427] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote>The world must look so simple when you ignore all context.</quote> Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC?</quote> Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful.</quote> "Trump has no chance of winning the presidency."</quote> "No one in Trump's campaign ever spoke to the Russians."</quote> Plenty of ppl in his campaign have spoken to Russians. Unfortunately that isn't the same as colluding with the Russian government. If your expectation is that any day now he'll be impeached, you're in for a long slow painful remaining 3 years.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sktgamer_13dude 08/01/17 7:23:50 PM #80:	Mal Fet is the same person who said that NATO wasn't a thing before 9/11, that Nazi Germany was leftist, and that the Nazi's weren't anti-gay. It's laughable that he thinks we actually take him seriously because "he's not a Trump supporter guys!!!!!!!" --- http://i.imgur.com/jWVrg9U.gif http://i.imgur.com/g2efUtT.jpg http://i.imgur.com/5dOwhaP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/LVdqu8J.gif Go Cougs and M's #DI4B <cite>sktgamer_13dude posted [p:884012574] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote>Mal Fet is the same person who said that NATO wasn't a thing before 9/11, that Nazi Germany was leftist, and that the Nazi's weren't anti-gay. It's laughable that he thinks we actually take him seriously because "he's not a Trump supporter guys!!!!!!!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ScazarMeltex 08/01/17 7:25:38 PM #81:	sktgamer_13dude posted... Mal Fet is the same person who said that NATO wasn't a thing before 9/11, that Nazi Germany was leftist, and that the Nazi's weren't anti-gay. It's laughable that he thinks we actually take him seriously because "he's not a Trump supporter guys!!!!!!!" I've always loved the "nazis were leftists because they have socialism in thurr name" schtick. Whenever someone says that I can pretty much tell that they've never actually studied any of the writings of any of the parties leadership. --- "If you wish to converse with me define your terms" Voltaire <cite>ScazarMeltex posted [p:884012664] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Mal Fet is the same person who said that NATO wasn't a thing before 9/11, that Nazi Germany was leftist, and that the Nazi's weren't anti-gay. It's laughable that he thinks we actually take him seriously because "he's not a Trump supporter guys!!!!!!!"</quote> I've always loved the "nazis were leftists because they have socialism in thurr name" schtick. Whenever someone says that I can pretty much tell that they've never actually studied any of the writings of any of the parties leadership.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sktgamer_13dude 08/01/17 7:26:30 PM #82:	ScazarMeltex posted... sktgamer_13dude posted... Mal Fet is the same person who said that NATO wasn't a thing before 9/11, that Nazi Germany was leftist, and that the Nazi's weren't anti-gay. It's laughable that he thinks we actually take him seriously because "he's not a Trump supporter guys!!!!!!!" I've always loved the "nazis were leftists because they have socialism in thurr name" schtick. Whenever someone says that I can pretty much tell that they've never actually studied any of the writings of any of the parties leadership. The worst part? That wasn't his argument. --- http://i.imgur.com/jWVrg9U.gif http://i.imgur.com/g2efUtT.jpg http://i.imgur.com/5dOwhaP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/LVdqu8J.gif Go Cougs and M's #DI4B <cite>sktgamer_13dude posted [p:884012715] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>ScazarMeltex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Mal Fet is the same person who said that NATO wasn't a thing before 9/11, that Nazi Germany was leftist, and that the Nazi's weren't anti-gay. It's laughable that he thinks we actually take him seriously because "he's not a Trump supporter guys!!!!!!!"</quote> I've always loved the "nazis were leftists because they have socialism in thurr name" schtick. Whenever someone says that I can pretty much tell that they've never actually studied any of the writings of any of the parties leadership.</quote> The worst part? That wasn't his argument.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 08/01/17 7:28:03 PM #83:	ScazarMeltex posted... sktgamer_13dude posted... Mal Fet is the same person who said that NATO wasn't a thing before 9/11, that Nazi Germany was leftist, and that the Nazi's weren't anti-gay. It's laughable that he thinks we actually take him seriously because "he's not a Trump supporter guys!!!!!!!" I've always loved the "nazis were leftists because they have socialism in thurr name" schtick. Whenever someone says that I can pretty much tell that they've never actually studied any of the writings of any of the parties leadership. He was trying to argue that the Nazis "seized the means of production". --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:884012792] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>ScazarMeltex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Mal Fet is the same person who said that NATO wasn't a thing before 9/11, that Nazi Germany was leftist, and that the Nazi's weren't anti-gay. It's laughable that he thinks we actually take him seriously because "he's not a Trump supporter guys!!!!!!!"</quote> I've always loved the "nazis were leftists because they have socialism in thurr name" schtick. Whenever someone says that I can pretty much tell that they've never actually studied any of the writings of any of the parties leadership.</quote> He was trying to argue that the Nazis "seized the means of production".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ScazarMeltex 08/01/17 7:28:34 PM #84:	sktgamer_13dude posted... ScazarMeltex posted... sktgamer_13dude posted... Mal Fet is the same person who said that NATO wasn't a thing before 9/11, that Nazi Germany was leftist, and that the Nazi's weren't anti-gay. It's laughable that he thinks we actually take him seriously because "he's not a Trump supporter guys!!!!!!!" I've always loved the "nazis were leftists because they have socialism in thurr name" schtick. Whenever someone says that I can pretty much tell that they've never actually studied any of the writings of any of the parties leadership. The worst part? That wasn't his argument. Like what was it then? Because that's literally the only thing you could possibly stand on, and like I said even that doesn't stand up to even the slightest actual research. --- "If you wish to converse with me define your terms" Voltaire <cite>ScazarMeltex posted [p:884012821] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ScazarMeltex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Mal Fet is the same person who said that NATO wasn't a thing before 9/11, that Nazi Germany was leftist, and that the Nazi's weren't anti-gay. It's laughable that he thinks we actually take him seriously because "he's not a Trump supporter guys!!!!!!!"</quote> I've always loved the "nazis were leftists because they have socialism in thurr name" schtick. Whenever someone says that I can pretty much tell that they've never actually studied any of the writings of any of the parties leadership.</quote> The worst part? That wasn't his argument.</quote> Like what was it then? Because that's literally the only thing you could possibly stand on, and like I said even that doesn't stand up to even the slightest actual research.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sktgamer_13dude 08/01/17 7:29:22 PM #85:	ScazarMeltex posted... sktgamer_13dude posted... ScazarMeltex posted... sktgamer_13dude posted... Mal Fet is the same person who said that NATO wasn't a thing before 9/11, that Nazi Germany was leftist, and that the Nazi's weren't anti-gay. It's laughable that he thinks we actually take him seriously because "he's not a Trump supporter guys!!!!!!!" I've always loved the "nazis were leftists because they have socialism in thurr name" schtick. Whenever someone says that I can pretty much tell that they've never actually studied any of the writings of any of the parties leadership. The worst part? That wasn't his argument. Like what was it then? Because that's literally the only thing you could possibly stand on, and like I said even that doesn't stand up to even the slightest actual research. They were socialists because they seized the means of production. That was his argument. --- http://i.imgur.com/jWVrg9U.gif http://i.imgur.com/g2efUtT.jpg http://i.imgur.com/5dOwhaP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/LVdqu8J.gif Go Cougs and M's #DI4B <cite>sktgamer_13dude posted [p:884012862] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>ScazarMeltex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ScazarMeltex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Mal Fet is the same person who said that NATO wasn't a thing before 9/11, that Nazi Germany was leftist, and that the Nazi's weren't anti-gay. It's laughable that he thinks we actually take him seriously because "he's not a Trump supporter guys!!!!!!!"</quote> I've always loved the "nazis were leftists because they have socialism in thurr name" schtick. Whenever someone says that I can pretty much tell that they've never actually studied any of the writings of any of the parties leadership.</quote> The worst part? That wasn't his argument.</quote> Like what was it then? Because that's literally the only thing you could possibly stand on, and like I said even that doesn't stand up to even the slightest actual research.</quote> They were socialists because they seized the means of production. That was his argument.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NadYobWoc 08/01/17 7:29:58 PM #86:	s0nicfan posted... NadYobWoc posted... s0nicfan posted... NadYobWoc posted... Sephiroth1288 posted... NadYobWoc posted... The world must look so simple when you ignore all context. Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC? Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful. "Trump has no chance of winning the presidency." "No one in Trump's campaign ever spoke to the Russians." Plenty of ppl in his campaign have spoken to Russians. Unfortunately that isn't the same as colluding with the Russian government. If your expectation is that any day now he'll be impeached, you're in for a long slow painful remaining 3 years. He and his cultists spent months claiming there was no contact, which was a lie. And the Don Jr email explicitly states the meeting would be a part of the Russia governments support for the Trump campaign. Taking a meeting with a Kremlin connected lawyer for the purpose of helping the campaign isnt collusion to you? Delusional. --- Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene <cite>NadYobWoc posted [p:884012886] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote>The world must look so simple when you ignore all context.</quote> Context like there's still no proof that Trump colluded with Russia to affect the election despite almost a year of digging? And how in the meantime, proof has arisen showing that news outlets like the Washington Post are shills for the DNC?</quote> Delusion just makes the inevitable fall more painful.</quote> "Trump has no chance of winning the presidency."</quote> "No one in Trump's campaign ever spoke to the Russians."</quote> Plenty of ppl in his campaign have spoken to Russians. Unfortunately that isn't the same as colluding with the Russian government. If your expectation is that any day now he'll be impeached, you're in for a long slow painful remaining 3 years.</quote> He and his cultists spent months claiming there was no contact, which was a lie. And the Don Jr email explicitly states the meeting would be a part of the Russia governments support for the Trump campaign. Taking a meeting with a Kremlin connected lawyer for the purpose of helping the campaign isnt collusion to you? Delusional.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sephiroth1288 08/01/17 7:37:00 PM #87:	NadYobWoc posted... Smoke is evidence. No it fuckin isnt, it's what you call shit that isn't solid enough to be called evidence. --- The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience. Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248 <cite>Sephiroth1288 posted [p:884013207] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote>Smoke is evidence. </quote> No it fuckin isnt, it's what you call shit that isn't solid enough to be called evidence.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sephiroth1288 08/01/17 7:38:09 PM #88:	sktgamer_13dude posted... Mal Fet is the same person who said that NATO wasn't a thing before 9/11, that Nazi Germany was leftist, and that the Nazi's weren't anti-gay. It's laughable that he thinks we actually take him seriously because "he's not a Trump supporter guys!!!!!!!" I only ever said one of these things Because it is true. --- The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience. Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248 <cite>Sephiroth1288 posted [p:884013264] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Mal Fet is the same person who said that NATO wasn't a thing before 9/11, that Nazi Germany was leftist, and that the Nazi's weren't anti-gay. It's laughable that he thinks we actually take him seriously because "he's not a Trump supporter guys!!!!!!!"</quote> I only ever said one of these things Because it is true.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scar the 1 08/01/17 7:39:36 PM #89:	Sephiroth1288 posted... NadYobWoc posted... Smoke is evidence. No it fuckin isnt, it's what you call shit that isn't solid enough to be called evidence. There are different qualities of evidence. For example, circumstantial evidence isn't very strong, and won't hold up in court on its own. It's still evidence. Hearsay is also evidence. Just not strong evidence. Learn words Mal. --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two. <cite>scar the 1 posted [p:884013325] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote>Smoke is evidence. </quote> No it fuckin isnt, it's what you call shit that isn't solid enough to be called evidence.</quote> There are different qualities of evidence. For example, circumstantial evidence isn't very strong, and won't hold up in court on its own. It's still evidence. Hearsay is also evidence. Just not strong evidence. Learn words Mal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NadYobWoc 08/01/17 7:40:39 PM #90:	Sephiroth1288 posted... NadYobWoc posted... Smoke is evidence. No it fuckin isnt, it's what you call shit that isn't solid enough to be called evidence. Little baby is angry. It's evidence, you not liking it doesnt change the meaning of the word. --- Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene <cite>NadYobWoc posted [p:884013376] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote>Smoke is evidence. </quote> No it fuckin isnt, it's what you call shit that isn't solid enough to be called evidence.</quote> Little baby is angry. It's evidence, you not liking it doesnt change the meaning of the word.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sephiroth1288 08/01/17 7:43:25 PM #91:	scar the 1 posted... There are different qualities of evidence. For example, circumstantial evidence isn't very strong, and won't hold up in court on its own. It's still evidence. Evidence that Trump advised Jr on how to handle the press is not evidence of colluding with Russia to subvert the election in any capacity. Stop acting dumb. --- The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience. Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248 <cite>Sephiroth1288 posted [p:884013496] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote>There are different qualities of evidence. For example, circumstantial evidence isn't very strong, and won't hold up in court on its own. It's still evidence. </quote> Evidence that Trump advised Jr on how to handle the press is not evidence of colluding with Russia to subvert the election in any capacity. Stop acting dumb.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scar the 1 08/01/17 7:43:47 PM #92:	Additionally, the word "smoke" isn't a technical term, it's alluding to the common saying that "there's no smoke without fire". In that metaphor, the smoke is most definitely evidence of there being a fire. --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two. <cite>scar the 1 posted [p:884013516] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote>Additionally, the word "smoke" isn't a technical term, it's alluding to the common saying that "there's no smoke without fire". In that metaphor, the smoke is most definitely evidence of there being a fire.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 08/01/17 7:43:54 PM #93:	scar the 1 posted... Sephiroth1288 posted... NadYobWoc posted... Smoke is evidence. No it fuckin isnt, it's what you call shit that isn't solid enough to be called evidence. There are different qualities of evidence. For example, circumstantial evidence isn't very strong, and won't hold up in court on its own. It's still evidence. Hearsay is also evidence. Just not strong evidence. Learn words Mal. I already had this argument with him in a previous topic and he wouldn't budge. Nothing is evidence unless it's a smoking gun I guess. --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:884013518] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote>Smoke is evidence. </quote> No it fuckin isnt, it's what you call shit that isn't solid enough to be called evidence.</quote> There are different qualities of evidence. For example, circumstantial evidence isn't very strong, and won't hold up in court on its own. It's still evidence. Hearsay is also evidence. Just not strong evidence. Learn words Mal.</quote> I already had this argument with him in a previous topic and he wouldn't budge. Nothing is evidence unless it's a smoking gun I guess.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scar the 1 08/01/17 7:44:55 PM #94:	Sephiroth1288 posted... scar the 1 posted... There are different qualities of evidence. For example, circumstantial evidence isn't very strong, and won't hold up in court on its own. It's still evidence. Evidence that Trump advised Jr on how to handle the press is not evidence of colluding with Russia to subvert the election in any capacity. Stop acting dumb. Guess the source of the following: Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion. This support may be strong or weak. The strongest type of evidence is that which provides direct proof of the truth of an assertion. At the other extreme is evidence that is merely consistent with an assertion but does not rule out other, contradictory assertions, as in circumstantial evidence. --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two. <cite>scar the 1 posted [p:884013570] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote>There are different qualities of evidence. For example, circumstantial evidence isn't very strong, and won't hold up in court on its own. It's still evidence. </quote> Evidence that Trump advised Jr on how to handle the press is not evidence of colluding with Russia to subvert the election in any capacity. Stop acting dumb.</quote> Guess the source of the following: Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion. This support may be strong or weak. The strongest type of evidence is that which provides direct proof of the truth of an assertion. At the other extreme is evidence that is merely consistent with an assertion but does not rule out other, contradictory assertions, as in circumstantial evidence.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sephiroth1288 08/01/17 7:53:45 PM #95:	scar the 1 posted... Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion. If the assertion were that Trump advised his son on how to handle the Russian lawyer thing then you got him nailed, bro. But the actual assertion you're trying to make is that Trump worked with the Russian government in order to screw with the election, so you're still left with no supporting evidence. --- The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience. Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248 <cite>Sephiroth1288 posted [p:884013997] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote>Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion.</quote> If the assertion were that Trump advised his son on how to handle the Russian lawyer thing then you got him nailed, bro. But the actual assertion you're trying to make is that Trump worked with the Russian government in order to screw with the election, so you're still left with no supporting evidence.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 08/01/17 8:00:34 PM #96:	NadYobWoc posted... He and his cultists spent months claiming there was no contact, which was a lie. And the Don Jr email explicitly states the meeting would be a part of the Russia governments support for the Trump campaign. Taking a meeting with a Kremlin connected lawyer for the purpose of helping the campaign isnt collusion to you? Delusional. I refer you to my first post: s0nicfan posted... and this time, this time, he's totally going to get indicted. The other hundred times were just practice. --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:884014357] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote> He and his cultists spent months claiming there was no contact, which was a lie. And the Don Jr email explicitly states the meeting would be a part of the Russia governments support for the Trump campaign. Taking a meeting with a Kremlin connected lawyer for the purpose of helping the campaign isnt collusion to you? Delusional.</quote> I refer you to my first post: <cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote>and this time, this time, he's totally going to get indicted. The other hundred times were just practice.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 08/01/17 8:02:49 PM #97:	s0nicfan posted... NadYobWoc posted... He and his cultists spent months claiming there was no contact, which was a lie. And the Don Jr email explicitly states the meeting would be a part of the Russia governments support for the Trump campaign. Taking a meeting with a Kremlin connected lawyer for the purpose of helping the campaign isnt collusion to you? Delusional. I refer you to my first post: s0nicfan posted... and this time, this time, he's totally going to get indicted. The other hundred times were just practice. Uhh isn't the investigation still ongoing? It's not up to reporters to charge him. --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:884014473] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote> He and his cultists spent months claiming there was no contact, which was a lie. And the Don Jr email explicitly states the meeting would be a part of the Russia governments support for the Trump campaign. Taking a meeting with a Kremlin connected lawyer for the purpose of helping the campaign isnt collusion to you? Delusional.</quote> I refer you to my first post: <cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote>and this time, this time, he's totally going to get indicted. The other hundred times were just practice.</quote></quote> Uhh isn't the investigation still ongoing? It's not up to reporters to charge him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sephiroth1288 08/01/17 8:04:34 PM #98:	Darmik posted... Uhh isn't the investigation still ongoing? It's not up to reporters to charge him. But they have been desperately seeking evidence to impeach him for a year now and they still haven't got anything. You'd think that the full force of the mainstream media's investigatory journalism would have turned up something by now, right? --- The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience. Friend Code: 2723-9696-7248 <cite>Sephiroth1288 posted [p:884014560] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darmik posted...</cite> <quote>Uhh isn't the investigation still ongoing? It's not up to reporters to charge him.</quote> But they have been desperately seeking evidence to impeach him for a year now and they still haven't got anything. You'd think that the full force of the mainstream media's investigatory journalism would have turned up something by now, right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scar the 1 08/01/17 8:08:44 PM #99:	Sephiroth1288 posted... scar the 1 posted... Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion. If the assertion were that Trump advised his son on how to handle the Russian lawyer thing then you got him nailed, bro. But the actual assertion you're trying to make is that Trump worked with the Russian government in order to screw with the election, so you're still left with no supporting evidence. If the assertion is "Trump colluded with Russia", then him personally trying to cover up a meeting with a Russian lawyer is evidence. Not strong enough for a conviction, but then again collusion isn't a crime. --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two. <cite>scar the 1 posted [p:884014755] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote>Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion.</quote> If the assertion were that Trump advised his son on how to handle the Russian lawyer thing then you got him nailed, bro. But the actual assertion you're trying to make is that Trump worked with the Russian government in order to screw with the election, so you're still left with no supporting evidence.</quote> If the assertion is "Trump colluded with Russia", then him personally trying to cover up a meeting with a Russian lawyer is evidence. Not strong enough for a conviction, but then again collusion isn't a crime.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NadYobWoc 08/01/17 8:09:12 PM #100:	Sephiroth1288 posted... Darmik posted... Uhh isn't the investigation still ongoing? It's not up to reporters to charge him. But they have been desperately seeking evidence to impeach him for a year now and they still haven't got anything. You'd think that the full force of the mainstream media's investigatory journalism would have turned up something by now, right? This is why no one likes Trump fanatics. --- Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene <cite>NadYobWoc posted [p:884014784] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sephiroth1288 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darmik posted...</cite> <quote>Uhh isn't the investigation still ongoing? It's not up to reporters to charge him.</quote> But they have been desperately seeking evidence to impeach him for a year now and they still haven't got anything. You'd think that the full force of the mainstream media's investigatory journalism would have turned up something by now, right?</quote> This is why no one likes Trump fanatics.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 08/01/17 8:10:31 PM #101:	s0nicfan posted... NadYobWoc posted... He and his cultists spent months claiming there was no contact, which was a lie. And the Don Jr email explicitly states the meeting would be a part of the Russia governments support for the Trump campaign. Taking a meeting with a Kremlin connected lawyer for the purpose of helping the campaign isnt collusion to you? Delusional. I refer you to my first post: s0nicfan posted... and this time, this time, he's totally going to get indicted. The other hundred times were just practice. I'm just curious. If basically indisputable proof came out today that Trump colluded, how much time do you think it would take before indictment? --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:884014853] in President ... [t:75628067]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NadYobWoc posted...</cite> <quote> He and his cultists spent months claiming there was no contact, which was a lie. And the Don Jr email explicitly states the meeting would be a part of the Russia governments support for the Trump campaign. Taking a meeting with a Kremlin connected lawyer for the purpose of helping the campaign isnt collusion to you? Delusional.</quote> I refer you to my first post: <cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote>and this time, this time, he's totally going to get indicted. The other hundred times were just practice.</quote></quote> I'm just curious. If basically indisputable proof came out today that Trump colluded, how much time do you think it would take before indictment?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Current Events > President Trump is now directly implicated in trying to cover up the Russia (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > President Trump is now directly implicated in trying to cover up the Russia