Current Events > Would you rather be a racist, or a social justice warrior?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
ClockworkHare 07/16/17 3:31:34 PM #51:	Would you rather be a racist, or a social justice warrior? Let's be real. In some cases, you don't have to choose these days. --- Bite me like one of your French rolls. http://www.imageupload.co.uk/images/2017/06/05/flcnpawn.png http://www.imageupload.co.uk/images/2017/06/05/84543589.gif <cite>ClockworkHare posted [p:883024154] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><quote>Would you rather be a racist, or a social justice warrior?</quote> Let's be real. In some cases, you don't have to choose these days. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#52	Post #52 was unavailable or deleted.
Capn Circus 07/16/17 3:34:33 PM #53:	Mal_Fet posted... ImAMarvel posted... Racists? You do realize the number of violent hate crimes has sprung up since Trump's election, right? Claims of hate crimes. http://nypost.com/2016/11/13/the-fake-post-election-hate-crime-epidemic-a-muslim-womans-vote-for-trump-and-other-commentary/ Lefties will make up shit to get attention or to bash someone they dislike. It's a well-recorded phenomenon. When you aren't a victim like the narrative you stand behind says, make yourself a victim. --- "I think that man will be president right about the time when spaceships come down filled with dinosaurs in red capes" - Tom Hanks <cite>Capn Circus posted [p:883024319] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImAMarvel posted...</cite> <quote>Racists? You do realize the number of violent hate crimes has sprung up since Trump's election, right? </quote> Claims of hate crimes. http://nypost.com/2016/11/13/the-fake-post-election-hate-crime-epidemic-a-muslim-womans-vote-for-trump-and-other-commentary/ Lefties will make up shit to get attention or to bash someone they dislike. It's a well-recorded phenomenon.</quote> When you aren't a victim like the narrative you stand behind says, make yourself a victim.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ammonitida 07/16/17 3:35:30 PM #54:	ImAMarvel posted... Mal_Fet posted... From an ideological level probably, but we both know which side is committing all the violence against innocents. Racists? You do realize the number of violent hate crimes has sprung up since Trump's election, right? Capn Circus posted... They don't go around rioting because of the outcome of our elections and they don't burn down their campus because of a speaker. They also don't spray paint things they're supposedly against on buildings to blame it on the side they hate. Oh, right. http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/15/antifa-and-trump-supporters-battle-at-berkeley-again/ You do realize that most victims of violent hate crimes this year have been white? For 2017 so far, we've had 7 hate crime murders. 5 of the victims were white, killed in three separate attacks -- all for being the wrong color. Yeah, Trump's America. http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-fresno-shooting-20170418-story.html http://www.wlwt.com/article/prosecutor-to-discuss-fatal-shooting-of-man-who-struck-4-year-old-with-car/9270770 http://www.kiro7.com/news/local/dicks-stabbing-suspect-f-whitey-take-me-to-jail/542942864 Edit -- there were two more hate crime murders, but they were minority on minority. In one case, a mentally ill black man shot and killed a Latino at a bar, screaming about Mexican cartels, etc. In the other, a trio of black men killed an Indian-American store owner, in an attack that had racial overtones. http://www.thestate.com/news/state/south-carolina/article157382694.html Edit again -- There was also the anti-cop shooting in NYC recently, perped by a cop-hating left-wing extremist. --- Russian Agent http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1477/86/1477860281404.jpg <cite>Ammonitida posted [p:883024372] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImAMarvel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote>From an ideological level probably, but we both know which side is committing all the violence against innocents. </quote> Racists? You do realize the number of violent hate crimes has sprung up since Trump's election, right? <cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>They don't go around rioting because of the outcome of our elections and they don't burn down their campus because of a speaker. They also don't spray paint things they're supposedly against on buildings to blame it on the side they hate. </quote> Oh, right. http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/15/antifa-and-trump-supporters-battle-at-berkeley-again/</quote> You do realize that most victims of violent hate crimes this year have been white? For 2017 so far, we've had 7 hate crime murders. 5 of the victims were white, killed in three separate attacks -- all for being the wrong color. Yeah, Trump's America. http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-fresno-shooting-20170418-story.html http://www.wlwt.com/article/prosecutor-to-discuss-fatal-shooting-of-man-who-struck-4-year-old-with-car/9270770 http://www.kiro7.com/news/local/dicks-stabbing-suspect-f-whitey-take-me-to-jail/542942864 Edit -- there were two more hate crime murders, but they were minority on minority. In one case, a mentally ill black man shot and killed a Latino at a bar, screaming about Mexican cartels, etc. In the other, a trio of black men killed an Indian-American store owner, in an attack that had racial overtones. http://www.thestate.com/news/state/south-carolina/article157382694.html Edit again -- There was also the anti-cop shooting in NYC recently, perped by a cop-hating left-wing extremist.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
--kresnik-- 07/16/17 3:36:53 PM #55:	Hahahahaha the results are surprising. --- Trump 2020 <cite>--kresnik-- posted [p:883024440] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>Hahahahaha the results are surprising.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thanosibe 07/16/17 3:37:25 PM #56:	They're both pretty artful tbh. Both groups judge people by one aspect; race/skin color, sexuality, gender, etc and make as if that one aspect is all encompassing of that person and therefore see that person as that one aspect. Racists tend to do if for feelings of superiority. The other group does it out of misguided notion that they are helping out a group by making that aspect their defining quality as a human being and then making it known to the world why this group needs attention. But they both do it for their own satisfaction. Most normal individuals are fine to treat each individual person in fairness and kindness on a person to person basis. Not adhearing to any such generalizations that both racist and social justice warriors do. The selfishness of both groups makes for some of the most embarrassing human behavior. We are all unique and not to be lumped by small aspects of ourselves by others such as skin color, gender and sexuality. --- I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski <cite>thanosibe posted [p:883024466] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>They're both pretty artful tbh. Both groups judge people by one aspect; race/skin color, sexuality, gender, etc and make as if that one aspect is all encompassing of that person and therefore see that person as that one aspect. Racists tend to do if for feelings of superiority. The other group does it out of misguided notion that they are helping out a group by making that aspect their defining quality as a human being and then making it known to the world why this group needs attention. But they both do it for their own satisfaction. Most normal individuals are fine to treat each individual person in fairness and kindness on a person to person basis. Not adhearing to any such generalizations that both racist and social justice warriors do. The selfishness of both groups makes for some of the most embarrassing human behavior. We are all unique and not to be lumped by small aspects of ourselves by others such as skin color, gender and sexuality.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bishop9800 07/16/17 3:50:27 PM #57:	The Admiral posted... Guess deflection was the only card you had left Hello Kettle? This is Pot. You're black. --- I don't have to insult you. I have proven that you are a hypocrite and a fool. That's not insulting you, that's exposing you. PSN-Bishop9800 <cite>Bishop9800 posted [p:883025123] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote> Guess deflection was the only card you had left</quote> Hello Kettle? This is Pot. You're black.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dabrikishaw15 07/16/17 3:53:13 PM #58:	You have to be really, really stupid about both of these terms to prefer being a racist. --- 3DS FC: 4382 - 2449 - 5707 IGN: Anthony <cite>Dabrikishaw15 posted [p:883025250] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>You have to be really, really stupid about both of these terms to prefer being a racist.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 07/16/17 3:59:43 PM #59:	SJWs are only a problem if you are an easily triggered special snowflake otherwise they are harmless. Racists are far worse. --- when you stub your toes it's the SJWs fualt. <cite>creativerealms posted [p:883025578] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>SJWs are only a problem if you are an easily triggered special snowflake otherwise they are harmless. Racists are far worse.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GiftedACIII 07/16/17 4:11:04 PM #60:	snovvlybub posted... truscum You mean, the scientific aspect and not "however I feel like it"? "Truscum" is the default of the trans community and the idea that you can change genders like clothing/be agender goes into delusional territory like the people who marry fictional characters --- </topic> <cite>GiftedACIII posted [p:883026205] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote>truscum</quote> You mean, the scientific aspect and not "however I feel like it"? "Truscum" is the default of the trans community and the idea that you can change genders like clothing/be agender goes into delusional territory like the people who marry fictional characters</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
donkeyjack 07/16/17 4:11:17 PM #61:	Racist. --- The boywonder is the American idol/And every night I go to bed with the title/With infrared in the bible. http://imgur.com/tyElXOs http://imgur.com/Mxpx3aN <cite>donkeyjack posted [p:883026215] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>Racist.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mal_Fet 07/16/17 4:11:23 PM #62:	creativerealms posted... SJWs are only a problem if you are an easily triggered special snowflake otherwise they are harmless. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hthHHX-oJh8 --- Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. -George Orwell <cite>Mal_Fet posted [p:883026220] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote>SJWs are only a problem if you are an easily triggered special snowflake otherwise they are harmless. </quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hthHHX-oJh8</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
snovvlybub 07/16/17 4:13:05 PM #63:	GiftedACIII posted... snovvlybub posted... truscum You mean, the scientific aspect and not "however I feel like it"? "Truscum" is the default of the trans community and the idea that you can change genders like clothing/be agender goes into delusional territory like the people who marry fictional characters truscum ideology hinges on gender essentialism which has no basis in science so --- in the back of a long line like always <cite>snovvlybub posted [p:883026311] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>GiftedACIII posted...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote>truscum</quote> You mean, the scientific aspect and not "however I feel like it"? "Truscum" is the default of the trans community and the idea that you can change genders like clothing/be agender goes into delusional territory like the people who marry fictional characters</quote> truscum ideology hinges on gender essentialism which has no basis in science so</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GiftedACIII 07/16/17 4:25:58 PM #64:	snovvlybub posted... GiftedACIII posted... snovvlybub posted... truscum You mean, the scientific aspect and not "however I feel like it"? "Truscum" is the default of the trans community and the idea that you can change genders like clothing/be agender goes into delusional territory like the people who marry fictional characters truscum ideology hinges on gender essentialism which has no basis in science so No it doesn't. "truscum", a buzzword used by no one other than a minority of idiots like globbers and 3DPD hinges on established key concepts like gender dysphoria and the brain. "Tucute" ideology hinges on being delusional, made up, and deviant. Like, the people who literally invented those concepts are tumblr users, one called "idislikecispeople" and have zero grounds in reality/science. They have as much relevancy as people who marry fictional characters. They trivialize the trans community who aren't delusional and make them seem like jokes --- </topic> <cite>GiftedACIII posted [p:883027039] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GiftedACIII posted...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote>truscum</quote> You mean, the scientific aspect and not "however I feel like it"? "Truscum" is the default of the trans community and the idea that you can change genders like clothing/be agender goes into delusional territory like the people who marry fictional characters</quote> truscum ideology hinges on gender essentialism which has no basis in science so</quote> No it doesn't. "truscum", a buzzword used by no one other than a minority of idiots like globbers and 3DPD hinges on established key concepts like gender dysphoria and the brain. "Tucute" ideology hinges on being delusional, made up, and deviant. Like, the people who literally invented those concepts are tumblr users, one called "idislikecispeople" and have zero grounds in reality/science. They have as much relevancy as people who marry fictional characters. They trivialize the trans community who aren't delusional and make them seem like jokes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Paper_Okami 07/16/17 4:28:55 PM #65:	ImAMarvel posted... jesus, these results ThyCorndog posted... Kid_Buu posted... why was i even surprised at the results tbh this --- "Conceit, arrogance and egotism are the essentials of patriotism"- Emma Goldman "Wimmy Wham Wham Wozzle!" -Slurms MacKenzie <cite>Paper_Okami posted [p:883027198] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImAMarvel posted...</cite> <quote>jesus, these results</quote> <cite>ThyCorndog posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kid_Buu posted...</cite> <quote>why was i even surprised at the results tbh</quote> this</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
snovvlybub 07/16/17 4:30:51 PM #66:	GiftedACIII posted... snovvlybub posted... GiftedACIII posted... snovvlybub posted... truscum You mean, the scientific aspect and not "however I feel like it"? "Truscum" is the default of the trans community and the idea that you can change genders like clothing/be agender goes into delusional territory like the people who marry fictional characters truscum ideology hinges on gender essentialism which has no basis in science so No it doesn't. "truscum", a buzzword used by no one other than a minority of idiots like globbers and 3DPD hinges on established key concepts like gender dysphoria and the brain. "Tucute" ideology hinges on being delusional, made up, and deviant. Like, the people who literally invented those concepts are tumblr users, one called "idislikecispeople" and have zero grounds in reality/science. They have as much relevancy as people who marry fictional characters. They trivialize the trans community who aren't delusional and make them seem like jokes the idea that gender dysphoria is central in the trans experience is gender essentialism which again has no basis in science so --- in the back of a long line like always <cite>snovvlybub posted [p:883027288] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>GiftedACIII posted...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GiftedACIII posted...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote>truscum</quote> You mean, the scientific aspect and not "however I feel like it"? "Truscum" is the default of the trans community and the idea that you can change genders like clothing/be agender goes into delusional territory like the people who marry fictional characters</quote> truscum ideology hinges on gender essentialism which has no basis in science so</quote> No it doesn't. "truscum", a buzzword used by no one other than a minority of idiots like globbers and 3DPD hinges on established key concepts like gender dysphoria and the brain. "Tucute" ideology hinges on being delusional, made up, and deviant. Like, the people who literally invented those concepts are tumblr users, one called "idislikecispeople" and have zero grounds in reality/science. They have as much relevancy as people who marry fictional characters. They trivialize the trans community who aren't delusional and make them seem like jokes</quote> the idea that gender dysphoria is central in the trans experience is gender essentialism which again has no basis in science so</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MLGSerperior111 07/16/17 4:30:54 PM #67:	Iodine posted... just lol. --- FC: 0233-0297-6306 IGN: Lucas So original, you can just feel the unoriginality of my originality. <cite>MLGSerperior111 posted [p:883027292] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>Iodine posted...</cite> <quote>just lol.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pinky0926 07/16/17 4:31:00 PM #68:	CE showing its true colours once again. "I'd rather be an actual bigot than an annoying smug person" --- CE's Resident Scotsman. http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z316/CeliaOfTheSky/Pinky0926.jpg <cite>pinky0926 posted [p:883027300] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>CE showing its true colours once again. "I'd rather be an actual bigot than an annoying smug person"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GiftedACIII 07/16/17 4:35:46 PM #69:	snovvlybub posted... GiftedACIII posted... snovvlybub posted... GiftedACIII posted... snovvlybub posted... truscum You mean, the scientific aspect and not "however I feel like it"? "Truscum" is the default of the trans community and the idea that you can change genders like clothing/be agender goes into delusional territory like the people who marry fictional characters truscum ideology hinges on gender essentialism which has no basis in science so No it doesn't. "truscum", a buzzword used by no one other than a minority of idiots like globbers and 3DPD hinges on established key concepts like gender dysphoria and the brain. "Tucute" ideology hinges on being delusional, made up, and deviant. Like, the people who literally invented those concepts are tumblr users, one called "idislikecispeople" and have zero grounds in reality/science. They have as much relevancy as people who marry fictional characters. They trivialize the trans community who aren't delusional and make them seem like jokes the idea that gender dysphoria is central in the trans experience is gender essentialism which again has no basis in science so No it isn't. Gender essentialism is the belief that gender stereotypes hold true for all men/women. Gender dysphoria is the conflict you feel between your physical sex and your gender. They're not at all related. --- </topic> <cite>GiftedACIII posted [p:883027569] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GiftedACIII posted...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GiftedACIII posted...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote>truscum</quote> You mean, the scientific aspect and not "however I feel like it"? "Truscum" is the default of the trans community and the idea that you can change genders like clothing/be agender goes into delusional territory like the people who marry fictional characters</quote> truscum ideology hinges on gender essentialism which has no basis in science so</quote> No it doesn't. "truscum", a buzzword used by no one other than a minority of idiots like globbers and 3DPD hinges on established key concepts like gender dysphoria and the brain. "Tucute" ideology hinges on being delusional, made up, and deviant. Like, the people who literally invented those concepts are tumblr users, one called "idislikecispeople" and have zero grounds in reality/science. They have as much relevancy as people who marry fictional characters. They trivialize the trans community who aren't delusional and make them seem like jokes</quote> the idea that gender dysphoria is central in the trans experience is gender essentialism which again has no basis in science so</quote> No it isn't. Gender essentialism is the belief that gender stereotypes hold true for all men/women. Gender dysphoria is the conflict you feel between your physical sex and your gender. They're not at all related.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
snovvlybub 07/16/17 4:39:58 PM #70:	GiftedACIII posted... snovvlybub posted... GiftedACIII posted... snovvlybub posted... GiftedACIII posted... snovvlybub posted... truscum You mean, the scientific aspect and not "however I feel like it"? "Truscum" is the default of the trans community and the idea that you can change genders like clothing/be agender goes into delusional territory like the people who marry fictional characters truscum ideology hinges on gender essentialism which has no basis in science so No it doesn't. "truscum", a buzzword used by no one other than a minority of idiots like globbers and 3DPD hinges on established key concepts like gender dysphoria and the brain. "Tucute" ideology hinges on being delusional, made up, and deviant. Like, the people who literally invented those concepts are tumblr users, one called "idislikecispeople" and have zero grounds in reality/science. They have as much relevancy as people who marry fictional characters. They trivialize the trans community who aren't delusional and make them seem like jokes the idea that gender dysphoria is central in the trans experience is gender essentialism which again has no basis in science so No it isn't. Gender essentialism is the belief that gender stereotypes hold true for all men/women. Gender dysphoria is the conflict you feel between your physical sex and your gender. They're not at all related. gender essentialism is necessitating a trait or phenotype as inherently tied to a gender, which is what causes dysphoria read up on ur zhou pls --- in the back of a long line like always <cite>snovvlybub posted [p:883027780] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>GiftedACIII posted...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GiftedACIII posted...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GiftedACIII posted...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote>truscum</quote> You mean, the scientific aspect and not "however I feel like it"? "Truscum" is the default of the trans community and the idea that you can change genders like clothing/be agender goes into delusional territory like the people who marry fictional characters</quote> truscum ideology hinges on gender essentialism which has no basis in science so</quote> No it doesn't. "truscum", a buzzword used by no one other than a minority of idiots like globbers and 3DPD hinges on established key concepts like gender dysphoria and the brain. "Tucute" ideology hinges on being delusional, made up, and deviant. Like, the people who literally invented those concepts are tumblr users, one called "idislikecispeople" and have zero grounds in reality/science. They have as much relevancy as people who marry fictional characters. They trivialize the trans community who aren't delusional and make them seem like jokes</quote> the idea that gender dysphoria is central in the trans experience is gender essentialism which again has no basis in science so</quote> No it isn't. Gender essentialism is the belief that gender stereotypes hold true for all men/women. Gender dysphoria is the conflict you feel between your physical sex and your gender. They're not at all related.</quote> gender essentialism is necessitating a trait or phenotype as inherently tied to a gender, which is what causes dysphoria read up on ur zhou pls</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NinjaWarrior455 07/16/17 4:49:02 PM #71:	Can't even say I'm surprised by the results or this topic. --- Fire Billy Davis http://myanimelist.net/animelist/NinjaWarrior457 <cite>NinjaWarrior455 posted [p:883028284] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>Can't even say I'm surprised by the results or this topic.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fam_Fam 07/16/17 4:50:22 PM #72:	the results are both sad and amusing to me <cite>Fam_Fam posted [p:883028356] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>the results are both sad and amusing to me</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GiftedACIII 07/16/17 4:53:35 PM #73:	snovvlybub posted... GiftedACIII posted... snovvlybub posted... GiftedACIII posted... snovvlybub posted... GiftedACIII posted... snovvlybub posted... truscum You mean, the scientific aspect and not "however I feel like it"? "Truscum" is the default of the trans community and the idea that you can change genders like clothing/be agender goes into delusional territory like the people who marry fictional characters truscum ideology hinges on gender essentialism which has no basis in science so No it doesn't. "truscum", a buzzword used by no one other than a minority of idiots like globbers and 3DPD hinges on established key concepts like gender dysphoria and the brain. "Tucute" ideology hinges on being delusional, made up, and deviant. Like, the people who literally invented those concepts are tumblr users, one called "idislikecispeople" and have zero grounds in reality/science. They have as much relevancy as people who marry fictional characters. They trivialize the trans community who aren't delusional and make them seem like jokes the idea that gender dysphoria is central in the trans experience is gender essentialism which again has no basis in science so No it isn't. Gender essentialism is the belief that gender stereotypes hold true for all men/women. Gender dysphoria is the conflict you feel between your physical sex and your gender. They're not at all related. gender essentialism is necessitating a trait or phenotype as inherently tied to a gender, which is what causes dysphoria read up on ur zhou pls Thats exactly why dysphoria has nothing to do with gender essentialism. Dysphoria is the conflict between your gender and your sex, nothing to do with your traits inherently being tied to a gender. You can be an extremely feminine biological girl and still feel dysphoria and vice versa. Or are you trying to say something else entirely, stuff that is full anti-reality like even sex being a social construct or that sex has zero links with gender meaning you can identify as the gender of apache helicopter? --- </topic> <cite>GiftedACIII posted [p:883028549] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GiftedACIII posted...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GiftedACIII posted...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GiftedACIII posted...</cite> <quote><cite>snovvlybub posted...</cite> <quote>truscum</quote> You mean, the scientific aspect and not "however I feel like it"? "Truscum" is the default of the trans community and the idea that you can change genders like clothing/be agender goes into delusional territory like the people who marry fictional characters</quote> truscum ideology hinges on gender essentialism which has no basis in science so</quote> No it doesn't. "truscum", a buzzword used by no one other than a minority of idiots like globbers and 3DPD hinges on established key concepts like gender dysphoria and the brain. "Tucute" ideology hinges on being delusional, made up, and deviant. Like, the people who literally invented those concepts are tumblr users, one called "idislikecispeople" and have zero grounds in reality/science. They have as much relevancy as people who marry fictional characters. They trivialize the trans community who aren't delusional and make them seem like jokes</quote> the idea that gender dysphoria is central in the trans experience is gender essentialism which again has no basis in science so</quote> No it isn't. Gender essentialism is the belief that gender stereotypes hold true for all men/women. Gender dysphoria is the conflict you feel between your physical sex and your gender. They're not at all related.</quote> gender essentialism is necessitating a trait or phenotype as inherently tied to a gender, which is what causes dysphoria read up on ur zhou pls</quote> Thats exactly why dysphoria has nothing to do with gender essentialism. Dysphoria is the conflict between your gender and your sex, nothing to do with your traits inherently being tied to a gender. You can be an extremely feminine biological girl and still feel dysphoria and vice versa. Or are you trying to say something else entirely, stuff that is full anti-reality like even sex being a social construct or that sex has zero links with gender meaning you can identify as the gender of apache helicopter?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThyCorndog 07/16/17 4:54:08 PM #74:	53% of CE uses the hard r --- Hey what's going on in this thread http://i.imgur.com/6fpKRW8.gif http://i.imgur.com/RNZi0gk.gif <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:883028571] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>53% of CE uses the hard r</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NonDairyMiltank 07/16/17 5:17:27 PM #75:	CE showing its true colours once again. "I'd rather be an actual bigot than an annoying smug person who can also be a bigot." like it or not, "SJW" has negative connotations now too because crybaby radicals keep trying to use established social movements for their own divisive agendas if you still think only racists, sexist, and bigots use the term as a pejorative for justice advocates, you're cluelessly out of date and INTENTIONALLY refusing to acknowledge any other popularized meanings of the term that have developed, the usage of terms evolve with pop culture, get over it there's moderates who now also use the term on social media to label hypocritical extremists who only claim to be justice advocates when they're just a different brand of bigot... there are freakin feminists who use the term now too out of convenience because we're also getting fuckin fed up with crazy ass radicals making our movements look ridiculous on media and handing the opposition even MORE fuel to burn us back stop telling me they don't fuckin exist when i as an active feminist and lgbt advocate have to deal with at least a couple of these radicalized nutjobs at every event we host, stop it --- le Moo <cite>NonDairyMiltank posted [p:883029842] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><quote>CE showing its true colours once again. "I'd rather be an actual bigot than an annoying smug person who can also be a bigot."</quote> like it or not, "SJW" has negative connotations now too because crybaby radicals keep trying to use established social movements for their own divisive agendas if you still think only racists, sexist, and bigots use the term as a pejorative for justice advocates, you're cluelessly out of date and INTENTIONALLY refusing to acknowledge any other popularized meanings of the term that have developed, the usage of terms evolve with pop culture, get over it there's moderates who now also use the term on social media to label hypocritical extremists who only claim to be justice advocates when they're just a different brand of bigot... there are freakin feminists who use the term now too out of convenience because we're also getting fuckin fed up with crazy ass radicals making our movements look ridiculous on media and handing the opposition even MORE fuel to burn us back stop telling me they don't fuckin exist when i as an active feminist and lgbt advocate have to deal with at least a couple of these radicalized nutjobs at every event we host, stop it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#76	Post #76 was unavailable or deleted.
HippopotamusRex 07/16/17 5:28:40 PM #77:	Love the results. It's a microcosm of the real world, and radicals don't realize it yet. When you divide the world into 'you are either with me or you are a pos racist bigot' most people aren't racist. And the more you prod and poke them about it, the more they'll just throw their hands up and say 'well I guess I'm racist then as long as I'm not on your side'. So now you have both the very limited actual racists in the world, and the people who would rather be called racist but aren't because they see how insufferable the radicals doing the sjw game are, slowly like passively avoiding a bad smell starting to congeal on the side of the "I'm sure as hell not with you" label. Whatever that is going to be. Whether it's racist, whether it's Hitler's second cousin, whatever you want to name that label. --- The Retro Hippo of the Retro Achievements http://retroachievements.org/User/HippopotamusRex <cite>HippopotamusRex posted [p:883030428] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>Love the results. It's a microcosm of the real world, and radicals don't realize it yet. When you divide the world into 'you are either with me or you are a pos racist bigot' most people aren't racist. And the more you prod and poke them about it, the more they'll just throw their hands up and say 'well I guess I'm racist then as long as I'm not on your side'. So now you have both the very limited actual racists in the world, and the people who would rather be called racist but aren't because they see how insufferable the radicals doing the sjw game are, slowly like passively avoiding a bad smell starting to congeal on the side of the "I'm sure as hell not with you" label. Whatever that is going to be. Whether it's racist, whether it's Hitler's second cousin, whatever you want to name that label.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mal_Fet 07/16/17 5:33:31 PM #78:	Conflict posted... Lol literally people defending racists itt. But then again, where am I? No one's defending racism. Only the idea that racists are worse than SJWs. --- Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. -George Orwell <cite>Mal_Fet posted [p:883030711] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote>Lol literally people defending racists itt. But then again, where am I?</quote> No one's defending racism. Only the idea that racists are worse than SJWs.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dustin1280 07/16/17 5:34:13 PM #79:	MakoReizei posted... trick question. both are racist. --- Smash DS Code: 4554-0120-5368 SB4 Name: Roz RIP: Orlando of the Axe Karma: 1642 --he delivered! <cite>Dustin1280 posted [p:883030750] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>MakoReizei posted...</cite> <quote>trick question. both are racist.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 07/16/17 5:43:09 PM #80:	Overlooking that SJWs are highly racist in addition to a slew of other negatives, it seems like only being racist is an improvement. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:883031220] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>Overlooking that SJWs are highly racist in addition to a slew of other negatives, it seems like only being racist is an improvement.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mist_Turnips 07/16/17 5:46:31 PM #81:	Dustin1280 posted... MakoReizei posted... trick question. both are racist. --- "They say if you don't hide your belly button, lightning could take it away from you! What would happen if it did?" http://i.imgur.com/G74y2NJ.png <cite>Mist_Turnips posted [p:883031411] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MakoReizei posted...</cite> <quote>trick question. both are racist.</quote></quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jimbiz 07/16/17 5:53:18 PM #82:	ITT: CEmen would rather be racist than discuss social issues that affects people Not surprised --- Toronto Raptors' fan and Kofi Kingston's brother. Montgomery14 : DeKobe giveth what he taketh away. <cite>jimbiz posted [p:883031791] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>ITT: CEmen would rather be racist than discuss social issues that affects people Not surprised</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mal_Fet 07/16/17 5:56:05 PM #83:	jimbiz posted... ITT: CEmen would rather be racist than discuss social issues that affects people Social issues like manspreading, defending teachers who call for mob justice against cameramen, and supporting racial segregation! --- Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. -George Orwell <cite>Mal_Fet posted [p:883031952] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>jimbiz posted...</cite> <quote>ITT: CEmen would rather be racist than discuss social issues that affects people</quote> Social issues like manspreading, defending teachers who call for mob justice against cameramen, and supporting racial segregation!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Trigg3rH4ppy 07/16/17 5:56:14 PM #84:	Ving_Rhames posted... Just ce things Good thing none of you will ever reproduce lol, dat projection. --- ~A little nonsense, now and then, is relished by the wisest men ~ TWSSted since~ 3/27/12 https://i.imgur.com/zlaENmx.png <cite>Trigg3rH4ppy posted [p:883031959] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ving_Rhames posted...</cite> <quote>Just ce things Good thing none of you will ever reproduce</quote> lol, dat projection.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Malcolm_Caradoc 07/16/17 6:44:29 PM #85:	The neckbeard levels are high on this board --- M. <cite>Malcolm_Caradoc posted [p:883034806] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>The neckbeard levels are high on this board</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeonOctopus 07/16/17 6:46:46 PM #86:	Gorbachev posted... MakoReizei posted... trick question. both are racist. Ayyyyyyy --- http://i.imgur.com/nlaY1qH.jpg http://i.imgur.com/zHJ1OCo.gif http://i.imgur.com/btBPP4E.jpg http://i.imgur.com/1B3bMHw.gif <cite>NeonOctopus posted [p:883034954] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>Gorbachev posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MakoReizei posted...</cite> <quote>trick question. both are racist.</quote> Ayyyyyyy</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ultimate reaver 07/16/17 6:48:13 PM #87:	jimbiz posted... ITT: CEmen would rather be racist than discuss social issues that affects people Not surprised --- butts <cite>ultimate reaver posted [p:883035035] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>jimbiz posted...</cite> <quote>ITT: CEmen would rather be racist than discuss social issues that affects people Not surprised</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pinky0926 07/16/17 6:49:24 PM #88:	NonDairyMiltank posted... CE showing its true colours once again. "I'd rather be an actual bigot than an annoying smug person who can also be a bigot." like it or not, "SJW" has negative connotations now too because crybaby radicals keep trying to use established social movements for their own divisive agendas if you still think only racists, sexist, and bigots use the term as a pejorative for justice advocates, you're cluelessly out of date and INTENTIONALLY refusing to acknowledge any other popularized meanings of the term that have developed, the usage of terms evolve with pop culture, get over it there's moderates who now also use the term on social media to label hypocritical extremists who only claim to be justice advocates when they're just a different brand of bigot... there are freakin feminists who use the term now too out of convenience because we're also getting fuckin fed up with crazy ass radicals making our movements look ridiculous on media and handing the opposition even MORE fuel to burn us back stop telling me they don't fuckin exist when i as an active feminist and lgbt advocate have to deal with at least a couple of these radicalized nutjobs at every event we host, stop it Essentially SJWs can be terrible people, but racists are just always terrible people. But of course CE is full of edgelords incapable of recognising nuance, altogether fixated on being contrary for its own sake. So like I said, unsurprising poll results --- CE's Resident Scotsman. http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z316/CeliaOfTheSky/Pinky0926.jpg <cite>pinky0926 posted [p:883035103] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>NonDairyMiltank posted...</cite> <quote><quote>CE showing its true colours once again. "I'd rather be an actual bigot than an annoying smug person who can also be a bigot."</quote> like it or not, "SJW" has negative connotations now too because crybaby radicals keep trying to use established social movements for their own divisive agendas if you still think only racists, sexist, and bigots use the term as a pejorative for justice advocates, you're cluelessly out of date and INTENTIONALLY refusing to acknowledge any other popularized meanings of the term that have developed, the usage of terms evolve with pop culture, get over it there's moderates who now also use the term on social media to label hypocritical extremists who only claim to be justice advocates when they're just a different brand of bigot... there are freakin feminists who use the term now too out of convenience because we're also getting fuckin fed up with crazy ass radicals making our movements look ridiculous on media and handing the opposition even MORE fuel to burn us back stop telling me they don't fuckin exist when i as an active feminist and lgbt advocate have to deal with at least a couple of these radicalized nutjobs at every event we host, stop it</quote> Essentially SJWs can be terrible people, but racists are just always terrible people. But of course CE is full of edgelords incapable of recognising nuance, altogether fixated on being contrary for its own sake. So like I said, unsurprising poll results</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SSMajinVegeta2 07/16/17 7:11:01 PM #89:	Mandasnake posted... DiesMortis posted... protip being called an sjw generally means A. you pissed off some rightist B. you're not an asshole The good thing is you feel morally superior to other people. Lol --- On my business card, I am a corporate president. In my mind, I am a game developer. But in my heart, I am a gamer. Satoru Iwata, 1959 - 2015 RIP GP God bless <cite>SSMajinVegeta2 posted [p:883036477] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mandasnake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DiesMortis posted...</cite> <quote>protip being called an sjw generally means A. you pissed off some rightist B. you're not an asshole</quote> The good thing is you feel morally superior to other people.</quote> Lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thanosibe 07/16/17 9:02:23 PM #90:	Trigg3rH4ppy posted... Ving_Rhames posted... Just ce things Good thing none of you will ever reproduce lol, dat projection. Yeah I'm pretty hopeful the same is of him from the shit posts I've seen of his. --- I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski <cite>thanosibe posted [p:883042514] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>Trigg3rH4ppy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ving_Rhames posted...</cite> <quote>Just ce things Good thing none of you will ever reproduce</quote> lol, dat projection.</quote>Yeah I'm pretty hopeful the same is of him from the shit posts I've seen of his.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MachoManSavage 07/16/17 9:06:00 PM #91:	I don't agree with racism, and SJW in theory is "good". However, in practise, SJWism is the biggest roadblock in current society. I side with racists over them because only the latter destroys free speech and sponsors social censorship. SJW and modern feminisn is a threat. I work with people like that and it's very scary. Having to watch what you do or say constantly because someone might be offended. And then claim you're a rapist and ruin your life (I've seen it happen). --- A proud wrestling Smark, because we know better than you. <cite>MachoManSavage posted [p:883042712] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>I don't agree with racism, and SJW in theory is "good". However, in practise, SJWism is the biggest roadblock in current society. I side with racists over them because only the latter destroys free speech and sponsors social censorship. SJW and modern feminisn is a threat. I work with people like that and it's very scary. Having to watch what you do or say constantly because someone might be offended. And then claim you're a rapist and ruin your life (I've seen it happen).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#92	Post #92 was unavailable or deleted.
Pastryarchy 07/16/17 10:39:24 PM #93:	It's just an internet poll. You don't have to "side" with either clusterfuck. --- Let them eat cake. http://tryimg.com/8/2017/06/05/3BY9w.gif http://tryimg.com/8/2017/06/05/3Bstc.jpg <cite>Pastryarchy posted [p:883048120] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>It's just an internet poll. You don't have to "side" with either clusterfuck. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheMikh 07/16/17 10:40:16 PM #94:	MakoReizei posted... trick question. both are racist. the topic should have ended with this post --- http://i.imgur.com/A0TAfek.png <cite>TheMikh posted [p:883048174] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>MakoReizei posted...</cite> <quote>trick question. both are racist.</quote> the topic should have ended with this post</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 07/16/17 10:40:43 PM #95:	broad, sweeping statements everywhere. --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to your story! BAWSE! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:883048198] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>broad, sweeping statements everywhere.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThanksUglyGod 07/16/17 10:57:26 PM #96:	Hmm, would I rather people find me annoying for attempting help others or people find me annoying for being an asshole? Decisions, decisions... <cite>ThanksUglyGod posted [p:883049133] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>Hmm, would I rather people find me annoying for attempting help others or people find me annoying for being an asshole? Decisions, decisions...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Re-iNcarnated 07/16/17 11:04:53 PM #97:	If I have to choose between the two, easily racist. <cite>Re-iNcarnated posted [p:883049514] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote>If I have to choose between the two, easily racist.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Re-iNcarnated 07/16/17 11:05:34 PM #98:	MachoManSavage posted... I don't agree with racism, and SJW in theory is "good". However, in practise, SJWism is the biggest roadblock in current society. I side with racists over them because only the latter destroys free speech and sponsors social censorship. SJW and modern feminisn is a threat. I work with people like that and it's very scary. Having to watch what you do or say constantly because someone might be offended. And then claim you're a rapist and ruin your life (I've seen it happen). <cite>Re-iNcarnated posted [p:883049551] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>MachoManSavage posted...</cite> <quote>I don't agree with racism, and SJW in theory is "good". However, in practise, SJWism is the biggest roadblock in current society. I side with racists over them because only the latter destroys free speech and sponsors social censorship. SJW and modern feminisn is a threat. I work with people like that and it's very scary. Having to watch what you do or say constantly because someone might be offended. And then claim you're a rapist and ruin your life (I've seen it happen).</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thanosibe 07/16/17 11:09:34 PM #99:	RickyTheBAWSE posted... broad, sweeping statements everywhere. Something you do well. --- I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski <cite>thanosibe posted [p:883049748] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote>broad, sweeping statements everywhere.</quote>Something you do well.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lorenzo_2003 07/16/17 11:14:25 PM #100:	Arcvalons posted... so·cial jus·tice war·ri·or noun, informal, derogatory a person who expresses or promotes socially progressive views. That is not very representative of how current SJW's act, let alone how they are viewed by reasonable people in general. It makes no mention of how SJW's are a caricature of activists. They're somewhere between laughingstock and pariah at this point. --- ... <cite>Lorenzo_2003 posted [p:883050024] in Would you ... [t:75571611]...</cite> <quote><cite>Arcvalons posted...</cite> <quote> <quote>so·cial jus·tice war·ri·or noun, informal, derogatory a person who expresses or promotes socially progressive views.</quote> </quote> That is not very representative of how current SJW's act, let alone how they are viewed by reasonable people in general. It makes no mention of how SJW's are a caricature of activists. They're somewhere between laughingstock and pariah at this point.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Current Events > Would you rather be a racist, or a social justice warrior? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Would you rather be a racist, or a social justice warrior?