Board 8 > A Feast For Crows Mafia: Topic 3 - Winter Friends Are Friends Forever

(+) Yeah! (+)

The Playerlist (17):
1) bng_mmmk
2) DoomTheGyarados
3) dowolf
4) FFDragon
5) HanOfTheNekos
6) htaeD
7) Jeff_Zero
8) Leafeon13N
9) Leo3L
10) MajinZidane
11) My_Immortal
12) MysteriousStan
13) Nanahara715
14) ScareChan
15) Shaduln
16) Vengeful_KBM
17) VeryInsane

With 17 alive it takes 9 to lynch. Day ends at Monday at 9 PM CST.
---

Tag
---

htaeD posted...

and is it just me, or was dowolf scummoned?

more like "is currently living on the west coast and finally got enough free time at work to check up on the topic"
---

My Immortal posted...

Echoing what I said early, I also have too much respect for Scare to be lying about doing something and actually being at his computer reading this and laughing.

Like, that doesn't mean he isn't scum. But thinking he's scum because of life things is fairly meh to me.

(Scare not doing things in the other 24 hours before he was driving is another story !!)

It's got nothing to do with lying
---

Why do you want to kill ffd, red?
---

dowolf who do you suspect so far?
---

Honestly I'm getting bored but there's that part of me that won't let go of Fuck 2016 mafia when town was in agreement that Scare should die and then just forgot to lynch him

Can someone copy votals to this topic
---

VeryInsane posted...

dowolf who do you suspect so far?

stan.
---

Votals Are Coming:
[4] Scare: Leo, Stan, puns, Death
[2] Chris: (puns), Scare, Nana
[2] MysteriousStan: Han, dowolf
[2] Boko: MI, KBM
[1] Leo: Chris, (MI)
[1] puns: Shad
[1] Death: VI
[0] VI: (Chris)
[0] red: (VI), (KBM)
[0] Nana: (Chris), (KBM)
[0] MI: (puns)
[0] dowolf: (Chris)
[0] Jeff: (Nana)

With 17 alive it takes 9 to lynch. Day ends at 9 PM CST tonight, roughly 8 hours 15 minutes from now.
---

Why did chris vote leo?

(If someone tells me to read the game I swear)
---

dowolf posted...

htaeD posted...

and is it just me, or was dowolf scummoned?

more like "is currently living on the west coast and finally got enough free time at work to check up on the topic"

fair enough
---

bng_mmmk posted...

Why did chris vote leo?

(If someone tells me to read the game I swear)

the inactivity thing I believe
---

Shaduln posted...

Why do you want to kill ffd, red?

He offered some token questions early but hasn't really offered us much in the way of opinions. He was happy to buddy up with Chris but hes gone almost entirely unmentioned by most of the game.

bng_mmmk posted...

Why did chris vote leo?

(If someone tells me to read the game I swear)

DoomTheGyarados posted...

Someone on scare has done the same amount of effort he has. A good sign that lunch isn't great.

Leo who gives no effort is usually a scum Leo. I would change my vote but mobile is a pain.

Seriously though, just floating through life that one is. Death, thoughts?

DoomTheGyarados posted...

##unvote: VI
##vote: Leo

Also I half expect Scare to roll in here at some point with like 5 paragraphs about his vote on me and my reaction to it because I think he likes to do that every once in awhile.

Anyway don't like how Scare's getting quite a few votes arbitrarily compared to Leo so time to wake up, old gent.

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pezx78YY-g

##vote: Stan
---

Hi Jeff can you rearticulate the reasoning for your vote please
---

People that post videos are scum. I'm not clicking on your shit.

dammit jeff.

there are literally rules about putting arguments in podcast form.

technically i don't think there are rules about full-fledged videos, but still.
---

Sure, happily! While I'm not defending Scare either way (it seems the basis people are forming for him being possible scum is largely mired in habits in the meta, which I'm unfamiliar with) I never got a great read on Leo voting him and then Stan voted him almost immediately thereafter. As I've stated in the past, this has looked fishy to me from square one.

I suspect them both, but there's more heat on Stan -- which means more people have called him on it with a wider host of reasons to do so. Given the interim time since I first made mention that they're possible scum, and given that I've found Leo's rebuttals better than Stan's, I've decided to vote Stan.
---

Leafeon13N posted...

People that post videos are scum. I'm not clicking on your shit.

You don't have to and I'd gladly edit it out if that were not against the rules. But I'd caution against immediately deciding I'm anything when this is my first game and I'm learning the ropes.

dowolf posted...

dammit jeff.

there are literally rules about putting arguments in podcast form.

technically i don't think there are rules about full-fledged videos, but still.

Ack, ah well. This is not my best look, then. I wish I could remove it!
---

First vote ever, I'm honored.

MysteriousStan posted...

First vote ever, I'm honored.

<3
---

Wait is that actually a video of Jeff explaining his vote? I didn't watch it obviously
---

i mean, you're probably good. the rule is there because someone once made an hour-long podcast thing. everyone basically agreed after the game that This Was Dumb and Should Not Happen Again >_>
---

bng_mmmk posted...

Wait is that actually a video of Jeff explaining his vote? I didn't watch it obviously

I wanted to do something to commemorate my first ever vote, but that doesn't mean I'm not just as glad to type it all out, as evidenced by my immediately doing so as soon as I was asked, and before it was brought to my attention that it's against the rules.
---

dowolf posted...

i mean, you're probably good. the rule is there because someone once made an hour-long podcast thing. everyone basically agreed after the game that This Was Dumb and Should Not Happen Again >_>

Haha, damn. That's insane.
---

It was more like "Atma wouldn't be crazy enough to make this hour long rant as scum so he's probably town." And he was scum.

Also I'm catching up but is there anything immediate that needs attention?

I once lost a game because of someone putting up an audio log (and he was scum)
so yeah its ehrm.. risky business
Ill let the hosts discuss that though
---

It was atma and the game was God of War and it was awesome

Really if he hadn't won in the final 4 it probably wouldn't even have become a rule

But past mafia games aside I like the vote and Jeff is clear town in my eyes at this point
---

MysteriousStan posted...

It was more like "Atma wouldn't be crazy enough to make this hour long rant as scum so he's probably town." And he was scum.

oh thats right, you were actually there
---

Well, what this teaches me is that I should have been thorough in looking up rules on the archive site. Suprak's rules listing was (by his own admission -- I'm not trying to assign blame or anything) a list of the most frequently broken bits.
---

MysteriousStan posted...

Also I'm catching up but is there anything immediate that needs attention?

well besides the vote, I have my suspicions of you, if you can consider that 'immediate'
So let me ask, you didnt think anything else was worth doing stuff about before Scare?
---

To be fair, there's nothing written in the rules Suprak posted aginst them
---

Wasn't Atma also the reason we're not allowed to make bets on the games based on outside events? I remember that happening. >_>

I actually like KBM even more for the vote on me. My Immortal, though, when you voted for me for inactivity on page 6/7, I had just made a few posts that morning on page 4/5. Did you feel like any of the things I said didn't jive well with you?

Red calling for me to be replaced strikes me as odd. I haven't posted a ton, but I know I haven't posted the least and it's been at least every single day since the game began.

@DoomTheGyarados I'm not saying it's a tell or read on you. That post you quoted didn't actually include anything, you're right, but I know that other posts on the page did.
---

Jeff Zero posted...

Well, what this teaches me is that I should have been thorough in looking up rules on the archive site. Suprak's rules listing was (by his own admission -- I'm not trying to assign blame or anything) a list of the most frequently broken bits.

I dont blame you
(you even went one step further and showed your face)
however, it makes you look about as genuine a town as one can be, if you are town
or a very convincing actor if you are scum
either way you can see why its kind of a cheat, for a game that analyzes only written statements
---

MysteriousStan posted...

Also I'm catching up but is there anything immediate that needs attention?

you need to claim tbqh.
---

This video is pretty great, moral ambiguity aside.
---

Vengeful_KBM posted...

Wasn't Atma also the reason we're not allowed to make bets on the games based on outside events? I remember that happening. >_>

someone was
might as well be him
---

Jeff Zero posted...

Well, what this teaches me is that I should have been thorough in looking up rules on the archive site. Suprak's rules listing was (by his own admission -- I'm not trying to assign blame or anything) a list of the most frequently broken bits.

a lot of the "rules" are more "various things that everyone's sort of agreed shouldn't happen but nobody's made a proper list of."

it's completely not your fault for not knowing >_>
---

MysteriousStan posted...

Also I'm catching up but is there anything immediate that needs attention?

Let's pump up the volume because zzzzzzz tbh


##unvote
##Vote: Stan

I've seen scum make this exact post. Town mindset doesn't think "does anything immediately need my attention?
---

Atma also caused swearing on your dead mother's grave to be banned!
---

also you already knew the term 'backpedaling' in mafia context
Jeffzero?
---

htaeD posted...

either way you can see why its kind of a cheat, for a game that analyzes only written statements

Ha, yeah. Now that I'm being given cause to think it all through, I won't do stuff like that again (not that I was planning on it but y'know what I mean) and I'm glad it's not a thing people can, generally, do. >_>;
---

Leo3L posted...

Atma also caused swearing on your dead mother's grave to be banned!

This is actually the exact event I was referring to; I'm like 95% sure I was in that game.

htaeD posted...

also you already knew the term 'backpedaling' in mafia context
Jeffzero?

In fairness he did mention his ex played mafia and he was the frequent recipient of rants about games. :p

bng_mmmk posted...

MysteriousStan posted...

Also I'm catching up but is there anything immediate that needs attention?

Let's pump up the volume because zzzzzzz tbh


##unvote
##Vote: Stan

I've seen scum make this exact post. Town mindset doesn't think "does anything immediately need my attention?

devils death advovate here
well replacees tend to say it
I actually made a post sorta like that myself this very game

I do agree he worded it differently and a little more self-centered
---

htaeD posted...

also you already knew the term 'backpedaling' in mafia context
Jeffzero?

I used it in common parlance, actually, but I wouldn't be surprised if the ex used it while describing Mafia games to me years ago, too.
---

htaeD posted...

MysteriousStan posted...

Also I'm catching up but is there anything immediate that needs attention?

well besides the vote, I have my suspicions of you, if you can consider that 'immediate'
So let me ask, you didnt think anything else was worth doing stuff about before Scare?

Do you mean before I voted Scare? I voted for him pretty much as soon as I woke up yesterday. Not much had been going on during that time, lot of early day joking around and reminiscing about old games and whatnot. Found Scare's content to be oddly similar to others so I decided that's where I wanted to go.