2005

Topic List	Page List: 1
NowItsAngeTime 05/15/17 12:00:38 AM #1:	Rules: -1 Vote per user -Vote based on the Board 8 Match, not the Official Match. A likely chance the match entrants will be different past Wildcard/Round 1 Results: http://board8.wikia.com/wiki/If_It_Were_Up_To_Board_8_BYiG Board 8 Matches: 1998 vs. 1992 2013 vs. 2005 List of Notables Games Per Year to Help Decide Your Vote: http://board8.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_Notable_Games_released_1985-2016 --- ISFJ. A VN, Anime, Japanese food and video game guy. Dubs > Subs. MajiKoi the best ever. My Fighting Game Mains: http://i.imgur.com/QcoQW75.jpg <cite>NowItsAngeTime posted [p:879118131] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>Rules: -1 Vote per user -Vote based on the Board 8 Match, not the Official Match. A likely chance the match entrants will be different past Wildcard/Round 1 Results: http://board8.wikia.com/wiki/If_It_Were_Up_To_Board_8_BYiG Board 8 Matches: 1998 vs. 1992 2013 vs. 2005 List of Notables Games Per Year to Help Decide Your Vote: http://board8.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_Notable_Games_released_1985-2016</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Snake5555555555 05/15/17 12:05:52 AM #2:	Board 8 Matches: 1998 2005 --- It's all been seen with exception for what could be http://tinyurl.com/jqx883t - http://tinyurl.com/zqwzc9a - http://tinyurl.com/h7np86d <cite>Snake5555555555 posted [p:879118368] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>Board 8 Matches: 1998 2005</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WibbleWobbleWok 05/15/17 12:06:27 AM #3:	1998/2013 It's obvious, people. OOT and WWHD. --- http://imgur.com/pfmTpMh Ravioli Ravioli give me the triforceoili <cite>WibbleWobbleWok posted [p:879118385] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>1998/2013 It's obvious, people. OOT and WWHD.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PSI_NESS 05/15/17 12:09:24 AM #4:	1992 and 2005 <cite>PSI_NESS posted [p:879118507] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>1992 and 2005</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mnkboy907 05/15/17 12:10:01 AM #5:	1998 and 2013 --- Our brackets went under, but DpObliVion's lived to tell the tale. http://i.imgur.com/gw03gl7.png - Number of people that D'awwed: 101 <cite>mnkboy907 posted [p:879118531] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>1998 and 2013</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NowItsAngeTime 05/15/17 12:12:59 AM #6:	Voting 1998 2005 --- ISFJ. A VN, Anime, Japanese food and video game guy. Dubs > Subs. MajiKoi the best ever. My Fighting Game Mains: http://i.imgur.com/QcoQW75.jpg <cite>NowItsAngeTime posted [p:879118652] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>Voting 1998 2005</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
cyan1001 05/15/17 12:14:27 AM #7:	1992 2005 a <cite>cyan1001 posted [p:879118718] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>1992 2005 a</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordoftheMorons 05/15/17 12:15:57 AM #8:	1998 2005 caps --- Ralliers' determination can't even hold a birthday candle to the blazing flame of DpOblivion's winning spirit! <cite>LordoftheMorons posted [p:879118785] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>1998 2005 caps</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jesse_Custer 05/15/17 12:28:00 AM #9:	1992 Don't care about the other match. <cite>Jesse_Custer posted [p:879119309] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>1992 Don't care about the other match.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackDra90n 05/15/17 12:28:33 AM #10:	Board 8 Matches: 1998 2005 --- http://psnprofiles.com/Drayxs <cite>BlackDra90n posted [p:879119332] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>Board 8 Matches: 1998 2005</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivany2008 05/15/17 12:28:35 AM #11:	I know its early, but I don't even know how 1998 is winning... don't get me wrong, I love all those games, but they are going head to head with arguably the best game ever made in Link to the Past, Sonic 2 which is arguably the best Sonic game, and a ton of other great games. so for me: 1992/2003 <cite>Ivany2008 posted [p:879119334] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>I know its early, but I don't even know how 1998 is winning... don't get me wrong, I love all those games, but they are going head to head with arguably the best game ever made in Link to the Past, Sonic 2 which is arguably the best Sonic game, and a ton of other great games. so for me: 1992/2003</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NowItsAngeTime 05/15/17 2:54:28 AM #12:	bump --- ISFJ. A VN, Anime, Japanese food and video game guy. Dubs > Subs. MajiKoi the best ever. My Fighting Game Mains: http://i.imgur.com/QcoQW75.jpg <cite>NowItsAngeTime posted [p:879124400] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>bump</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Yuri_LowelI 05/15/17 3:26:41 AM #13:	98 2005 caps --- http://k09.kn3.net/1256263BF.gif <cite>Yuri_LowelI posted [p:879125266] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>98 2005 caps</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Yuri_LowelI 05/15/17 3:29:27 AM #14:	Ivany2008 posted... I know its early, but I don't even know how 1998 is winning... don't get me wrong, I love all those games, but they are going head to head with arguably the best game ever made in Link to the Past, Sonic 2 which is arguably the best Sonic game, and a ton of other great games. so for me: 1992/2003 No one gives a shit about sonic games. And the pc library alone best out 92. People need to realise why 98 is so highly rated. Just because 92 had your fav game ever doesn't mean much. The year overall is what counts and 98 completely oblirates 92. --- http://k09.kn3.net/1256263BF.gif <cite>Yuri_LowelI posted [p:879125333] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote>I know its early, but I don't even know how 1998 is winning... don't get me wrong, I love all those games, but they are going head to head with arguably the best game ever made in Link to the Past, Sonic 2 which is arguably the best Sonic game, and a ton of other great games. so for me: 1992/2003</quote> No one gives a shit about sonic games. And the pc library alone best out 92. People need to realise why 98 is so highly rated. Just because 92 had your fav game ever doesn't mean much. The year overall is what counts and 98 completely oblirates 92.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Axl_Rose_85 05/15/17 3:35:36 AM #15:	1998 2005 Uppercase BS --- Fave Five: 1. Rollins 2. Owens 3. Styles 4. Lesnar 5. Ambrose <cite>Axl_Rose_85 posted [p:879125501] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>1998 2005 Uppercase BS</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cody11533 05/15/17 7:52:50 AM #16:	Board 8 Matches: 1998 2005 --- Watch me on Twitch! - https://www.twitch.tv/dappercody "A delayed game is eventually good, but a rushed game is forever bad." -Shigeru Miyamoto <cite>Cody11533 posted [p:879130540] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>Board 8 Matches: 1998 2005</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivany2008 05/15/17 8:04:24 AM #17:	Yuri_LowelI posted... Ivany2008 posted... I know its early, but I don't even know how 1998 is winning... don't get me wrong, I love all those games, but they are going head to head with arguably the best game ever made in Link to the Past, Sonic 2 which is arguably the best Sonic game, and a ton of other great games. so for me: 1992/2003 No one gives a shit about sonic games. And the pc library alone best out 92. People need to realise why 98 is so highly rated. Just because 92 had your fav game ever doesn't mean much. The year overall is what counts and 98 completely oblirates 92. No one gives a shit about Sonic.... thats why it spawned over a dozen sequels on multiple platforms and over 3 television shows, and got him an as a character into Smash Brothers, but yes, no no one cares about Sonic....... And I'm not saying 1998 was a bad year in gaming, not at all. Just that 1992 blows it out of the water. First real competitor to Street Fighter in Mortal Kombat, Wolfenstein which is credited as establishing the First Person Shooter Genre, and LTTP which is in the running for best game on the SNES. And no, Link to the Past isn't my favorite game. That would be Megaman X, or Terranigma, kind of a tie between the two. <cite>Ivany2008 posted [p:879130778] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote><cite>Yuri_LowelI posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote>I know its early, but I don't even know how 1998 is winning... don't get me wrong, I love all those games, but they are going head to head with arguably the best game ever made in Link to the Past, Sonic 2 which is arguably the best Sonic game, and a ton of other great games. so for me: 1992/2003</quote> No one gives a shit about sonic games. And the pc library alone best out 92. People need to realise why 98 is so highly rated. Just because 92 had your fav game ever doesn't mean much. The year overall is what counts and 98 completely oblirates 92.</quote> No one gives a shit about Sonic.... thats why it spawned over a dozen sequels on multiple platforms and over 3 television shows, and got him an as a character into Smash Brothers, but yes, no no one cares about Sonic....... And I'm not saying 1998 was a bad year in gaming, not at all. Just that 1992 blows it out of the water. First real competitor to Street Fighter in Mortal Kombat, Wolfenstein which is credited as establishing the First Person Shooter Genre, and LTTP which is in the running for best game on the SNES. And no, Link to the Past isn't my favorite game. That would be Megaman X, or Terranigma, kind of a tie between the two.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NaberiusBuster 05/15/17 8:07:29 AM #18:	Board 8 Matches: 1998 2005 I want to know why Xenosaga 2 was mentioned in the 2005 profile. Would anyone ever be swayed by the most disappointing Xeno game? Ivany2008 posted... And I'm not saying 1998 was a bad year in gaming, not at all. Just that 1992 blows it out of the water. First real competitor to Street Fighter in Mortal Kombat, Wolfenstein which is credited as establishing the First Person Shooter Genre, and LTTP which is in the running for best game on the SNES. People don't care about genre codifiers or how big a game was back then. They are more concerned with the game still being playable now when compared to modern things like BotW. --- Current Best Year in Gaming Stats: 21/26 correct match picks and 25/32 points so far. Damn 2000 and 2006 match pics. <cite>NaberiusBuster posted [p:879130867] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>Board 8 Matches: 1998 2005 I want to know why Xenosaga 2 was mentioned in the 2005 profile. Would anyone ever be swayed by the most disappointing Xeno game? <cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote>And I'm not saying 1998 was a bad year in gaming, not at all. Just that 1992 blows it out of the water. First real competitor to Street Fighter in Mortal Kombat, Wolfenstein which is credited as establishing the First Person Shooter Genre, and LTTP which is in the running for best game on the SNES.</quote> People don't care about genre codifiers or how big a game was back then. They are more concerned with the game still being playable now when compared to modern things like BotW.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
militant agnostic 05/15/17 8:20:20 AM #19:	1998 (Unsung vote swayers for me are Final Fantasy Tactics and Baldur's Gate) 2003 --- Without their dreams men would have fallen upon and devoured one another long ago, and yet every dream is an illusion, and every illusion is a lie. <cite>militant agnostic posted [p:879131214] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>1998 (Unsung vote swayers for me are Final Fantasy Tactics and Baldur's Gate) 2003</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivany2008 05/15/17 8:53:11 AM #20:	NaberiusBuster posted... Board 8 Matches: 1998 2005 I want to know why Xenosaga 2 was mentioned in the 2005 profile. Would anyone ever be swayed by the most disappointing Xeno game? Ivany2008 posted... And I'm not saying 1998 was a bad year in gaming, not at all. Just that 1992 blows it out of the water. First real competitor to Street Fighter in Mortal Kombat, Wolfenstein which is credited as establishing the First Person Shooter Genre, and LTTP which is in the running for best game on the SNES. People don't care about genre codifiers or how big a game was back then. They are more concerned with the game still being playable now when compared to modern things like BotW. smh, forget it. Its not hard to see that regardless of what I say that I won't win this battle. <cite>Ivany2008 posted [p:879132129] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote><cite>NaberiusBuster posted...</cite> <quote>Board 8 Matches: 1998 2005 I want to know why Xenosaga 2 was mentioned in the 2005 profile. Would anyone ever be swayed by the most disappointing Xeno game? <cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote>And I'm not saying 1998 was a bad year in gaming, not at all. Just that 1992 blows it out of the water. First real competitor to Street Fighter in Mortal Kombat, Wolfenstein which is credited as establishing the First Person Shooter Genre, and LTTP which is in the running for best game on the SNES.</quote> People don't care about genre codifiers or how big a game was back then. They are more concerned with the game still being playable now when compared to modern things like BotW.</quote> smh, forget it. Its not hard to see that regardless of what I say that I won't win this battle.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
metroid composite 05/15/17 9:21:33 AM #21:	Ivany2008 posted... No one gives a s* about Sonic.... thats why it spawned over a dozen sequels on multiple platforms and over 3 television shows, and got him an as a character into Smash Brothers, but yes, no no one cares about Sonic....... I mean, I'm pretty sure Pac-Man has a similar pedigree. What year did 1980 lose to again? Oh it didn't lose to any year because it literally wasn't in the contest? OK. 1981 had Ms Pac Man, which was the more popular sequel, and it immediately lost to 2006, which immediately lost to 2011. And Pac-Man is legit, in some ways arguably still the best game at what it does. (By comparison, my general opinion of Sonic is that it was a strong marketing campaign. Sega presented him as the "cool" version of Mario. And in 1992 that worked; people owned one console or the other, and would argue their games were better without even playing the other system's games. But in 2017, people can easily go back and play both Mario and Sonic, and say "huh, these Mario games are better.") --- Cats land on their feet. Toast lands peanut butter side down. A cat with toast strapped to its back will hover above the ground in a state of quantum indecision <cite>metroid composite posted [p:879133063] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote>No one gives a s* about Sonic.... thats why it spawned over a dozen sequels on multiple platforms and over 3 television shows, and got him an as a character into Smash Brothers, but yes, no no one cares about Sonic.......</quote> I mean, I'm pretty sure Pac-Man has a similar pedigree. What year did 1980 lose to again? Oh it didn't lose to any year because it literally wasn't in the contest? OK. 1981 had Ms Pac Man, which was the more popular sequel, and it immediately lost to 2006, which immediately lost to 2011. And Pac-Man is legit, in some ways arguably still the best game at what it does. (By comparison, my general opinion of Sonic is that it was a strong marketing campaign. Sega presented him as the "cool" version of Mario. And in 1992 that worked; people owned one console or the other, and would argue their games were better without even playing the other system's games. But in 2017, people can easily go back and play both Mario and Sonic, and say "huh, these Mario games are better.")</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mikestrauss 05/15/17 9:24:36 AM #22:	1992 2005 Though I honestly feel, for the second battle, that I am digging through the leavings of two better battles -MS <cite>mikestrauss posted [p:879133147] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>1992 2005 Though I honestly feel, for the second battle, that I am digging through the leavings of two better battles -MS</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
xx521xx 05/15/17 10:32:28 AM #23:	1998 2005 >_> --- \\//\\// Real life would be better with an undo function. /_/\_\/_/\_\ xx521xx <cite>xx521xx posted [p:879135846] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>1998 2005 >_></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OrangeCrush980 05/15/17 11:32:10 AM #24:	1998 2005 > 2013 instead of 2003 Good thing it's not up to Board 8 then --- "I am strong... I am wise... I am handsome... And I am right! Always! More than anybody!" - Narshen, Fire Emblem: Sword of Seals <cite>OrangeCrush980 posted [p:879138658] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>1998 2005 > 2013 instead of 2003 Good thing it's not up to Board 8 then</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NowItsAngeTime 05/15/17 2:47:27 PM #25:	bupo --- ISFJ. A VN, Anime, Japanese food and video game guy. Dubs > Subs. MajiKoi the best ever. My Fighting Game Mains: http://i.imgur.com/QcoQW75.jpg <cite>NowItsAngeTime posted [p:879148909] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>bupo</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
banananor 05/15/17 3:09:05 PM #26:	even though i love re4 1998 2013 --- You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured. <cite>banananor posted [p:879150184] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>even though i love re4 1998 2013</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
profDEADPOOL 05/15/17 3:10:54 PM #27:	98 And 05 --- profDEADPOOL posted with GameRaven "I am one with the Force and the force is with me." <cite>profDEADPOOL posted [p:879150309] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>98 And 05</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TsunamiXXVIII 05/15/17 4:08:30 PM #28:	Ivany2008 posted... Yuri_LowelI posted... Ivany2008 posted... I know its early, but I don't even know how 1998 is winning... don't get me wrong, I love all those games, but they are going head to head with arguably the best game ever made in Link to the Past, Sonic 2 which is arguably the best Sonic game, and a ton of other great games. so for me: 1992/2003 No one gives a shit about sonic games. And the pc library alone best out 92. People need to realise why 98 is so highly rated. Just because 92 had your fav game ever doesn't mean much. The year overall is what counts and 98 completely oblirates 92. No one gives a shit about Sonic.... thats why it spawned over a dozen sequels on multiple platforms and over 3 television shows, and got him an as a character into Smash Brothers, but yes, no no one cares about Sonic....... And I'm not saying 1998 was a bad year in gaming, not at all. Just that 1992 blows it out of the water. First real competitor to Street Fighter in Mortal Kombat, Wolfenstein which is credited as establishing the First Person Shooter Genre, and LTTP which is in the running for best game on the SNES. And no, Link to the Past isn't my favorite game. That would be Megaman X, or Terranigma, kind of a tie between the two. Heh, I don't even like ALttP, definitely think OoT is better...but nevertheless you've swayed me. 1992 2013 --- FC 5026-4424-6331 -- Native Vivillon type: Polar Still need Marine, Sun, Icy Snow, Monsoon, River, and Jungle <cite>TsunamiXXVIII posted [p:879153631] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Yuri_LowelI posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote>I know its early, but I don't even know how 1998 is winning... don't get me wrong, I love all those games, but they are going head to head with arguably the best game ever made in Link to the Past, Sonic 2 which is arguably the best Sonic game, and a ton of other great games. so for me: 1992/2003</quote> No one gives a shit about sonic games. And the pc library alone best out 92. People need to realise why 98 is so highly rated. Just because 92 had your fav game ever doesn't mean much. The year overall is what counts and 98 completely oblirates 92.</quote> No one gives a shit about Sonic.... thats why it spawned over a dozen sequels on multiple platforms and over 3 television shows, and got him an as a character into Smash Brothers, but yes, no no one cares about Sonic....... And I'm not saying 1998 was a bad year in gaming, not at all. Just that 1992 blows it out of the water. First real competitor to Street Fighter in Mortal Kombat, Wolfenstein which is credited as establishing the First Person Shooter Genre, and LTTP which is in the running for best game on the SNES. And no, Link to the Past isn't my favorite game. That would be Megaman X, or Terranigma, kind of a tie between the two.</quote> Heh, I don't even like ALttP, definitely think OoT is better...but nevertheless you've swayed me. 1992 2013</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Januzaj_Dragon 05/15/17 4:44:26 PM #29:	Ivany2008 posted... Yuri_LowelI posted... Ivany2008 posted... I know its early, but I don't even know how 1998 is winning... don't get me wrong, I love all those games, but they are going head to head with arguably the best game ever made in Link to the Past, Sonic 2 which is arguably the best Sonic game, and a ton of other great games. so for me: 1992/2003 No one gives a shit about sonic games. And the pc library alone best out 92. People need to realise why 98 is so highly rated. Just because 92 had your fav game ever doesn't mean much. The year overall is what counts and 98 completely oblirates 92. No one gives a shit about Sonic.... thats why it spawned over a dozen sequels on multiple platforms and over 3 television shows, and got him an as a character into Smash Brothers, but yes, no no one cares about Sonic....... And I'm not saying 1998 was a bad year in gaming, not at all. Just that 1992 blows it out of the water. First real competitor to Street Fighter in Mortal Kombat, Wolfenstein which is credited as establishing the First Person Shooter Genre, and LTTP which is in the running for best game on the SNES. And no, Link to the Past isn't my favorite game. That would be Megaman X, or Terranigma, kind of a tie between the two. Sorry but Your argument for 92 blowing 98 out of the water is weak. Noone cares about wolfenstien being the first FPS or whatever. Sonic games were decent in the 16 bit era but every other sonic game post the 16 bit era has been utterly shit. Sonic 1 and 3 are vastly superior to Sonic 2 as well. 92 was a decent year. Yes Lttp was great as was MK But cmon now. Not even the best year for 16 bit era gaming. 98 had more platforms and vast amount of AA/AAA games of the highest quality. Whats more insulting is you didn't even bother to mention the best game that came out in 1992. Which was Flashback. Technically it's a 93 game on SNES/GEn but it came out on Amiga in 1992. A true masterpiece. <cite>Januzaj_Dragon posted [p:879155619] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Yuri_LowelI posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivany2008 posted...</cite> <quote>I know its early, but I don't even know how 1998 is winning... don't get me wrong, I love all those games, but they are going head to head with arguably the best game ever made in Link to the Past, Sonic 2 which is arguably the best Sonic game, and a ton of other great games. so for me: 1992/2003</quote> No one gives a shit about sonic games. And the pc library alone best out 92. People need to realise why 98 is so highly rated. Just because 92 had your fav game ever doesn't mean much. The year overall is what counts and 98 completely oblirates 92.</quote> No one gives a shit about Sonic.... thats why it spawned over a dozen sequels on multiple platforms and over 3 television shows, and got him an as a character into Smash Brothers, but yes, no no one cares about Sonic....... And I'm not saying 1998 was a bad year in gaming, not at all. Just that 1992 blows it out of the water. First real competitor to Street Fighter in Mortal Kombat, Wolfenstein which is credited as establishing the First Person Shooter Genre, and LTTP which is in the running for best game on the SNES. And no, Link to the Past isn't my favorite game. That would be Megaman X, or Terranigma, kind of a tie between the two.</quote> Sorry but Your argument for 92 blowing 98 out of the water is weak. Noone cares about wolfenstien being the first FPS or whatever. Sonic games were decent in the 16 bit era but every other sonic game post the 16 bit era has been utterly shit. Sonic 1 and 3 are vastly superior to Sonic 2 as well. 92 was a decent year. Yes Lttp was great as was MK But cmon now. Not even the best year for 16 bit era gaming. 98 had more platforms and vast amount of AA/AAA games of the highest quality. Whats more insulting is you didn't even bother to mention the best game that came out in 1992. Which was Flashback. Technically it's a 93 game on SNES/GEn but it came out on Amiga in 1992. A true masterpiece.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivany2008 05/15/17 5:19:55 PM #30:	never said it was the best year in 16 bit gaming, but in comparison to 98 it was better. I don't believe that Sonic 1 was better than Sonic 2 and here is why. Sonic 2 had more memorable zones, better theme music(though I do love me some Green Hill Zone), and most importantly it added the ability for Sonic to spin dash. Sonic 1 just felt so slow. As for Wolfenstein, you seem to forget that it was a pioneer. Without it you might not have gotten games like Doom, Duke Nukem 3d and Quake. As for the best game released in 92, it could very well be Shining Force 1, though Turtles 4 also came out that year, interesting that wasn't mentioned in the battle. <cite>Ivany2008 posted [p:879157686] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>never said it was the best year in 16 bit gaming, but in comparison to 98 it was better. I don't believe that Sonic 1 was better than Sonic 2 and here is why. Sonic 2 had more memorable zones, better theme music(though I do love me some Green Hill Zone), and most importantly it added the ability for Sonic to spin dash. Sonic 1 just felt so slow. As for Wolfenstein, you seem to forget that it was a pioneer. Without it you might not have gotten games like Doom, Duke Nukem 3d and Quake. As for the best game released in 92, it could very well be Shining Force 1, though Turtles 4 also came out that year, interesting that wasn't mentioned in the battle.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
tennisboy213 05/15/17 7:22:59 PM #31:	PSI_NESS posted... 1992 and 2005 --- Joe Bulo says hi <cite>tennisboy213 posted [p:879165174] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote><cite>PSI_NESS posted...</cite> <quote>1992 and 2005</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MZero11 05/15/17 7:53:20 PM #32:	1992 and 2005 --- MZero, to the extreme "The problem is the racism against cute Pokemon." - LusterSoldier <cite>MZero11 posted [p:879166882] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>1992 and 2005</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NowItsAngeTime 05/15/17 11:17:58 PM #33:	Bump --- ISFJ. A VN, Anime, Japanese food and video game guy. Dubs > Subs. MajiKoi the best ever. My Fighting Game Mains: http://i.imgur.com/QcoQW75.jpg <cite>NowItsAngeTime posted [p:879179742] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>Bump</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hylianknight3 05/15/17 11:20:47 PM #34:	1998 2005 caps --- DpObliVion has fought mudcrabs more fearsome than my bracket! <cite>hylianknight3 posted [p:879179901] in If It Were... [t:75346998]...</cite> <quote>1998 2005 caps</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Board 8 > If It Were Up To Board 8 Best Year in Gaming R2: 1998/1992 + 2013/2005 (+) Yeah! (+)

Board 8 > If It Were Up To Board 8 Best Year in Gaming R2: 1998/1992 + 2013/2005