Board 8 > 1990 lost to 2000?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
LukeInside 05/08/17 1:02:46 AM #1:	That's ridiculous to be honest. These "contests" seem to work as always - by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively. Some titles are well respected and recognised, even if you didn't play every one of them :) When I done this by myself it came out that the winner was 1991. I hope that's possible... <cite>LukeInside posted [p:878678573] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>That's ridiculous to be honest. These "contests" seem to work as always - by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively. Some titles are well respected and recognised, even if you didn't play every one of them :) When I done this by myself it came out that the winner was 1991. I hope that's possible...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EmDubyaSee 05/08/17 1:04:25 AM #2:	LukeInside posted... That's ridiculous to be honest. These "contests" seem to work as always - by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively. Some titles are well respected and recognised, even if you didn't play every one of them :) When I done this by myself it came out that the winner was 1991. I hope that's possible... 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. Fair, next. --- Tom Bombadil: "you are probably the king of b8 dragonball fans at least!" <cite>EmDubyaSee posted [p:878678635] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote>That's ridiculous to be honest. These "contests" seem to work as always - by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively. Some titles are well respected and recognised, even if you didn't play every one of them :) When I done this by myself it came out that the winner was 1991. I hope that's possible...</quote> 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. Fair, next.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ninkendo 05/08/17 1:08:07 AM #3:	In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off --- http://i.imgur.com/LhGP5E6.gif http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/CaptainRockman.png <cite>ninkendo posted [p:878678780] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LOLIAmAnAlt 05/08/17 1:20:42 AM #4:	EmDubyaSee posted... MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. MM is the only Zelda I have ever put down without completing. --- lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll <cite>LOLIAmAnAlt posted [p:878679258] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>EmDubyaSee posted...</cite> <quote>MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. </quote> MM is the only Zelda I have ever put down without completing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EmDubyaSee 05/08/17 1:22:39 AM #5:	LOLIAmAnAlt posted... EmDubyaSee posted... MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. MM is the only Zelda I have ever put down without completing. That's on you...,, --- Tom Bombadil: "you are probably the king of b8 dragonball fans at least!" <cite>EmDubyaSee posted [p:878679340] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>LOLIAmAnAlt posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EmDubyaSee posted...</cite> <quote>MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. </quote> MM is the only Zelda I have ever put down without completing.</quote> That's on you...,,</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkrain108 05/08/17 1:24:25 AM #6:	EmDubyaSee posted... LukeInside posted... That's ridiculous to be honest. These "contests" seem to work as always - by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively. Some titles are well respected and recognised, even if you didn't play every one of them :) When I done this by myself it came out that the winner was 1991. I hope that's possible... 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. Fair, next. Think it'll be close with 97 --- [email protected]/8GB Ripjaws PC3 10666/XFX Radeon 5850 1GB/Westinghouse 24"LCD/WD Blue 500GB/WD Blue 640GB/Creative Fatality Pro/G15 Keyboard/CM Storm Mouse <cite>darkrain108 posted [p:878679408] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>EmDubyaSee posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote>That's ridiculous to be honest. These "contests" seem to work as always - by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively. Some titles are well respected and recognised, even if you didn't play every one of them :) When I done this by myself it came out that the winner was 1991. I hope that's possible...</quote> 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. Fair, next.</quote> Think it'll be close with 97</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LOLIAmAnAlt 05/08/17 1:29:23 AM #7:	EmDubyaSee posted... LOLIAmAnAlt posted... EmDubyaSee posted... MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. MM is the only Zelda I have ever put down without completing. That's on you...,, Now your getting it! --- lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll <cite>LOLIAmAnAlt posted [p:878679603] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>EmDubyaSee posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LOLIAmAnAlt posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EmDubyaSee posted...</cite> <quote>MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. </quote> MM is the only Zelda I have ever put down without completing.</quote> That's on you...,,</quote> Now your getting it!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NFUN 05/08/17 1:29:33 AM #8:	In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off --- Thus is our treaty written, thus is our agreement made. Thought is the arrow of time; memory never fades. What was asked is given; the price is paid. ARF <cite>NFUN posted [p:878679610] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EmDubyaSee 05/08/17 1:31:05 AM #9:	darkrain108 posted... EmDubyaSee posted... LukeInside posted... That's ridiculous to be honest. These "contests" seem to work as always - by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively. Some titles are well respected and recognised, even if you didn't play every one of them :) When I done this by myself it came out that the winner was 1991. I hope that's possible... 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. Fair, next. Think it'll be close with 97 I'd really like it if 97 or 95 gave it a run. But I really don't see it hapepning. Pretty sure 98 will just roll any and everything. --- Tom Bombadil: "you are probably the king of b8 dragonball fans at least!" <cite>EmDubyaSee posted [p:878679668] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkrain108 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EmDubyaSee posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote>That's ridiculous to be honest. These "contests" seem to work as always - by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively. Some titles are well respected and recognised, even if you didn't play every one of them :) When I done this by myself it came out that the winner was 1991. I hope that's possible...</quote> 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. Fair, next.</quote> Think it'll be close with 97</quote> I'd really like it if 97 or 95 gave it a run. But I really don't see it hapepning. Pretty sure 98 will just roll any and everything.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shaduln 05/08/17 1:32:24 AM #10:	In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off --- Emperor of Board 8 Peaceful days are over. Let's survive! <cite>Shaduln posted [p:878679704] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_SJimW_ 05/08/17 1:42:27 AM #11:	LukeInside posted... while it should be judged objectively. there is no way to judge video game years objectively also if everyone did that then everyone would vote the same --- RIP in Pieces GamerJM, 2007-2015. You will be missed. #UnPermabanJim <cite>_SJimW_ posted [p:878680075] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote>while it should be judged objectively.</quote> there is no way to judge video game years objectively also if everyone did that then everyone would vote the same</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LukeInside 05/08/17 1:48:42 AM #12:	ninkendo posted... In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off Taylor Swift = "one of the greatest artists of our time"? :D No wonder you don't know anything about games if you don't know anything about good music. Allow your game ratings to the public and I'll tell you who you are. You can shake it off yourself if you like it so much. Over and out... <cite>LukeInside posted [p:878680294] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>ninkendo posted...</cite> <quote>In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off</quote> Taylor Swift = "one of the greatest artists of our time"? :D No wonder you don't know anything about games if you don't know anything about good music. Allow your game ratings to the public and I'll tell you who you are. You can shake it off yourself if you like it so much. Over and out...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bhaas1107 05/08/17 1:52:18 AM #13:	LukeInside posted... ninkendo posted... In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off Taylor Swift = "one of the greatest artists of our time"? :D No wonder you don't know anything about games if you don't know anything about good music. Allow your game ratings to the public and I'll tell you who you are. You can shake it off yourself if you like it so much. Over and out... It's the stupid whiners game. It coincides with the second you posted it at... <cite>Bhaas1107 posted [p:878680422] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ninkendo posted...</cite> <quote>In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off</quote> Taylor Swift = "one of the greatest artists of our time"? :D No wonder you don't know anything about games if you don't know anything about good music. Allow your game ratings to the public and I'll tell you who you are. You can shake it off yourself if you like it so much. Over and out...</quote> It's the stupid whiners game. It coincides with the second you posted it at...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LukeInside 05/08/17 1:54:53 AM #14:	EmDubyaSee posted... 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. Fair, next. Mmmkay...1990 had not only SMB3 but also first FF and a great RCR. As for the 2000's - as much as I love Diablo II and everything from Rare (Perfect Dark) I still think that it should lose. SMB3 did a lot for platformers and FF did a lot for jRPGs. That's why I think it was better as I decided to follow my brain than my heart. <cite>LukeInside posted [p:878680504] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>EmDubyaSee posted...</cite> <quote> 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. Fair, next.</quote> Mmmkay...1990 had not only SMB3 but also first FF and a great RCR. As for the 2000's - as much as I love Diablo II and everything from Rare (Perfect Dark) I still think that it should lose. SMB3 did a lot for platformers and FF did a lot for jRPGs. That's why I think it was better as I decided to follow my brain than my heart.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ZeldaTPLink 05/08/17 1:58:10 AM #15:	LukeInside posted... EmDubyaSee posted... 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. Fair, next. Mmmkay...1990 had not only SMB3 but also first FF and a great RCR. As for the 2000's - as much as I love Diablo II and everything from Rare (Perfect Dark) I still think that it should lost. SMB3 did a lot for platformers and FF did a lot for jRPG. That's why I think it was better as I decided to follow my brain than my heart. If only you followed your brain when making the bracket too... <cite>ZeldaTPLink posted [p:878680623] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EmDubyaSee posted...</cite> <quote> 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. Fair, next.</quote> Mmmkay...1990 had not only SMB3 but also first FF and a great RCR. As for the 2000's - as much as I love Diablo II and everything from Rare (Perfect Dark) I still think that it should lost. SMB3 did a lot for platformers and FF did a lot for jRPG. That's why I think it was better as I decided to follow my brain than my heart.</quote> If only you followed your brain when making the bracket too...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LukeInside 05/08/17 1:58:19 AM #16:	Bhaas1107 posted... It's the stupid whiners game. It coincides with the second you posted it at... Nah dude. It was clear when those who love MM posted their toxic stuff. Cheers. <cite>LukeInside posted [p:878680630] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bhaas1107 posted...</cite> <quote> It's the stupid whiners game. It coincides with the second you posted it at...</quote> Nah dude. It was clear when those who love MM posted their toxic stuff. Cheers.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
XIII_rocks 05/08/17 1:58:57 AM #17:	Wow I didn't think we'd actually get topics like this for this contest --- Such a lust for revenge <cite>XIII_rocks posted [p:878680649] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>Wow I didn't think we'd actually get topics like this for this contest</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LukeInside 05/08/17 2:00:03 AM #18:	ZeldaTPLink posted... 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. If only you followed your brain when making the bracket too... Well, for now I have everything right apart from that. What's your score whimp? Your nick says everything sad and childish person :) <cite>LukeInside posted [p:878680691] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>ZeldaTPLink posted...</cite> <quote> 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. If only you followed your brain when making the bracket too...</quote> Well, for now I have everything right apart from that. What's your score whimp? Your nick says everything sad and childish person :)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_SecretSquirrel 05/08/17 2:00:22 AM #19:	Now, this is the perfect topic to use the whiner seconds game on. --- Agent Triple Zero at your service! This line reserved for 2017 Guru champion. <cite>_SecretSquirrel posted [p:878680702] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>Now, this is the perfect topic to use the whiner seconds game on.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bhaas1107 05/08/17 2:01:14 AM #20:	LukeInside posted... ZeldaTPLink posted... 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. If only you followed your brain when making the bracket too... Well, for now I have everything right apart from that. What's your score whimp? Your nick says everything sad and childish person :) My score is perfect... <cite>Bhaas1107 posted [p:878680735] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ZeldaTPLink posted...</cite> <quote> 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. If only you followed your brain when making the bracket too...</quote> Well, for now I have everything right apart from that. What's your score whimp? Your nick says everything sad and childish person :)</quote> My score is perfect...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
xp1337 05/08/17 2:01:20 AM #21:	I'm #2 on the leaderboard. does that mean you all have to defer to me? oh ya unlimited power --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out? <cite>xp1337 posted [p:878680738] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>I'm #2 on the leaderboard. does that mean you all have to defer to me? oh ya unlimited power</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VeryInsane 05/08/17 2:01:33 AM #22:	XIII_rocks posted... Wow I didn't think we'd actually get topics like this for this contest There are many people on the internet who would love to argue about literally anything --- Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett <cite>VeryInsane posted [p:878680747] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>XIII_rocks posted...</cite> <quote>Wow I didn't think we'd actually get topics like this for this contest</quote> There are many people on the internet who would love to argue about literally anything</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bhaas1107 05/08/17 2:02:09 AM #23:	xp1337 posted... I'm #2 on the leaderboard. does that mean you all have to defer to me? oh ya unlimited power Like a thousand of us are tied.... <cite>Bhaas1107 posted [p:878680770] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>xp1337 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm #2 on the leaderboard. does that mean you all have to defer to me? oh ya unlimited power</quote> Like a thousand of us are tied....</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LukeInside 05/08/17 2:09:24 AM #24:	VeryInsane posted... XIII_rocks posted... Wow I didn't think we'd actually get topics like this for this contest There are many people on the internet who would love to argue about literally anything There wasn't a slightest whining in my comment. I'm just ultimately surprised people voted for 2000's, while also "not surprised" at all that such "contests" go this way. I'm not from the US nor Canada so I can't win anything in this one anyway. Go figure dude. Would I care for absurd bragging points here? Problem is that people will always rate with their heart, not with their brain. It seems you can't even have an intelligent discussion with fanboys of certain game series. People and their childish idols, sheesh :) <cite>LukeInside posted [p:878681035] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>VeryInsane posted...</cite> <quote><cite>XIII_rocks posted...</cite> <quote>Wow I didn't think we'd actually get topics like this for this contest</quote> There are many people on the internet who would love to argue about literally anything</quote> There wasn't a slightest whining in my comment. I'm just ultimately surprised people voted for 2000's, while also "not surprised" at all that such "contests" go this way. I'm not from the US nor Canada so I can't win anything in this one anyway. Go figure dude. Would I care for absurd bragging points here? Problem is that people will always rate with their heart, not with their brain. It seems you can't even have an intelligent discussion with fanboys of certain game series. People and their childish idols, sheesh :)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
xp1337 05/08/17 2:11:00 AM #25:	Objectively 2000 > 1990 it's just math --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out? <cite>xp1337 posted [p:878681088] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>Objectively 2000 > 1990 it's just math</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LukeInside 05/08/17 2:14:10 AM #26:	xp1337 posted... Objectively 2000 > 1990 it's just math Not if you consider how many SMB fanatics there are. Not many voted for Diablo II or Perfect Dark I guess. Mostly Zelda fanboys ranked up the score :) <cite>LukeInside posted [p:878681227] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>xp1337 posted...</cite> <quote>Objectively 2000 > 1990 it's just math</quote> Not if you consider how many SMB fanatics there are. Not many voted for Diablo II or Perfect Dark I guess. Mostly Zelda fanboys ranked up the score :)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
xp1337 05/08/17 2:14:55 AM #27:	No, I'm fairly certain that 2000 is a larger integer than 1990. If we're comparing them objectively, that is. --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out? <cite>xp1337 posted [p:878681261] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>No, I'm fairly certain that 2000 is a larger integer than 1990. If we're comparing them objectively, that is.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LukeInside 05/08/17 2:17:10 AM #28:	xp1337 posted... No, I'm fairly certain that 2000 is a larger integer than 1990. If we're comparing them objectively, that is. It depends actually. Only this topic alone shows how many Zelda series fanboys there are. Multiply it by a couple thousands. <cite>LukeInside posted [p:878681343] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>xp1337 posted...</cite> <quote>No, I'm fairly certain that 2000 is a larger integer than 1990. If we're comparing them objectively, that is.</quote> It depends actually. Only this topic alone shows how many Zelda series fanboys there are. Multiply it by a couple thousands.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NFUN 05/08/17 2:29:48 AM #29:	2000 - 1990 = 10 > 0 %u2234 2000 > 1990 QED Why Why do the triple "therefore" dots show up in the comment editor but not the fucking post? 1990 should've won; this site hasn't reached the year 2000 yet. --- Thus is our treaty written, thus is our agreement made. Thought is the arrow of time; memory never fades. What was asked is given; the price is paid. ARF <cite>NFUN posted [p:878681804] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>2000 - 1990 = 10 > 0 %u2234 2000 > 1990 QED Why Why do the triple "therefore" dots show up in the comment editor but not the fucking post? 1990 should've won; this site hasn't reached the year 2000 yet.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LukeInside 05/08/17 2:39:04 AM #30:	NFUN posted... 2000 - 1990 = 10 > 0 %u2234 2000 > 1990 QED Why Why do the triple "therefore" dots show up in the comment editor but not the fucking post? 1990 should've won; this site hasn't reached the year 2000 yet. Well, I'm not saying that the 1990 "should have won". I'm just stating that it's ridiculous because most of the time people rate without thinking. I've literally spend some time on every single "battle" to actually THINK what year has done more FOR THE GAMING, as it's not called "rate your favourite year in gaming". I know it's supposed to be for fun but I thought that there will be some professionalism here and knowledge about gaming. I was wrong ;) <cite>LukeInside posted [p:878682117] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>NFUN posted...</cite> <quote>2000 - 1990 = 10 > 0 %u2234 2000 > 1990 QED Why Why do the triple "therefore" dots show up in the comment editor but not the fucking post? 1990 should've won; this site hasn't reached the year 2000 yet.</quote> Well, I'm not saying that the 1990 "should have won". I'm just stating that it's ridiculous because most of the time people rate without thinking. I've literally spend some time on every single "battle" to actually THINK what year has done more FOR THE GAMING, as it's not called "rate your favourite year in gaming". I know it's supposed to be for fun but I thought that there will be some professionalism here and knowledge about gaming. I was wrong ;)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheMissingShoe 05/08/17 2:44:17 AM #31:	LukeInside posted... I've literally spend some time on every single "battle" to actually THINK what year has done more FOR THE GAMING I'm sorry to be the one to inform you but you voted wrong. <cite>TheMissingShoe posted [p:878682272] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote>I've literally spend some time on every single "battle" to actually THINK what year has done more FOR THE GAMING</quote> I'm sorry to be the one to inform you but you voted wrong.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLOUR 05/08/17 2:44:36 AM #32:	Imagine voting for a crappy movie over a revered movie you've never seen. That's what this contest has become. -- --- If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule? <cite>FLOUR posted [p:878682282] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>Imagine voting for a crappy movie over a revered movie you've never seen. That's what this contest has become. --</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NFUN 05/08/17 2:58:33 AM #33:	LukeInside posted... NFUN posted... 2000 - 1990 = 10 > 0 %u2234 2000 > 1990 QED Why Why do the triple "therefore" dots show up in the comment editor but not the fucking post? 1990 should've won; this site hasn't reached the year 2000 yet. Well, I'm not saying that the 1990 "should have won". I'm just stating that it's ridiculous because most of the time people rate without thinking. I've literally spend some time on every single "battle" to actually THINK what year has done more FOR THE GAMING, as it's not called "rate your favourite year in gaming". I know it's supposed to be for fun but I thought that there will be some professionalism here and knowledge about gaming. I was wrong ;) Ok this is getting old I'm going to ruin everybody's fun and point it out in the most simple of terms. The post in question: xp1337 posted... Objectively 2000 > 1990 it's just math 2000, two thousand, the unitless number 2000, is being compared to 1990, one thousand nine hundred and ninety, not a year, a number. The number 2000 is a bigger number than 1990. If you count up from 1990, you will reach 2000, as 2000 is larger than 1990. 2000 is the greater quantity. I will provide an example, because these are large numbers and this might be difficult to grasp. 3 is bigger than 2. You can count: 1, 2, 3. Notice that 3 is after 2? That is because 3 is a larger number than 2. If Tim has 3 apples, and Mike has 2, Tim has more apples. If you took away 2 apples from both of them, Mike wouldn't have any apples, but Tim would have 1. That's because Tim has more apples than Mike, because 3 is greater than 2. Now here's the tricky part: ">" This symbol means "greater than". It signifies that one number is greater than another. Like, in our example, 3 and 2. 3 is greater than 2, so 3 > 2. This applies to even very large numbers like 2000 and 1990. 2000 is bigger than 1990, so 2000 > 1990. Now here's the really hard part. You can't objectively justify one year being more important than another. There are many different metrics, and the importance of each one is up to the participant. Nobody can comprehend the true impact or importance of everything, and judging the most well-regarded titles to be the best is the opposite of objective. It's a fool's errand, and if you believe that you are voting only for the objectively correct answer every time, you're an arrogant bastard and probably can't emphasize with somebody who may have a different opinion (yes, they're opinions) than you. Your lack of empathy is also noted in the fact you seem to be completely incapable of understanding that people are joking. Math is the only objective metric, and math says that 2000 > 1990. Please reply if you have any questions. --- Thus is our treaty written, thus is our agreement made. Thought is the arrow of time; memory never fades. What was asked is given; the price is paid. ARF <cite>NFUN posted [p:878682677] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NFUN posted...</cite> <quote>2000 - 1990 = 10 > 0 %u2234 2000 > 1990 QED Why Why do the triple "therefore" dots show up in the comment editor but not the fucking post? 1990 should've won; this site hasn't reached the year 2000 yet.</quote> Well, I'm not saying that the 1990 "should have won". I'm just stating that it's ridiculous because most of the time people rate without thinking. I've literally spend some time on every single "battle" to actually THINK what year has done more FOR THE GAMING, as it's not called "rate your favourite year in gaming". I know it's supposed to be for fun but I thought that there will be some professionalism here and knowledge about gaming. I was wrong ;)</quote> Ok this is getting old I'm going to ruin everybody's fun and point it out in the most simple of terms. The post in question: <cite>xp1337 posted...</cite> <quote>Objectively 2000 > 1990 it's just math</quote> 2000, two thousand, the unitless number 2000, is being compared to 1990, one thousand nine hundred and ninety, not a year, a number. The number 2000 is a bigger number than 1990. If you count up from 1990, you will reach 2000, as 2000 is larger than 1990. 2000 is the greater quantity. I will provide an example, because these are large numbers and this might be difficult to grasp. 3 is bigger than 2. You can count: 1, 2, 3. Notice that 3 is after 2? That is because 3 is a larger number than 2. If Tim has 3 apples, and Mike has 2, Tim has more apples. If you took away 2 apples from both of them, Mike wouldn't have any apples, but Tim would have 1. That's because Tim has more apples than Mike, because 3 is greater than 2. Now here's the tricky part: ">" This symbol means "greater than". It signifies that one number is greater than another. Like, in our example, 3 and 2. 3 is greater than 2, so 3 > 2. This applies to even very large numbers like 2000 and 1990. 2000 is bigger than 1990, so 2000 > 1990. Now here's the really hard part. You can't objectively justify one year being more important than another. There are many different metrics, and the importance of each one is up to the participant. Nobody can comprehend the true impact or importance of everything, and judging the most well-regarded titles to be the best is the opposite of objective. It's a fool's errand, and if you believe that you are voting only for the objectively correct answer every time, you're an arrogant bastard and probably can't emphasize with somebody who may have a different opinion (yes, they're opinions) than you. Your lack of empathy is also noted in the fact you seem to be completely incapable of understanding that people are joking. Math is the only objective metric, and math says that 2000 > 1990. Please reply if you have any questions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bryans7 05/08/17 3:29:16 AM #34:	LukeInside posted... ninkendo posted... In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off Taylor Swift = "one of the greatest artists of our time"? :D No wonder you don't know anything about games if you don't know anything about good music. Allow your game ratings to the public and I'll tell you who you are. You can shake it off yourself if you like it so much. Over and out... Seems like you are seeing red my friend, really letting the sparks fly there. No reason for this sort of bad blood just because of a disagreement; personally that's not my style. Maybe when I was fifteen or 22, but this is just mean. Never in my wildest dreams did I think I'd see such blatant character attacks on gamefaqs. It's not too late though, we can always begin again. --- http://s9.postimg.org/52c0cmqtp/2nbu45s.jpg <cite>bryans7 posted [p:878683400] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ninkendo posted...</cite> <quote>In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off</quote> Taylor Swift = "one of the greatest artists of our time"? :D No wonder you don't know anything about games if you don't know anything about good music. Allow your game ratings to the public and I'll tell you who you are. You can shake it off yourself if you like it so much. Over and out...</quote> Seems like you are seeing red my friend, really letting the sparks fly there. No reason for this sort of bad blood just because of a disagreement; personally that's not my style. Maybe when I was fifteen or 22, but this is just mean. Never in my wildest dreams did I think I'd see such blatant character attacks on gamefaqs. It's not too late though, we can always begin again.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Steiner 05/08/17 4:28:16 AM #35:	LukeInside posted... by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively this is why there are votes and allen didn't just publish a bracket and the 'objective' results majora's mask and final fantasy ix are objectively better than every game released in 1990 also --- Remember, we are eternal - all this pain is an illusion *User of the Year 2016, UotY16 Fantasy Champion* <cite>Steiner posted [p:878684753] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote> by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively</quote> this is why there are votes and allen didn't just publish a bracket and the 'objective' results majora's mask and final fantasy ix are objectively better than every game released in 1990 also</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Steiner 05/08/17 4:29:13 AM #36:	LukeInside posted... ninkendo posted... In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off Taylor Swift = "one of the greatest artists of our time"? :D No wonder you don't know anything about games if you don't know anything about good music. Allow your game ratings to the public and I'll tell you who you are. You can shake it off yourself if you like it so much. Over and out... what a quality post --- Remember, we are eternal - all this pain is an illusion *User of the Year 2016, UotY16 Fantasy Champion* <cite>Steiner posted [p:878684770] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ninkendo posted...</cite> <quote>In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off</quote> Taylor Swift = "one of the greatest artists of our time"? :D No wonder you don't know anything about games if you don't know anything about good music. Allow your game ratings to the public and I'll tell you who you are. You can shake it off yourself if you like it so much. Over and out...</quote> what a quality post</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SwiftyDC 05/08/17 4:47:32 AM #37:	Tay-Tay love --- Dilated Chemist DpObliVion is the one true king of Guru's. <cite>SwiftyDC posted [p:878685136] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>Tay-Tay love</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JDPizza 05/08/17 5:49:47 AM #38:	Honestly guys, I think Bad Blood is better for this topic than Shake It Off. >_> --- By the slice, baby. <cite>JDPizza posted [p:878686348] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>Honestly guys, I think Bad Blood is better for this topic than Shake It Off. >_></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ZeldaTPLink 05/08/17 5:50:56 AM #39:	xp1337 posted... I'm #2 on the leaderboard. does that mean you all have to defer to me? oh ya unlimited power It means all your opinions are right unless the guy on 1st place disagrees with then. <cite>ZeldaTPLink posted [p:878686371] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>xp1337 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm #2 on the leaderboard. does that mean you all have to defer to me? oh ya unlimited power</quote> It means all your opinions are right unless the guy on 1st place disagrees with then.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ZeldaTPLink 05/08/17 5:54:20 AM #40:	Anyway, I was going to say MM is objectively better than SMB3, but I guess my opinion is worthless because I have a "sad" username. I need to create an alt with a happier username, I see. <cite>ZeldaTPLink posted [p:878686435] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>Anyway, I was going to say MM is objectively better than SMB3, but I guess my opinion is worthless because I have a "sad" username. I need to create an alt with a happier username, I see.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EmDubyaSee 05/08/17 5:56:03 AM #41:	Steiner posted... LukeInside posted... by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively this is why there are votes and allen didn't just publish a bracket and the 'objective' results majora's mask and final fantasy ix are objectively better than every game released in 1990 also This too. --- Tom Bombadil: "you are probably the king of b8 dragonball fans at least!" <cite>EmDubyaSee posted [p:878686474] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>Steiner posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote> by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively</quote> this is why there are votes and allen didn't just publish a bracket and the 'objective' results majora's mask and final fantasy ix are objectively better than every game released in 1990 also</quote> This too.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ChichiriMuyo 05/08/17 6:36:59 AM #42:	ninkendo posted... In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off I'd shake her off after a double O, ;) This result was a bit of an upset, though. --- Ulti, nifboy, yo, Jman, voltch, Kaxon, Z1mZum, Rufus Shinra, EC, FastFalcon, Krahen, Dr Football, Black Turtle, SuperNiceDog, raytan and Dp <cite>ChichiriMuyo posted [p:878687237] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>ninkendo posted...</cite> <quote>In the words of one of the greatest artists of our time: Shake it off</quote> I'd shake her off after a double O, ;) This result was a bit of an upset, though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ChichiriMuyo 05/08/17 6:39:14 AM #43:	Steiner posted... LukeInside posted... by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively this is why there are votes and allen didn't just publish a bracket and the 'objective' results majora's mask and final fantasy ix are objectively better than every game released in 1990 also Not objectively. I really like those games, a lot, but not everyone thinks they's better. Or did I miss the first match where there were 0 votes for the losing side? --- Ulti, nifboy, yo, Jman, voltch, Kaxon, Z1mZum, Rufus Shinra, EC, FastFalcon, Krahen, Dr Football, Black Turtle, SuperNiceDog, raytan and Dp <cite>ChichiriMuyo posted [p:878687272] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>Steiner posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote> by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively</quote> this is why there are votes and allen didn't just publish a bracket and the 'objective' results majora's mask and final fantasy ix are objectively better than every game released in 1990 also</quote> Not objectively. I really like those games, a lot, but not everyone thinks they's better. Or did I miss the first match where there were 0 votes for the losing side?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ZeeksFire 05/08/17 6:42:00 AM #44:	I'm not suprised 1990 lost to 2000, after all, that was one of the best years for games for the worst advertised system out there, of which none of the games from it showed up on the important game list. Yes, I'm talking about the Dreamcast. Quantity and quality is what let 2000 beat 1990 (and the ps2 release didn't hurt either) <cite>ZeeksFire posted [p:878687332] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>I'm not suprised 1990 lost to 2000, after all, that was one of the best years for games for the worst advertised system out there, of which none of the games from it showed up on the important game list. Yes, I'm talking about the Dreamcast. Quantity and quality is what let 2000 beat 1990 (and the ps2 release didn't hurt either)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Steiner 05/08/17 6:49:31 AM #45:	ChichiriMuyo posted... Steiner posted... LukeInside posted... by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively this is why there are votes and allen didn't just publish a bracket and the 'objective' results majora's mask and final fantasy ix are objectively better than every game released in 1990 also Not objectively. I really like those games, a lot, but not everyone thinks they's better. Or did I miss the first match where there were 0 votes for the losing side? congratulations you spotted the point of my post. --- Remember, we are eternal - all this pain is an illusion *User of the Year 2016, UotY16 Fantasy Champion* <cite>Steiner posted [p:878687487] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>ChichiriMuyo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Steiner posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote> by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively</quote> this is why there are votes and allen didn't just publish a bracket and the 'objective' results majora's mask and final fantasy ix are objectively better than every game released in 1990 also</quote> Not objectively. I really like those games, a lot, but not everyone thinks they's better. Or did I miss the first match where there were 0 votes for the losing side?</quote> congratulations you spotted the point of my post.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
StealThisSheen 05/08/17 8:17:37 AM #46:	This topic was funny until I noticed names that I actually recognized complaining, too --- Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996 Step FOUR! Get Paid! <cite>StealThisSheen posted [p:878689460] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>This topic was funny until I noticed names that I actually recognized complaining, too</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
metroid composite 05/08/17 11:09:30 AM #47:	LukeInside posted... When I done this by myself it came out that the winner was 1991. Wait, really? Why? If we're being strictly objective, SMB3 was considered a much better game than SMW at the time. (More levels, more worlds, more varied power ups, more balanced power ups, sticks closer to Mario iconography with goombas looking like they do in the rest of the series). Final Fantasy 4 is only really liked by people who are full of nostalgia for whom it was their first RPG. If you have people go back after both games came out, and play both FF4 and FF6, pretty much everyone agrees that FF6 is objectively the better game, for instance. Like...the only way I can see trying to argue that 1991 is the best year on some kind of objective level would be pretty much entirely due to Street Fighter II. And I suppose you could make that argument. But like...on an objective level even if you want to heavily weigh tournament fighters...let's see...what year did SSBM come out? 2001? Yeah, I'd take that over 1991. Both games with lasting tournament scenes, but SSBM is still standing the test of time, often gets the most viewers at EVO, and is actually currently growing as a tournament scene. Whereas SF2...occasionally gets a spot at EVO once every few years as a novelty. Or like...what year did Starcraft Brood War come out? 1998? That game looks like it's about to outlive its sequel in terms of tournament longevity as everyone hops off SC2 and onto SC HD remake. People have stopped trying to make tournament RTS games because nobody thinks they can compete with Starcraft. Also birthed e-sports as we know it, saved a country's economy etc. --- Cats land on their feet. Toast lands peanut butter side down. A cat with toast strapped to its back will hover above the ground in a state of quantum indecision <cite>metroid composite posted [p:878696056] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote>When I done this by myself it came out that the winner was 1991.</quote> Wait, really? Why? If we're being strictly objective, SMB3 was considered a much better game than SMW at the time. (More levels, more worlds, more varied power ups, more balanced power ups, sticks closer to Mario iconography with goombas looking like they do in the rest of the series). Final Fantasy 4 is only really liked by people who are full of nostalgia for whom it was their first RPG. If you have people go back after both games came out, and play both FF4 and FF6, pretty much everyone agrees that FF6 is objectively the better game, for instance. Like...the only way I can see trying to argue that 1991 is the best year on some kind of objective level would be pretty much entirely due to Street Fighter II. And I suppose you could make that argument. But like...on an objective level even if you want to heavily weigh tournament fighters...let's see...what year did SSBM come out? 2001? Yeah, I'd take that over 1991. Both games with lasting tournament scenes, but SSBM is still standing the test of time, often gets the most viewers at EVO, and is actually currently growing as a tournament scene. Whereas SF2...occasionally gets a spot at EVO once every few years as a novelty. Or like...what year did Starcraft Brood War come out? 1998? That game looks like it's about to outlive its sequel in terms of tournament longevity as everyone hops off SC2 and onto SC HD remake. People have stopped trying to make tournament RTS games because nobody thinks they can compete with Starcraft. Also birthed e-sports as we know it, saved a country's economy etc.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Steiner 05/08/17 11:21:43 AM #48:	uh, mc, did you just ignore the SNES, super mario world and sonic 1 all coming out in the same year? those three things in tandem are the reason for 1991's strength - possibly intangibles causing it to be stronger than the sum of its parts --- Remember, we are eternal - all this pain is an illusion *User of the Year 2016, UotY16 Fantasy Champion* <cite>Steiner posted [p:878696662] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>uh, mc, did you just ignore the SNES, super mario world and sonic 1 all coming out in the same year? those three things in tandem are the reason for 1991's strength - possibly intangibles causing it to be stronger than the sum of its parts</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zero_Maniac 05/08/17 11:22:15 AM #49:	EmDubyaSee posted... darkrain108 posted... EmDubyaSee posted... LukeInside posted... That's ridiculous to be honest. These "contests" seem to work as always - by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively. Some titles are well respected and recognised, even if you didn't play every one of them :) When I done this by myself it came out that the winner was 1991. I hope that's possible... 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. Fair, next. Think it'll be close with 97 I'd really like it if 97 or 95 gave it a run. But I really don't see it hapepning. Pretty sure 98 will just roll any and everything. 97: -Castlevania: Symphony of the Night -Final Fantasy VII -Mega Man X4 (the last good MMX game) -Mario Kart 64 -Fallout -Breath of Fire III -Shadow Warrior -Star Fox 64 -Age of Empires 98: -Ocarina of Time -Metal Gear Solid -Half-Life -Resident Evil 2 -Grim Fandango -Fallout 2 -Xenogears -Parasite Eve -Baldur's Gate It'll be close. --- "Remember kid, there's heroes and there's legends. Heroes get remembered, but legends never die. Follow your heart kid, and you'll never go wrong." <cite>Zero_Maniac posted [p:878696700] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote><cite>EmDubyaSee posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkrain108 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EmDubyaSee posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LukeInside posted...</cite> <quote>That's ridiculous to be honest. These "contests" seem to work as always - by "which games I like the most" method, while it should be judged objectively. Some titles are well respected and recognised, even if you didn't play every one of them :) When I done this by myself it came out that the winner was 1991. I hope that's possible...</quote> 98 wins in a landslide. MM is a better game than SMB3 anyway. Fair, next.</quote> Think it'll be close with 97</quote> I'd really like it if 97 or 95 gave it a run. But I really don't see it hapepning. Pretty sure 98 will just roll any and everything.</quote> 97: -Castlevania: Symphony of the Night -Final Fantasy VII -Mega Man X4 (the last good MMX game) -Mario Kart 64 -Fallout -Breath of Fire III -Shadow Warrior -Star Fox 64 -Age of Empires 98: -Ocarina of Time -Metal Gear Solid -Half-Life -Resident Evil 2 -Grim Fandango -Fallout 2 -Xenogears -Parasite Eve -Baldur's Gate It'll be close.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VeryInsane 05/08/17 11:32:08 AM #50:	98 also has Pokemon Red/Blue so it won't lose --- Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett <cite>VeryInsane posted [p:878697188] in 1990 lost ... [t:75323163]...</cite> <quote>98 also has Pokemon Red/Blue so it won't lose</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Board 8 > 1990 lost to 2000? (+) Yeah! (+)

Board 8 > 1990 lost to 2000?