Poll of the Day > Watching Pulp Fiction for my cinema class.

(+) Yeah! (+)

This better be as great as it's cracked up to be.
---

Not sure how you went this long without seeing Pulp Fiction but the system failed you.
---

Not sure how you went this long without seeing The Silence of the Lambs but the system failed you.
---

Royale, with cheese.
---

I thought it was alright
---

Samuel Jackson is a card.

I DON'T REMEMBER ASKIN' YOU A GODDAMN THING!!
---

It's very boring.
---

Oh man, I shot Marvin in the face!
---

Oh my gosh the watch scene. That guy was acting all serious, then starts rambling on about the watch being up a guy's ass.
---

Quit fucking being on potd and pay attention to the god damn movie

MICHALECOLE posted...

Quit fucking being on potd and pay attention to the god damn movie

pulp fiction: srs bzns

berniepanders posted...

MICHALECOLE posted...

Quit fucking being on potd and pay attention to the god damn movie

pulp fiction: srs bzns

Well it's like "herpy derp hope this movie is as good as everybody says" *sits on phone the whole time*

Claude_Frollo posted...

Oh my gosh the watch scene. That guy was acting all serious, then starts rambling on about the watch being up a guy's ass.

That guy? Your class is failing you.
---

GinsuVictim posted...

Claude_Frollo posted...

Oh my gosh the watch scene. That guy was acting all serious, then starts rambling on about the watch being up a guy's ass.

That guy? Your class is failing you.

Fine, Butch's father. Sue me.
---

Claude_Frollo posted...

GinsuVictim posted...

Claude_Frollo posted...

Oh my gosh the watch scene. That guy was acting all serious, then starts rambling on about the watch being up a guy's ass.

That guy? Your class is failing you.

Fine, Butch's father. Sue me.

Jesus Christ..

Claude_Frollo posted...

Not sure how you went this long without seeing The Silence of the Lambs but the system failed you.

95% sure I have seen Silence of the Lambs (or at least a good chunk of it), but it's a weird choice anyway given the absurd number of better films you could accuse me of having not seen. Especially since as far as American pop culture goes, Pulp Fiction is a waaaaaaaaaay bigger draw.

berniepanders posted...

MICHALECOLE posted...

Quit fucking being on potd and pay attention to the god damn movie

pulp fiction: srs bzns

It really is.

MICHALECOLE posted...

Claude_Frollo posted...

GinsuVictim posted...

Claude_Frollo posted...

Oh my gosh the watch scene. That guy was acting all serious, then starts rambling on about the watch being up a guy's ass.

That guy? Your class is failing you.

Fine, Butch's father. Sue me.

Jesus Christ..

I know, he learned nothing. SMH!
---

Zeus posted...

95% sure I have seen Silence of the Lambs, but it's a weird choice anyway given the absurd number of better films you could accuse me of having not seen.

There really aren't that many better films out there; if you actually had seen it you wouldn't be making such a claim.
---

Claude_Frollo posted...

Zeus posted...

95% sure I have seen Silence of the Lambs, but it's a weird choice anyway given the absurd number of better films you could accuse me of having not seen.

There really aren't that many better films out there; if you actually had seen it you wouldn't be making such a claim.

There really are and the fact that you're making that claim suggests you've seen almost nothing. Sad!
---

Zeus clearly hasn't seen silence of the lambs and is under rating it a massive amount

@Zeus, since I know you're posting in this topic, I'm still waiting on that proof from you of your claim that coal is cheaper and cleaner than every other alternative energy source.

It'll be funny when you accuse me of harassment instead of shutting the fuck up and just posting that proof.

That proof doesn't exist, otherwise you would've posted it already
---

Shut the fuck up already Erik. Goddamn, dude.

MICHALECOLE posted...

Zeus clearly hasn't seen silence of the lambs and is under rating it a massive amount

No.

Erik_P posted...

@Zeus, since I know you're posting in this topic, I'm still waiting on that proof from you of your claim that coal is cheaper and cleaner than every other alternative energy source.

@Erik_P Which literally wasn't the claim I was making (or even comes close to resembling it), but literacy was never your strong suit. Also, you know that I'm just ignoring your mentions now, right? You abused that privilege and now you're lost it. Also wtf is up with you always wanting immediate responses to everything? I went out to dinner with friends. I'm not going to bring my laptop along to argue with shit trolls while I'm eating.
---

He's ignoring my mentions as he mentions me. Right.

You tried claiming coal was cheaper and less polluting than any other energy source which is some Fox News level lying ass bullshit.

Also, you were at dinner for 5 hours?
---

Erik_P posted...

@Zeus, since I know you're posting in this topic, I'm still waiting on that proof from you of your claim that coal is cheaper and cleaner than every other alternative energy source.

It'll be funny when you accuse me of harassment instead of shutting the fuck up and just posting that proof.

That proof doesn't exist, otherwise you would've posted it already

He seriously claimed that it was CLEANER? Link.
---

Claude_Frollo posted...

Erik_P posted...

@Zeus, since I know you're posting in this topic, I'm still waiting on that proof from you of your claim that coal is cheaper and cleaner than every other alternative energy source.

It'll be funny when you accuse me of harassment instead of shutting the fuck up and just posting that proof.

That proof doesn't exist, otherwise you would've posted it already

He seriously claimed that it was CLEANER? Link.

https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/3-poll-of-the-day/75198362

It's the last page.
---

Erik_P posted...

He's ignoring my mentions as he mentions me. Right.

You tried claiming coal was cheaper and less polluting than any other energy source which is some Fox News level lying ass bullshit.

No, I was checking this topic and saw your nonsense post where you made up some shitty fake accusation that doesn't resemble anything I said. But given that you're constantly wrong, it's no wonder that you'd make up shit and distort other peoples' claims.

Claude_Frollo posted...

Erik_P posted...

@Zeus, since I know you're posting in this topic, I'm still waiting on that proof from you of your claim that coal is cheaper and cleaner than every other alternative energy source.

It'll be funny when you accuse me of harassment instead of shutting the fuck up and just posting that proof.

That proof doesn't exist, otherwise you would've posted it already

He seriously claimed that it was CLEANER? Link.

Of course not, it's Anti-Reality Erik. He doesn't hear or read anything people say and just imagines things instead. By some bizarre transitive property, Erik distorts the fact that coal isn't the most polluting energy source to mean that it's the cleanest energy source because nothing Erik says ever makes any sense.
---

From my topic:

You can't really believe that it's not, given all of the possible energy sources many of which are more polluting than coal.

That's you claiming coal isn't as bad as other energy sources.

And yes, at this point it would be an unnatural death because coal is still the cheapest, most viable wide-scale energy source which we know because otherwise its prices would be undercut by other energies

That's you claiming coal is cheaper than every other energy source.

The only one lying and distorting anything is you. Still waiting on that proof you said you would provide showing your claims that coal is cheaper and cleaner than anything else.

If you want sources, I'm going to have to get back to you on that

That's the quote proving you said you would provide sources. Still not distorting anything. Also, you said that 5 hours ago and I'm still waiting. You weren't at dinner for 5 hours.

Anymore smart ass comments?
---

Erik_P posted...

That's you claiming coal isn't as bad as other energy sources.

I admire how you can quote a post and then not actually read what it says. That's impressive denial.

Erik_P posted...

That's you claiming coal is cheaper than every other energy source.

Again, read the full sentence.

Erik_P posted...

The only one lying and distorting anything is you. Still waiting on that proof you said you would provide showing your claims that coal is cheaper and cleaner than anything else.

No, you're asking me to prove something I never said. More importantly, you also don't seem to understand the concept of trade-offs. I even spelled that out several times because if you had a wide-scale energy source that was as cheap as coal and less polluting, everybody would be using that to undercut coal. In no way does that statement imply that coal is the least-polluting thing ever and only somebody with zero reading comprehension believes that it does.

Erik_P posted...

That's the quote proving you said you would provide sources. Still not distorting anything. Also, you said that 5 hours ago and I'm still waiting. You weren't at dinner for 5 hours.

You want one example? Fine, wood. Wood is readily available, fairly cheap, but because it's so inefficient it causes far more pollution for its output (ie, compared to getting similar energy output from other sources) and, by the way, the use of wood for energy is one cause of deforestation and deforestation is alleged to be a major factor where climate change is concerned.

And there are a lot of examples like that of things we either don't use or are less likely to use because they're not as practical as coal, natural gas, oil, etc.
---

HAHAHAHA

Did you get whiplash from the backtracking you did? You knew you were completely full of shit and couldn't prove your claims so now you're pulling this shit about how you totally were misunderstood.

Sorry buddy but your distortions won't work. Thanks for the laugh though. You have a long way to go before you can get on Trump's level. He's able to shoot missiles at foreign countries to get people to forget about scandals that involve him. You don't get that luxury.
---

Erik_P posted...

HAHAHAHA

Did you get whiplash from the backtracking you did? You knew you were completely full of shit and couldn't prove your claims so now you're pulling this shit about how you totally were misunderstood.

Sorry buddy but your distortions won't work. Thanks for the laugh though. You have a long way to go before you can get on Trump's level. He's able to shoot missiles at foreign countries to get people to forget about scandals that involve him. You don't get that luxury.

HAHAHAHA

You purposefully misread what I actually said and then claim that I'm backpedaling when I bring up the VERY claims I had already made in your other topic. You are literally the worst. You do things like quote me saying "blue," and then shout, "See, he said YELLOW!" You're trying to gaslight the board with your anti-reality nonsense. It's a reminder that you are by far the worst poster on this board.

And it's not even close to being the first time you've done this. You've consistently ignored reality either through denial or by reading a few words in a sentence while ignoring the rest. You frequently post sources which contradict everything you say and then claim, "See, this is evidence!" Evidence of what? That you don't know what the fuck you're talking about? That you live on some other plane of existence? Or that you reject our reality and insert your own?
---

Holy shit, this topic turned real sad real fast.

gravy posted...

Holy shit, this topic turned real sad real fast.

It was sad from the moment Carl doubted it was good.
---

So all you're capable of doing is "I know you are but what am I?"

I guess one can't expect originality or cleverness from a Trump cultist.
---

Erik_P posted...

So all you're capable of doing is "I know you are but what am I?"

I guess one can't expect originality or cleverness from a Trump cultist.

Anatomy of an Erik post:
Denial of reality.
Random nonsense
Weird Trump non-sequitur

If you're read one, you've read them all.
---

Well this topic went places just as I hoped it would!
---

Claude_Frollo posted...

GinsuVictim posted...

Claude_Frollo posted...

Oh my gosh the watch scene. That guy was acting all serious, then starts rambling on about the watch being up a guy's ass.

That guy? Your class is failing you.

Fine, Butch's father. Sue me.

Wrong. You shouldn't have been on your phone.

That guy = Christopher Walken (Capt Koons)
---

Claude_Frollo posted...

GinsuVictim posted...

Claude_Frollo posted...

Oh my gosh the watch scene. That guy was acting all serious, then starts rambling on about the watch being up a guy's ass.

That guy? Your class is failing you.

Fine, Butch's father. Sue me.

hahahahaha how can you seriously be in a film class and not know who the fuck christopher walken is

like how can you be alive in 2017 and not know who christopher walken is

Claude_Frollo posted...

There really aren't that many better films out there; if you actually had seen it you wouldn't be making such a claim.

i've seen silence of the lambs many times and i can easily say there are dozens if not hundreds of better films

Carl just likes it because Hannibal is also a cannibal. He has this weird fixation on cannibals.
---

Zeus posted...

Carl just likes it because Hannibal is also a cannibal. He has this weird fixation on cannibals.

In all sincerity there actually isn't any correlation between my love for that movie and my fetish, it's just a fantastic film on its own.
---