Kabutops had quite the lead for much of the final, and Aggron got lots of love during the last couple hours. Final was 28-24 in favor of Kabutops.
This final reminded me of the Ground final. Flygon was to Ground what Aggron was to Rock. They are consistently saved first and have the advantage of speed, but not the staying power to compete with Gen I.
Voter turnout was pretty low this time, the lowest we've seen besides the Normal final, I think. Even though Rock-types aren't very popular, things got interesting with miracle comebacks one after another.
I'll be going on vacation at the end of this month, and since the Electric contest won't finish before then, I'll wait until I come back from vacation to start it rather than leave it on hiatus for a week. Next contest will probably start on the second week of July.
Anyone have a creative name for the redo series? I was thinking of calling it "Save My Electric Pokemon Redux". Someone might have a better name.
From: starfox2245 | #025 Yeah, I'd rather have a week-long hiatus in the middle of it than a month-long one hiatus between contests. Really? People didn't seem to enjoy the hiatus during the Rock contest very much. It kills the hype, no?
From: SilentWanderer | #021 Save My Electric Pokemon: The Lights are Back On This is a good one, but we'd need something different for each of the remaining contests.
From: starfox2245 | #025 Yeah, I'd rather have a week-long hiatus in the middle of it than a month-long one hiatus between contests. Really? People didn't seem to enjoy the hiatus during the Rock contest very much. It kills the hype, no?
Yes it does, but nothing would kill my hype for a contest more than a month-long break before it even starts!
Yeah, same thing with Gen. We'd rather be no hiatus at all, but if there has to be one, I'd take the shorter one while the contest has at least gotten underway. Waiting for a month for the thing to start kinda kills it.
Key: Generation | Pokemon in Top/Bottom Ten | Number Expected | Difference
Top Ten Breakdown Gen I | 4 (Marowak, Sandslash, Cubone, Sanshrew) | 2 | +2 Gen II | 1 (Gligar) | 2 | -1 Gen III | 3 (Flygon, Camerupt, Swampert) | 2 | +1 Gen IV | 1 (Torterra) | 2 | -1 Gen V | 1 (Krookodile) | 2 | -1
Bottom Ten Breakdown Gen I | 1 (Graveler) | 2 | -1 Gen II | 0 | 2 | -2 Gen III | 3 (Trapinch, Barboach, Baltoy) | 2 | +1 Gen IV | 2 (Hippopotas, Wormandam Sandy Cloak)| 2 | 0 Gen V | 4 (Seismitoad, Stunfisk, Palpitoad, Landorus) | 2 | +2
Generation Breakdowns
Gen I Top performer: Marowak (1st 100th percentile) Worst performer: Graveler (55th 7th percentile) Average placement: 23.28 (62nd percentile)
Gen II Top performer: Gligar (6th 91st percentile) Worst performer: Piloswine (48th 19th percentile) Average placement: 27.3 (55th percentile)
Gen III Top performer: Flygon (2nd 98th percentile) Worst performer: Baltoy (54th 9th percentile) Average placement: 29.08 (52nd percentile)
Gen IV Top performer: Torterra (9th 86th percentile) Worst performer: Wormadam Sandy Cloak (59th 0th percentile) Average placement: 33.55 (44th percentile)
Gen V Top performer: Krookodile (3rd 97th percentile) Worst performer: Landorus (58th 2nd percentile) Average placement: 38.55 (35th percentile)
Alright, well first thing to note is that this is the first time each Gen had the exact same expected values in terms of performance, so numbers dont really need to be adjusted to accommodate it this time. At least not nearly as heavily. So, the winner this time was once again Gen I. It had very evenly spaced eliminations throughout the field except at the extremes, an oversaturation and the top and somewhat avoiding the bottom allowed Gen I to claim both the contest winner and overall best performance among the Generations. Coming up in second is, you guessed it, Gen II. And what did it do? The same thing it does every time. Presence at the top isnt particularly heavy, but it avoids the bottom almost entirely, which allows it to pull ahead of the Gens that were either evenly spaced or all over the place. Gen III comes in third (a welcome break from its many recent last place finishes) mainly due to its elimination spread. It had a somewhat heavy presence at the top (three in the top ten, all fairly evenly spaced), but had an equally heavy presence at the bottom (three, all packed towards the upper part of that group). Fairly even distribution throughout the rest of the competitors give it a percentile slightly above 50, which is a nice improvement over its typically lackluster finishes. Gen IV follows that, having a pretty light presence at the top with only two in the top twenty. It only landed three in the bottom twenty, but two of them finished pretty low, and all of its mid-carders all finished towards the lower part of the middle tier. And then theres poor, poor Gen V once again, the bottom Gen was saved from catastrophe due to one Pokemon (Krookodile this time). Its presence in the top was very light, matching Gen IV with two in the top twenty. However, its two did fare better (Krookodile in third compared to Torterra in ninth, and Excadrill in thirteenth compared to Gliscor in sixteenth). But it was hit really hard at the bottom, having four in the bottom ten (two of the bottom four). Six of its eleven contestants ended up in the bottom twenty, with an additional two grabbing the following two spots. This performance also ranks among the worst percentiles weve seen, and joins a few others as one of the worst performances a generation has made.
For all zero people who happened to read the last one...
Ghost
Winner: Gengar (Generation I)
Key: Generation | Pokemon in Top/Botom Ten | Expected | Difference
Top Ten Breakdown Gen I | 2 (Gengar, Haunter) | 1 | +1 Gen II | 1 (Misdreavus) | 0 | +1 Gen III | 2 (Shedinja, Banette ) | 2 | 0 Gen IV | 1 (Froslass) | 3 | -2 Gen V | 3 (Chandelure, Golurk, Cofagrigus) | 3 | 0
Bottom Ten Breakdown Gen I | 0 | 1 | -1 Gen II | 0 | 0 | 0 Gen III | 1 (Duskull) | 2 | -1 Gen IV | 5 (Giratina Altered Forme, Drifblim, Drifloon, Rotom, Spiritomb) | 3 | +2 Gen V | 4 (Golett, Yamask, Jellicent, Frillish) | 3 | +1
Generation Breakdowns
Gen I Top performer: Gengar (1st 100th percentile) Worst performer: Gastly (13th 56th percentile) Average placement: 6.67 (80th percentile)
Gen II Top performer: Misdreavus (5th 85th percentile) Worst performer: Misdreavus (5th 85th percentile) Average placement: 5th (85th percentile)
Gen III Top performer: Shedinja (3rd 93rd percentile) Worst performer: Duskull (19th 33rd percentile) Average placement: 12.83 (58th percentile)
Gen IV Top performer: Froslass (7th 78th percentile) Worst performer: Spiritomb (28th 0th percentile) Average placement: 19.22 (35th percentile)
Gen V Top performer: Chandelure (2nd 96th percentile) Worst performer: Frillish (24th 15th percentile) Average placement: 14.22 (53rd percentile)
The odd stats this time around stems entirely from the fact that the pool was so small this time around. With only 28 participants, only eight Pokemon didnt make the top or bottom ten. Also, after Rock finished, I was going to do an overall thing including a few top fives, but I find it REALLY difficult to bring myself to include a performance from this contest simply due to the weirdness the small competitor amount caused. Anyway on to the actual performances. Im going to say Gen II is stuck in sort of a state of limbo, as Misdreavus is its only Ghost type. It did finish fifth, which is impressive for it being the only one from the gen, but I cant honestly label it the best performance because of that. Gen I I also have the same issue with. Its somewhat better, having three participants, but still isnt a ton. Due to it at least making up 10% of the field though, Id be more willing to call it the most dominant performance. Gengar won, Haunter finished sixth, and Gastly still finished above the 50th percentile, so thats pretty impressive. Now, on to the generations that actually had a sizeable pool of participants. Of those, Gen III is definitely the standout, managing to get two top ten spots, and only having one in the bottom ten (which was at the very top of that list, and wouldnt be anywhere close to it given a larger participant pool). Given the circumstances, it actually performed pretty well here. The same cant be said for Gen V, though. It DID get four Pokemon in the top ten, including two of the top four, but it also had five of the bottom ten. However, these performances cancelled out, and its middle tier performed as expected giving it a decent 50th percentile-range finish. Gen IV well yet another steamroll. Not only did it have five in the bottom ten, it had THE bottom four. Its highest finisher was Froslass in seventh, which would be great in any other contest, but that actually barely cracks the top quartile. It had the next two spots (Mismagius took 11th and Dusknoir took 12th), but that only puts them in above-average territory. After that, two whod be considered below-average, then four in the bottom of the heap, and this all added up to a terrible performance from Gen IV. Still, just because of the weirdness of the contest pool, I wouldnt put it as one of the worst performances seen, but its still undeniably bad.