Current Events > Supreme Court rejects challenge to Arkansas law banning abortion-inducing drugs

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Balrog0 05/29/18 10:56:11 AM #1:	https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/29/politics/supreme-court-arkansas-abortion-order/index.html The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a challenge to a controversial Arkansas abortion law blocking medication-induced abortions. The law, passed in 2015, says that any physician who "gives, sells, dispenses, administers, or otherwise provides or proscribes the abortion-inducing drug" shall have to have a contract with a physician who has admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. The order, issued without comment, clears the way for the law to go into effect in mid-July if no other legal action is taken. Planned Parenthood is expected to make another challenge to the law in US district court. "The Arkansas restriction, which was enacted supposedly to protect women's health, is medically unnecessary," lawyers for Planned Parenthood argued in court papers. They say it is unconstitutional because it places an undue burden on a patient's right to choose abortion. Medication abortion available only early in a pregnancy involves the combination of two pills called mifepristone and misoprostol. Lawyers for Arkansas say the law is a "commonsense requirement" that "merely requires medication abortion providers to have a contractual relationship (to ensure follow-up treatment if needed) with a physician that has admitting privileges. --- It's one more thing we do to the poor, the deprived: cut out their tongues . . . allow them a language as lousy as their lives <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:902175741] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote>https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/29/politics/supreme-court-arkansas-abortion-order/index.html The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a challenge to a controversial Arkansas abortion law blocking medication-induced abortions. The law, passed in 2015, says that any physician who "gives, sells, dispenses, administers, or otherwise provides or proscribes the abortion-inducing drug" shall have to have a contract with a physician who has admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. The order, issued without comment, clears the way for the law to go into effect in mid-July if no other legal action is taken. Planned Parenthood is expected to make another challenge to the law in US district court. "The Arkansas restriction, which was enacted supposedly to protect women's health, is medically unnecessary," lawyers for Planned Parenthood argued in court papers. They say it is unconstitutional because it places an undue burden on a patient's right to choose abortion. Medication abortion available only early in a pregnancy involves the combination of two pills called mifepristone and misoprostol. Lawyers for Arkansas say the law is a "commonsense requirement" that "merely requires medication abortion providers to have a contractual relationship (to ensure follow-up treatment if needed) with a physician that has admitting privileges.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 05/29/18 11:53:37 AM #2:	What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:902178376] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote>What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 05/29/18 1:51:09 PM #3:	darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? --- It's one more thing we do to the poor, the deprived: cut out their tongues . . . allow them a language as lousy as their lives <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:902184497] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control?</quote> would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/29/18 1:53:21 PM #4:	Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? Yes. I don't see the issue with making guns difficult to acquire. The problem is when they are banned outright. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5 <cite>Howl posted [p:902184615] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote> What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control?</quote> would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location?</quote> Yes. I don't see the issue with making guns difficult to acquire. The problem is when they are banned outright.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 05/29/18 2:00:55 PM #5:	Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? Are you implying that I'm okay with this abortion law? Keep in mind that the government doesn't pay gun shops to stay open, and plenty of laws exist in liberal towns to keep gun shops out. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:902185051] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control?</quote> would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location?</quote> Are you implying that I'm okay with this abortion law? Keep in mind that the government doesn't pay gun shops to stay open, and plenty of laws exist in liberal towns to keep gun shops out.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ChainedRedone 05/29/18 2:01:28 PM #6:	Howl posted... Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? Yes. I don't see the issue with making guns difficult to acquire. Bullshit. --- David Mink. Hero. https://c1.staticflickr.com/7/6043/6337878059_009dd4c4f3_z.jpg <cite>ChainedRedone posted [p:902185083] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote> What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control?</quote> would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location?</quote> Yes. I don't see the issue with making guns difficult to acquire. </quote> Bullshit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/29/18 2:06:56 PM #7:	ChainedRedone posted... Howl posted... Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? Yes. I don't see the issue with making guns difficult to acquire. Bullshit. What do you mean bullshit? I've never once said anything about making guns difficult to obtain being a bad thing. I support licensing restrictions, closing gunshow loopholes and all that. As long as guns are legal to obtain and possess I'm cool with it. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5 <cite>Howl posted [p:902185439] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>ChainedRedone posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote> What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? </quote> would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? </quote> Yes. I don't see the issue with making guns difficult to acquire. </quote> Bullshit.</quote> What do you mean bullshit? I've never once said anything about making guns difficult to obtain being a bad thing. I support licensing restrictions, closing gunshow loopholes and all that. As long as guns are legal to obtain and possess I'm cool with it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ChainedRedone 05/29/18 2:15:41 PM #8:	Howl posted... ChainedRedone posted... Howl posted... Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? Yes. I don't see the issue with making guns difficult to acquire. Bullshit. What do you mean bullshit? I've never once said anything about making guns difficult to obtain being a bad thing. I support licensing restrictions, closing gunshow loopholes and all that. As long as guns are legal to obtain and possess I'm cool with it. Then clearly you weren't the target audience of that post. Gun nuts were the obvious target. --- David Mink. Hero. https://c1.staticflickr.com/7/6043/6337878059_009dd4c4f3_z.jpg <cite>ChainedRedone posted [p:902185938] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ChainedRedone posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote> What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? </quote> would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? </quote> Yes. I don't see the issue with making guns difficult to acquire. </quote> Bullshit.</quote> What do you mean bullshit? I've never once said anything about making guns difficult to obtain being a bad thing. I support licensing restrictions, closing gunshow loopholes and all that. As long as guns are legal to obtain and possess I'm cool with it.</quote> Then clearly you weren't the target audience of that post. Gun nuts were the obvious target.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 05/29/18 2:20:08 PM #9:	darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? There isn't supposed to be an "h" in it. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902186196] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control?</quote> There isn't supposed to be an "h" in it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 05/29/18 2:22:01 PM #10:	Howl posted... ChainedRedone posted... Howl posted... Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? Yes. I don't see the issue with making guns difficult to acquire. Bullshit. What do you mean bullshit? I've never once said anything about making guns difficult to obtain being a bad thing. I support licensing restrictions, closing gunshow loopholes and all that. As long as guns are legal to obtain and possess I'm cool with it. Define 'gun show loophole.' --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:902186310] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ChainedRedone posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote> What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? </quote> would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? </quote> Yes. I don't see the issue with making guns difficult to acquire. </quote> Bullshit.</quote> What do you mean bullshit? I've never once said anything about making guns difficult to obtain being a bad thing. I support licensing restrictions, closing gunshow loopholes and all that. As long as guns are legal to obtain and possess I'm cool with it.</quote> Define 'gun show loophole.'</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 05/29/18 2:22:47 PM #11:	Webmaster4531 posted... darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? There isn't supposed to be an "h" in it. I'm typing too fast on my phone, and the - is a long-hold on the h key. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:902186355] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control?</quote> There isn't supposed to be an "h" in it.</quote> I'm typing too fast on my phone, and the - is a long-hold on the h key.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 05/29/18 2:23:59 PM #12:	Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? I'm sure Democrats would be okay with putting the only location you can buy a gun off on an abandoned oil rig, so I don't see why Republicans shouldn't just play the whole half way game with shit the Democrats hate. It'd be some damn good karma, I tell you what. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:902186436] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control?</quote> would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location?</quote> I'm sure Democrats would be okay with putting the only location you can buy a gun off on an abandoned oil rig, so I don't see why Republicans shouldn't just play the whole half way game with shit the Democrats hate. It'd be some damn good karma, I tell you what.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 05/29/18 2:26:07 PM #13:	darkjedilink posted... Are you implying that I'm okay with this abortion law? your post implied it! darkjedilink posted... Keep in mind that the government doesn't pay gun shops to stay open, and plenty of laws exist in liberal towns to keep gun shops out. are you implying I'm okay with those laws? ;) --- It's one more thing we do to the poor, the deprived: cut out their tongues . . . allow them a language as lousy as their lives <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:902186596] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Are you implying that I'm okay with this abortion law? </quote> your post implied it! <cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Keep in mind that the government doesn't pay gun shops to stay open, and plenty of laws exist in liberal towns to keep gun shops out.</quote> are you implying I'm okay with those laws? ;)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bloodychess 05/29/18 2:26:26 PM #14:	Balrog0 posted... The order, issued without comment, clears the way for the law to go into effect in mid-July if no other legal action is taken. Planned Parenthood is expected to make another challenge to the law in US district court. I thought shit was supposed to end after the SCOTUS weighed in --- To err is human To arr is pirate <cite>Bloodychess posted [p:902186614] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>The order, issued without comment, clears the way for the law to go into effect in mid-July if no other legal action is taken. Planned Parenthood is expected to make another challenge to the law in US district court.</quote> I thought shit was supposed to end after the SCOTUS weighed in</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AnimeTeddies 05/29/18 2:27:04 PM #15:	djl is Mal_Jr but possibly worse --- https://imgur.com/kM8hJQy <cite>AnimeTeddies posted [p:902186643] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote>djl is Mal_Jr but possibly worse</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 05/29/18 2:28:21 PM #16:	Bloodychess posted... Balrog0 posted... The order, issued without comment, clears the way for the law to go into effect in mid-July if no other legal action is taken. Planned Parenthood is expected to make another challenge to the law in US district court. I thought shit was supposed to end after the SCOTUS weighed in I'm not a lawyer, but my understanding is that rejecting a challenge is more like saying it doesn't belong in the Supreme Court than actually weighing in on the substance of the law itself. --- It's one more thing we do to the poor, the deprived: cut out their tongues . . . allow them a language as lousy as their lives <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:902186723] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bloodychess posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>The order, issued without comment, clears the way for the law to go into effect in mid-July if no other legal action is taken. Planned Parenthood is expected to make another challenge to the law in US district court.</quote> I thought shit was supposed to end after the SCOTUS weighed in</quote> I'm not a lawyer, but my understanding is that rejecting a challenge is more like saying it doesn't belong in the Supreme Court than actually weighing in on the substance of the law itself.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FairyLeviathan 05/29/18 2:28:25 PM #17:	Good. Maybe PP will just pack up and get their sorry asses out of the state. <cite>FairyLeviathan posted [p:902186728] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote>Good. Maybe PP will just pack up and get their sorry asses out of the state.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 05/29/18 2:28:52 PM #18:	Tropicalwood posted... Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? I'm sure Democrats would be okay with putting the only location you can buy a gun off on an abandoned oil rig, so I don't see why Republicans shouldn't just play the whole half way game with shit the Democrats hate. Not every Democrat is that anti-gun. The Republicans are causing death and orphan abandonment gaining nothing in return except their imaginary friend would be happy. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902186751] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control?</quote> would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location?</quote> I'm sure Democrats would be okay with putting the only location you can buy a gun off on an abandoned oil rig, so I don't see why Republicans shouldn't just play the whole half way game with shit the Democrats hate.</quote> Not every Democrat is that anti-gun. The Republicans are causing death and orphan abandonment gaining nothing in return except their imaginary friend would be happy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 05/29/18 2:30:24 PM #19:	Bloodychess posted... Balrog0 posted... The order, issued without comment, clears the way for the law to go into effect in mid-July if no other legal action is taken. Planned Parenthood is expected to make another challenge to the law in US district court. I thought shit was supposed to end after the SCOTUS weighed in They get the final say in the matter, but they only refused to take it up so they could deal with more important things, like someone throwing a fish back in the water when they noticed the coast guard. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:902186852] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bloodychess posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>The order, issued without comment, clears the way for the law to go into effect in mid-July if no other legal action is taken. Planned Parenthood is expected to make another challenge to the law in US district court.</quote> I thought shit was supposed to end after the SCOTUS weighed in</quote> They get the final say in the matter, but they only refused to take it up so they could deal with more important things, like someone throwing a fish back in the water when they noticed the coast guard.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 05/29/18 2:31:58 PM #20:	Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... Are you implying that I'm okay with this abortion law? your post implied it! darkjedilink posted... Keep in mind that the government doesn't pay gun shops to stay open, and plenty of laws exist in liberal towns to keep gun shops out. are you implying I'm okay with those laws? ;) My post was mocking all the gun grabbers who hide their disdain for the Constitution behind 'common sense' gun bans. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:902186941] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Are you implying that I'm okay with this abortion law? </quote> your post implied it! <cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Keep in mind that the government doesn't pay gun shops to stay open, and plenty of laws exist in liberal towns to keep gun shops out.</quote> are you implying I'm okay with those laws? ;)</quote> My post was mocking all the gun grabbers who hide their disdain for the Constitution behind 'common sense' gun bans.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 05/29/18 2:33:22 PM #21:	Webmaster4531 posted... Tropicalwood posted... Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? I'm sure Democrats would be okay with putting the only location you can buy a gun off on an abandoned oil rig, so I don't see why Republicans shouldn't just play the whole half way game with shit the Democrats hate. Not every Democrat is that anti-gun. The Republicans are causing death and orphan abandonment gaining nothing in return except their imaginary friend would be happy. "We're not anti-gun, we just make a bunch of half-way laws so you can only own guns we didn't ban yet" Also, nice excuse for euthanizing humans without their consent. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:902187038] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control?</quote> would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location?</quote> I'm sure Democrats would be okay with putting the only location you can buy a gun off on an abandoned oil rig, so I don't see why Republicans shouldn't just play the whole half way game with shit the Democrats hate.</quote> Not every Democrat is that anti-gun. The Republicans are causing death and orphan abandonment gaining nothing in return except their imaginary friend would be happy.</quote> "We're not anti-gun, we just make a bunch of half-way laws so you can only own guns we didn't ban yet" Also, nice excuse for euthanizing humans without their consent.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RE_expert44 05/29/18 2:34:22 PM #22:	Now those reckless teens and adults who make poor decisions are going to have to get back alley abortions all over again --- 0 Post Topic http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1074-resident-evil-past-present-and-future <cite>RE_expert44 posted [p:902187100] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote>Now those reckless teens and adults who make poor decisions are going to have to get back alley abortions all over again</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 05/29/18 2:35:41 PM #23:	Tropicalwood posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Tropicalwood posted... Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? I'm sure Democrats would be okay with putting the only location you can buy a gun off on an abandoned oil rig, so I don't see why Republicans shouldn't just play the whole half way game with shit the Democrats hate. Not every Democrat is that anti-gun. The Republicans are causing death and orphan abandonment gaining nothing in return except their imaginary friend would be happy. "We're not anti-gun, we just make a bunch of half-way laws so you can only own guns we didn't ban yet" Also, nice excuse for euthanizing humans without their consent. I'm not a law maker. You're the one killing women. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902187193] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control?</quote> would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location?</quote> I'm sure Democrats would be okay with putting the only location you can buy a gun off on an abandoned oil rig, so I don't see why Republicans shouldn't just play the whole half way game with shit the Democrats hate.</quote> Not every Democrat is that anti-gun. The Republicans are causing death and orphan abandonment gaining nothing in return except their imaginary friend would be happy.</quote> "We're not anti-gun, we just make a bunch of half-way laws so you can only own guns we didn't ban yet" Also, nice excuse for euthanizing humans without their consent.</quote> I'm not a law maker. You're the one killing women.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 05/29/18 2:36:04 PM #24:	The party of family values supports dead women and children that grow up in bad homes or orphanages. They also support teen pregnancy and STDs. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:902187213] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote>The party of family values supports dead women and children that grow up in bad homes or orphanages. They also support teen pregnancy and STDs.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 05/29/18 2:36:57 PM #25:	Webmaster4531 posted... Tropicalwood posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Tropicalwood posted... Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? I'm sure Democrats would be okay with putting the only location you can buy a gun off on an abandoned oil rig, so I don't see why Republicans shouldn't just play the whole half way game with shit the Democrats hate. Not every Democrat is that anti-gun. The Republicans are causing death and orphan abandonment gaining nothing in return except their imaginary friend would be happy. "We're not anti-gun, we just make a bunch of half-way laws so you can only own guns we didn't ban yet" Also, nice excuse for euthanizing humans without their consent. I'm not a law maker. You're the one killing women. I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:902187274] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control?</quote> would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location?</quote> I'm sure Democrats would be okay with putting the only location you can buy a gun off on an abandoned oil rig, so I don't see why Republicans shouldn't just play the whole half way game with shit the Democrats hate.</quote> Not every Democrat is that anti-gun. The Republicans are causing death and orphan abandonment gaining nothing in return except their imaginary friend would be happy.</quote> "We're not anti-gun, we just make a bunch of half-way laws so you can only own guns we didn't ban yet" Also, nice excuse for euthanizing humans without their consent.</quote> I'm not a law maker. You're the one killing women.</quote> I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 05/29/18 2:38:34 PM #26:	Tropicalwood posted... I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution. You're just someone who believes that the United States should be a theocracy. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902187380] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote>I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution.</quote> You're just someone who believes that the United States should be a theocracy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 05/29/18 2:38:47 PM #27:	Of course the Nazi defender is trying to virtue signal. Of course --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:902187394] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote>Of course the Nazi defender is trying to virtue signal. Of course</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#28	Post #28 was unavailable or deleted.
Webmaster4531 05/29/18 2:41:42 PM #29:	shockthemonkey posted... This is fucked up. I dont see how this law could possibly be imposed without putting an unnecessary burden on women seeking abortions. Yeah, the conservatives like activist judges now. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902187588] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote>This is fucked up. I dont see how this law could possibly be imposed without putting an unnecessary burden on women seeking abortions.</quote> Yeah, the conservatives like activist judges now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 05/29/18 2:46:14 PM #30:	Webmaster4531 posted... Tropicalwood posted... I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution. You're just someone who believes that the United States should be a theocracy. No, I just don't think activists should be put on the bench so they can make up a bunch of rights on the spot and claim rights that were guaranteed by the constitution aren't protected. But of course you hate the constitution and support horrible judges like Ginsburg that have out right said they don't like the constitution. But please, keep calling Americans that are fed up with your crap nazis and murderers. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:902187846] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote>I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution.</quote> You're just someone who believes that the United States should be a theocracy.</quote> No, I just don't think activists should be put on the bench so they can make up a bunch of rights on the spot and claim rights that were guaranteed by the constitution aren't protected. But of course you hate the constitution and support horrible judges like Ginsburg that have out right said they don't like the constitution. But please, keep calling Americans that are fed up with your crap nazis and murderers.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 05/29/18 2:46:51 PM #31:	FairyLeviathan posted... Good. Maybe PP will just pack up and get their sorry asses out of the state. Or, you know, just acquire admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:902187885] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>FairyLeviathan posted...</cite> <quote>Good. Maybe PP will just pack up and get their sorry asses out of the state.</quote> Or, you know, just acquire admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BLAKUboy 05/29/18 2:48:39 PM #32:	AnimeTeddies posted... djl is Mal_Jr but possibly worse He's basically Mal if Mal didn't believe a single thing he posted. --- Aeris dies if she takes more damage than her current HP - Panthera https://signavatar.com/26999_s.png <cite>BLAKUboy posted [p:902187997] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>AnimeTeddies posted...</cite> <quote>djl is Mal_Jr but possibly worse</quote> He's basically Mal if Mal didn't believe a single thing he posted.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 05/29/18 2:50:56 PM #33:	Tropicalwood posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Tropicalwood posted... I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution. You're just someone who believes that the United States should be a theocracy. No, I just don't think activists should be put on the bench so they can make up a bunch of rights on the spot and claim rights that were guaranteed by the constitution aren't protected. But of course you hate the constitution and support horrible judges like Ginsburg that have out right said they don't like the constitution. But please, keep calling Americans that are fed up with your crap nazis and murderers. You were literally called the Nazi defender. You're literally fine with dead women. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902188135] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote>I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution.</quote> You're just someone who believes that the United States should be a theocracy.</quote> No, I just don't think activists should be put on the bench so they can make up a bunch of rights on the spot and claim rights that were guaranteed by the constitution aren't protected. But of course you hate the constitution and support horrible judges like Ginsburg that have out right said they don't like the constitution. But please, keep calling Americans that are fed up with your crap nazis and murderers.</quote> You were literally called the Nazi defender. You're literally fine with dead women.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 05/29/18 2:53:44 PM #34:	Webmaster4531 posted... Tropicalwood posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Tropicalwood posted... I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution. You're just someone who believes that the United States should be a theocracy. No, I just don't think activists should be put on the bench so they can make up a bunch of rights on the spot and claim rights that were guaranteed by the constitution aren't protected. But of course you hate the constitution and support horrible judges like Ginsburg that have out right said they don't like the constitution. But please, keep calling Americans that are fed up with your crap nazis and murderers. You were literally called the Nazi defender. You're literally fine with dead women. You're literally defending something that lets people kill babies, what does that make you. The NRA. I guess your opinion doesn't matter, mr NRA man. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:902188311] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote>I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution.</quote> You're just someone who believes that the United States should be a theocracy.</quote> No, I just don't think activists should be put on the bench so they can make up a bunch of rights on the spot and claim rights that were guaranteed by the constitution aren't protected. But of course you hate the constitution and support horrible judges like Ginsburg that have out right said they don't like the constitution. But please, keep calling Americans that are fed up with your crap nazis and murderers.</quote> You were literally called the Nazi defender. You're literally fine with dead women.</quote> You're literally defending something that lets people kill babies, what does that make you. The NRA. I guess your opinion doesn't matter, mr NRA man.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#35	Post #35 was unavailable or deleted.
Webmaster4531 05/29/18 2:56:30 PM #36:	Tropicalwood posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Tropicalwood posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Tropicalwood posted... I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution. You're just someone who believes that the United States should be a theocracy. No, I just don't think activists should be put on the bench so they can make up a bunch of rights on the spot and claim rights that were guaranteed by the constitution aren't protected. But of course you hate the constitution and support horrible judges like Ginsburg that have out right said they don't like the constitution. But please, keep calling Americans that are fed up with your crap nazis and murderers. You were literally called the Nazi defender. You're literally fine with dead women. You're literally defending something that lets people kill babies, what does that make you. The NRA. I guess your opinion doesn't matter, mr NRA man. I'm just putting living women above fetuses. It's the greater good. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902188466] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote>I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution.</quote> You're just someone who believes that the United States should be a theocracy.</quote> No, I just don't think activists should be put on the bench so they can make up a bunch of rights on the spot and claim rights that were guaranteed by the constitution aren't protected. But of course you hate the constitution and support horrible judges like Ginsburg that have out right said they don't like the constitution. But please, keep calling Americans that are fed up with your crap nazis and murderers.</quote> You were literally called the Nazi defender. You're literally fine with dead women.</quote> You're literally defending something that lets people kill babies, what does that make you. The NRA. I guess your opinion doesn't matter, mr NRA man.</quote> I'm just putting living women above fetuses. It's the greater good.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sktgamer_13dude 05/29/18 2:57:34 PM #37:	Tropicalwood posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Tropicalwood posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Tropicalwood posted... Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? I'm sure Democrats would be okay with putting the only location you can buy a gun off on an abandoned oil rig, so I don't see why Republicans shouldn't just play the whole half way game with shit the Democrats hate. Not every Democrat is that anti-gun. The Republicans are causing death and orphan abandonment gaining nothing in return except their imaginary friend would be happy. "We're not anti-gun, we just make a bunch of half-way laws so you can only own guns we didn't ban yet" Also, nice excuse for euthanizing humans without their consent. I'm not a law maker. You're the one killing women. I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution. Abortion isnt murder no matter how much think it is. --- https://imgur.com/jWVrg9U https://imgur.com/g2efUtT https://imgur.com/5dOwhaP https://imgur.com/LVdqu8J Go Cougs and M's #DI4B <cite>sktgamer_13dude posted [p:902188544] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control?</quote> would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location?</quote> I'm sure Democrats would be okay with putting the only location you can buy a gun off on an abandoned oil rig, so I don't see why Republicans shouldn't just play the whole half way game with shit the Democrats hate.</quote> Not every Democrat is that anti-gun. The Republicans are causing death and orphan abandonment gaining nothing in return except their imaginary friend would be happy.</quote> "We're not anti-gun, we just make a bunch of half-way laws so you can only own guns we didn't ban yet" Also, nice excuse for euthanizing humans without their consent.</quote> I'm not a law maker. You're the one killing women.</quote> I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution.</quote> Abortion isnt murder no matter how much think it is.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 05/29/18 2:59:07 PM #38:	You can't reason with theocrats like Tropical. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902188642] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote>You can't reason with theocrats like Tropical.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 05/29/18 3:06:03 PM #39:	Webmaster4531 posted... Tropicalwood posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Tropicalwood posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Tropicalwood posted... I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution. You're just someone who believes that the United States should be a theocracy. No, I just don't think activists should be put on the bench so they can make up a bunch of rights on the spot and claim rights that were guaranteed by the constitution aren't protected. But of course you hate the constitution and support horrible judges like Ginsburg that have out right said they don't like the constitution. But please, keep calling Americans that are fed up with your crap nazis and murderers. You were literally called the Nazi defender. You're literally fine with dead women. You're literally defending something that lets people kill babies, what does that make you. The NRA. I guess your opinion doesn't matter, mr NRA man. I'm just putting living women above fetuses. It's the greater good. No, you're deciding what's human and forcing a law through the branch that isn't supposed to make up legislation, and then you're going off to call anyone that sees through you a nazi and women killer because you don't want everyone knowing you're in the wrong for wanting the Federal government deface the laws they're supposed to abide by, But great argument for wanting to treat the Constitution like Michael Moore's toilet paper after a trip to south america. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:902189093] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote>I don't remember legalizing murder as long as I defined it as privacy after a series of bullshit rulings because I don't like the constitution.</quote> You're just someone who believes that the United States should be a theocracy.</quote> No, I just don't think activists should be put on the bench so they can make up a bunch of rights on the spot and claim rights that were guaranteed by the constitution aren't protected. But of course you hate the constitution and support horrible judges like Ginsburg that have out right said they don't like the constitution. But please, keep calling Americans that are fed up with your crap nazis and murderers.</quote> You were literally called the Nazi defender. You're literally fine with dead women.</quote> You're literally defending something that lets people kill babies, what does that make you. The NRA. I guess your opinion doesn't matter, mr NRA man.</quote> I'm just putting living women above fetuses. It's the greater good.</quote> No, you're deciding what's human and forcing a law through the branch that isn't supposed to make up legislation, and then you're going off to call anyone that sees through you a nazi and women killer because you don't want everyone knowing you're in the wrong for wanting the Federal government deface the laws they're supposed to abide by, But great argument for wanting to treat the Constitution like Michael Moore's toilet paper after a trip to south america.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#40	Post #40 was unavailable or deleted.
AnimeTeddies 05/29/18 3:08:36 PM #41:	Do constitutionalists realize that the constitution was designed to be amended? It's not some sacred, infallible document. --- https://imgur.com/kM8hJQy <cite>AnimeTeddies posted [p:902189273] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote>Do constitutionalists realize that the constitution was designed to be amended? It's not some sacred, infallible document.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 05/29/18 3:09:05 PM #42:	Tropicalwood posted... No, you're deciding what's human I know women who can get pregnant are human. You literally want laws that will increase their death toll. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902189315] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote>No, you're deciding what's human</quote> I know women who can get pregnant are human. You literally want laws that will increase their death toll.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/29/18 3:11:58 PM #43:	darkjedilink posted... Howl posted... ChainedRedone posted... Howl posted... Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? Yes. I don't see the issue with making guns difficult to acquire. Bullshit. What do you mean bullshit? I've never once said anything about making guns difficult to obtain being a bad thing. I support licensing restrictions, closing gunshow loopholes and all that. As long as guns are legal to obtain and possess I'm cool with it. Define 'gun show loophole.' Lol, are you serious? --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5 <cite>Howl posted [p:902189466] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>ChainedRedone posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote> What's wrong with some commonhsense abortion control? </quote> would you be okay if your state only let you buy guns in one location? </quote> Yes. I don't see the issue with making guns difficult to acquire. </quote> Bullshit. </quote> What do you mean bullshit? I've never once said anything about making guns difficult to obtain being a bad thing. I support licensing restrictions, closing gunshow loopholes and all that. As long as guns are legal to obtain and possess I'm cool with it.</quote> Define 'gun show loophole.'</quote> Lol, are you serious?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 05/29/18 3:12:12 PM #44:	AnimeTeddies posted... Do constitutionalists realize that the constitution was designed to be amended? It's not some sacred, infallible document. The Constitution has a process for drafting and ratifying amendments, making them up and sending them the the Supreme Court to decided if it's all good isn't how this country is supposed to work. Webmaster4531 posted... I know women who can get pregnant are human. You literally want laws that will increase their death toll. You sound like Hillary Clinton "Well I had this 12 year old Dreamer get past my armed guards and tell me this heart breaking story as to why Donald Trump is evil" You sound just as bad as her and that guy from Parkland that was calling normal people murderers for having differing opinions while defending the guys that let it happen. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:902189482] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>AnimeTeddies posted...</cite> <quote>Do constitutionalists realize that the constitution was designed to be amended? It's not some sacred, infallible document.</quote> The Constitution has a process for drafting and ratifying amendments, making them up and sending them the the Supreme Court to decided if it's all good isn't how this country is supposed to work. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote>I know women who can get pregnant are human. You literally want laws that will increase their death toll.</quote> You sound like Hillary Clinton "Well I had this 12 year old Dreamer get past my armed guards and tell me this heart breaking story as to why Donald Trump is evil" You sound just as bad as her and that guy from Parkland that was calling normal people murderers for having differing opinions while defending the guys that let it happen.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 05/29/18 3:21:27 PM #45:	Tropicalwood posted... Webmaster4531 posted... I know women who can get pregnant are human. You literally want laws that will increase their death toll. You sound like Hillary Clinton "Well I had this 12 year old Dreamer get past my armed guards and tell me this heart breaking story as to why Donald Trump is evil" You sound just as bad as her and that guy from Parkland that was calling normal people murders for having differing opinions. That makes absolutely no sense. I'm 100% correct that women will die and you're having a melt down. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902189999] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote>I know women who can get pregnant are human. You literally want laws that will increase their death toll.</quote> You sound like Hillary Clinton "Well I had this 12 year old Dreamer get past my armed guards and tell me this heart breaking story as to why Donald Trump is evil" You sound just as bad as her and that guy from Parkland that was calling normal people murders for having differing opinions.</quote> That makes absolutely no sense. I'm 100% correct that women will die and you're having a melt down.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 05/29/18 3:23:37 PM #46:	Webmaster4531 posted... That makes absolutely no sense. I'm 100% correct that women will die and you're having a melt down. It makes perfect sense, you're just pretending you're the center of the universe and saying anyone that doesn't agree with allowing the Judicial branch to make up laws is a nazi and theocrat, and cry like a baby when they say no to you. Obviously these are all signs that you don't like the way this country is operated and can't make a solid argument as to why the courts should make up rights on the spot outside of a sap story you made up. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:902190140] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote>That makes absolutely no sense. I'm 100% correct that women will die and you're having a melt down.</quote> It makes perfect sense, you're just pretending you're the center of the universe and saying anyone that doesn't agree with allowing the Judicial branch to make up laws is a nazi and theocrat, and cry like a baby when they say no to you. Obviously these are all signs that you don't like the way this country is operated and can't make a solid argument as to why the courts should make up rights on the spot outside of a sap story you made up.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#47	Post #47 was unavailable or deleted.
Webmaster4531 05/29/18 3:29:41 PM #48:	Tropicalwood posted... Webmaster4531 posted... That makes absolutely no sense. I'm 100% correct that women will die and you're having a melt down. It makes perfect sense, you're just pretending you're the center of the universe and saying anyone that doesn't agree with allowing the Judicial branch to make up laws and cry like a baby when they say no to you. The Supreme Court is in Article 3 of the constitution. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902190533] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote>That makes absolutely no sense. I'm 100% correct that women will die and you're having a melt down.</quote> It makes perfect sense, you're just pretending you're the center of the universe and saying anyone that doesn't agree with allowing the Judicial branch to make up laws and cry like a baby when they say no to you.</quote> The Supreme Court is in Article 3 of the constitution. <quote>The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
treewojima 05/29/18 3:36:04 PM #49:	Questionmarktarius posted... FairyLeviathan posted... Good. Maybe PP will just pack up and get their sorry asses out of the state. Or, you know, just acquire admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. that's a tall order <cite>treewojima posted [p:902190902] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FairyLeviathan posted...</cite> <quote> Good. Maybe PP will just pack up and get their sorry asses out of the state.</quote> Or, you know, just acquire admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.</quote> that's a tall order</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pillowpantz 05/29/18 3:59:42 PM #50:	Why are liberals so against comprehensive abortion reform? --- https://imgur.com/b3gLOdA https://imgur.com/4O42xr1 https://youtu.be/hcrjb5dzhvw http://archive.is/Zp6HT <cite>Pillowpantz posted [p:902192251] in Supreme Co... [t:76654172]...</cite> <quote>Why are liberals so against comprehensive abortion reform?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Supreme Court rejects challenge to Arkansas law banning abortion-inducing drugs (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Supreme Court rejects challenge to Arkansas law banning abortion-inducing drugs