Current Events > Trump ignores court ruling that he can't block critics on Twitter

Topic List	Page List: 1
Giant_Aspirin 05/24/18 5:31:04 PM #1:	http://www.newsweek.com/trump-ignores-court-ruling-he-cant-block-critics-twitter-president-thinks-hes-943315?piano_t=1 of course he did, rules don't apply to him. --- Playing: Doom (2016) (PC) *(~);} - I suppose it will all make sense when we grow up - {;(~)* <cite>Giant_Aspirin posted [p:901924555] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>http://www.newsweek.com/trump-ignores-court-ruling-he-cant-block-critics-twitter-president-thinks-hes-943315?piano_t=1 of course he did, rules don't apply to him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kaiganeer 05/24/18 5:33:30 PM #2:	what a great use of time and money from everyone involved <cite>Kaiganeer posted [p:901924677] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>what a great use of time and money from everyone involved</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#3	Post #3 was unavailable or deleted.
StucklnMyPants 05/24/18 5:39:31 PM #4:	Bullet_Wing posted... "One option is to ask the judge to issue an injunction which would, in essence, force the president to unblock us, Gu said. Lmao I can't believe this is real life. --- Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakes. <cite>StucklnMyPants posted [p:901925010] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bullet_Wing posted...</cite> <quote>"One option is to ask the judge to issue an injunction which would, in essence, force the president to unblock us, Gu said.</quote> Lmao I can't believe this is real life.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CableZL 05/24/18 5:40:24 PM #5:	This is a weird timeline --- https://imgur.com/ByKGlJb https://imgur.com/nZdaA8D https://imgur.com/VBLBILg <cite>CableZL posted [p:901925052] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>This is a weird timeline</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 05/24/18 5:41:03 PM #6:	Who could have seen this one coming. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:901925083] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>Who could have seen this one coming.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 05/24/18 5:42:00 PM #7:	Bullet_Wing posted... Amazing that our president is such a manchild that this is real life Following the ruling, Gu revealed that the plaintiffs have already discussed next steps with their legal team. One option is to ask the judge to issue an injunction which would, in essence, force the president to unblock us, Gu said. Although the judicial branch cannot order the president to act, Gu said they could potentially order the White House Director of Social Media to execute the unblocking. The judge can order Dan Scavino to actually unblock. And that wouldnt run into any kind of constitutional roadblocks." People sued for being blocked on Twitter, but Trump is the manchild? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:901925143] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bullet_Wing posted...</cite> <quote>Amazing that our president is such a manchild that this is real life <quote>Following the ruling, Gu revealed that the plaintiffs have already discussed next steps with their legal team. One option is to ask the judge to issue an injunction which would, in essence, force the president to unblock us, Gu said. Although the judicial branch cannot order the president to act, Gu said they could potentially order the White House Director of Social Media to execute the unblocking. The judge can order Dan Scavino to actually unblock. And that wouldnt run into any kind of constitutional roadblocks." </quote></quote> People sued for being blocked on Twitter, but Trump is the manchild?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gmanthebest 05/24/18 5:42:17 PM #8:	So people are getting triggered by being blocked on a social media site? Like, so upset that they're going to court over it? Sure, Trump's a fucking idiot, but god damn man. --- What do I feel when I shoot an enemy? Recoil. <cite>gmanthebest posted [p:901925158] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>So people are getting triggered by being blocked on a social media site? Like, so upset that they're going to court over it? Sure, Trump's a fucking idiot, but god damn man.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bloodychess 05/24/18 5:43:26 PM #9:	darkjedilink posted... Bullet_Wing posted... Amazing that our president is such a manchild that this is real life Following the ruling, Gu revealed that the plaintiffs have already discussed next steps with their legal team. One option is to ask the judge to issue an injunction which would, in essence, force the president to unblock us, Gu said. Although the judicial branch cannot order the president to act, Gu said they could potentially order the White House Director of Social Media to execute the unblocking. The judge can order Dan Scavino to actually unblock. And that wouldnt run into any kind of constitutional roadblocks." People sued for being blocked on Twitter, but Trump is the manchild? "Wah, i cant troll and peddle my own progaganda anymore!!" BOTH SIDES can fuck off --- To err is human To arr is pirate <cite>Bloodychess posted [p:901925213] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bullet_Wing posted...</cite> <quote>Amazing that our president is such a manchild that this is real life <quote>Following the ruling, Gu revealed that the plaintiffs have already discussed next steps with their legal team. One option is to ask the judge to issue an injunction which would, in essence, force the president to unblock us, Gu said. Although the judicial branch cannot order the president to act, Gu said they could potentially order the White House Director of Social Media to execute the unblocking. The judge can order Dan Scavino to actually unblock. And that wouldnt run into any kind of constitutional roadblocks." </quote></quote> People sued for being blocked on Twitter, but Trump is the manchild?</quote> "Wah, i cant troll and peddle my own progaganda anymore!!" <cite>BOTH SIDES</cite> can fuck off</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
0AbsoluteZero0 05/24/18 5:46:04 PM #10:	Tmaster148 posted... Who could have seen this one coming. Seriously - its sad, but the surprising outcome would have been if the clown-in-chief showed respect for the ruling and immediately complied without complaint. --- -The Admirable <cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted [p:901925351] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>Who could have seen this one coming.</quote> Seriously - its sad, but the surprising outcome would have been if the clown-in-chief showed respect for the ruling and immediately complied without complaint.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
iamintents 05/24/18 5:46:56 PM #11:	Kaiganeer posted... what a great use of time and money from everyone involved Just the president --- https://imgur.com/rCECrB9 <cite>iamintents posted [p:901925403] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaiganeer posted...</cite> <quote>what a great use of time and money from everyone involved</quote> Just the president</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Weezy_Tha_Don 05/24/18 5:47:30 PM #12:	Trump is above the law https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-jXe0x4YdM" data-time=" --- https://imgur.com/hwZyGuA - courtesy of the homie United_World I speak my mind, cause biting my tongue hurts. <cite>Weezy_Tha_Don posted [p:901925450] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>Trump is above the law https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-jXe0x4YdM" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dameon_reaper 05/24/18 5:48:42 PM #13:	Man....what a great time to be alive. This is literally the internet... <cite>dameon_reaper posted [p:901925516] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>Man....what a great time to be alive. This is literally the internet...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Serious Cat 05/24/18 5:58:48 PM #14:	darkjedilink posted... People sued for being blocked on Twitter, but Trump is the manchild? They sued because they were selectively prevented from viewing public statements by the President of the United States. That's illegal and the court agreed. --- I are Serious Cat This is serious thread <cite>Serious Cat posted [p:901926026] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>People sued for being blocked on Twitter, but Trump is the manchild? </quote> They sued because they were selectively prevented from viewing public statements by the President of the United States. That's illegal and the court agreed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
On_The_Edge 05/24/18 5:59:40 PM #15:	Lmao you know you can log out of twitter and read his tweets right?Serious Cat posted... darkjedilink posted... People sued for being blocked on Twitter, but Trump is the manchild? They sued because they were selectively prevented from viewing public statements by the President of the United States. That's illegal and the court agreed. --- We're here. https://discord.gg/Q9K3ndP <cite>On_The_Edge posted [p:901926077] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>Lmao you know you can log out of twitter and read his tweets right?<cite>Serious Cat posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>People sued for being blocked on Twitter, but Trump is the manchild? </quote> They sued because they were selectively prevented from viewing public statements by the President of the United States. That's illegal and the court agreed.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anarchy_Juiblex 05/24/18 6:00:10 PM #16:	As he should. What a stupid fucking decision. --- "Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali <cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted [p:901926097] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>As he should. What a stupid fucking decision.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 05/24/18 6:00:42 PM #17:	The bigger issue would be not be able to respond to Trump tweets as that would cross the line on the 1st amendment as a government body was preventing another person from saying what they want. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:901926135] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>The bigger issue would be not be able to respond to Trump tweets as that would cross the line on the 1st amendment as a government body was preventing another person from saying what they want.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 05/24/18 6:02:32 PM #18:	On_The_Edge posted... Lmao you know you can log out of twitter and read his tweets right?Serious Cat posted... darkjedilink posted... People sued for being blocked on Twitter, but Trump is the manchild? They sued because they were selectively prevented from viewing public statements by the President of the United States. That's illegal and the court agreed. This. Nobody was prevented from doing anything. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:901926219] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>On_The_Edge posted...</cite> <quote>Lmao you know you can log out of twitter and read his tweets right?<cite>Serious Cat posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>People sued for being blocked on Twitter, but Trump is the manchild? </quote> They sued because they were selectively prevented from viewing public statements by the President of the United States. That's illegal and the court agreed.</quote></quote> This. Nobody was prevented from doing anything.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 05/24/18 6:03:10 PM #19:	Tmaster148 posted... The bigger issue would be not be able to respond to Trump tweets as that would cross the line on the 1st amendment as a government body was preventing another person from saying what they want. No, they aren't. You just can't directly speak to the President via Twitter. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:901926249] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>The bigger issue would be not be able to respond to Trump tweets as that would cross the line on the 1st amendment as a government body was preventing another person from saying what they want.</quote> No, they aren't. You just can't directly speak to the President via Twitter.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
refmon 05/24/18 6:04:01 PM #20:	Anarchy_Juiblex posted... As he should. What a stupid fucking decision. --- If you read this signature, then that meant that I had control of what you read for 5 SECONDS!! <cite>refmon posted [p:901926293] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote>As he should. What a stupid fucking decision.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
P4wn4g3 05/24/18 6:04:30 PM #21:	It would be best if the court just fucking banned Trump from twitter. --- Hive Mind of Dark Aether, the unofficial Metroid Social Private board. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/851-dark-aether <cite>P4wn4g3 posted [p:901926314] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>It would be best if the court just fucking banned Trump from twitter.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#22	Post #22 was unavailable or deleted.
D-Lo_BrownTown 05/24/18 6:05:04 PM #23:	This isn't going to help the left. --- https://imgur.com/dWXgtSb <cite>D-Lo_BrownTown posted [p:901926342] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>This isn't going to help the left.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
uwnim 05/24/18 6:05:45 PM #24:	darkjedilink posted... Tmaster148 posted... The bigger issue would be not be able to respond to Trump tweets as that would cross the line on the 1st amendment as a government body was preventing another person from saying what they want. No, they aren't. You just can't directly speak to the President via Twitter. His twitter account is an official government platform, so yes. --- I want a pet Lavos Spawn. [Order of the Cetaceans: Phocoena dioptrica] <cite>uwnim posted [p:901926376] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>The bigger issue would be not be able to respond to Trump tweets as that would cross the line on the 1st amendment as a government body was preventing another person from saying what they want.</quote> No, they aren't. You just can't directly speak to the President via Twitter.</quote> His twitter account is an official government platform, so yes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeonOctopus 05/24/18 6:06:02 PM #25:	Kaiganeer posted... what a great use of time and money from everyone involved --- https://imgur.com/nlaY1qH https://imgur.com/zHJ1OCo https://imgur.com/btBPP4E https://imgur.com/1B3bMHw <cite>NeonOctopus posted [p:901926389] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kaiganeer posted...</cite> <quote>what a great use of time and money from everyone involved</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 05/24/18 6:06:21 PM #26:	All I can think of is Queen "Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy?" --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:901926416] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>All I can think of is Queen "Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy?"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DifferentialEquation 05/24/18 6:06:24 PM #27:	Serious Cat posted... darkjedilink posted... People sued for being blocked on Twitter, but Trump is the manchild? They sued because they were selectively prevented from viewing public statements by the President of the United States. That's illegal and the court agreed. Their specific Twitter accounts were blocked. They can easily log out or open another browser where they're logged out and view Trump's twitter in its entirety. --- There's no business to be taxed. <cite>DifferentialEquation posted [p:901926419] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>Serious Cat posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>People sued for being blocked on Twitter, but Trump is the manchild? </quote> They sued because they were selectively prevented from viewing public statements by the President of the United States. That's illegal and the court agreed.</quote> Their specific Twitter accounts were blocked. They can easily log out or open another browser where they're logged out and view Trump's twitter in its entirety.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eston 05/24/18 6:09:31 PM #28:	It's something that was bound to come up sooner or later in the era of social media, and I assume this is exactly the sort of thing the "Knight First Amendment Institute of Columbia University" (which is who filed the lawsuit) exists for. Interesting that the court apparently has no ability to enforce it. --- http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i215/estonc/grizzly_bear_chairs_2.jpg https://imgur.com/8kjZU <cite>eston posted [p:901926600] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>It's something that was bound to come up sooner or later in the era of social media, and I assume this is exactly the sort of thing the "Knight First Amendment Institute of Columbia University" (which is who filed the lawsuit) exists for. Interesting that the court apparently has no ability to enforce it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 05/24/18 6:10:53 PM #29:	uwnim posted... darkjedilink posted... Tmaster148 posted... The bigger issue would be not be able to respond to Trump tweets as that would cross the line on the 1st amendment as a government body was preventing another person from saying what they want. No, they aren't. You just can't directly speak to the President via Twitter. His twitter account is an official government platform, so yes. It literally isn't. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:901926657] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>uwnim posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>The bigger issue would be not be able to respond to Trump tweets as that would cross the line on the 1st amendment as a government body was preventing another person from saying what they want.</quote> No, they aren't. You just can't directly speak to the President via Twitter.</quote> His twitter account is an official government platform, so yes.</quote> It literally isn't.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DrizztLink 05/24/18 6:12:45 PM #30:	darkjedilink posted... uwnim posted... darkjedilink posted... Tmaster148 posted... The bigger issue would be not be able to respond to Trump tweets as that would cross the line on the 1st amendment as a government body was preventing another person from saying what they want. No, they aren't. You just can't directly speak to the President via Twitter. His twitter account is an official government platform, so yes. It literally isn't. You're wrong but don't let that stop you. --- http://guidesmedia.ign.com/guides/9846/images/slowpoke.gif https://imgur.com/6ezFwG1 <cite>DrizztLink posted [p:901926752] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>uwnim posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>The bigger issue would be not be able to respond to Trump tweets as that would cross the line on the 1st amendment as a government body was preventing another person from saying what they want.</quote> No, they aren't. You just can't directly speak to the President via Twitter.</quote> His twitter account is an official government platform, so yes.</quote> It literally isn't.</quote> You're wrong but don't let that stop you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#31	Post #31 was unavailable or deleted.
I_Stay_Noided 05/24/18 6:14:09 PM #32:	im p sure djl is a gimmick account at this point --- https://imgur.com/2vyBLJn <cite>I_Stay_Noided posted [p:901926825] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>im p sure djl is a gimmick account at this point</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
known2FAIL 05/24/18 6:14:15 PM #33:	DrizztLink posted... darkjedilink posted... uwnim posted... darkjedilink posted... Tmaster148 posted... The bigger issue would be not be able to respond to Trump tweets as that would cross the line on the 1st amendment as a government body was preventing another person from saying what they want. No, they aren't. You just can't directly speak to the President via Twitter. His twitter account is an official government platform, so yes. It literally isn't. You're wrong but don't let that stop you. --- The Hanzo main; Potential DOOMFIST Main <cite>known2FAIL posted [p:901926832] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>DrizztLink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>uwnim posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>The bigger issue would be not be able to respond to Trump tweets as that would cross the line on the 1st amendment as a government body was preventing another person from saying what they want.</quote> No, they aren't. You just can't directly speak to the President via Twitter.</quote> His twitter account is an official government platform, so yes.</quote> It literally isn't.</quote> You're wrong but don't let that stop you.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarthAragorn 05/24/18 6:31:40 PM #34:	god this is so stupid --- A thousand eyes, and one. <cite>DarthAragorn posted [p:901927717] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>god this is so stupid</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 05/24/18 6:36:17 PM #35:	Bullet_Wing posted... darkjedilink posted... uwnim posted... darkjedilink posted... Tmaster148 posted... The bigger issue would be not be able to respond to Trump tweets as that would cross the line on the 1st amendment as a government body was preventing another person from saying what they want. No, they aren't. You just can't directly speak to the President via Twitter. His twitter account is an official government platform, so yes. It literally isn't. https://www.cnn.com/2017/06/06/politics/trump-tweets-official-statements/index.html Directly from your golden boy's administration So Nikki Haley getting in trouble for making official statements on her personal Twitter account is a red herring by Dems? You can't have it both ways. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:901927972] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bullet_Wing posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>uwnim posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>The bigger issue would be not be able to respond to Trump tweets as that would cross the line on the 1st amendment as a government body was preventing another person from saying what they want.</quote> No, they aren't. You just can't directly speak to the President via Twitter.</quote> His twitter account is an official government platform, so yes.</quote> It literally isn't.</quote> https://www.cnn.com/2017/06/06/politics/trump-tweets-official-statements/index.html Directly from your golden boy's administration</quote> So Nikki Haley getting in trouble for making official statements on her personal Twitter account is a red herring by Dems? You can't have it both ways.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#36	Post #36 was unavailable or deleted.
Serious Cat 05/24/18 11:40:15 PM #37:	On_The_Edge posted... Lmao you know you can log out of twitter and read his tweets right? It's illegal to selectively prevent people from viewing official statements regardless. Blocking prevents a user from retweeting and commenting on tweets as well. Like the ruling said, Trump is free to disregard input but not allowed to block it entirely. --- I are Serious Cat This is serious thread <cite>Serious Cat posted [p:901943893] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>On_The_Edge posted...</cite> <quote>Lmao you know you can log out of twitter and read his tweets right?</quote> It's illegal to selectively prevent people from viewing official statements regardless. Blocking prevents a user from retweeting and commenting on tweets as well. Like the ruling said, Trump is free to disregard input but not allowed to block it entirely.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz 05/24/18 11:40:57 PM #38:	CableZL posted... This is a weird timeline --- Not removing this until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) 2018 NFLB Summersim (2-4): https://imgur.com/7cjNtgQ <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:901943934] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>CableZL posted...</cite> <quote>This is a weird timeline</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WilliamPorygon 05/24/18 11:42:09 PM #39:	Can we impeach him for blocking people on Twitter? Pretty please? --- Love dolphins and whales? Come hang out at Cetacea Cove! https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1404-cetacea-cove <cite>WilliamPorygon posted [p:901944001] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote>Can we impeach him for blocking people on Twitter? Pretty please?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Serious Cat 05/24/18 11:46:49 PM #40:	darkjedilink posted... So Nikki Haley getting in trouble for making official statements on her personal Twitter account is a red herring by Dems? You can't have it both ways. Yes you can because Trump doesn't have to follow State Department policy. --- I are Serious Cat This is serious thread <cite>Serious Cat posted [p:901944235] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>So Nikki Haley getting in trouble for making official statements on her personal Twitter account is a red herring by Dems? You can't have it both ways.</quote> Yes you can because Trump doesn't have to follow State Department policy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
littlebro07 05/24/18 11:49:58 PM #41:	CableZL posted... This is a weird timeline Seriously. Go back to like 2009. Was Twitter a thing then? If not then go back to when it started being a thing. I didn't start using it til like 2011. Anyway... Saying "In 2018, the President of the United States of America will be sued for blocking critics on Twitter" would almost sound as crazy as "in 2018, the President of the United States of America will be Donald Trump" --- http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/bb289/volcaitlin/gifs/dancning.gif <cite>littlebro07 posted [p:901944398] in Trump igno... [t:76639942]...</cite> <quote><cite>CableZL posted...</cite> <quote>This is a weird timeline</quote> Seriously. Go back to like 2009. Was Twitter a thing then? If not then go back to when it started being a thing. I didn't start using it til like 2011. Anyway... Saying "In 2018, the President of the United States of America will be sued for blocking critics on Twitter" would almost sound as crazy as "in 2018, the President of the United States of America will be Donald Trump"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Trump ignores court ruling that he can't block critics on Twitter (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Trump ignores court ruling that he can't block critics on Twitter