Board 8 > Community Mafia Topic 2 - The Psychology of Fake Claiming

(+) Yeah! (+)

I think knightz defending everyone that seems scum means he is scum. Because if his teammates die its up to him.

I think knightz defending everyone that seems scum means he is scum. Because if his teammates die its up to him.

Either way I feel like Kirby was ironically as stubborn sounding as you were, Sbell.
(How do you feel about Blade now btw?)
I also disagree with Kirby either way about the Blade thing having no substance.
Just because you think Blade's arguments were bad, does not mean you have nothing to say about thWed.

He did say he found Blade to the same as Lopen.
Following that up by voting Lopen (for the greater good) is just confusing then.

only because they are blatently town.

With me skimming he seems scum. Ignoring everyone else I would not be shocked if he is third party.

With me skimming he seems scum. Ignoring everyone else I would not be shocked if he is third party.

Blade is blatantly town? What makes it so clear cut?

Either way I feel like Kirby was ironically as stubborn sounding as you were, Sbell.
(How do you feel about Blade now btw?)
I also disagree with Kirby either way about the Blade thing having no substance.
Just because you think Blade's arguments were bad, does not mean you have nothing to say about them.

No one thought I was serious for voting Lopen there, right...?

I don't think even Lopen took me seriously when he swiftly disproved my theorem by bringing up Yu-Gi-Oh Mafia lol

I call everyone blatantly town until theres evidence against that person.
I'm not saying Blade is innocent, I am sayijng that we should give he/her the benefit of the doubt instead of trying to lynch them without evidence.

Taco - neither MI or I were terribly impressed with your response to my question last night. It's fine that you suspect Knightz, but i would challenge you to keep an eye on everyone else, too. This isn't among us where there are two scum and some number of third parties.

With 250 posts to catch up with at the time, arguments that can't be taken seriously aren't worth my time to focus on.

Peaf has given me an idea of how Blade plays in Mafia, so I'll be using that as a reference.

I want to go back to this with Taco suddenly saying Kirby might be third party.

I haven't played Among Us in some time, but when I did there were certainly no third parties.

Did third parties get added to Among Us?

You seemed awfully quick to label people as scum when given even a little bit of evidence last game tho.

You've never played with Blade, are asking for help reading Blade however are wise enough to know the argument can't be taken seriously and isn't worth your time?

##unvote
##vote: kirby

I want to go back to this with Taco suddenly saying Kirby might be third party.

I haven't played Among Us in some time, but when I did there were certainly no third parties.

Did third parties get added to Among Us?

I want to go back to this with Taco suddenly saying Kirby might be third party.

I haven't played Among Us in some time, but when I did there were certainly no third parties.

Did third parties get added to Among Us?

I want a taco

SBell: "Blade is scumcasing within the first page of the topic wtf is he stupid everyone thinks I'm scum on Day 1"

Also SBell: "Kirby wtf Blade was absolutely cooking how dare you say his arguments were worthless"

I still dont see what was so bad or insane about Blade's arguments about Sbell itself

No, they have never been in vanilla among us

Yes, at least in versions that the youtubers play since at least a year ago or something

that isnt a very strong defense for why you are speaking out of both sides of your mouth.

Meanwhile

This being Isquens first and only substantive post is as confusing as it is alarming. Especially since he disappeared after he said he got off work

You're one to talk

You keep saying I'm avoiding talking about Blade and using his ridiculousness as an excuse, but you're not acknowledging the fact that the argument he made to scumcase you is ridiculous, at least for having such a strong conviction so early into the game.

Who was the first?

I still watched the occasional hafu bit but haven't played since the b8 lobbies died.

So it's likely that vanilla still just has the normal two scum. I know they've made updates though so I'm surprised they haven't added 3p.

In any case. Possibly a slip from taco, yeah.

it's less than 600 posts and you were here for about a hundred or so of then so its not so bad.

fit it in before homeroom

##vote: wall

Does Corrik as scum ever pop in to drop a vote after his see you day 2 post? I feel like Ive seen him do it before but dont remember his alignment. Its probably too unreliable to read into

Dont you know, Isquen hates reading

Okay but we had no idea you were sick or exhausted, so take it easy....

Also thats oddly the 2nd time someone said 600 new posts in an hour.

....Corrik ........unreliable to read into

read back means read things in the past.

Of course I do, I work in a library.

Thank you, but I didn't say new posts. I was eyeballing the first ...300 or so before I went "meh" and crashed, with my only contribution thinking red was accusing me instead of Sbell.