Current Events > Guess Which Part of Texas Is Looking For Porn the Most?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Zero_Destroyer posted...

One function of these laws is to redefine anything relating to LGBTQ content as innately pornographic.

I also wouldn't put it past Abbot, or anti-sodomy law supporting Paxton, to push for searching for that content to be illegal.

Zero_Destroyer posted...

One function of these laws is to redefine anything relating to LGBTQ content as innately pornographic. Doubt Jerry will address that tho

If that's happening then that's bad and should be addressed. Hard to make the connection myself so I would jump on that discussion without a lead, no.

Again, you types REALLLLLLY want to disagree about more. Kinda sucks you cant. You wanna get pissed off about made up ideologies you project onto people, then buddy boys, you're in some fucked up company.

Jerry_Hellyeah posted...

Again, you types REALLLLLLY want to disagree about more.

No, people are rightfully upset about the correct thing.

If it's hard to make the connection between the people who want to institute ID checks for the internet and the people who want to legislate LGBTQ+ people back into the closet when they're the same people and are also the same people banning LGBTQ+ media under claims that such media IS porn then that sounds like a you problem.

Never mind that Texas is also the state that wrote an open bounty on abortion.

I have to say even as I cringe and wonder what could be wrong with these people, I do enjoy the massive meltdowns on this site sometimes.

Dude is in a crater sized hole and still digging furiously.

Jerry_Hellyeah posted...

If that's happening then that's bad and should be addressed. Hard to make the connection myself so I would jump on that discussion without a lead, no.

Again, you types REALLLLLLY want to disagree about more. Kinda sucks you cant. You wanna get pissed off about made up ideologies you project onto people, then buddy boys, you're in some fucked up company.

What I'm trying to communicate is that you should reconsider your beliefs if you assume these laws were made in good faith or think they are made to protect kids. Its naive to repeat their talking points

Heineken14 posted...

No, people are rightfully upset about the correct thing.

No, being upset that I said voter ID is bad is not correct. Stop, bro bro.

GranAures posted...

If it's hard to make the connection between the people who want to institute ID checks for the internet and the people who want to legislate LGBTQ+ people back into the closet when they're the same people and are also the same people banning LGBTQ+ media under claims that such media IS porn then that sounds like a you problem.

Never mind that Texas is also the state that wrote an open bounty on abortion.

Sounds like the anti LBGTQ legislation is a problem, yes. Also sounds like underage porn access isn't something I care to anchor to that. I'm honestly not even sure what porno site is hosting the non porn being brought up now, unless we're talking about something else.

Again, when this happens for anything besides porn or illegal substances, you'll see me bitching and moaning like I always do.

Im not calling for an internet wide porn ban. I just dont think adult entertainment companies should be able to do what they've gotten away with for decades.

Sandalorn posted...

I have to say even as I cringe and wonder what could be wrong with these people, I do enjoy the massive meltdowns on this site sometimes.

Dude is in a crater sized hole and still digging furiously.

Bro, meltdown? Dudes still trying to find a slur that rhymes with "West Virginia".

Jerry_Hellyeah posted...

If that's happening then that's bad and should be addressed.

They are literally telling you that it is what they intend.

If you haven't caught on yet you're either blindingly ignorant or utterly complacent.

The Texas Democratic Party only has over $14,000 on hand.

https://www.transparencyusa.org/tx/committee/texas-democratic-party-15831-gpac/

By contrast, the Texas Republican Party has over $305,000 on hand.

https://www.transparencyusa.org/tx/committee/republican-party-of-texas-15662-gpac/payees

This, THIS is why Democrats can't win in Texas. Because the state Democratic Party is broke.
The DNC needs to invest in Texas. BADLY.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


The dude who decided to make the dig about it. Duh.

And are you going to response to post 102?

Slippery slope let's not do shit about shit fallacy mixed with what the fuck are you talking about of course places are required to ID

You may not want to anchor it, but the people you clap along for absolutely have the record to try. Or do you think they'll just stop there despite actively attacking material concerning the LGBTQ+ community as pornographic, drag as pornographic, etc. purely because you don't want it anchored? Reminder that numerous books have been banned by states run by people like Abbot purely because they have LGBTQ+ characters and themes which have had those books attacked as porn. Any site that sold those books would then be distributing porn to children(oh my, how dare) in those states thereby limiting access to LGBTQ+ positive media for LGBTQ+ children. Your inability to assess who is pushing for these laws and the type of people they are while cheering on their goals is a you problem.

But sure, let's trust them to have the best interest of children in mind while they actively do nothing about the actual threats to children they allow to persist while they push for their additional control.

Jerry_Hellyeah posted...

Nah, it's not. It's porn. That's got an age requirement. It's not new, it's just riling up the addicts that need the intervention anyways.

Lmao addicts. Look at this square ass prude

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Funny thing is, I don't think I've ever been carded on the two times I bought physical porn.

Axiom posted...

Lmao addicts. Look at this square ass prude

He's been told about the opinion he's supposed to have, logic-ing his way in is on him.

It's not working out very well.

DrizztLink posted...

He's been told about the opinion he's supposed to have, logic-ing his way in is on him.

It's not working out very well.

Are you sure Bro? Maybe he's just being a Dude Bro!

GranAures posted...

You may not want to anchor it, but the people you clap along for absolutely have the record to try. Or do you think they'll just stop there despite actively attacking material concerning the LGBTQ+ community as pornographic, drag as pornographic, etc. purely because you don't want it? Reminder that numerous books have been banned by states run by people like Abbot purely because they have LGBTQ+ characters and themes which have had those books attacked as porn. Any site that sold those books would then be distributing porn to children(oh my, how dare) in those states thereby limiting access to LGBTQ+ positive media for LGBTQ+ children. Your inability to assess who is pushing for these laws and the type of people they are while cheering on their goals is a you problem.

But sure, let's trust them to have the best interest of children in mind while they actively do nothing about the actual threats to children they allow to persist while they push for their additional control.

Classifying non porn as porn is an issue that absolutely needs addressed. We agree on that. I don't personally believe that gives justification for companies to provide adult material to minors, and that's okay.

Jerry_Hellyeah posted...

Classifying non porn as porn is an issue that absolutely needs addressed. We agree on that. I don't personally believe that gives justification for companies to provide adult material to minors, and that's okay.

Youre being purposely obtuse. This law is overreach because now anything labeled porn is going to require an ID, and many sites will just choose not to operate in areas enforcing it.

Its all about control and making it easier to bar things deemed pornographic from the internet. Its rife for abuse and you understand that, you just dont care.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

^

Sandalorn posted...

Are you sure Bro? Maybe he's just being a Dude Bro!

My personal favorite is him acting like we're against it because we'd be somehow unable to view porn.

Like, we're a bunch of grown-ass adults.

DrizztLink posted...

My personal favorite is him acting like we're against it because we'd be somehow unable to view porn.

Like, we're a bunch of grown-ass adults.

And there are a slew of sites that don't age check or are foreign sites. And VPNs.

Jerry_Hellyeah posted...

No, being upset that I said voter ID is bad is not correct. Stop, bro bro.

Asher was making a comparison to them. You are the one that supports government overreach, Vince Russo.

They should just use xvideos

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Adults providing pornography under the table to minors is bad regardless of how frequently you've been exposed to it. You should have learned about this on one of those "very special episodes". I'm personally not going to say a sexual crime involving a minor is okay under any circumstance I can think of.

Now you're here saying brick and mortar stores can sell to minors. Nothing I can really say to that. Crimes happen I guess?

Jerry_Hellyeah posted...

Adults providing pornography under the table to minors is bad regardless of how frequently you've been exposed to it. You should have learned about this on one of those "very special episodes". I'm personally not going to say a sexual crime involving a minor is okay under any circumstance I can think of.

Now you're here saying brick and mortar stores can sell to minors. Nothing I can really say to that. Crimes happen I guess?

Don't come back until you're finished:

https://www.hookedonphonics.com/

brick and mortar stores can sell to minors.

Not what was said.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Because it lets him believe you support something he thinks is bad so he can pretend you support sexual crimes.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Yeah? I mean it's not a long post. Should have an idea, but you do your thing.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


I mean I have absolutely no idea what this means to you. Are you saying that since cashiers can visually confirm someone to be well over the age of 18, that computers not doing that is some reason not to ID ANYBODY? I'm all ears as to what you're trying to say there. Be honest.

Jerry_Hellyeah posted...

Yeah? I mean it's not a long post. Should have an idea, but you do your thing.

I mean I have absolutely no idea what this means to you. Are you saying that since cashiers can visually confirm someone to be well over the age of 18, that computers not doing that is some reason not to ID ANYBODY? I'm all ears as to what you're trying to say there. Be honest.

Bad boy.

I know you aren't done with your homework.

https://www.hookedonphonics.com/

GranAures posted...

Because it lets him believe you support something he thinks is bad so he can pretend you support sexual crimes.

Nah, it's just something we grew up with and never used the right language for it. And the language is uncomfortable. It's an important part of making that shift in perception. I dont think its okay that so many businesses have profited off of what they have.

Who posted

Why would somebody else have an idea why you construed
[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

somehow means

Now you're here saying brick and mortar stores can sell to minors.

But I guess the homeslice needs to pretend everybody is just selling porn to kids so he can clap for Abbot and his ilk.

GranAures posted...

Why would somebody else have an idea why you construed

somehow means
But I guess the homeslice needs to pretend everybody is just selling porn to kids so he can clap for Abbot and his ilk.

Yeah well its the best I could come up with. How about you answer my question bro bro

What the fuck IS he talking about

Nvm, see post #16

If you get mad, see post #23

"now that I've been thoroughly embarrassed, please go back to my previous posts to embarrass me further"

Who posted

Remember when this dude was pretending his horny posting was fake earlier? I somehow miss that version of him compared to whatever the fuck hes doing now.

Jerry Falwell back from the dead yall xD

I can't wait til I need to send Netflix my drivers license to watch rated R movies

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


I mean what does that mean to you? A store that doesn't ID anyone gets shut down. I mean is that really the point you were trying to make? You understand that the people that aren't IDed are visually confirmed to be older than 18 and that this wouldn't happen online.

Now, let's go back to the original piece of what we are discussing. Why are you in support of a law that is overly paternalistic creating a slippery slope into other nanny state laws which can be used to discriminate as stated by others in the topic?

Oh no, theres no discussion. I stated an opinion in post #13. Im not a legislator and I'm not voting based on porn, so ya'll are free to be as goofy about this as you want.

MirageOfRuins posted...

Jerry Falwell back from the dead yall xD

I mean ya'll really act like I'm televangelizing, yeah XD

ssb_yunglink2 posted...

Remember when this dude was pretending his horny posting was fake earlier? I somehow miss that version of him compared to whatever the fuck hes doing now.

Bro is still out here telling people about my sexual needs, doing the lord's work.

lol texas