Current Events > Sooo, why is Lola Bunny over-corrected?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Also, @Darmik , you're once again making that weird implication that boobies would automatically make a female character less appealing -- even to her own demographic. Where exactly does this belief come from? You think girls would relate less to a female character that has a bit of a developed chest?

---

superman 2000 posted...

Yes. Space Jam was commercially successful all around when it came out. Did you not exist in 1996/1997?

That's not what I asked.

superman 2000 posted...

you're once again making that weird implication that boobies would automatically make a female character less appealing -- even to her own demographic. Where exactly does this belief come from? You think girls would relate less to a female character that has a bit of a developed chest?

I'm basing it on characters popular with little girls right now. The concept of having to differentiate girl animal characters with breasts and human anatomy is dated


---

Darmik posted...

That's not what I asked.

ALL AROUND. As in with both girls and boys. Yes, that does answer what you asked; you're just splitting hairs and constantly moving the goalposts because you have nowhere to go.

I'm basing it on characters popular with little girls right now.

Lola having a bosom isn't going to be what kids use to determine whether or not they like her. Again, what are you basing this odd belief on??

---

This is a topic with over 300 posts

superman 2000 posted...

ALL AROUND. As in with both girls and boys. Yes, that does answer what you asked; you're just splitting hairs and constantly moving the goalposts because you have nowhere to go.

Lola having a bosom isn't going to be what kids use to determine whether or not they like her. Again, what are you basing this odd belief on??

And yet Lola Bunny never had her own show. Where are the girls outraged over her design change?

---

Darmik posted...

That's not what I asked.

I'm basing it on characters popular with little girls right now. The concept of having to differentiate girl animal characters with breasts and human anatomy is dated

^You are comparing a cartoon for preschoolers with the Looney Tunes, which feature guns/bombs/dynamite/cartoonishly violent slapstick/etc. You do realize that kids as a demographic still comes with subdivisions, right? A cartoon for 8-to-12-year-olds may not be appropriate for preschoolers, and a cartoon for 14-year-olds may not be appropriate for 8-12.

---

Darmik posted...

And yet Lola Bunny never had her own show. Where are the girls outraged over her design change?

I'm sorry, but based on how often you move goalposts and use irrelevant arguments to make irrelevant points, it's become too obvious that you just don't know how to argue.

---

just admit youre a furry

---

superman 2000 posted...

She doesn't look more athletic now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEJkZBiLVAI

---

superman 2000 posted...

^You are comparing a cartoon for preschoolers with the Looney Tunes, which feature guns/bombs/dynamite/cartoonishly violent slapstick/etc. You do realize that kids as a demographic still comes with subdivisions, right? A cartoon for 8-to-12-year-olds may not be appropriate for preschoolers, and a cartoon for 14-year-olds may not be appropriate for 8-12.

Nobody said anything about appropriate. I'm talking about popularity.

No girl of any age gives a shit about Looney Tunes or Lola Bunny. This is their attempt to change that. Meanwhile here you are crying to girls that they should want boobs on their cartoon animals.

Also the target audience for Bluey is 5-7. I was in that age range when I watched Space Jam in the cinemas.

---

Ryuko_Chan posted...

just admit youre a furry

Way to rub those two brain cells together to come up with an original insult.

---

superman 2000 posted...

Way to rub those two brain cells together to come up with an original insult.

no, im being serious

you are a grown man having a tantrum about this, if you arent attracted to her that honestly makes it weirder

---

Darmik posted...

Nobody said anything about appropriate. I'm talking about popularity.

And your argument is rubbish.

No girl of any age gives a shit about Looney Tunes or Lola Bunny.

Demonstrably false.

This is their attempt to change that.

How does removing boobs make people care about Lola? Your argument is bad and stupid.

Meanwhile here you are crying to girls that they should want boobs on their cartoon animals.

Never happened once.

You're finished.


---

Ryuko_Chan posted...

you are a grown man having a tantrum about this,

Never happened.

---

Darmik posted...

Also the target audience for Bluey is 5-7. I was in that age range when I watched Space Jam in the cinemas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluey_(2018_TV_series)

"Bluey is an Australian animated television series for preschoolers"

---

superman 2000 posted...

How does removing boobs make people care about Lola? Your argument is bad and stupid.

I didn't say that.

The point is that boobs on the character says more than the lack of boobs. Lola had boobs in the original so Bugs had things to be attracted to. The goal of the character in Space Jam 2 is now different.

Then again you're the guy who called Penelope the Nude Cat and called Lola a human with rabbit features so I don't think I can really make this sort of thing clear to a guy like you.

---

Darmik posted...

I didn't say that.

The point is that boobs on the character says more than the lack of boobs. Lola had boobs in the original so Bugs had things to be attracted to.

All of this was pulled straight from your ass. Again, you're done.

Then again you're the guy who called Penelope the Nude Cat and called Lola a human with rabbit features so I don't think I can really make this sort of thing clear to a guy like you.

Ignoring the context of both statements to make them seem senseless. Very intellectually honest of you.

---

Conflict posted...

TC you need to see a therapist

No, I do not.

---

Darmik posted...

Nobody said anything about appropriate. I'm talking about popularity.

No girl of any age gives a shit about Looney Tunes or Lola Bunny. This is their attempt to change that. Meanwhile here you are crying to girls that they should want boobs on their cartoon animals.

Also the target audience for Bluey is 5-7. I was in that age range when I watched Space Jam in the cinemas.

I disagree about girls not caring about looney tunes. It doesn't hit hard as say, Disney. But Gen X and Milennials grew up with looney tunes, and younger Milennials (early 30s and lower) especially are nostalgic with cartoons.. Don't think anybody really cares about lola bunny though. She's like a one off.

---

I'll do this again because I find this to be the most fun.

Why does Sylvester's wife look like this?



But Lola needs to have breasts?

---

Quite misogynistic of you, @Darmik , to assume that Lola having a bosom had everything to do with how she was perceived by a male character, and couldn't possibly have been because the artists just wanted to anthropomorphize her in such a way. As if Bugs had never before been attracted to a female character without boobs.

---

Itty bitty kitty committee

I have nothing to add, just saw Darmiks last post and that popped in my head and I wanted to share.

---

Darmik posted...

I'll do this again because I find this to be the most fun.

Why does Sylvester's wife look like this?



But Lola needs to have breasts?

This is the Penelope argument all over again. You're a broken record.

---

So Sylvester and Pepe Le Pew are attracted to animals and Bugs is attracted to and I quote "essentially a human with bunny features."

Why?

---

Darmik posted...

So Sylvester and Pepe Le Pew are attracted to animals and Bugs is attracted to and I quote "essentially a human with bunny features."

Why?

It was fun while it lasted, Mr. Misogynist. Hope you work on that one day.

---

Just give her huge tiddies and she speaks exclusively in innuendo and slap a PG-13 on the movie.

---

Middle hope posted...

Just give her huge tiddies and she speaks exclusively in innuendo and slap a PG-13 on the movie.

Nah. Lola doesn't need to be sexualized at all.

---

superman 2000 posted...

Nah. Lola doesn't need to be sexualized at all.

Why not? If it's a pg13 movie it can compensate for lack of depth in a character.

---

How do we know her boobs were real to begin with? Maybe she had fake ones like Wile and Bugs.



I think this would explain the inconsistency with Penelope and Mrs Cat. Lola is now more comfortable with her body.

---

Middle hope posted...

Why not? If it's a pg13 movie it can compensate for lack of depth in a character.

I actually didn't have a problem with Lola's mild sultriness, though I understand why some consider it problematic (perpetuates the idea that women have to have sex appeal). Personally though, I'm more interested in them giving her a more fun personality. I think the biggest problem with Lola Bunny has always been that she's not really a loony toon, despite being a Looney Tune. I don't mind her being one-dimensional -- most of the characters are -- but one-dimensional in the way of just being athletic and sultry is kinda boring.

---

Darmik posted...

I'll do this again because I find this to be the most fun.

Why does Sylvester's wife look like this?



But Lola needs to have breasts?

Why does Superman need muscle if Charlie Brown doesn't?

FortuneCookie posted...

Why does Superman need muscle if Charlie Brown doesn't?

That doesnt even make sense as Charlie Brown isnt DC while both Lola and Lady cat here are both Loony Tunes.

---

Why the fuck does this topic have seven pages? Y'all care about Lola Bunny way too much.

---

superman 2000 posted...

ALL AROUND. As in with both girls and boys. Yes, that does answer what you asked; you're just splitting hairs and constantly moving the goalposts because you have nowhere to go.

That is what some people here want to the with Lola.

---

Alucard188 posted...

Why the fuck does this topic have seven pages? Y'all care about Lola Bunny way too much.

Heck I don't care about cartoons but I would bump this topic to read the arguments.

It's a bit like spidermans situation. Obvious walls and suit graphics downgrade. Less environmental objects.

Why dO yOU cArE AbOUt sOmE puddles? HErE I Add sOmE pUddLE stIckErs tO phOtOmOdE. HAhAhA.

---

spikethedevil posted...

That doesnt even make sense as Charlie Brown isnt DC while both Lola and Lady cat here are both Loony Tunes.

Okay, you want same company comparisons? Goofy and Pluto.

cjsdowg posted...

That is what some people here want to the with Lola.

HA! Clever.

---

Sorry you cant rub the pud to a cartoon rabbit anymore TC.

---

Having a sexual attraction to cartoons is really quite odd tbh

---

FortuneCookie posted...

Okay, you want same company comparisons? Goofy and Pluto.

I've always wondered why Pluto had these huge tits but Goofy only has moderate sized tits which are hidden by his clothes.

---

Kakapo posted...

Sorry you cant rub the pud to a cartoon rabbit anymore TC.

Using black magic, my Cash App account now receives an automatic $5 donation every time someone makes this brain-dead comment.

---

I mean we all have our fetishes, but it's weird to argue about your attraction to a bunny cartoon for 350 posts

---

Cobra1010 posted...

Heck I don't care about cartoons but I would bump this topic to read the arguments.

It's a bit like spidermans situation. Obvious walls and suit graphics downgrade. Less environmental objects.

Why dO yOU cArE AbOUt sOmE puddles? HErE I Add sOmE pUddLE stIckErs tO phOtOmOdE. HAhAhA.

Lotta people think not caring is cool, and opt to be sneering when they have nothing interesting to say.

---

Doom_Art posted...

I mean we all have our fetishes, but it's weird to argue about your attraction to a bunny cartoon for 350 posts

Damn, you're STILL here? You must have literally nothing better to do with your life, lol

---

superman 2000 posted...

You must have literally nothing better to do with your life, lol

you've been arguing about tits on a cartoon bunny since yesterday afternoon

---

Doom_Art posted...

you've been arguing about tits on a cartoon bunny since yesterday afternoon

I created the topic; I'm obviously interested in what others have to say. You're just a rando lurking on a topic you clearly think little of, constantly repeating variations of "lol ur weird lol fetish lol unfunny condescension". Like, we get it already, ya one-trick pony. Now take a bath.

---

superman 2000 posted...

I'm obviously interested in what others have to say.

I mean you're not tho, you just like arguing.

---

Doom_Art posted...

I mean you're not tho, you just like arguing.

THIS JUST IN: You can like arguing AND be interested in other people's opinions! More at 11.

---

superman 2000 posted...

Using black magic, my Cash App account now receives an automatic $5 donation every time someone makes this brain-dead comment.

Sorry we cant all have silky smooth palms, Brosephine de Beauharnais

---