Current Events > What happened to make paedophiles so open online in recent years?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Seeing an increasing number of people saying they're getting off to loli or shota stuff. Just encountered it in a random reddit comment and it had lots of upvotes.

Wtf is wrong with people?

---

4chan.

---

Kuja_88 posted...

4chan.

... Has been around for almost 2 decades
Not that I've seen what TC is taking about but it must be something else
---

TC, your post and topic title are about different things.
---

qanaon.

---

Kuja_88 posted...

4chan.

Nah, it was 8chan.

---

SamWincester posted...

TC, your post and topic title are about different things.

They're really not.

---

SamWincester posted...

TC, your post and topic title are about different things.

Oh youre one of those people who thinks lolicons arent pedos

Comparing animated Loli and Shota to real-life pedophilia is rather absurd.

---

Iodine posted...

Comparing animated Loli and Shota to real-life pedophilia is rather absurd.

Not really.


---

Let me short circuit this conversation
"What, does playing GTA3 mean you want to murder people?"
"No, but if your dick gets hard while you fictionally dismember someone, you probably have particular sexual fantasies/fetishes"

I think it's pretty absurd to try to disconnect them. Like, if you get off to loli stuff, I think it's unlikely that you're not attracted to children. I understand why people want to distance themselves, but it would be better if people didn't feel the need to.

---

COVxy posted...

Let me short circuit this conversation
"What, does playing GTA3 mean you want to murder people?"
"No, but if your dick gets hard while you fictionally dismember someone, you probably have particular sexual fantasies/fetishes"

You had to change the correlation in order to make your wrong conclusion work. Fictional sex to real sex, fictional violence to real violence. You made it fictional violence to sexual gratification out of nowhere.
---

COVxy posted...

Let me short circuit this conversation
"What, does playing GTA3 mean you want to murder people?"
"No, but if your dick gets hard while you fictionally dismember someone, you probably have particular sexual fantasies/fetishes"

I think it's pretty absurd to try to disconnect them. Like, if you get off to loli stuff, I think it's unlikely that you're not attracted to children. I understand why people want to distance themselves, but it would be better if people didn't feel the need to.

This is the truth.

---

Iodine posted...

Comparing animated Loli and Shota to real-life pedophilia is rather absurd.

What else is getting off to people who look like children then?

A paedophile isn't necessarily someone who has sexually assaulted a child.

---

They all got kicked off Tumblr and so moved to Twitter.

Bandit_Keith posted...

You had to change the correlation in order to make your wrong conclusion work. Fictional sex to real sex, fictional violence to real violence. You made it fictional violence to sexual gratification out of nowhere.

I'm not in the game of playing along with stupid arguments that have the mask of validity.

If you find yourself getting off to the fictional representation of a thing, it's not really very likely that you are not attracted to that thing. You like a drawing of a child because child-like features are attractive to you.

You may not ever act on it, but the attraction is still there. You may even feel so guilty about it that you can't even get off to pictures of real children! But that doesn't mean that the attraction isn't there. People want to try to play these word games because admitting that this is the case is too taboo and shameful.

---

ghostblob posted...

loli or shota

It's pretty gross, but fiction is fiction. I'm more concerned with people who go after actual children -- not illustrations.

COVxy posted...

I'm not in the game of playing along with stupid arguments that have the mask of validity.

If you find yourself getting off to the fictional representation of a thing, it's not really very likely that you are not attracted to that thing. You like a drawing of a child because child-like features are attractive to you.

You may not ever act on it, but the attraction is still there. You may even feel so guilty about it that you can't even get off to pictures of real children! But that doesn't mean that the attraction isn't there. People want to try to play these word games because admitting that this is the case is too taboo and shameful.

Do you apply your opinion to all fictional things people enjoy, or just loli trash?
---

Bandit_Keith posted...

Do you apply your opinion to all fictional things people enjoy, or just loli trash?

Feel like my wording was relatively clear.

COVxy posted...

If you find yourself getting off to the fictional representation of a thing, it's not really very likely that you are not attracted to that thing.

---

Bandit_Keith posted...

Do you apply your opinion to all fictional things people enjoy, or just loli trash?

What's confusing about "If you jerk off to X, then you might be X"

Loli, milfs, bdsm etc. Doesn't change, whatever the thing is that gets you off.

---

COVxy posted...

Feel like my wording was relatively clear.

Yours was, mine wasn't. Sorry. I meant is this just for sexual things, or all fictional things?
---

coh posted...

SamWincester posted...

TC, your post and topic title are about different things.

Oh youre one of those people who thinks lolicons arent pedos

To be clear, I'm not into either, but they are very different categories.
---

COVxy posted...

If you find yourself getting off to the fictional representation of a thing, it's not really very likely that you are not attracted to that thing.

so if you have fun playing GTA, running down pedestrians and shooting hookers, you'd have fun doing it in real life?

i'm tagging you jack thompson.

---