Poll of the Day > Republicans HAS the VOTES to Confirm Supreme Court Nominee BEFORE the Election!

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Full Throttle 09/22/20 1:45:30 AM #1:	Do you think it's time the Democrats play dirty like the Republicans and fight back? Yes. No more going the high road. It's time they play dirty too and fight back the hypocritical Cons No. I don't like this but trying to be on the same level as Republicans is not any better They should just accept it and allow this great woman bring America back to it's conservative roots Do you think it's time the Democrats play dirty like the Republicans and fight back? - Results (62 votes) Yes. No more going the high road. It's time they play dirty too and fight back the hypocritical Cons 56.45% (35 votes) 35 No. I don't like this but trying to be on the same level as Republicans is not any better 9.68% (6 votes) 6 They should just accept it and allow this great woman bring America back to it's conservative roots 33.87% (21 votes) 21 In a blow to Democrats, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman, Lindsey Graham has said that Trump has the votes to confirm a Supreme Court nominee after 2 swing republican senators have now voiced their support to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg seat BEFORE the election. Graham said "It's pretty obvious that if Democrats want an outcome, they'll just destroy anybody's life to keep the seats open. They said they tried to destroy Brett Kavanaugh so they could fill the seat,they were dumb enough tos ay that I've seen this movie before, it's not going to work. We've got the votes to confirm and we can vote before the election. Now, that's the constitutional process" Graham himself said in 2016 to use his words AGAINST him if he ever voted to confirm a supreme court even if the president was a republican that was right before an election after not having a hearing on Merrick Garland. Iowa Senator, Chuck Grassley and Senator Corey Gardner confirmed they will back a hearing though not necessarily vote to confirm. It was thought Grassley could block the nomination process because he opposed filling vacancies in an election year. Gardner is also facing a tough re-election and some thought he could side with Democrats to boost his standing among moderates. The nomination comes 6 weeks before an election and the Republicans now have 50 votes. All eyes could be on Mitt Romney who is on the ire of Trump's side and if he sides with 2 senators opposed it, Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins, he could be the spoiler if the vote happens AFTER the election as Mark Kelly from Arizona could boot Martha McSally out and be filled immediately. Nancy Pelosi is also not ruling out IMPEACHING the president to halt the process as Democrats are pulling out the stops As of right now, Amy Coney Barrett will be Trump's choice although he will be meeting Barbara Lagoa this week but so far, Barrett is the one who will face the Senate.. Do you think it's time Democrats start to play dirty like the Republicans and do whatever it takes to stop this? https://i.imgur.com/ogYh2Ds.jpg https://i.imgur.com/33kdr2S.jpg https://i.imgur.com/Wa9CEpG.jpg https://i.imgur.com/ggSH2Lg.jpg https://i.imgur.com/ljxF6PT.jpg https://i.imgur.com/fHbhDGH.jpg https://i.imgur.com/EKQtqqZ.jpg https://i.imgur.com/8qzFBkT.jpg --- The News Will Continue...For Now call me mrduckbear, sweater monkeys. I'm an Asian Liberal. RESIST The Alt-Right <cite>Full Throttle posted [p:944928115] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote> Do you think it's time the Democrats play dirty like the Republicans and fight back? Yes. No more going the high road. It's time they play dirty too and fight back the hypocritical Cons No. I don't like this but trying to be on the same level as Republicans is not any better They should just accept it and allow this great woman bring America back to it's conservative roots Vote View Results Do you think it's time the Democrats play dirty like the Republicans and fight back? - Results (62 votes) Yes. No more going the high road. It's time they play dirty too and fight back the hypocritical Cons 56.45% (35 votes) 35 No. I don't like this but trying to be on the same level as Republicans is not any better 9.68% (6 votes) 6 They should just accept it and allow this great woman bring America back to it's conservative roots 33.87% (21 votes) 21 Show Voting Form In a blow to Democrats, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman, Lindsey Graham has said that Trump has the votes to confirm a Supreme Court nominee after 2 swing republican senators have now voiced their support to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg seat BEFORE the election. Graham said "It's pretty obvious that if Democrats want an outcome, they'll just destroy anybody's life to keep the seats open. They said they tried to destroy Brett Kavanaugh so they could fill the seat,they were dumb enough tos ay that I've seen this movie before, it's not going to work. We've got the votes to confirm and we can vote before the election. Now, that's the constitutional process" Graham himself said in 2016 to use his words AGAINST him if he ever voted to confirm a supreme court even if the president was a republican that was right before an election after not having a hearing on Merrick Garland. Iowa Senator, Chuck Grassley and Senator Corey Gardner confirmed they will back a hearing though not necessarily vote to confirm. It was thought Grassley could block the nomination process because he opposed filling vacancies in an election year. Gardner is also facing a tough re-election and some thought he could side with Democrats to boost his standing among moderates. The nomination comes 6 weeks before an election and the Republicans now have 50 votes. All eyes could be on Mitt Romney who is on the ire of Trump's side and if he sides with 2 senators opposed it, Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins, he could be the spoiler if the vote happens AFTER the election as Mark Kelly from Arizona could boot Martha McSally out and be filled immediately. Nancy Pelosi is also not ruling out IMPEACHING the president to halt the process as Democrats are pulling out the stops As of right now, Amy Coney Barrett will be Trump's choice although he will be meeting Barbara Lagoa this week but so far, Barrett is the one who will face the Senate.. Do you think it's time Democrats start to play dirty like the Republicans and do whatever it takes to stop this? https://i.imgur.com/ogYh2Ds.jpg https://i.imgur.com/33kdr2S.jpg https://i.imgur.com/Wa9CEpG.jpg https://i.imgur.com/ggSH2Lg.jpg https://i.imgur.com/ljxF6PT.jpg https://i.imgur.com/fHbhDGH.jpg https://i.imgur.com/EKQtqqZ.jpg https://i.imgur.com/8qzFBkT.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jen0125 09/22/20 1:47:12 AM #2:	I'm absolutely shocked they all did a 180 on their previous rhetoric. --- https://imgur.com/4ihiyS2 "I am not gay! Can't you get that through your head? I am very much aroused at the site of a naked woman!" - Dan0429 <cite>Jen0125 posted [p:944928144] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>I'm absolutely shocked they all did a 180 on their previous rhetoric. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Soup_or_Science 09/22/20 2:05:22 AM #3:	Full Throttle posted... IMPEACHING the president Again? <cite>Soup_or_Science posted [p:944928484] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Full Throttle posted... </cite> <quote>IMPEACHING the president</quote>Again? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 09/22/20 2:17:18 AM #4:	The Dems need to do whatever they can to fucking stall this. It's ridiculous, hypocritical, and vile that Republicans would try to rush and fill a seat 6 weeks before an election when NINE GOD DAMNED MONTHS was "too soon". And voters in the moderate Republicans' states need to write letters and apply some pressure so they actually do the right thing. I'm so sick of this "when they go low, we go high" bull crap. Republicans have just mopped the floor with Democrats over and over. Obama should've put Garland on the bench and made the Senate vote him off of it. I thought they might try and appoint a "moderate" conservative justice to try and pressure Dems into just accepting it. But they literally have zero shame, and are going straight for some far right religious nut job. Fight back! <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:944928714] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>The Dems need to do whatever they can to fucking stall this. It's ridiculous, hypocritical, and vile that Republicans would try to rush and fill a seat 6 weeks before an election when NINE GOD DAMNED MONTHS was "too soon". And voters in the moderate Republicans' states need to write letters and apply some pressure so they actually do the right thing. I'm so sick of this "when they go low, we go high" bull crap. Republicans have just mopped the floor with Democrats over and over. Obama should've put Garland on the bench and made the Senate vote him off of it. I thought they might try and appoint a "moderate" conservative justice to try and pressure Dems into just accepting it. But they literally have zero shame, and are going straight for some far right religious nut job. Fight back! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 09/22/20 2:43:31 AM #5:	Do you think it's time the Democrats play dirty That's what they've been doing. That's why they have no credibility. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:944929163] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote><quote>Do you think it's time the Democrats play dirty</quote>That's what they've been doing. That's why they have no credibility. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
xjayguyx 09/22/20 3:07:46 AM #6:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... That's what they've been doing. That's why they have no credibility. This <cite>xjayguyx posted [p:944929567] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>That's what they've been doing. That's why they have no credibility.</quote> This </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 09/22/20 3:39:35 AM #7:	Another reason "we go high" is utterly pointless is because no matter how often the Democrats play nice while Republicans lie, cheat, and steal... Their sheep followers will lap up Rush and Alex Jones telling them "it's actually the Dems who play dirty," anyway They nominated freaking Biden, ultra centrist as President And Harris, a DA that loves locking up innocent people as VP ..And Republicans STILL immediately began labeling them far left extremists! It literally doesn't matter what they do, the other side will falsely vilify them just the same. <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:944930114] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Another reason "we go high" is utterly pointless is because no matter how often the Democrats play nice while Republicans lie, cheat, and steal... Their sheep followers will lap up Rush and Alex Jones telling them "it's actually the Dems who play dirty," anyway They nominated freaking Biden, ultra centrist as President And Harris, a DA that loves locking up innocent people as VP ..And Republicans STILL immediately began labeling them far left extremists! It literally doesn't matter what they do, the other side will falsely vilify them just the same. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metalsonic66 09/22/20 4:23:13 AM #8:	Trump had her taken out --- PSN/Steam ID: Metalsonic_69 Big bombs go kabang. <cite>Metalsonic66 posted [p:944930779] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Trump had her taken out </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheWorstPoster 09/22/20 4:29:20 AM #9:	Soup_or_Science posted... Again? Nancy Pelosi stated recently that she would impeach Trump every day for ANYTHING. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HA9E2a5mTXY If anything, Pelosi instead should be impeached for corruption. <cite>TheWorstPoster posted [p:944930868] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Soup_or_Science posted... </cite> <quote>Again?</quote>Nancy Pelosi stated recently that she would impeach Trump every day for ANYTHING. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HA9E2a5mTXY If anything, Pelosi instead should be impeached for corruption. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zareth 09/22/20 4:49:32 AM #10:	Ah yes, we all know appeasement is a proven strategy that always works. --- It's okay, I have no idea who I am either. https://imgur.com/WOo6wcq <cite>Zareth posted [p:944931121] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Ah yes, we all know appeasement is a proven strategy that always works. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 09/22/20 5:07:10 AM #11:	Republicans HAS the VOTES to Confirm Supreme Court Nominee BEFORE the Election! Ducky, you literally just posted a grammar quiz topic the other day. XD Full Throttle posted... Nancy Pelosi is also not ruling out IMPEACHING the president to halt the process as Democrats are pulling out the stops Which would be the stupidest fucking thing ever and make Dems look far worse than Republicans. streamofthesky posted... I thought they might try and appoint a "moderate" conservative justice to try and pressure Dems into just accepting it. But they literally have zero shame, and are going straight for some far right religious nut job. ...they literally haven't even picked a nominee, so where the fuck is "going for some far right religious nut job" coming from? Until he actually nominates somebody, you don't know what they're going to be like. So far the only thing he's said is that he wants to go with a woman, but even that might not be the case. And while Hillary was pushing the whole, "They go low, we go high," she was having representatives go to foreign governments to try to get campaign dirt on her opponent -- you know, the same thing they accused Trump of doing -- and not only did she get her a load of (by the way, unverified) stuff from foreign governments, but she had her agents try to distribute it to the media where even WaPo refused to run those claims. streamofthesky posted... Another reason "we go high" is utterly pointless is because no matter how often the Democrats play nice while Republicans lie, cheat, and steal... Well, the biggest problem is that they never go high, it's just a talking point. They try to pull the same shit as Republicans, maybe even worse. Can you imagine threatening to impeach a president to stop him from making a nomination? As much as people complain about Republicans trying to obstruct Obama, they NEVER had the gall to do half the things that Democrats have done to Trump and, even when they were bitching about Obama's treatment, they had just come off obstructing GWB. streamofthesky posted... They nominated freaking Biden, ultra centrist as President He's not all that centrist. After doing a deep dive on his stated policies, I'm honestly not even sure he's a moderate. As I mentioned the other week: Well, let's evaluate some of his policies, shall we? https://joebiden.com/racial-economic-equity/ He's currently pushing a race-oriented home ownership program. (It's worth noting that attempts to boost home ownership rates were an underlying factor in the 2008 housing crisis.) https://joebiden.com/caregiving/ He supports universal preschool and public-funded childcare facilities. https://joebiden.com/clean-energy Supports a coal ban and one with a more aggressive timeline than many European nations, as well as seeking to right "environmental justice" wrongs (sounds more like AOC than Biden) His clean energy investments have a lot of strings attached including diversity hire requirements, paid leave, and union support. https://joebiden.com/womens-agenda/ Supports the nonsensical "equal pay" claims for women and will push pay increases in industries largely staffed by women. https://joebiden.com/gunsafety/ Goes far further than Bernie Sanders on gun issues, resolving to ensure gun-makers will be held accountable for deaths caused by guns (similar to what Hillary promised). Actually, going over his gun agenda, he's surprisingly very radical on this issue (whereas a lot of the stuff on his site more uses radical rhetoric but, at surface value, doesn't go as far as other candidates; this section is massive and goes into some draconian shit). https://joebiden.com/vawa/ The whole section on "violence against women" is pretty out there in terms of new provisions. That could be a post onto itself. https://joebiden.com/justice/ His CJ plan is pretty radical, although some of those provisions are probably widely supported (particularly given the way the arguments are framed). https://joebiden.com/catholics/ This section notes his commitment to more than double the federal minimum wage, which is a highly radical position considering the vast disparities between states where many can't afford that kind of a leap. https://joebiden.com/joes-agenda-for-students/ Universal community college, increased loan forgiveness, and even more loans. And he has a radical loan payment and forgiveness program that will shift costs onto taxpayers instead of controlling costs at colleges. https://joebiden.com/environmental-justice-plan/ Establish an Environmental and Climate Justice Division within the U.S. Department of Justice. ...you know, just by looking at Biden's own statements, I'm kinda starting to see some justification for those radical claims. He seemed* more moderate during the debates.* streamofthesky posted... And Harris, a DA that loves locking up innocent people as VP Yeah, that's just fucked up. And she was the DNC's hand-chosen candidate, too. There were a LOT of potential candidates who weren't terrible fucking people and who hadn't repeatedly called Biden racist, but he chose her at the party's behest. Honestly, if it was just Biden, it probably wouldn't be a big deal, but Kamala "We Don't Want to Deplete Our Prison Labor Pool" Harris is too much fucking much --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:944931391] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote><quote>Republicans HAS the VOTES to Confirm Supreme Court Nominee BEFORE the Election!</quote> Ducky, you literally just posted a grammar quiz topic the other day. XD Full Throttle posted... </cite> <quote>Nancy Pelosi is also not ruling out IMPEACHING the president to halt the process as Democrats are pulling out the stops</quote> Which would be the stupidest fucking thing ever and make Dems look far worse than Republicans. streamofthesky posted... </cite> <quote>I thought they might try and appoint a "moderate" conservative justice to try and pressure Dems into just accepting it. But they literally have zero shame, and are going straight for some far right religious nut job.</quote> ...they literally haven't even picked a nominee, so where the fuck is "going for some far right religious nut job" coming from? Until he actually nominates somebody, you don't know what they're going to be like. So far the only thing he's said is that he wants to go with a woman, but even that might not be the case. And while Hillary was pushing the whole, "They go low, we go high," she was having representatives go to foreign governments to try to get campaign dirt on her opponent -- you know, the same thing they accused Trump of doing -- and not only did she get her a load of (by the way, unverified) stuff from foreign governments, but she had her agents try to distribute it to the media where even WaPo refused to run those claims. streamofthesky posted... </cite> <quote>Another reason "we go high" is utterly pointless is because no matter how often the Democrats play nice while Republicans lie, cheat, and steal...</quote> Well, the biggest problem is that they never go high, it's just a talking point. They try to pull the same shit as Republicans, maybe even worse. Can you imagine threatening to impeach a president to stop him from making a nomination? As much as people complain about Republicans trying to obstruct Obama, they NEVER had the gall to do half the things that Democrats have done to Trump and, even when they were bitching about Obama's treatment, they had just come off obstructing GWB. streamofthesky posted... </cite> <quote>They nominated freaking Biden, ultra centrist as President</quote> He's not all that centrist. After doing a deep dive on his stated policies, I'm honestly not even sure he's a moderate. As I mentioned the other week: Well, let's evaluate some of his policies, shall we? https://joebiden.com/racial-economic-equity/ He's currently pushing a race-oriented home ownership program. (It's worth noting that attempts to boost home ownership rates were an underlying factor in the 2008 housing crisis.) https://joebiden.com/caregiving/ He supports universal preschool and public-funded childcare facilities. https://joebiden.com/clean-energy Supports a coal ban and one with a more aggressive timeline than many European nations, as well as seeking to right "environmental justice" wrongs (sounds more like AOC than Biden) His clean energy investments have a lot of strings attached including diversity hire requirements, paid leave, and union support. https://joebiden.com/womens-agenda/ Supports the nonsensical "equal pay" claims for women and will push pay increases in industries largely staffed by women. https://joebiden.com/gunsafety/ Goes far further than Bernie Sanders on gun issues, resolving to ensure gun-makers will be held accountable for deaths caused by guns (similar to what Hillary promised). Actually, going over his gun agenda, he's surprisingly very radical on this issue (whereas a lot of the stuff on his site more uses radical rhetoric but, at surface value, doesn't go as far as other candidates; this section is massive and goes into some draconian shit). https://joebiden.com/vawa/ The whole section on "violence against women" is pretty out there in terms of new provisions. That could be a post onto itself. https://joebiden.com/justice/ His CJ plan is pretty radical, although some of those provisions are probably widely supported (particularly given the way the arguments are framed). https://joebiden.com/catholics/ This section notes his commitment to more than double the federal minimum wage, which is a highly radical position considering the vast disparities between states where many can't afford that kind of a leap. https://joebiden.com/joes-agenda-for-students/ Universal community college, increased loan forgiveness, and even more loans. And he has a radical loan payment and forgiveness program that will shift costs onto taxpayers instead of controlling costs at colleges. https://joebiden.com/environmental-justice-plan/ Establish an Environmental and Climate Justice Division within the U.S. Department of Justice. ...you know, just by looking at Biden's own statements, I'm kinda starting to see some justification for those radical claims. He seemed more moderate during the debates. streamofthesky posted... </cite> <quote>And Harris, a DA that loves locking up innocent people as VP</quote> Yeah, that's just fucked up. And she was the DNC's hand-chosen candidate, too. There were a LOT of potential candidates who weren't terrible fucking people and who hadn't repeatedly called Biden racist, but he chose her at the party's behest. Honestly, if it was just Biden, it probably wouldn't be a big deal, but Kamala "We Don't Want to Deplete Our Prison Labor Pool" Harris is too much fucking much </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Soup_or_Science 09/22/20 5:32:23 AM #12:	Zeus posted... Ducky, you literally just posted a grammar quiz topic the other day. XD I THINK His Grammar is the LEAST of Our Concerns! <cite>Soup_or_Science posted [p:944931791] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted... </cite> <quote>Ducky, you literally just posted a grammar quiz topic the other day. XD</quote>I THINK His Grammar is the LEAST of Our Concerns! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BUMPED2002 09/22/20 8:53:46 AM #13:	Of course they do but when Obama made his pick, these SOBs blocked it until Trump came into office. --- SpankageBros <cite>BUMPED2002 posted [p:944935216] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Of course they do but when Obama made his pick, these SOBs blocked it until Trump came into office. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fam_Fam 09/22/20 8:59:41 AM #14:	Jen0125 posted... I'm absolutely shocked they all did a 180 on their previous rhetoric. yes but the democrats are pretty corrupt. what can you expect? <cite>Fam_Fam posted [p:944935367] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Jen0125 posted... </cite> <quote>I'm absolutely shocked they all did a 180 on their previous rhetoric.</quote> yes but the democrats are pretty corrupt. what can you expect? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jen0125 09/22/20 9:20:13 AM #15:	Fam_Fam posted... yes but the democrats are pretty corrupt. what can you expect? Shut the fuck up --- https://imgur.com/4ihiyS2 "I am not gay! Can't you get that through your head? I am very much aroused at the site of a naked woman!" - Dan0429 <cite>Jen0125 posted [p:944935821] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Fam_Fam posted... </cite> <quote>yes but the democrats are pretty corrupt. what can you expect?</quote> Shut the fuck up </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BarneyBosco 09/22/20 9:27:29 AM #16:	She could have retired under Obama but was too selfish to do so. And this dying wish fiasco lol. Democrats really do hate personal responsibility and the people who support it. Its all about the Jones's with them. I hope the new justice is a staunch unapologetic conservative. --- http://celebmafia.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Ana-Ivanovic-5.jpg PSN J_Frost77 search my PSN to join the Divinity Original Sin Community <cite>BarneyBosco posted [p:944936005] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>She could have retired under Obama but was too selfish to do so. And this dying wish fiasco lol. Democrats really do hate personal responsibility and the people who support it. Its all about the Jones's with them. I hope the new justice is a staunch unapologetic conservative. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nichtcrawler X 09/22/20 9:29:31 AM #17:	BarneyBosco posted... I hope the new justice is a staunch unapologetic conservative. I do not foresee that ending well in the current climate. --- Official Teetotaller of PotD Dovie'andi se tovya sagain! <cite>Nichtcrawler X posted [p:944936071] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>BarneyBosco posted... </cite> <quote>I hope the new justice is a staunch unapologetic conservative.</quote> I do not foresee that ending well in the current climate. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BarneyBosco 09/22/20 9:32:36 AM #18:	Nichtcrawler X posted... I do not foresee that ending well in the current climate. It really doesn't matter. Democrats will play by the same rules as we all do or get put down like rabid dogs. --- http://celebmafia.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Ana-Ivanovic-5.jpg PSN J_Frost77 search my PSN to join the Divinity Original Sin Community <cite>BarneyBosco posted [p:944936166] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Nichtcrawler X posted... </cite> <quote>I do not foresee that ending well in the current climate.</quote> It really doesn't matter. Democrats will play by the same rules as we all do or get put down like rabid dogs. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nichtcrawler X 09/22/20 9:38:20 AM #19:	BarneyBosco posted... It really doesn't matter. Democrats will play by the same rules as we all do or get put down like rabid dogs. Unless I am misremembering things, Scalia's seat was held open for over a year. Seems more like the Republicans are not playing by the "same rules". Edit: also what is that Wikipedia default sorting? Thomas is clearly the senior member by a long stretch, but he is not ordered as such? --- Official Teetotaller of PotD Dovie'andi se tovya sagain! <cite>Nichtcrawler X posted [p:944936304] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>BarneyBosco posted... </cite> <quote>It really doesn't matter. Democrats will play by the same rules as we all do or get put down like rabid dogs.</quote> Unless I am misremembering things, Scalia's seat was held open for over a year. Seems more like the Republicans are not playing by the "same rules". Edit: also what is that Wikipedia default sorting? Thomas is clearly the senior member by a long stretch, but he is not ordered as such? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jen0125 09/22/20 9:38:24 AM #20:	BarneyBosco posted... It really doesn't matter. Democrats will play by the same rules as we all do or get put down like rabid dogs. Do you think you sound cool or intelligent saying dumb shit like this? Put down like rabid dogs? By whom? You, with your tendies grease smeared t-shirt? Shut the fuck up --- https://imgur.com/4ihiyS2 "I am not gay! Can't you get that through your head? I am very much aroused at the site of a naked woman!" - Dan0429 <cite>Jen0125 posted [p:944936306] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>BarneyBosco posted... </cite> <quote>It really doesn't matter. Democrats will play by the same rules as we all do or get put down like rabid dogs.</quote> Do you think you sound cool or intelligent saying dumb shit like this? Put down like rabid dogs? By whom? You, with your tendies grease smeared t-shirt? Shut the fuck up </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BarneyBosco 09/22/20 10:03:03 AM #21:	Jen0125 posted... Do you think you sound cool or intelligent saying dumb shit like this? Put down like rabid dogs? By whom? You, with your tendies grease smeared t-shirt? Shut the fuck up Get ready for four more years. Prison is coming your way lol. --- http://celebmafia.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Ana-Ivanovic-5.jpg PSN J_Frost77 search my PSN to join the Divinity Original Sin Community <cite>BarneyBosco posted [p:944936920] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Jen0125 posted... </cite> <quote>Do you think you sound cool or intelligent saying dumb shit like this? Put down like rabid dogs? By whom? You, with your tendies grease smeared t-shirt? Shut the fuck up</quote> Get ready for four more years. Prison is coming your way lol. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
argonautweakend 09/22/20 10:11:54 AM #22:	What will happen is exactly what I knew would happen: despite the republicans making up a rule last time about no new justices in an election year, despite RBG dying much sooner to election day than Scalia, they are going to ram in a new justice as soon as they can do it. Democrats will complain about how unfair it is republicans make up rules out of nowhere and then don't even follow the rules as soon as they get the first chance not to. Democrats will be seen as losers and whiners to at least asking the other party to be consistent with regards to rules they made up. SC gets a new Trump justice, democrats look like losers. The only defense i've seen is that "you just know the democrats would do the same thing" which, the last time they could have, 1988, they did not. <cite>argonautweakend posted [p:944937165] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>What will happen is exactly what I knew would happen: despite the republicans making up a rule last time about no new justices in an election year, despite RBG dying much sooner to election day than Scalia, they are going to ram in a new justice as soon as they can do it. Democrats will complain about how unfair it is republicans make up rules out of nowhere and then don't even follow the rules as soon as they get the first chance not to. Democrats will be seen as losers and whiners to at least asking the other party to be consistent with regards to rules they made up. SC gets a new Trump justice, democrats look like losers. The only defense i've seen is that "you just know the democrats would do the same thing" which, the last time they could have, 1988, they did not. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jen0125 09/22/20 10:15:22 AM #23:	BarneyBosco posted... Get ready for four more years. Prison is coming your way lol. Maybe for you. I'm leaving the US. Enjoy your hellhole. --- https://imgur.com/4ihiyS2 "I am not gay! Can't you get that through your head? I am very much aroused at the site of a naked woman!" - Dan0429 <cite>Jen0125 posted [p:944937272] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>BarneyBosco posted... </cite> <quote>Get ready for four more years. Prison is coming your way lol.</quote> Maybe for you. I'm leaving the US. Enjoy your hellhole. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fierce_Deity_08 09/22/20 10:41:58 AM #24:	They have no grounds for impeachment. You dont impeach a president for doing his job. --- Official Fierce Deity in my own mind. GT: OnikaraStar, PSN: Onikara, NNID: OnikaraStar <cite>Fierce_Deity_08 posted [p:944938018] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>They have no grounds for impeachment. You dont impeach a president for doing his job. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nichtcrawler X 09/22/20 10:46:48 AM #25:	Fierce_Deity_08 posted... You dont impeach a president for doing his job. Without modifiers no. They probably think he is doing an improper or immoral job, which might clash with laws based on interpretation. --- Official Teetotaller of PotD Dovie'andi se tovya sagain! <cite>Nichtcrawler X posted [p:944938178] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Fierce_Deity_08 posted... </cite> <quote>You dont impeach a president for doing his job.</quote> Without modifiers no. They probably think he is doing an improper or immoral job, which might clash with laws based on interpretation. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fam_Fam 09/22/20 11:34:07 AM #26:	argonautweakend posted... What will happen is exactly what I knew would happen: despite the republicans making up a rule last time about no new justices in an election year, despite RBG dying much sooner to election day than Scalia, they are going to ram in a new justice as soon as they can do it. Democrats will complain about how unfair it is republicans make up rules out of nowhere and then don't even follow the rules as soon as they get the first chance not to. Democrats will be seen as losers and whiners to at least asking the other party to be consistent with regards to rules they made up. SC gets a new Trump justice, democrats look like losers. The only defense i've seen is that "you just know the democrats would do the same thing" which, the last time they could have, 1988, they did not. so what do you think about biden's statements on these topics in 1992 and 2016, then? <cite>Fam_Fam posted [p:944939936] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>argonautweakend posted... </cite> <quote>What will happen is exactly what I knew would happen: despite the republicans making up a rule last time about no new justices in an election year, despite RBG dying much sooner to election day than Scalia, they are going to ram in a new justice as soon as they can do it. Democrats will complain about how unfair it is republicans make up rules out of nowhere and then don't even follow the rules as soon as they get the first chance not to. Democrats will be seen as losers and whiners to at least asking the other party to be consistent with regards to rules they made up. SC gets a new Trump justice, democrats look like losers. The only defense i've seen is that "you just know the democrats would do the same thing" which, the last time they could have, 1988, they did not.</quote> so what do you think about biden's statements on these topics in 1992 and 2016, then? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 09/22/20 11:39:10 AM #27:	Republicans are evil. Toss them in a saturday morning cartoon like Captain Planet or GI Joe and they would fit right in as super villains. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:944940168] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Republicans are evil. Toss them in a saturday morning cartoon like Captain Planet or GI Joe and they would fit right in as super villains. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blightzkrieg 09/22/20 12:14:07 PM #28:	https://twitter.com/burgessev/status/1308403549651562499 Even the literal best they have to offer is such a huge piece of shit. Fuck the whole Republican party. Democracy in the USA is non functional as they exist right now. They need to get fucked asap and be replaced by a new opposition party, or soon they will be the only party. --- https://imgur.com/mmESgwx <cite>Blightzkrieg posted [p:944941697] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote> https://twitter.com/burgessev/status/1308403549651562499 Even the literal best they have to offer is such a huge piece of shit. Fuck the whole Republican party. Democracy in the USA is non functional as they exist right now. They need to get fucked asap and be replaced by a new opposition party, or soon they will be the only party. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BeerOnTap 09/22/20 12:19:57 PM #29:	Amy Coney Barrett! This is who I wanted last time around instead of Kavanaugh. My body is ready! <cite>BeerOnTap posted [p:944941969] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Amy Coney Barrett! This is who I wanted last time around instead of Kavanaugh. My body is ready! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wanded 09/22/20 12:55:27 PM #30:	Jen0125 posted... I'm absolutely shocked they all did a 180 on their previous rhetoric. streamofthesky posted... The Dems need to do whatever they can to fucking stall this. It's ridiculous, hypocritical, and vile that Republicans would try to rush and fill a seat 6 weeks before an election when NINE GOD DAMNED MONTHS was "too soon". And voters in the moderate Republicans' states need to write letters and apply some pressure so they actually do the right thing. I'm so sick of this "when they go low, we go high" bull crap. Republicans have just mopped the floor with Democrats over and over. Obama should've put Garland on the bench and made the Senate vote him off of it. I thought they might try and appoint a "moderate" conservative justice to try and pressure Dems into just accepting it. But they literally have zero shame, and are going straight for some far right religious nut job. Fight back! SKARDAVNELNATE posted... That's what they've been doing. That's why they have no credibility. yeah...you need to watch this video https://www.newsweek.com/gop-ad-democrats-supreme-court-vacancy-filled-1533500 --- Puss in Boots was a good movie and it deserves more recognition <cite>Wanded posted [p:944943486] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Jen0125 posted... </cite> <quote>I'm absolutely shocked they all did a 180 on their previous rhetoric.</quote> streamofthesky posted... </cite> <quote>The Dems need to do whatever they can to fucking stall this. It's ridiculous, hypocritical, and vile that Republicans would try to rush and fill a seat 6 weeks before an election when NINE GOD DAMNED MONTHS was "too soon". And voters in the moderate Republicans' states need to write letters and apply some pressure so they actually do the right thing. I'm so sick of this "when they go low, we go high" bull crap. Republicans have just mopped the floor with Democrats over and over. Obama should've put Garland on the bench and made the Senate vote him off of it. I thought they might try and appoint a "moderate" conservative justice to try and pressure Dems into just accepting it. But they literally have zero shame, and are going straight for some far right religious nut job. Fight back!</quote> SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>That's what they've been doing. That's why they have no credibility.</quote> yeah...you need to watch this video https://www.newsweek.com/gop-ad-democrats-supreme-court-vacancy-filled-1533500 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jen0125 09/22/20 1:39:07 PM #31:	I don't need to watch anything. It's plainly obvious their rhetoric has changed. --- https://imgur.com/4ihiyS2 "I am not gay! Can't you get that through your head? I am very much aroused at the site of a naked woman!" - Dan0429 <cite>Jen0125 posted [p:944945134] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>I don't need to watch anything. It's plainly obvious their rhetoric has changed. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wanded 09/22/20 2:01:43 PM #32:	Jen0125 posted... I don't need to watch anything. It's plainly obvious their rhetoric has changed. yeah, the video is about democrats formerly supporting what republicans are currently doing, hence they did a 180 as well --- Puss in Boots was a good movie and it deserves more recognition <cite>Wanded posted [p:944946145] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Jen0125 posted... </cite> <quote>I don't need to watch anything. It's plainly obvious their rhetoric has changed.</quote>yeah, the video is about democrats formerly supporting what republicans are currently doing, hence they did a 180 as well </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metalsonic66 09/22/20 2:04:43 PM #33:	They're both hypocrites obviously --- PSN/Steam ID: Metalsonic_69 Big bombs go kabang. <cite>Metalsonic66 posted [p:944946262] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>They're both hypocrites obviously </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blightzkrieg 09/22/20 2:15:35 PM #34:	Wanded posted... yeah, the video is about democrats formerly supporting what republicans are currently doing, hence they did a 180 as well Because Republicans literally changed the rules in 2016. You're looking at the reaction as the cause dude, you've got your brain in backwards. --- https://imgur.com/mmESgwx <cite>Blightzkrieg posted [p:944946705] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Wanded posted... </cite> <quote>yeah, the video is about democrats formerly supporting what republicans are currently doing, hence they did a 180 as well</quote>Because Republicans literally changed the rules in 2016. You're looking at the reaction as the cause dude, you've got your brain in backwards. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheBabaYaga 09/22/20 2:15:56 PM #35:	Our dear country, what will they do to you? :( <cite>TheBabaYaga posted [p:944946715] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Our dear country, what will they do to you? :( </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kangolcone 09/22/20 2:16:17 PM #36:	TheWorstPoster posted... Nancy Pelosi stated recently that she would impeach Trump every day for ANYTHING. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HA9E2a5mTXY If anything, Pelosi instead should be impeached for corruption. You can expel a senator, they dont get impeached. --- Annoy a Conservative, punch a Nazi. <cite>kangolcone posted [p:944946737] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>TheWorstPoster posted... </cite> <quote>Nancy Pelosi stated recently that she would impeach Trump every day for ANYTHING. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HA9E2a5mTXY If anything, Pelosi instead should be impeached for corruption.</quote> You can expel a senator, they dont get impeached. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blightzkrieg 09/22/20 2:19:05 PM #37:	The "dems will impeach Trump for ANYTHING" is such a stupid fucking take. Can you take a good fucking look at the last four years and tell me how many things he's been impeached for? I can tell you it's a lot fewer things than it should be. --- https://imgur.com/mmESgwx <cite>Blightzkrieg posted [p:944946860] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>The "dems will impeach Trump for ANYTHING" is such a stupid fucking take. Can you take a good fucking look at the last four years and tell me how many things he's been impeached for? I can tell you it's a lot fewer things than it should be. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jen0125 09/22/20 2:20:07 PM #38:	Wanded posted... yeah, the video is about democrats formerly supporting what republicans are currently doing, hence they did a 180 as well So what? Did I say anything about democrats? I'm talking about the Republicans. Stop deflecting. --- https://imgur.com/4ihiyS2 "I am not gay! Can't you get that through your head? I am very much aroused at the site of a naked woman!" - Dan0429 <cite>Jen0125 posted [p:944946909] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Wanded posted... </cite> <quote>yeah, the video is about democrats formerly supporting what republicans are currently doing, hence they did a 180 as well</quote> So what? Did I say anything about democrats? I'm talking about the Republicans. Stop deflecting. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Entity13 09/22/20 2:22:39 PM #39:	Blightzkrieg posted... The "dems will impeach Trump for ANYTHING" is such a stupid fucking take. Can you take a good fucking look at the last four years and tell me how many things he's been impeached for? I can tell you it's a lot fewer things than it should be. And worse still is how many times he's been convicted, which is zero, if only because the same people on the right arguing FOR the proper procedure had also denied actual proof or testimony from taking place, all the while the Repub-controlled Senate just lets the momentum of the judicial system die since actually doing their jobs is inconvenient on multiple levels. --- http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb179/EntityXIII/entityfn7.jpg <cite>Entity13 posted [p:944947030] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Blightzkrieg posted... </cite> <quote>The "dems will impeach Trump for ANYTHING" is such a stupid fucking take. Can you take a good fucking look at the last four years and tell me how many things he's been impeached for? I can tell you it's a lot fewer things than it should be.</quote> And worse still is how many times he's been convicted, which is zero, if only because the same people on the right arguing FOR the proper procedure had also denied actual proof or testimony from taking place, all the while the Repub-controlled Senate just lets the momentum of the judicial system die since actually doing their jobs is inconvenient on multiple levels. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HornedLion 09/22/20 2:40:31 PM #40:	BeerOnTap posted... Amy Coney Barrett! This is who I wanted last time around instead of Kavanaugh. My body is ready! We all know you didnt know who she was before this week so drop it. --- "Skippitty Bop boom ba-dop. Wham wham bam bam" <cite>HornedLion posted [p:944947785] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>BeerOnTap posted... </cite> <quote>Amy Coney Barrett! This is who I wanted last time around instead of Kavanaugh. My body is ready!</quote> We all know you didnt know who she was before this week so drop it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fierce_Deity_08 09/22/20 3:39:21 PM #41:	Blightzkrieg posted... The "dems will impeach Trump for ANYTHING" is such a stupid fucking take. Can you take a good fucking look at the last four years and tell me how many things he's been impeached for? I can tell you it's a lot fewer things than it should be. They wanted to impeach him before he was sworn in! --- Official Fierce Deity in my own mind. GT: OnikaraStar, PSN: Onikara, NNID: OnikaraStar <cite>Fierce_Deity_08 posted [p:944950234] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Blightzkrieg posted... </cite> <quote>The "dems will impeach Trump for ANYTHING" is such a stupid fucking take. Can you take a good fucking look at the last four years and tell me how many things he's been impeached for? I can tell you it's a lot fewer things than it should be.</quote>They wanted to impeach him before he was sworn in! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wanded 09/22/20 4:07:28 PM #42:	Blightzkrieg posted... Because Republicans literally changed the rules in 2016. You're looking at the reaction as the cause dude, you've got your brain in backwards. what rule was changed? --- Puss in Boots was a good movie and it deserves more recognition <cite>Wanded posted [p:944951364] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Blightzkrieg posted... </cite> <quote>Because Republicans literally changed the rules in 2016. You're looking at the reaction as the cause dude, you've got your brain in backwards.</quote>what rule was changed? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 09/22/20 4:30:31 PM #43:	Wanded posted... what rule was changed? The part where Obama had over 11 months left in his term but that wasn't enough time to seat a new justice. But now it is enough time, with just 3.5 months left. Per Mitch McConnell <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:944952260] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Wanded posted... </cite> <quote>what rule was changed?</quote>The part where Obama had over 11 months left in his term but that wasn't enough time to seat a new justice. But now it is enough time, with just 3.5 months left. Per Mitch McConnell </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Phantom_Nook 09/22/20 4:41:42 PM #44:	Fierce_Deity_08 posted... They wanted to impeach him before he was sworn in! well, he was already a criminal before being sworn in. and he's kept doing stuff worthy of impeachment. --- Not posted with GameRaven 3.5.2 <cite>Phantom_Nook posted [p:944952708] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Fierce_Deity_08 posted... </cite> <quote>They wanted to impeach him before he was sworn in!</quote>well, he was already a criminal before being sworn in. and he's kept doing stuff worthy of impeachment. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fierce_Deity_08 09/22/20 7:39:54 PM #45:	Phantom_Nook posted... well, he was already a criminal before being sworn in. and he's kept doing stuff worthy of impeachment. In the imagination of everybody on the left, sure. --- Official Fierce Deity in my own mind. GT: OnikaraStar, PSN: Onikara, NNID: OnikaraStar <cite>Fierce_Deity_08 posted [p:944959656] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Phantom_Nook posted... </cite> <quote>well, he was already a criminal before being sworn in. and he's kept doing stuff worthy of impeachment.</quote>In the imagination of everybody on the left, sure. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Phantom_Nook 09/22/20 7:42:03 PM #46:	Fierce_Deity_08 posted... In the imagination of everybody on the left, sure. Sure, whatever Fox tells you to believe. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.2 <cite>Phantom_Nook posted [p:944959745] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Fierce_Deity_08 posted...</cite> <quote>In the imagination of everybody on the left, sure.</quote> Sure, whatever Fox tells you to believe.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fierce_Deity_08 09/22/20 7:48:54 PM #47:	Phantom_Nook posted... Sure, whatever Fox tells you to believe. You didnt even wait to see what kind of job he could do. Just keep whining that the job was stolen from Hillary. --- Official Fierce Deity in my own mind. GT: OnikaraStar, PSN: Onikara, NNID: OnikaraStar <cite>Fierce_Deity_08 posted [p:944960043] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Phantom_Nook posted... </cite> <quote>Sure, whatever Fox tells you to believe.</quote>You didnt even wait to see what kind of job he could do. Just keep whining that the job was stolen from Hillary. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zareth 09/22/20 7:57:55 PM #48:	Hillary is a corporate owned warhawk she's about as centrist as you can get. --- It's okay, I have no idea who I am either. https://imgur.com/WOo6wcq <cite>Zareth posted [p:944960403] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Hillary is a corporate owned warhawk she's about as centrist as you can get. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Phantom_Nook 09/22/20 8:01:06 PM #49:	Fierce_Deity_08 posted... You didnt even wait to see what kind of job he could do. Just keep whining that the job was stolen from Hillary I didn't say anything about Hillary. It was just easy to see he would be shitty. The only thing I underestimated was how shitty he would be. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.2 <cite>Phantom_Nook posted [p:944960516] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>Fierce_Deity_08 posted...</cite> <quote>You didnt even wait to see what kind of job he could do. Just keep whining that the job was stolen from Hillary</quote> I didn't say anything about Hillary. It was just easy to see he would be shitty. The only thing I underestimated was how shitty he would be.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Decoy77 09/22/20 9:17:34 PM #50:	He should announce his nominee on Saturday at 5 PM as planned. And the Senate should vote for her on Monday morning. Who needs hearings anyways? --- 5-27-15 The day Gfaqs died i7 4770k \| ASUS Maximus VII Hero \| EVGA GTX 1070 8GB \| 16GB RAM \| ADATA SP600 256GB \| 3TB HD \| Asus 23.6'' @ 1920 x 1080, Win10 x64 <cite>Decoy77 posted [p:944963496] in Republican... [t:78991881]...</cite> <quote>He should announce his nominee on Saturday at 5 PM as planned. And the Senate should vote for her on Monday morning. Who needs hearings anyways? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Poll of the Day > Republicans HAS the VOTES to Confirm Supreme Court Nominee BEFORE the Election! (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Republicans HAS the VOTES to Confirm Supreme Court Nominee BEFORE the Election!