Poll of the Day > Rioters burn a building with child inside

(+) Yeah! (+)

darcandkharg31 posted...

okay there, have fun stroking yourself off there about those Ben Shapiro's or whatever you wanna call them. Like that wasn't the point of the topic but okay, you guys politics make you nuts.

So delicate... Why don't you go lie down for a while and decompress, sweetie. Stressing over shit like this is bad for your health

---

Far-Queue posted...

So delicate... Why don't you go lie down for a while and decompress, sweetie. Stressing over shit like this is bad for your health

That all? You just keep calling everyone delicate and fragile? Okie dokie.

---

BeerOnTap posted...

failed

Wasn't looking to accomplish anything outside of framing that source and it's founder for the bullshit tabloid that it is. Don't really care to help you feel better about your hurt feelings, honestly.

---

darcandkharg31 posted...

That all? You just keep calling everyone delicate and fragile? Okie dokie.

Far-Queue posted...

Don't really care to help you feel better about your hurt feelings, honestly.

---

Far-Queue posted...

whatever you keep telling yourself in your head there man.

---

FYI this logic sucks: "You didn't say you condemn the rioters, so you must be okay with setting kids on fire." lol that's flat-out dumb

I'm here to school you all on whatever you need hmu

---

Far-Queue posted...

FYI this logic sucks: "You didn't say you condemn the rioters, so you must be okay with setting kids on fire." lol that's flat-out dumb

I'm here to school you all on whatever you need hmu

Naw, I was talking about how all you cared about was calling people Ben snowflakes, rather than that the rioters were doing a terrible thing, but okay. No need to go further, I know you just care about political division and I don't care about that "My side your side" stuff.

---

SonyMichel posted...

The far left want to cause chaos and take down the government while the far right want to cause a civil race war.

https://i.imgur.com/v8Uvhbt.jpg

Far-Queue posted...

Wasn't looking to accomplish anything outside of framing that source and it's founder for the bullshit tabloid that it is. Don't really care to help you feel better about your hurt feelings, honestly.

"Literal description of events is fake news REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
---

darcandkharg31 posted...

Naw, I was talking about how all you cared about was calling people Ben snowflakes, rather than that the rioters were doing a terrible thing, but okay. No need to go further, I know you just care about political division and I don't care about that "My side your side" stuff.

Sorry you feel the need to jump to conclusions when things aren't laid out for you in explicit detail, you poor thing.

Revelation34 posted...

"Literal description of events is fake news REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"

"I can't stomach someone insulting my favorite source of biased disinformation waaaahhh "

---

Far-Queue posted...

Sorry you feel the need to jump to conclusions when things aren't laid out for you in explicit detail, you poor thing.

Aaand back to the "you delicate little thing", okie dokie.

---

darcandkharg31 posted...

Naw, I was talking about how all you cared about was calling people Ben snowflakes, rather than that the rioters were doing a terrible thing, but okay. No need to go further, I know you just care about political division and I don't care about that "My side your side" stuff.

still waiting for you to find posts supporting the rioters in this topic, which you heavily implied was a thing

---

Mead posted...

still waiting for you to find posts supporting the rioters in this topic, which you heavily implied was a thing

I didn't imply, you just took it as that, I just smh at people just caring about political sides instead of that this was a bad thing the rioters did, just because you're so gung ho to make me out to be only on one side of everything doesn't mean it's true.

---

Far-Queue posted...

biased

what news source isn't biased
Far-Queue posted...

disinformation

what exactly is the disinformation in this specific case

---

Wanded posted...

what news source isn't biased

facts

reality

---

Wanded posted...

what news source isn't biased

Most sources have some bias but some are worse than others. Dailywire is no better than tabloids like National Enquirer lmao

https://www.adfontesmedia.com/?v=402f03a963ba

https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/

Try to stick to the middle as much as possible. I use a lot if Reuters, AP, AFP, BBC, NYT, Business Insider, NPR, Fox...

---

Far-Queue posted...

Most sources have some bias but some are worse than others. Dailywire is no better than tabloids like National Enquirer lmao

https://www.adfontesmedia.com/?v=402f03a963ba

https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/

Try to stick to the middle as much as possible. I use a lot of Reuters, AP, AFP, BBC, NYT, Business Insider, NPR, Fox...

LMAO
---

Revelation34 posted...

LMAO

If you steer clear of the talking heads like Hannity and Tucker Carlson, Fox as a news agency has a definite right-leaning bias but the news reporting is pretty fair. Laugh all you want but I don't take any news report at face value. Always look up separate sources to see if they're reporting the same. Anyone who sticks to one news outlet is probably not doing their due diligence and is ill-informed on most matters

---

Far-Queue posted...

Most sources have some bias but some are worse than others. Dailywire is no better than tabloids like National Enquirer lmao

https://www.adfontesmedia.com/?v=402f03a963ba

https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/

Try to stick to the middle as much as possible. I use a lot of Reuters, AP, AFP, BBC, NYT, Business Insider, NPR, Fox...

How do you know those three sites aren't biased?
If i open a fourth site called "centrist objective fact checker" and label those three sites as leftist sites, how am i less valid than them?

There are plenty of examples in which the "fact checks" turned up wrong, biased and full of agenda, then again you wouldn't stumble upon those cases since you don't stray from the liberal narrative lane which espouses those checks, looking at the "fact check" site for 3 minutes i saw

Claim by Trump: There is NO WAY (ZERO!) that Mail-In Ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent. Mail boxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed.AP Fact Check rating: False

How is trumps claim false? the day trump tweeted that news broke out about a mailman changing ballots, how does that not prove him right? The fact check immediately after that is

Claim by Viral video: A manipulated video makes it look like Joe Biden is incoherent during a television interview on ABCs The View.FactCheck.org rating: False

What exactly is the claim here? that biden is incoherent? and that it's false? the leftists in this biased board themselves said biden is incoherent and is not 100% with us

can you find me a fact check on that site about trump not being a russian spy? kavanaugh not being a serial rapist when he was young?
Yeah, thought so. This is obviously a leftist site and it doesn't take much to see that lol

as for allsides i peeked at BBC and christian science monitor which they deem "center", not to my surprise those outlets have zero to do with "center" and everything to do with leftist, TCCSM front page is basically black lives matter propaganda and BBC has this on the front
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-52900486/george-floyd-protests-trudeau-s-epic-pause-when-asked-about-trump-s-response

I'm sorry but you have to be extremely delusional or extremely ignorant about US politics to view those sites as anything but leftist

All of this wasn't my point though, i'll rephrase - do you think there CAN BE such a thing as an unbiased news source?

---

and don't even get me started on NYT, a former newspaper lol

---

Mead posted...

still waiting for you to find posts supporting the rioters in this topic, which you heavily implied was a thing

Yeah getting mad that the headline makes the rioters look bad isn't a defense of them. Totally. And saying that babies' lives aren't worth more than anyone else's which is basically the equivalent of the people screaming all lives matter lol. No, surely these people just wanna make sure all the facts are straight kind of ironically like Ben Shapiro

Wanded posted...

I'm sorry but you have to be extremely delusional or extremely ignorant about US politics to view those sites as anything but leftist

Like I said, most outlets have some bias, but places like dailywire are straight trash tabloid BS. Sorry this ruffled your feathers so much.

I don't take my news from any one source. When I read an article on one site I typically check other sites to look for consistency in reporting and verify information. I don't rely on any one, single source, including those I mentioned - which I never said were completely without bias, only that they were more centered than hackjob fucking dailywire lmao but nice feeble attempt trying to pigeonhole me into subscribing to strictly liberal news sources

How am I supposed to take you seriously on your stance on media bias when you literally use fucking trash heap dailywire?

---

Far-Queue posted...

straight trash tabloid BS

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-52900486/george-floyd-protests-trudeau-s-epic-pause-when-asked-about-trump-s-response\

and this is not? you said bbc is one of your main news sources AFTER you bothered filtering them via bias
Far-Queue posted...

most outlets have some bias

and when did i ask about that, you are avoiding my question, i asked if it is possible for a news source to be unbiased

---

Wanded posted...

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-52900486/george-floyd-protests-trudeau-s-epic-pause-when-asked-about-trump-s-response\

and this is not? you said bbc is one of your main news sources AFTER you bothered filtering them via bias

You have to consider the ratio of obviously biased articles to genuine news when evaluating your sources. Of course you can go through any of the outlets I listed and cherry pick some bullshit like that Trudeau piece. But if you pull your head out of Shapiro's pucker long enough to bother looking over more than a couple articles you'll find some good reporting on BBC.

Contrast that with dailydumpsterfire that has maybe one page worth of halfway decent reporting lost in a sea of moronic swill... There's no comparison.

---

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-52889106

Covid 19 is racist apparantly lol
what can i say, real grade a material over here

you still won't answer my question though

---

Wanded posted...

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-52889106

Covid 19 is racist apparantly

Way to skew the article. There have been multiple reports that the virus is impacting minority groups more severely. That does not make the virus racist, it's simply an evaluation of statistics and data.

No wonder you're so easily entranced by Shitpiro lmao

---

Far-Queue posted...

the virus is impacting minority groups more severely

yea, because they have a higher obesity rate which is a really big deal relating to the autoimmune system
let's ctrl f "obesity" in that article and see what we find shall we?

"The analysis on ethnicity and risk did not consider a person's occupation or obesity, even though both are known risk factors for getting seriously ill with coronavirus."

imagine my surprise

Far-Queue posted...

it's simply an evaluation of statistics and data

No, as i have just shown, it is a manipulation of statistics and data to piggyback ride over the racism narrative currently rampant and enlarge its scope and effect

i'm not going to get an answer to my question btw am i? should i even bother asking again?

---

Wanded posted...

"The analysis on ethnicity and risk did not consider a person's occupation or obesity, even though both are known risk factors for getting seriously ill with coronavirus."

White people can be fat with hazardous jobs, genius. Just like anyone else. That doesn't negate the fact that minority groups have been impacted more severely.

Wanded posted...

as i have just shown

As I have just shown, you're pulling bullshit out of your ass just like your darling Shitpiro lmao does that dumb asshole have a Dumb Asshole playbook that ya'll follow??

---

Far-Queue posted...

White people can be fat with hazardous jobs, genius. Just like anyone else. That doesn't negate the fact that minority groups have been impacted more severely.

Wanded posted...

because they have a higher obesity rate which is a really big deal relating to the autoimmune system

Wanded posted...

higher

---

Far-Queue posted...

That doesn't negate the fact that minority groups have been impacted more severely.

---

Wanded posted...

it is a manipulation of statistics and data to piggyback ride over the racism narrative currently rampant and enlarge its scope and effect

if you don't see this as an agenda piece with this aim in mind to outrage people and clickbait for racism i don't know what to tell you, the one single most important factor "just so happens" to be omitted (i wonder why, perhaps because it cuts against the racism narrative?) but that has nothing to do with a certain agenda, no sir

---

"The report if nothing else emphasises the complexity of what we're seeing, so really we're urging people not to jump to conclusions and institute measures which are not really justified by the data," he added.

^ from the same article you linked. But keep trying to reinforce your own delusions bud lmao

Trying to inform a section of the population that they may be at an increased risk for adverse reactions to the virus is not race-baiting.

The fact that you feel that way illustrates how much Shitpiro's dumbass narrative has warped your easily manipulated mind

---

Far-Queue posted...

^ from the same article you linked. But keep trying to reinforce your own delusions bud lmao

Trying to inform a section of the population that they may be at an increased risk for adverse reactions to the virus is not race-baiting.

The fact that you feel that way illustrates how much Shitpiro's dumbass narrative has warped your easily manipulated mind

of course it is, otherwise the title would have been "covid has nothing to do with ethnicity and everything to do with obesity and other health conditions"

^that is contradictory to their current title, hence they cannot be true at the same time

---

Wanded posted...

of course it is, otherwise the title would have been "covid has nothing to do with ethnicity and everything to do with obesity and other health conditions"

Why not both? As well as other factors? They're still studying this virus. All this article is doing is relaying some of the findings. It's not the be-all and end-all on the Covid situation.

The article isn't stating that covid is only affecting minorities... It even points out minority groups aren't the worst off, that people of advanced age are the most adversely affected. The article is only stating minority groups are facing steeper difficulties coping with the virus than some other sections of the population. That's it. I take it as a message to minority groups and the medical personnel treating them that they may want to take extra steps to ensure their health and well-being. Not sure why you're unable to grasp that notion.

It even goes so far as to say "Don't jump to conclusions here!" - meaning there's still a lot of data to collect and process. Meaning "Hey, this is the data set we have right now, but as we continue to study this, our findings may change."

Now, you may ask "Why report on it if the research is ongoing?" and the reason for that is if these findings hold up in the long run, the sooner people act on them the better. Could save lives. Not only minority lives but the lives of those in direct or indirect contact with them. There's no harm in reporting these findings prematurely if the information will help those affected.

This must be what happens to a brain that puts all their faith in singular sources with clear biases. Your flawed logic seems to be "well, if I can't completely escape bias in the media, I may as well consume the stuff that reinforces my ideology and worldview" Instead of trying to collect as much information as you can from multiple sources and filter it yourself, you'd rather be spoonfed borderline propaganda because it makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside. And you're so sensitive over your precious dailywire that you're lashing out like an angry toddler, trying and failing to discredit more legitimate news agencies because you can find a couple examples of bias in their reporting. Bias which I've acknowledged and the media bias trackers I shared with you acknowledge. Bias which I've attempted to explain that one should do their due diligence in acquiring what factual information they can and check that information against other sources. That's what a mature, responsible consumer of news would do. But you do you. Keep your head buried in the tabloid sand.

---

Far-Queue posted...

Why not both?

ask them, they're the ones purposely omitting the actually important data, misleading everybody.
It's not that that data isn't in yet, it is, they left it out on purpose.

again, for the bezilionth time, covid 19 has zero, nada, zilch, nothing to do with race or ethnicity, saying otherwise is race baiting.
You seem to be agreeing with me on this simple fact, the problem here is that you are carrying water for bbc trying to find excuses where there are none for that disgrace of an article existing no matter what, i can't argue with that, this is up to other people to read the article and decide for themselves whether it is "objective truth with no bias or agenda whatsoever" like you claim or not, we'll let them do so.
Far-Queue posted...

Instead of trying to collect as much information as you can from multiple sources and filter it yourself,

how do know that is not what i am already doing?
because that is pretty much what i already am doing

---

Wanded posted...

again, for the bezilionth time, covid 19 has zero, nada, zilch, nothing to do with race or ethnicity

Funnily enough I heard it was effecting black people less, presumably an inadvertent side effect of sickle cell.
---