Current Events > CNN trying to say Biden is leading in the polls...LOL

Topic List	Page List: 1
MFBKBass5 12/19/19 3:05:23 PM #1:	Yeahhhhh....I don't believe that. Honestly, I don't trust any polls anymore. And I don't think we should be relying on polls to see who we like or support for the democratic candidate. 2020 will be interesting. I don't see Biden winning the nomination at all. I think it'll either be Bernie, or Buttigieg. But us young people just have to VOTE. Biden is old and senile. Bernie is old, but is 100% correct on calling out all the corruption from money in Washington. --- !!!!!!!!! https://imgur.com/DzJSPWA <cite>MFBKBass5 posted [p:931806535] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>Yeahhhhh....I don't believe that. Honestly, I don't trust any polls anymore. And I don't think we should be relying on polls to see who we like or support for the democratic candidate. 2020 will be interesting. I don't see Biden winning the nomination at all. I think it'll either be Bernie, or Buttigieg. But us young people just have to VOTE. Biden is old and senile. Bernie is old, but is 100% correct on calling out all the corruption from money in Washington. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#2	Post #2 was unavailable or deleted.
MFBKBass5 12/19/19 3:11:40 PM #3:	Spooking posted... Biden is leading in every poll: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html Well, Clinton was leading in every poll back in 2016, and we believed it like fools. Look at how that turned out :) --- !!!!!!!!! https://imgur.com/DzJSPWA <cite>MFBKBass5 posted [p:931806776] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>Spooking posted... </cite> <quote>Biden is leading in every poll: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html</quote> Well, Clinton was leading in every poll back in 2016, and we believed it like fools. Look at how that turned out :) </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
solosnake 12/19/19 3:13:26 PM #4:	I really dont get how the democratic party truly believes nominating Biden would be a good idea. --- "We would have no NBA possibly if they got rid of all the flopping." ~ Dwyane Wade https://imgur.com/MYYEIx5 https://imgur.com/WGE12ef <cite>solosnake posted [p:931806827] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>I really dont get how the democratic party truly believes nominating Biden would be a good idea. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MFBKBass5 12/19/19 3:14:41 PM #5:	solosnake posted... I really dont get how the democratic party truly believes nominating Biden would be a good idea. Honestly, I'm not convinced they are. --- !!!!!!!!! https://imgur.com/DzJSPWA <cite>MFBKBass5 posted [p:931806880] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>solosnake posted... </cite> <quote>I really dont get how the democratic party truly believes nominating Biden would be a good idea.</quote> Honestly, I'm not convinced they are. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
vigorm0rtis 12/19/19 3:17:18 PM #6:	Biden's leading because he's safe to seniors and doesn't base all his rhetoric on what he sees in social media. Not saying he's my choice, but that's how it is. Not everyone lives in an online bubble. --- "Can't wait to count out your coin!" -- Bethesda, 2018 <cite>vigorm0rtis posted [p:931806977] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>Biden's leading because he's safe to seniors and doesn't base all his rhetoric on what he sees in social media. Not saying he's my choice, but that's how it is. Not everyone lives in an online bubble. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MFBKBass5 12/19/19 3:21:30 PM #7:	vigorm0rtis posted... Biden's leading because he's safe to seniors and doesn't base all his rhetoric on what he sees in social media. Not saying he's my choice, but that's how it is. Not everyone lives in an online bubble. Biden is literally senile. Watch the videos from his rallies the last few months. Biden can't even keep track of what state he's in...his mind is gone. He's got good intentions, but honestly I'm seeing early signs of dementia. --- !!!!!!!!! https://imgur.com/DzJSPWA <cite>MFBKBass5 posted [p:931807136] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>vigorm0rtis posted... </cite> <quote>Biden's leading because he's safe to seniors and doesn't base all his rhetoric on what he sees in social media. Not saying he's my choice, but that's how it is. Not everyone lives in an online bubble.</quote> Biden is literally senile. Watch the videos from his rallies the last few months. Biden can't even keep track of what state he's in...his mind is gone. He's got good intentions, but honestly I'm seeing early signs of dementia. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#8	Post #8 was unavailable or deleted.
solosnake 12/19/19 3:23:08 PM #9:	MFBKBass5 posted... Biden is literally senile. Watch the videos from his rallies the last few months. Biden can't even keep track of what state he's in...his mind is gone. He's got good intentions, but honestly I'm seeing early signs of dementia. They REEEEEEEAAAAAAAALLLLLLY need to put a cap on age limit for presidential candidates. Theres 0 reason for someone close to 80 years old to be in that position --- "We would have no NBA possibly if they got rid of all the flopping." ~ Dwyane Wade https://imgur.com/MYYEIx5 https://imgur.com/WGE12ef <cite>solosnake posted [p:931807190] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>MFBKBass5 posted... </cite> <quote>Biden is literally senile. Watch the videos from his rallies the last few months. Biden can't even keep track of what state he's in...his mind is gone. He's got good intentions, but honestly I'm seeing early signs of dementia.</quote>They REEEEEEEAAAAAAAALLLLLLY need to put a cap on age limit for presidential candidates. Theres 0 reason for someone close to 80 years old to be in that position </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MFBKBass5 12/19/19 3:25:01 PM #10:	solosnake posted... They REEEEEEEAAAAAAAALLLLLLY need to put a cap on age limit for presidential candidates. Theres 0 reason for someone close to 80 years old to be in that position Ehhhh I disagree. Plenty of people who are in their 80s are perfectly fine mentally. --- !!!!!!!!! https://imgur.com/DzJSPWA <cite>MFBKBass5 posted [p:931807258] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>solosnake posted... </cite> <quote>They REEEEEEEAAAAAAAALLLLLLY need to put a cap on age limit for presidential candidates. Theres 0 reason for someone close to 80 years old to be in that position</quote> Ehhhh I disagree. Plenty of people who are in their 80s are perfectly fine mentally. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Serious Cat 12/19/19 3:25:14 PM #11:	MFBKBass5 posted... Well, Clinton was leading in every poll back in 2016, and we believed it like fools. Look at how that turned out :) She got 3 million more popular votes than Trump. There was nothing inaccurate about the polls --- I are Serious Cat This is serious thread <cite>Serious Cat posted [p:931807266] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>MFBKBass5 posted... </cite> <quote>Well, Clinton was leading in every poll back in 2016, and we believed it like fools. Look at how that turned out :)</quote>She got 3 million more popular votes than Trump. There was nothing inaccurate about the polls </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
solosnake 12/19/19 3:26:27 PM #12:	MFBKBass5 posted... Ehhhh I disagree. Plenty of people who are in their 80s are perfectly fine mentally. Its not just their mental capacity. They are deciding the fate for people who will be alive long after they are gone. I think 70 should be a hard limit --- "We would have no NBA possibly if they got rid of all the flopping." ~ Dwyane Wade https://imgur.com/MYYEIx5 https://imgur.com/WGE12ef <cite>solosnake posted [p:931807310] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>MFBKBass5 posted... </cite> <quote>Ehhhh I disagree. Plenty of people who are in their 80s are perfectly fine mentally.</quote>Its not just their mental capacity. They are deciding the fate for people who will be alive long after they are gone. I think 70 should be a hard limit </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MFBKBass5 12/19/19 3:34:20 PM #13:	Serious Cat posted... She got 3 million more popular votes than Trump. There was nothing inaccurate about the polls There were tons of inaccurate polls. What are you talking about? She wasn't projected to lose a lot of the swing states. --- !!!!!!!!! https://imgur.com/DzJSPWA <cite>MFBKBass5 posted [p:931807621] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>Serious Cat posted... </cite> <quote>She got 3 million more popular votes than Trump. There was nothing inaccurate about the polls</quote> There were tons of inaccurate polls. What are you talking about? She wasn't projected to lose a lot of the swing states. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 12/19/19 3:35:55 PM #14:	He is. --- Occam's razor: The simplest solution (answer) is most likely the right one <cite>creativerealms posted [p:931807678] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>He is. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 12/19/19 3:40:37 PM #15:	MFBKBass5 posted... Well, Clinton was leading in every poll back in 2016, and we believed it like fools. Look at how that turned out :) ...and she won the popular vote. Polls were remarkably accurate, just that Trump got lucky within the margins in the states that matter. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:931807869] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>MFBKBass5 posted... </cite> <quote>Well, Clinton was leading in every poll back in 2016, and we believed it like fools. Look at how that turned out :)</quote> ...and she won the popular vote. Polls were remarkably accurate, just that Trump got lucky within the margins in the states that matter. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MFBKBass5 12/19/19 3:42:06 PM #16:	COVxy posted... ...and she won the popular vote. Polls were remarkably accurate, just that Trump got lucky within the margins in the states that matter. Again, she lost plenty of states where she was projected to win in the polls. --- !!!!!!!!! https://imgur.com/DzJSPWA <cite>MFBKBass5 posted [p:931807928] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>COVxy posted... </cite> <quote>...and she won the popular vote. Polls were remarkably accurate, just that Trump got lucky within the margins in the states that matter.</quote> Again, she lost plenty of states where she was projected to win in the polls. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 12/19/19 3:44:08 PM #17:	MFBKBass5 posted... Again, she lost plenty of states where she was projected to win in the polls. Polls not 100 percent accurate. Nothing is. They are estimations based on the available data. There are always factors that can't be accounted for. --- Occam's razor: The simplest solution (answer) is most likely the right one <cite>creativerealms posted [p:931808004] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>MFBKBass5 posted... </cite> <quote>Again, she lost plenty of states where she was projected to win in the polls.</quote>Polls not 100 percent accurate. Nothing is. They are estimations based on the available data. There are always factors that can't be accounted for. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 12/19/19 3:44:17 PM #18:	MFBKBass5 posted... Again, she lost plenty of states where she was projected to win in the polls. Again, statistics is about probability and error. Trump got lucky within the margins. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:931808013] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>MFBKBass5 posted... </cite> <quote>Again, she lost plenty of states where she was projected to win in the polls.</quote> Again, statistics is about probability and error. Trump got lucky within the margins. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MFBKBass5 12/19/19 3:47:46 PM #19:	COVxy posted... Again, statistics is about probability and error. Trump got lucky within the margins. He was way outside the margin of error though. What are you talking about? The polls from 2016 were blatantly wrong. Which is why his win was a MAJOR shock to everyone. If he was within the margin of error, there wouldn't have been hundreds of articles claiming that Hillary had the election in bags for weeks before the polls opened. --- !!!!!!!!! https://imgur.com/DzJSPWA <cite>MFBKBass5 posted [p:931808162] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>COVxy posted... </cite> <quote>Again, statistics is about probability and error. Trump got lucky within the margins.</quote> He was way outside the margin of error though. What are you talking about? The polls from 2016 were blatantly wrong. Which is why his win was a MAJOR shock to everyone. If he was within the margin of error, there wouldn't have been hundreds of articles claiming that Hillary had the election in bags for weeks before the polls opened. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 12/19/19 3:53:01 PM #20:	MFBKBass5 posted... He was way outside the margin of error though. What are you talking about? The polls from 2016 were blatantly wrong. Which is why his win was a MAJOR shock to everyone. If he was within the margin of error, there wouldn't have been hundreds of articles claiming that Hillary had the election in bags for weeks before the polls opened. Naw, just like the majority of things just after the 2016 election, this is narrative, not truth. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-polls-are-all-right/ Most people only examined the probabilistic simulations run by 538, which, as it turns out, are probabilistic. Don't worry, scientists suck at probabilistic reasoning too, so there's no expectation that anyone else should be good at it. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:931808373] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>MFBKBass5 posted... </cite> <quote>He was way outside the margin of error though. What are you talking about? The polls from 2016 were blatantly wrong. Which is why his win was a MAJOR shock to everyone. If he was within the margin of error, there wouldn't have been hundreds of articles claiming that Hillary had the election in bags for weeks before the polls opened.</quote> Naw, just like the majority of things just after the 2016 election, this is narrative, not truth. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-polls-are-all-right/ Most people only examined the probabilistic simulations run by 538, which, as it turns out, are probabilistic. Don't worry, scientists suck at probabilistic reasoning too, so there's no expectation that anyone else should be good at it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ElatedVenusaur 12/19/19 3:55:35 PM #21:	COVxy posted... ...and she won the popular vote. Polls were remarkably accurate, just that Trump got lucky within the margins in the states that matter. General election polls are fairly accurate, but this is a primary. Here're some examples: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/ia/iowa_democratic_caucus-208.html https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/nh/new_hampshire_democratic_primary-194.html https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/mi/michigan_democratic_presidential_primary-5224.html It's much harder for pollsters to get a read on who is going to show up. <cite>ElatedVenusaur posted [p:931808475] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>COVxy posted... </cite> <quote>...and she won the popular vote. Polls were remarkably accurate, just that Trump got lucky within the margins in the states that matter.</quote>General election polls are fairly accurate, but this is a primary. Here're some examples: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/ia/iowa_democratic_caucus-208.html https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/nh/new_hampshire_democratic_primary-194.html https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/mi/michigan_democratic_presidential_primary-5224.html It's much harder for pollsters to get a read on who is going to show up. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 12/19/19 4:40:12 PM #22:	ElatedVenusaur posted... General election polls are fairly accurate, but this is a primary. Here're some examples: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/ia/iowa_democratic_caucus-208.html https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/nh/new_hampshire_democratic_primary-194.html https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/mi/michigan_democratic_presidential_primary-5224.html It's much harder for pollsters to get a read on who is going to show up. That's a different argument (which I havent evaluated). But the "2016 polls were inaccurate therefore don't trust polls" argument is pretty false (on both the antecedent, and even if you assume the antecedent, the consequent doesn't follow). --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:931810192] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>ElatedVenusaur posted... </cite> <quote>General election polls are fairly accurate, but this is a primary. Here're some examples: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/ia/iowa_democratic_caucus-208.html https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/nh/new_hampshire_democratic_primary-194.html https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/mi/michigan_democratic_presidential_primary-5224.html It's much harder for pollsters to get a read on who is going to show up.</quote> That's a different argument (which I havent evaluated). But the "2016 polls were inaccurate therefore don't trust polls" argument is pretty false (on both the antecedent, and even if you assume the antecedent, the consequent doesn't follow). </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LightHawKnight 12/19/19 4:42:57 PM #23:	MFBKBass5 posted... Biden is literally senile. Watch the videos from his rallies the last few months. Biden can't even keep track of what state he's in...his mind is gone. He's got good intentions, but honestly I'm seeing early signs of dementia. Trump is senile as well, so what? --- The Official Odin of the Shin Megami Tensei IV board. "You know how confusing the whole good-evil concept is for me." <cite>LightHawKnight posted [p:931810311] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>MFBKBass5 posted... </cite> <quote>Biden is literally senile. Watch the videos from his rallies the last few months. Biden can't even keep track of what state he's in...his mind is gone. He's got good intentions, but honestly I'm seeing early signs of dementia.</quote> Trump is senile as well, so what? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 12/19/19 4:50:26 PM #24:	Serious Cat posted... She got 3 million more popular votes than Trump. There was nothing inaccurate about the polls Considering the three million in surplus came from the same damn state with rampant corruption, the polls were anything closs to accurate. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:931810590] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>Serious Cat posted... </cite> <quote>She got 3 million more popular votes than Trump. There was nothing inaccurate about the polls</quote>Considering the three million in surplus came from the same damn state with rampant corruption, the polls were anything closs to accurate. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/19/19 4:52:36 PM #25:	Polls aren't really a thing you are supposed to "believe" in. They just take the temperature of a room. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:931810683] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>Polls aren't really a thing you are supposed to "believe" in. They just take the temperature of a room. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Arcanine2009 12/20/19 7:05:32 PM #26:	Spooking posted... Biden is leading in every poll: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html It sucks because everyone other than Biden has to put in at least 2x the effort. He's the status quo so it's an easy ride for him. He's guaranteed to be in the primaries and the most likely to win for name recognition with the Obama's and being a centralist alone. Biden even more recognized positively after the ikraine thing --- Less is more. Everything you want, isn't everything you need. <cite>Arcanine2009 posted [p:931858869] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>Spooking posted... </cite> <quote>Biden is leading in every poll: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html</quote>It sucks because everyone other than Biden has to put in at least 2x the effort. He's the status quo so it's an easy ride for him. He's guaranteed to be in the primaries and the most likely to win for name recognition with the Obama's and being a centralist alone. Biden even more recognized positively after the ikraine thing </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ethosian 12/20/19 7:07:35 PM #27:	Tropicalwood posted... Considering the three million in surplus came from the same damn state with rampant corruption, the polls were anything closs to accurate. Lmao, so salty the impeached president supporters are! <cite>Ethosian posted [p:931858939] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>Tropicalwood posted... </cite> <quote>Considering the three million in surplus came from the same damn state with rampant corruption, the polls were anything closs to accurate.</quote>Lmao, so salty the impeached president supporters are! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Omnislasher 12/20/19 7:10:48 PM #28:	Biden's poll numbers are hot air. They poll landlines. They consider 'likely voters' ie. if you've voted before and/or how often. Bernie's campaign will rely on the young and previously non-voting demographic. The only thing that can upset Bernie is the media. <cite>Omnislasher posted [p:931859031] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote> Biden's poll numbers are hot air. They poll landlines. They consider 'likely voters' ie. if you've voted before and/or how often. Bernie's campaign will rely on the young and previously non-voting demographic. The only thing that can upset Bernie is the media. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 12/20/19 7:12:08 PM #29:	vigorm0rtis posted... Biden's leading because he's safe to seniors I thought the republicans was the party of the out of touch boomers. I know my Grandpa was democrat all the way, but he was 96 when died. <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:931859070] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>vigorm0rtis posted... </cite> <quote>Biden's leading because he's safe to seniors</quote> I thought the republicans was the party of the out of touch boomers. I know my Grandpa was democrat all the way, but he was 96 when died. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Omnislasher 12/20/19 7:13:50 PM #30:	darkphoenix181 posted... I thought the republicans was the party of the out of touch boomers. ...no, the democrats have plenty of them, too <cite>Omnislasher posted [p:931859116] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>darkphoenix181 posted... </cite> <quote>I thought the republicans was the party of the out of touch boomers.</quote> ...no, the democrats have plenty of them, too </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 12/20/19 7:18:56 PM #31:	ElatedVenusaur posted... General election polls are fairly accurate, but this is a primary. Here're some examples: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/ia/iowa_democratic_caucus-208.html https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/nh/new_hampshire_democratic_primary-194.html https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/mi/michigan_democratic_presidential_primary-5224.html It's much harder for pollsters to get a read on who is going to show up. Primary polling is hard but national "primary" polls eliminate a lot of those issues. National primary polls in the 2016 Republican primaries tracked pretty well with overall vote share during the primaries. Democratic national polls in 2016 as well. --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:931859255] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>ElatedVenusaur posted... </cite> <quote>General election polls are fairly accurate, but this is a primary. Here're some examples: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/ia/iowa_democratic_caucus-208.html https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/nh/new_hampshire_democratic_primary-194.html https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/mi/michigan_democratic_presidential_primary-5224.html It's much harder for pollsters to get a read on who is going to show up.</quote> Primary polling is hard but national "primary" polls eliminate a lot of those issues. National primary polls in the 2016 Republican primaries tracked pretty well with overall vote share during the primaries. Democratic national polls in 2016 as well. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HairyThotter 12/20/19 7:20:37 PM #32:	MFBKBass5 posted... 2020 will be interesting 2020, no matter who wins, will be one of the biggest shit shows we've seen yet. People on both sides will be dissatisfied with the outcome. --- "With cheese in either hand, anything is possible" <cite>HairyThotter posted [p:931859317] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>MFBKBass5 posted... </cite> <quote> 2020 will be interesting</quote> 2020, no matter who wins, will be one of the biggest shit shows we've seen yet. People on both sides will be dissatisfied with the outcome. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ElatedVenusaur 12/20/19 7:23:42 PM #33:	Omnislasher posted... ...no, the democrats have plenty of them, too It's why Bernie is investing so heavily in ground-game in the early states: his voters are the people who don't always show up. Essentially, if the pollsters are correct about what the primary electorate will look like, we're going to have a pretty messy opening leading into Super Tuesday, with Biden doing well in South Carolina but very possibly losing Iowa(to Buttigieg or Bernie), New Hampshire(to Warren/Bernie/Buttigieg), and/or Nevada(to Bernie or Warren). If he consistently places at least 2nd or a close 3rd and performs strongly in South Carolina, he'll probably be in good shape, as he's likely to clean up in southern primaries with their primarily older, more moderate black voters and Bernie won't win California by enough to mitigate it. If he takes a beating early though, his electability argument will go down in flames, and his standing will deteriorate. If Bernie or Warren is the big beneficiary, you'll probably see the donor class and Obama endorse Biden(or Buttigieg, if he's doing better) in an attempt to "save the party". <cite>ElatedVenusaur posted [p:931859436] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>Omnislasher posted... </cite> <quote>...no, the democrats have plenty of them, too</quote>It's why Bernie is investing so heavily in ground-game in the early states: his voters are the people who don't always show up. Essentially, if the pollsters are correct about what the primary electorate will look like, we're going to have a pretty messy opening leading into Super Tuesday, with Biden doing well in South Carolina but very possibly losing Iowa(to Buttigieg or Bernie), New Hampshire(to Warren/Bernie/Buttigieg), and/or Nevada(to Bernie or Warren). If he consistently places at least 2nd or a close 3rd and performs strongly in South Carolina, he'll probably be in good shape, as he's likely to clean up in southern primaries with their primarily older, more moderate black voters and Bernie won't win California by enough to mitigate it. If he takes a beating early though, his electability argument will go down in flames, and his standing will deteriorate. If Bernie or Warren is the big beneficiary, you'll probably see the donor class and Obama endorse Biden(or Buttigieg, if he's doing better) in an attempt to "save the party". </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cheater87 12/20/19 7:24:03 PM #34:	CNN and MSNBC are pro Bien. --- Doom, the game with unlimited ways to play. <cite>Cheater87 posted [p:931859452] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>CNN and MSNBC are pro Bien. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Broseph_Stalin 12/20/19 7:28:35 PM #35:	Horseshoe theory remains undefeated. <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted [p:931859633] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>Horseshoe theory remains undefeated. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
butthole666 12/20/19 7:31:59 PM #36:	Wasnt there an actual headline about sanders losing 3rd to another candidate because he had risen to 1st --- "Kenan & Kel is what made me realize I wasn't racist." ~ NewportBox100s <cite>butthole666 posted [p:931859777] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>Wasnt there an actual headline about sanders losing 3rd to another candidate because he had risen to 1st </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Delirious_Beard 12/20/19 7:37:13 PM #37:	the complete generational divide when it comes to candidates like biden and hillary is just fascinating --- https://imgur.com/HUHxlFl You act like I don't know my own way home <cite>Delirious_Beard posted [p:931859974] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>the complete generational divide when it comes to candidates like biden and hillary is just fascinating </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cheater87 12/20/19 7:54:09 PM #38:	butthole666 posted... Wasnt there an actual headline about sanders losing 3rd to another candidate because he had risen to 1st Yup. --- Doom, the game with unlimited ways to play. <cite>Cheater87 posted [p:931860550] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>butthole666 posted... </cite> <quote>Wasnt there an actual headline about sanders losing 3rd to another candidate because he had risen to 1st</quote> Yup. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#39	Post #39 was unavailable or deleted.
MFBKBass5 12/20/19 9:19:18 PM #40:	Omnislasher posted... Biden's poll numbers are hot air. They poll landlines. They consider 'likely voters' ie. if you've voted before and/or how often. Bernie's campaign will rely on the young and previously non-voting demographic. The only thing that can upset Bernie is the media. Yep. Media is anti Bernie because hes anti major corporation. Look at all the times hes pissed off debate moderators for calling out the networks live on debate stages hahaha --- !!!!!!!!! https://imgur.com/DzJSPWA <cite>MFBKBass5 posted [p:931863632] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>Omnislasher posted... </cite> <quote>Biden's poll numbers are hot air. They poll landlines. They consider 'likely voters' ie. if you've voted before and/or how often. Bernie's campaign will rely on the young and previously non-voting demographic. The only thing that can upset Bernie is the media.</quote> Yep. Media is anti Bernie because hes anti major corporation. Look at all the times hes pissed off debate moderators for calling out the networks live on debate stages hahaha </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MaverickXeo 12/20/19 10:01:31 PM #41:	LightHawKnight posted... Trump is senile as well, so what? Trump isn't senile... he's just not smart. --- --- MaverickXeo --- <cite>MaverickXeo posted [p:931865192] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>LightHawKnight posted... </cite> <quote>Trump is senile as well, so what?</quote> Trump isn't senile... he's just not smart. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Guide 12/20/19 10:04:27 PM #42:	Tropicalwood posted... Considering the three million in surplus came from the same damn state with rampant corruption, the polls were anything closs to accurate. Tell me how this "rampant corruption" would adjust the polls. Never mind that a surplus doesn't even make sense for the purposes of the popular vote. --- formerly evening formerly guide https://youtu.be/Acn5IptKWQU <cite>Guide posted [p:931865281] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>Tropicalwood posted... </cite> <quote>Considering the three million in surplus came from the same damn state with rampant corruption, the polls were anything closs to accurate.</quote> Tell me how this "rampant corruption" would adjust the polls. Never mind that a surplus doesn't even make sense for the purposes of the popular vote. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#43	Post #43 was unavailable or deleted.
bevan306 12/20/19 10:10:42 PM #44:	leave your bubbles --- http://rateyourmusic.com/~bevan https://imgur.com/5Ta28 <cite>bevan306 posted [p:931865493] in CNN trying... [t:78267545]...</cite> <quote>leave your bubbles </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > CNN trying to say Biden is leading in the polls...LOL (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > CNN trying to say Biden is leading in the polls...LOL