Current Events > Okay so where the fuck are these "no-go zones" in London?

(+) Yeah! (+)

AmpV2 posted...

There are no quotes from police officers saying they exist. What you posted as a source doesn't even back you up, lol. That's why you had to put the bullshit qualifier "police *effectively* saying they do".

Your last account was banned for trolling, right? That's why you're on a 4 karma alt?
---

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

What areas? Specifically in London.

I would guess the ones in the link I posted that you clearly didn't visit. Here is the top 10 by crime by street using actual police data since clearly asking you to actually look at the evidence I've provided is too hard. I've even cut it down to the top 3 worst streets for the top 3 most relevant crimes to spoon feed it.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8294418/Most-dangerous-neighbourhood-identified-by-crime-map.html

Worst streets for total crime in December
Glover's Court, Preston (152 incidents)
Wind Street, Swansea (148)
Surrey Street, Portsmouth (136)

Burglary
Fairfield Drive, Bury (10 incidents)
Kingswood Close, Egham (10)
Davies Street, Oldham (9)

Violence
Guildhall Walk, Portsmouth (38 incidents)
Lower Twelfth Street, Milton Keynes (35)
Wind Street, Swansea (34)

bro you're listing places that aren't even in london
---

Razuberii posted...

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

What areas? Specifically in London.

I would guess the ones in the link I posted that you clearly didn't visit. Here is the top 10 by crime by street using actual police data since clearly asking you to actually look at the evidence I've provided is too hard. I've even cut it down to the top 3 worst streets for the top 3 most relevant crimes to spoon feed it.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8294418/Most-dangerous-neighbourhood-identified-by-crime-map.html

Worst streets for total crime in December
Glover's Court, Preston (152 incidents)
Wind Street, Swansea (148)
Surrey Street, Portsmouth (136)

Burglary
Fairfield Drive, Bury (10 incidents)
Kingswood Close, Egham (10)
Davies Street, Oldham (9)

Violence
Guildhall Walk, Portsmouth (38 incidents)
Lower Twelfth Street, Milton Keynes (35)
Wind Street, Swansea (34)

bro you're listing places that aren't even in london

Yep, that's my bad. I screwed up there. Let me see if I can limit it to the ones just in London.

EDIT:
https://www.police.uk/metropolitan/00BK17N/crime/violent-crime/

John Adams Street seems to be the worst, followed by Bridge Street by limiting the search to violent crime in London
---

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

There are no quotes from police officers saying they exist. What you posted as a source doesn't even back you up, lol. That's why you had to put the bullshit qualifier "police *effectively* saying they do".

Your last account was banned for trolling, right? That's why you're on a 4 karma alt?

Stop deflecting. There are no quotes from police officers saying they exist, because they don't. That's why you had to add "effectively" ("police effectively say they exist") to make a stretch out of your source that doesn't make your point. You are embarrassing yourself as usual; such is the life of the Trump supporter.
---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqY4Z1fTrMc" data-time="
---

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

What areas? Specifically in London.

I would guess the ones in the link I posted that you clearly didn't visit. Here is the top 10 by crime by street using actual police data since clearly asking you to actually look at the evidence I've provided is too hard. I've even cut it down to the top 3 worst streets for the top 3 most relevant crimes to spoon feed it.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8294418/Most-dangerous-neighbourhood-identified-by-crime-map.html

Worst streets for total crime in December
Glover's Court, Preston (152 incidents)
Wind Street, Swansea (148)
Surrey Street, Portsmouth (136)

Burglary
Fairfield Drive, Bury (10 incidents)
Kingswood Close, Egham (10)
Davies Street, Oldham (9)

Violence
Guildhall Walk, Portsmouth (38 incidents)
Lower Twelfth Street, Milton Keynes (35)
Wind Street, Swansea (34)

Okay so:

1. London is a much bigger place than I thought apparently.

2. 152 incidents constitutes as a no-go zone.

Thanks, my questions are answered.
---

AmpV2 posted...

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

There are no quotes from police officers saying they exist. What you posted as a source doesn't even back you up, lol. That's why you had to put the bullshit qualifier "police *effectively* saying they do".

Your last account was banned for trolling, right? That's why you're on a 4 karma alt?

Stop deflecting. There are no quotes from police officers saying they exist, because they don't. That's why you had to add "effectively" ("police effectively say they exist") to make a stretch out of your source that doesn't make your point. You are embarrassing yourself as usual; such is the life of the Trump supporter.

"Is trump right when he says no-go zones exist?"
Officer: "I guess he has a point"
You: "He didn't literally say 'yes, no go zones exist'! I proved you wrong. trolololo I can't wait until I'm banned again. I'm a totally serious poster."
---

SuperMedz3 posted...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqY4Z1fTrMc" data-time="

What a bitch, literally looking to cause trouble.
---

SpiritSephiroth posted...

2. 152 incidents constitutes as a no-go zone.

A month. Those statistics were for one month.
---

King_Hellebuyck posted...

So there arent any Muslim no go zones or really any other ones just some normal city crime?

---

Are no go zones the same as the walled in parts of cities were Jews were forced in after the NAZIS were voted in power?
---

This topic is really going off the rails now.
---

AmpV2 posted...

SuperMedz3 posted...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqY4Z1fTrMc" data-time="

What a bitch, literally looking to cause trouble.

She was warned of trouble from others...
---

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

2. 152 incidents constitutes as a no-go zone.

A month. Those statistics were for one month.

So then thats a no-go zone? Im asking you if it is.
---

s0nicfan posted...

"Is trump right when he says no-go zones exist?"
Nick Ferrari: "I guess he has a point"

Fixed.

King_Hellebuyck posted...

King_Hellebuyck posted...

So there arent any Muslim no go zones or really any other ones just some normal city crime?

TC isn't talking about Muslims. If you wanted to explicitly ask with regard to Muslims, you'd have to do this:
s0nicfan posted...

analyze by looking at regional demographics and matching them to crime statistics to determine objectively whether there's any truth to that statement.

Which I haven't done, because it sounds like a lot of work, but that would be the only way to objectively answer whether it was true or not.
---

SpiritSephiroth posted...

This topic is really going off the rails now.

Off the rails into a no go zone
---

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

There are no quotes from police officers saying they exist. What you posted as a source doesn't even back you up, lol. That's why you had to put the bullshit qualifier "police *effectively* saying they do".

Your last account was banned for trolling, right? That's why you're on a 4 karma alt?

Stop deflecting. There are no quotes from police officers saying they exist, because they don't. That's why you had to add "effectively" ("police effectively say they exist") to make a stretch out of your source that doesn't make your point. You are embarrassing yourself as usual; such is the life of the Trump supporter.

"Is trump right when he says no-go zones exist?"
Officer: "I guess he has a point"
You: "He didn't literally say 'yes, no go zones exist'! I proved you wrong. trolololo I can't wait until I'm banned again. I'm a totally serious poster."

The cop never said that, the idiot who wrote your propaganda piece said Trump has a point lol.

Don't worry, I'll be embarrassed for you. You are wrong because you have no idea what you are talking about. Ever been to London? No? Gtfo

"I love the poorly educated!" - Trump
---

SpiritSephiroth posted...

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

2. 152 incidents constitutes as a no-go zone.

A month. Those statistics were for one month.

So then thats a no-go zone? Im asking you if it is.

I would say so, yes, going by your definition.
EDIT: and my interpretation of "extremely dangerous"
---

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

2. 152 incidents constitutes as a no-go zone.

A month. Those statistics were for one month.

So then thats a no-go zone? Im asking you if it is.

I would say so, yes, going by your definition.

You're really good or really bad at deflecting things aren't you? Never a straight answer.
---

Is this a no go zone?
https://streamable.com/m0iaq
---

SpiritSephiroth posted...

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

2. 152 incidents constitutes as a no-go zone.

A month. Those statistics were for one month.

So then thats a no-go zone? Im asking you if it is.

I would say so, yes, going by your definition.

You're really good or really bad at deflecting things aren't you? Never a straight answer.

I literally said yes. How is that deflecting? I qualified "by your definition" because as others have pointed out it's a non-standard definition of no-go zone. I literally can't be any more direct at giving an answer.
---

SpiritSephiroth posted...

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

2. 152 incidents constitutes as a no-go zone.

A month. Those statistics were for one month.

So then thats a no-go zone? Im asking you if it is.

I would say so, yes, going by your definition.

You're really good or really bad at deflecting things aren't you? Never a straight answer.

Sonicfan is a waste of time to debate. Nothing is gained by engaging ignorance. He literally lied about a quote in his own source, made it sound like a cop said "trump has a point" (no cop ever has said this) just to try to sound kind of correct.
---

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

2. 152 incidents constitutes as a no-go zone.

A month. Those statistics were for one month.

So then thats a no-go zone? Im asking you if it is.

I would say so, yes, going by your definition.

You're really good or really bad at deflecting things aren't you? Never a straight answer.

I literally said yes. How is that deflecting? I qualified "by your definition" because as others have pointed out it's a non-standard definition of no-go zone. I literally can't be any more direct at giving an answer.

Okay, so a no-go zone in london is having 152 incidents.....all the way in Preston.

Fucking hell.
---

AmpV2 posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

2. 152 incidents constitutes as a no-go zone.

A month. Those statistics were for one month.

So then thats a no-go zone? Im asking you if it is.

I would say so, yes, going by your definition.

You're really good or really bad at deflecting things aren't you? Never a straight answer.

Sonicfan is a waste of time to debate. Nothing is gained by engaging ignorance. He literally lied about a quote in his own source, made it sound like a cop said "trump has a point" (no cop ever has said this) just to try to sound kind of correct.

Yeah I think im gonna go back to hitting the books. I've wasted a lot of time here already.
---

SpiritSephiroth posted...

AmpV2 posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

s0nicfan posted...

SpiritSephiroth posted...

2. 152 incidents constitutes as a no-go zone.

A month. Those statistics were for one month.

So then thats a no-go zone? Im asking you if it is.

I would say so, yes, going by your definition.

You're really good or really bad at deflecting things aren't you? Never a straight answer.

Sonicfan is a waste of time to debate. Nothing is gained by engaging ignorance. He literally lied about a quote in his own source, made it sound like a cop said "trump has a point" (no cop ever has said this) just to try to sound kind of correct.

Yeah I think im gonna go back to hitting the books. I've wasted a lot of time here already.

Yep, let him splash around in the kiddie pool by himself.
---

Maybe AmpV2 will do a better job of not getting banned, but I sincerely doubt it. AmpV3 has promise, though.
---

hahaha, Sonicfan deleted his last post when he realized he was wrong. Whoops!

Time to disengage this Trumper; I've made my point.
---

AmpV2 posted...

hahaha, Sonicfan deleted his last post when he realized he was wrong. Whoops!

Time to disengage this Trumper; I've made my point.

You made your point plenty when you had to make a "V2" of your account because you're so toxic that you can't maintain an account without being banned for trolling.
---

Let them believe in their no go zones if they want.
---

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

hahaha, Sonicfan deleted his last post when he realized he was wrong. Whoops!

Time to disengage this Trumper; I've made my point.

You made your point plenty when you had to make a "V2" of your account because you're so toxic that you can't maintain an account without being banned for trolling.

Haha, another deflection!

I read your post before you deleted it; you highlighted the fact that I said no cop has ever said that Trump was right or had a point about these no go zones, and you replied with a quote from a cop that didn't say it either. Lol, a hilarious fail. Good thing you deleted it.

Deflect some more, you've enbarassd yourself thoroughly. Talking about my account won't help you.
---

creativerealms posted...

Let them believe in their no go zones if they want.

More fun for those who have no issues traveling there then!
---

"And here lies Sonicfan, RIP (rekt in peace)"

Why are Trumpers so easy to outfox?
---

AmpV2 posted...

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

hahaha, Sonicfan deleted his last post when he realized he was wrong. Whoops!

Time to disengage this Trumper; I've made my point.

You made your point plenty when you had to make a "V2" of your account because you're so toxic that you can't maintain an account without being banned for trolling.

Haha, another deflection!

I read your post before you deleted it; you highlighted the fact that I said no cop has ever said that Trump was right or had a point about these no go zones, and you replied with a quote from a cop that didn't say it either. Lol, a hilarious fail. Good thing you deleted it.

Deflect some more, you've enbarassd yourself thoroughly. Talking about my account won't help you.

I deleted it because the part I highlighed is where an officer explicitly says there are areas cops are advised not to go in uniform. You are correct in that it didn't match your specific complaint that a cop said trump had a point, because it instead directly addressed the original topic of whether or not a cop had said there are no go zones. I figured you'd hyper-focus on the fact that I had made that mismatch even though the quote itself proves the ACTUAL point of whether a cop said there are no go zones, but I deleted it anyway because I figured it wasn't worth the fight because you'd never acknowledge that I was right about this:
AmpV2 posted...

There are no quotes from police officers saying they exist. What you posted as a source doesn't even back you up, lol. That's why you had to put the bullshit qualifier "police *effectively* saying they do".

And surprise surprise I was right.
---

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

hahaha, Sonicfan deleted his last post when he realized he was wrong. Whoops!

Time to disengage this Trumper; I've made my point.

You made your point plenty when you had to make a "V2" of your account because you're so toxic that you can't maintain an account without being banned for trolling.

Haha, another deflection!

I read your post before you deleted it; you highlighted the fact that I said no cop has ever said that Trump was right or had a point about these no go zones, and you replied with a quote from a cop that didn't say it either. Lol, a hilarious fail. Good thing you deleted it.

Deflect some more, you've enbarassd yourself thoroughly. Talking about my account won't help you.

I deleted it because the part I highlighed is where an officer explicitly says there are areas cops are advised not to go in uniform. You are correct in that it didn't match your specific complaint that a cop said trump had a point, because it instead directly addressed the original topic of whether or not a cop had said there are no go zones. I figured you'd hyper-focus on the fact that I had made that mismatch even though the quote itself proves the ACTUAL point of whether a cop said there are no go zones, but I deleted it anyway because I figured it wasn't worth the fight because you'd never acknowledge that I was right about this:
AmpV2 posted...

There are no quotes from police officers saying they exist. What you posted as a source doesn't even back you up, lol. That's why you had to put the bullshit qualifier "police *effectively* saying they do".

And surprise surprise I was right.

Lol, *Facepalm*

Only a Trumper can claim victory after being dismantled and proven wrong.

A total waste of time, moving on.
---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qk35-_t0S0E" data-time="
---

AmpV2 posted...

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

hahaha, Sonicfan deleted his last post when he realized he was wrong. Whoops!

Time to disengage this Trumper; I've made my point.

You made your point plenty when you had to make a "V2" of your account because you're so toxic that you can't maintain an account without being banned for trolling.

Haha, another deflection!

I read your post before you deleted it; you highlighted the fact that I said no cop has ever said that Trump was right or had a point about these no go zones, and you replied with a quote from a cop that didn't say it either. Lol, a hilarious fail. Good thing you deleted it.

Deflect some more, you've enbarassd yourself thoroughly. Talking about my account won't help you.

I deleted it because the part I highlighed is where an officer explicitly says there are areas cops are advised not to go in uniform. You are correct in that it didn't match your specific complaint that a cop said trump had a point, because it instead directly addressed the original topic of whether or not a cop had said there are no go zones. I figured you'd hyper-focus on the fact that I had made that mismatch even though the quote itself proves the ACTUAL point of whether a cop said there are no go zones, but I deleted it anyway because I figured it wasn't worth the fight because you'd never acknowledge that I was right about this:
AmpV2 posted...

There are no quotes from police officers saying they exist. What you posted as a source doesn't even back you up, lol. That's why you had to put the bullshit qualifier "police *effectively* saying they do".

And surprise surprise I was right.

Lol, *Facepalm*

Only a Trumper can claim victory after being dismantled and proven wrong.

A total waste of time, moving on.

If you were capable of moving on, you wouldn't have a V2 account. See you the next time you show up to remind everyone why you had to make a second account.
---

"Gotta get the last word!", cries the Trumper.

Bye bye Felicia
---

Millennial couple bikes through ISIS territory to prove humans are kind and gets killed
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/07/world/asia/islamic-state-tajikistan-bike-attack.html
---

AmpV2 posted...

A total waste of time, moving on.

s0nicfan posted...

If you were capable of moving on, you wouldn't have a V2 account. See you the next time you show up to remind everyone why you had to make a second account.

AmpV2 posted...

"Gotta get the last word!", cries the Trumper.

Bye bye Felicia

Your ability to continually play yourself is truly masterful.
---

I remember that police interview. It came a few days after a Jamaican lad from Stratford died in police custody. I was living in Stratford at the time and there was a lot of fairly big protests and as part of the deescalation police were told not to wear uniforms unless they were working. As for it being a no-go zone? I wouldn't say so. I used to run at 10/11pm with my headphones and felt safe. I got offered drugs a few times but less frequently than when I lived in the US.

On the other hand, alt-right hero, Tommy Robinson, has spent time in prison for aggravated assault of a police officer, so perhaps the no-go zone is referring to Tommy's digs?

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

hahaha, Sonicfan deleted his last post when he realized he was wrong. Whoops!

Time to disengage this Trumper; I've made my point.

You made your point plenty when you had to make a "V2" of your account because you're so toxic that you can't maintain an account without being banned for trolling.

So what if I lied repeatedly? You got banned! is a pretty terrible argument.
---

King_Hellebuyck posted...

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

hahaha, Sonicfan deleted his last post when he realized he was wrong. Whoops!

Time to disengage this Trumper; I've made my point.

You made your point plenty when you had to make a "V2" of your account because you're so toxic that you can't maintain an account without being banned for trolling.

So what if I lied repeatedly? You got banned! is a pretty terrible argument.

Says the guy that has REPEATEDLY tried to make this about Islam when the TC explicitly said he wasn't talking about religion, and who has for the 2nd or 3rd time now refused to acknowledge that I have provided a completely objective, politics-free way of determining whether your version of no go zones exists.
---

King_Hellebuyck posted...

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

hahaha, Sonicfan deleted his last post when he realized he was wrong. Whoops!

Time to disengage this Trumper; I've made my point.

You made your point plenty when you had to make a "V2" of your account because you're so toxic that you can't maintain an account without being banned for trolling.

So what if I lied repeatedly? You got banned! is a pretty terrible argument.

Hahaha, wrecked again.

Me - "Sonicfan, you are wrong"

(Proves he us wrong)

Sonicfan - "Uh, you were banned before!"

Touche! What a retort!
---

AmpV2 posted...

Hahaha, wrecked again.

Me - "Sonicfan, you are wrong"

(Proves he us wrong)

Sonicfan - "Uh, you were banned before!"

Touche! What a retort!

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

A total waste of time, moving on.

s0nicfan posted...

If you were capable of moving on, you wouldn't have a V2 account. See you the next time you show up to remind everyone why you had to make a second account.

AmpV2 posted...

"Gotta get the last word!", cries the Trumper.

Bye bye Felicia

Your ability to continually play yourself is truly masterful.

---

s0nicfan posted...

King_Hellebuyck posted...

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

hahaha, Sonicfan deleted his last post when he realized he was wrong. Whoops!

Time to disengage this Trumper; I've made my point.

You made your point plenty when you had to make a "V2" of your account because you're so toxic that you can't maintain an account without being banned for trolling.

So what if I lied repeatedly? You got banned! is a pretty terrible argument.

Says the guy that has REPEATEDLY tried to make this about Islam when the TC explicitly said he wasn't talking about religion, and who has for the 2nd or 3rd time now refused to acknowledge that I have provided a completely objective, politics-free way of determining whether your version of no go zones exists.

So what if I lied? You mentioned Muslims! is also a pretty terrible argument.
---

King_Hellebuyck posted...

s0nicfan posted...

King_Hellebuyck posted...

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

hahaha, Sonicfan deleted his last post when he realized he was wrong. Whoops!

Time to disengage this Trumper; I've made my point.

You made your point plenty when you had to make a "V2" of your account because you're so toxic that you can't maintain an account without being banned for trolling.

So what if I lied repeatedly? You got banned! is a pretty terrible argument.

Says the guy that has REPEATEDLY tried to make this about Islam when the TC explicitly said he wasn't talking about religion, and who has for the 2nd or 3rd time now refused to acknowledge that I have provided a completely objective, politics-free way of determining whether your version of no go zones exists.

So what if I lied? You mentioned Muslims! is also a pretty terrible argument.

Sonifan embarrassment level - 10/10

He keeps going, too. Trumpers never understand when they lose, and badly.
---

Areas of Bradford, England are 'no-go zones'
---

King_Hellebuyck posted...

s0nicfan posted...

King_Hellebuyck posted...

s0nicfan posted...

AmpV2 posted...

hahaha, Sonicfan deleted his last post when he realized he was wrong. Whoops!

Time to disengage this Trumper; I've made my point.

You made your point plenty when you had to make a "V2" of your account because you're so toxic that you can't maintain an account without being banned for trolling.

So what if I lied repeatedly? You got banned! is a pretty terrible argument.

Says the guy that has REPEATEDLY tried to make this about Islam when the TC explicitly said he wasn't talking about religion, and who has for the 2nd or 3rd time now refused to acknowledge that I have provided a completely objective, politics-free way of determining whether your version of no go zones exists.

So what if I lied? You mentioned Muslims! is also a pretty terrible argument.

This thing started over whether or not a cop admitted there were no go zones. You and Amp decided to play the semantics game about whether or not saying "there are areas we're advised not to go" counts as no go zones. I was objectively wrong about the officer saying Trump had a point because I was quoting the wrong person. That doesn't change the fact that the officers still said there are areas they're advised not to go in uniform because they'll get assaulted.

Amp is gonna shit himself with joy, and I even made sure to bold the part he's looking for, because I really don't care. He can have that point. He's still wrong about the one that mattered. He's also making a fool of himself by repeatedly replying AFTER trying to "take the high road" and say that "trumpers have to have the last word" and that he's "moving on"

EDIT: and I know he'll reply to this, too, and the post after, and EVERY post until we hit 500, because he is physically incapable of actually keeping himself from replying and having the "last word" after he explicitly tried to jab me for that.
---

In some places, paramedics have to have police escorts

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5759889/The-suburbs-ambulances-WONT-help-Paramedics-handed-list-no-zones-attacks.html

What happened to Europe is sick and a mortal sin. I am thankful every day for Trump protecting us from ending up like Europe.
---