Poll of the Day > This 20 y/o Ohio Cashier exposed her BOOBS to a CUSTOMER cause she was MAD!!!

(+) Yeah! (+)

20 y/o Ohio Ho, AJ Ball who works as a cashier at Mr Zub's Deli was so fed up with an african american female customer that she got the last wordd by flashing her pidgeon chested BREASTS to her and said "That's my t** b****"!!

The fight occurred at closing timee and was captured by a customer as it's unclear what started the argument but it begins with the female cashier telling the female customer that she wouldn't be getting her money back as the customer said she tok her food away and THREW IT

The customer's companion asked her for money back and demanded her food be returned by the young cashier is losing her patience and tells people to "get the f*** o ut. Everybody get the f*** out"

When the customer refuses to leave until she got her money back, the cashier walks back and says "Take your f****** money and get the f*** out" and then waves 2 middle fingers to the camera!!

The customer said "Ok, this is customer service." and the girl replies "You can literally eat my a******. You can eat my a*****. Get the f*** out"

Then a male employee backs her up and said "You gotta go" but not before the girl then says "I hope you get f***** views b****. Get the f*** out"

The customer then says "This cashier is weird as f***" and that's when the cashier lifts up her shirt with no bra on and said "That's my t** b****"

It happened in February but a reddit usr who knows the girl said that she's a full-time college student in the middle of midterms and was working at a restaurant and had just finished her last shift of the week and was DRINKING when she was asked to work to cover another employee.

She has since been fired from her job and even started a GOFUNDME page before it was shut down as she aked for donations while looking for another job.

But restaurant workers are calling her a HERO because of similar situations they had to endure with difficult customers and wished they could have done the SAME..

She got even got a FREE TATTOO from a tattoo artist who wrote an escription on her arm...

Do you think this girl is weird as f***?

Dailymail didn't do a good job of censoring her breasts so watch the youtube instead :)

After some digging, it also appears she's a LESBIAN LIBERTARIAN who supports the LGBT movement but is a fiscal conservative

http://tinyurl.com/ybhd5x6v

http://tinyurl.com/y9wm5e6r

http://tinyurl.com/ybthfdwu

The fight -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTqPJLmnqG0" data-time="

AJ exposing her breasts -

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/07/17/4E031C1100000578-5928817-image-a-90_1530980260372.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/07/16/4E0265CB00000578-0-image-m-64_1530977751486.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/07/07/16/4E0265C200000578-0-image-a-77_1530977873861.jpg
---

This happened fucking months ago.
---

AwesomeTurtwig posted...

This happened fucking months ago.

It was kind of funny.

I remember a lot of people who watched the vid were concerned that the girl was like 16.
---

Eh, she's kinda cute.
---

I like that the thumbnail for the video has an arrow pointing at the censored boob. In case you dont know where to look.
---

mrduckbear posted...

restaurant workers are calling her a HERO because of similar situations they had to endure with difficult customers

No where in this article does it indicate the customer did anything wrong.

mrduckbear posted...

that's when the cashier lifts up her shirt with no bra on and said "That's my t** b****"

And that supports her side of this... how?
---

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

mrduckbear posted...

restaurant workers are calling her a HERO because of similar situations they had to endure with difficult customers

No where in this article does it indicate the customer did anything wrong.

Because there's no clarification as to what started the argument. Only that a group of female customers were irate about something, and that they had been bitching at this minimum-wage employee for several minutes already. And the customers were asked to leave repeatedly by both the cashier and her manager, who had then threatened to call the cops.

However, anybody who has worked food service or retail for any length of time can emphasize with a situation involving difficult customers. Those are industries that can give you a lifetime of crazy stories.
---

I don't even get how that's supposed to be an insult. Like, has "Oh no, not titties, anything but those!" ever been uttered by anyone at any point in time in the history of ever?

Red_Frog posted...

I don't even get how that's supposed to be an insult. Like, has "Oh no, not titties, anything but those!" ever been uttered by anyone at any point in time in the history of ever?

I think it's meant to be like mooning them. Keep in mind that she was doing this to women so there's likely no sexual attraction going on. Without the attraction, it's just an obscene gesture.
---

Zeus posted...

Eh, she's kinda cute.

Your her pops age fam.
---

mrduckbear posted...

Do you think this girl is weird as fuck?

Unprofessional but not weird. Some customers can be real arse holes.

Zeus posted...

Eh, she's kinda cute.

Agreed.
---

she doesn't look like she works there at all

she's on her damn phone in street clothes
---

doesn't look like a place with a strict uniform and she's literally on the phone with the police which is explained in the video.

But yeah, this is months old and she was justified
---

If you've ever dealt with the public in your job, you kno there are times when telling a customer to "go eat your a$$" is completely justified. Since the other guy was backing her up, there's clearly more to this story so I'm siding with the weird flasher girl because the customer is always wrong.
---

Syntheticon posted...

If you've ever dealt with the public in your job, you kno there are times when telling a customer to "go eat your a$$" is completely justified. Since the other guy was backing her up, there's clearly more to this story so I'm siding with the weird flasher girl because the customer is always wrong.

if only that customer didn't act like an entitled bitch, pretty sure both could have a sensible conversation to resolve the issue :(. one gets nothing by getting angry. gotta explain issue and why it was wrong.
---

mrduckbear posted...

shirt with no bra on

Found the fake news.
She was wearing a sports bra. You can see her have to grab it and lift it.
---

This is pretty old.
---

I gotta start more fights with libertarian lesbians.
---

helIy posted...

she doesn't look like she works there at all

she's on her damn phone in street clothes

It's clearly not a franchised fast food joint. Not every place is going to have a real dress code.

Syntheticon posted...

If you've ever dealt with the public in your job, you kno there are times when telling a customer to "go eat your a$$" is completely justified.

Well... Justified is a strong word, considering you shouldn't be doing that shit no matter what.
---

well it's a straight tie
---

you missed the reason why. If she flashes the camera its harder for it to be shared, and possibly lessens its chance of going viral. Kinda smart imo. Yell something awful and show some goods to try and avoid public shame. Granted, it made it blow up more, but interesting idea.
---

lol, that's not something I would do but it is smart. The video probably cannot get monetized.
---

Zeus posted...

Because there's no clarification as to what started the argument. Only that a group of female customers were irate about something, and that they had been bitching at this minimum-wage employee for several minutes already. And the customers were asked to leave repeatedly by both the cashier and her manager, who had then threatened to call the cops.

However, anybody who has worked food service or retail for any length of time can emphasize with a situation involving difficult customers. Those are industries that can give you a lifetime of crazy stories.

Well legally they have to give money back in a situation like that.

PuddingBoy posted...

But yeah, this is months old and she was justified

Lol.

kingdrake2 posted...

if only that customer didn't act like an entitled bitch, pretty sure both could have a sensible conversation to resolve the issue :(. one gets nothing by getting angry. gotta explain issue and why it was wrong.

There was no entitlement there. It would be considered theft if they didn't give the money back.
---

Revelation34 posted...

Well legally they have to give money back in a situation like that.

Revelation34 posted...

It would be considered theft if they didn't give the money back.

Not 100% sure that either is really the case. Accepting returns is usually somewhat discretionary in most businesses and the nature of the food service industry further adds to those conditions. If they gave them money and got nothing in return, then sure, that's theft.

In this case, they purchased and received a product then tried to give it back and apparently said something along the lines of "I don't want it" (with one of her friends suggesting that it be thrown out). As soon as she handed the product back and said "I don't want it," that can be reasonably construed as ceding ownership. That doesn't create a legal obligation to give back money.

The grey area here depends on the nature of the complaint. If they received a completely different order (ie, a salad instead of a hamburger), they didn't get what they paid for (and it's doubly an issue if what they received was cheaper than what they ordered). If it's not done to spec or otherwise has an error, that's not theft (ie, a criminal matter), that's a civil matter. Given the context of the story, it's more likely a matter of things not being done to spec.
---

Zeus posted...

Revelation34 posted...

Well legally they have to give money back in a situation like that.

Revelation34 posted...

It would be considered theft if they didn't give the money back.

Not 100% sure that either is really the case. Accepting returns is usually somewhat discretionary in most businesses and the nature of the food service industry further adds to those conditions. If they gave them money and got nothing in return, then sure, that's theft.

In this case, they purchased and received a product then tried to give it back and apparently said something along the lines of "I don't want it" (with one of her friends suggesting that it be thrown out). As soon as she handed the product back and said "I don't want it," that can be reasonably construed as ceding ownership. That doesn't create a legal obligation to give back money.

The grey area here depends on the nature of the complaint. If they received a completely different order (ie, a salad instead of a hamburger), they didn't get what they paid for (and it's doubly an issue if what they received was cheaper than what they ordered). If it's not done to spec or otherwise has an error, that's not theft (ie, a criminal matter), that's a civil matter. Given the context of the story, it's more likely a matter of things not being done to spec.

This isn't returns. They threw the food out. They never received the product.
---

"That's my tit, bitch!"

Classic.
---

Revelation34 posted...

Zeus posted...

Revelation34 posted...

Well legally they have to give money back in a situation like that.

Revelation34 posted...

It would be considered theft if they didn't give the money back.

Not 100% sure that either is really the case. Accepting returns is usually somewhat discretionary in most businesses and the nature of the food service industry further adds to those conditions. If they gave them money and got nothing in return, then sure, that's theft.

In this case, they purchased and received a product then tried to give it back and apparently said something along the lines of "I don't want it" (with one of her friends suggesting that it be thrown out). As soon as she handed the product back and said "I don't want it," that can be reasonably construed as ceding ownership. That doesn't create a legal obligation to give back money.

The grey area here depends on the nature of the complaint. If they received a completely different order (ie, a salad instead of a hamburger), they didn't get what they paid for (and it's doubly an issue if what they received was cheaper than what they ordered). If it's not done to spec or otherwise has an error, that's not theft (ie, a criminal matter), that's a civil matter. Given the context of the story, it's more likely a matter of things not being done to spec.

This isn't returns. They threw the food out. They never received the product.

They did get their money back though and then were refused service which they're allowed to do.
---

PuddingBoy posted...

They did get their money back though and then were refused service which they're allowed to do.

It was never actually shown them getting the money back. They denied their money back at first even if they did give it back. If they had just left it would have been up for a lawsuit.
---

Revelation34 posted...

PuddingBoy posted...

They did get their money back though and then were refused service which they're allowed to do.

It was never actually shown them getting the money back. They denied their money back at first even if they did give it back. If they had just left it would have been up for a lawsuit.

You can hear the girl behind the counter saying "take your money and leave" or something to that affect.
---

PuddingBoy posted...

You can hear the girl behind the counter saying "take your money and leave" or something to that affect.

"It was never actually shown them getting the money back."
---

Okay well Ill follow logic while you continue to ignore it
---

PuddingBoy posted...

Okay well Ill follow logic while you continue to ignore it

I laughed.
---

Revelation34 posted...

Zeus posted...

Revelation34 posted...

Well legally they have to give money back in a situation like that.

Revelation34 posted...

It would be considered theft if they didn't give the money back.

Not 100% sure that either is really the case. Accepting returns is usually somewhat discretionary in most businesses and the nature of the food service industry further adds to those conditions. If they gave them money and got nothing in return, then sure, that's theft.

In this case, they purchased and received a product then tried to give it back and apparently said something along the lines of "I don't want it" (with one of her friends suggesting that it be thrown out). As soon as she handed the product back and said "I don't want it," that can be reasonably construed as ceding ownership. That doesn't create a legal obligation to give back money.

The grey area here depends on the nature of the complaint. If they received a completely different order (ie, a salad instead of a hamburger), they didn't get what they paid for (and it's doubly an issue if what they received was cheaper than what they ordered). If it's not done to spec or otherwise has an error, that's not theft (ie, a criminal matter), that's a civil matter. Given the context of the story, it's more likely a matter of things not being done to spec.

This isn't returns. They threw the food out. They never received the product.

...they brought it back to the counter, that's a return.
---

Zeus posted...

..they brought it back to the counter, that's a return.

You can't return freshly prepared food at any restaurant.
---

Revelation34 posted...

Zeus posted...

..they brought it back to the counter, that's a return.

You can't return freshly prepared food at any restaurant.

And yet people try to do that for any number of reasons all the time when they dislike what they got.
---

The Popo posted...

I like that the thumbnail for the video has an arrow pointing at the censored boob. In case you dont know where to look.

Well, given that the TC routinely calls women "heifers" (or is that the other click bait topic creator? (they kinda blend together after a while)), I was actually looking at her crotch for her udder. I was really confused until I noticed the arrow.
---

Blaqthourne posted...

The Popo posted...

I like that the thumbnail for the video has an arrow pointing at the censored boob. In case you dont know where to look.

Well, given that the TC routinely calls women "heifers" (or is that the other click bait topic creator? (they kinda blend together after a while)), I was actually looking at her crotch for her udder. I was really confused until I noticed the arrow.

All I know is that I was udderly disappointed by the censor bar.
---

Zeus posted...

And yet people try to do that for any number of reasons all the time when they dislike what they got.

They don't. They ask for a refund or to fix the order.
---