Current Events > Watching Fox News is an exercise in censorship

Topic List	Page List: 1
spudger 02/18/18 11:21:23 AM #1:	Interrupting every guest critical of trump or his admin Its so obvious --- -Only dead fish swim with the current http://error1355.com/ce/spudger.html <cite>spudger posted [p:896309636] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote>Interrupting every guest critical of trump or his admin Its so obvious</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kombucha 02/18/18 11:21:51 AM #2:	why are you watching fox news --- http://www.last.fm/user/walkingishonest <cite>Kombucha posted [p:896309660] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote>why are you watching fox news</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KillCommunism 02/18/18 11:22:27 AM #3:	Acting like CNN isn't worse. <cite>KillCommunism posted [p:896309681] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote>Acting like CNN isn't worse.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spudger 02/18/18 11:23:31 AM #4:	KillCommunism posted... Acting like CNN isn't worse. Aaaand the deflection starts --- -Only dead fish swim with the current http://error1355.com/ce/spudger.html <cite>spudger posted [p:896309721] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>KillCommunism posted...</cite> <quote>Acting like CNN isn't worse.</quote> Aaaand the deflection starts</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Genocet_10-325 02/18/18 11:26:00 AM #5:	KillCommunism posted... Acting like CNN isn't worse. Lol 3 posts in and the whataboutism is already out in full force --- Formerly known as The_Great_Geno Conservatism is a plague on society. <cite>Genocet_10-325 posted [p:896309824] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>KillCommunism posted...</cite> <quote>Acting like CNN isn't worse.</quote> Lol 3 posts in and the whataboutism is already out in full force</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
myzz7 02/18/18 11:26:59 AM #6:	spudger posted... KillCommunism posted... Acting like CNN isn't worse. Aaaand the deflection starts both are bad. nothing really controversial about saying that is there. should be common knowledge like water is wet and sky is blue. --- http://s10.postimage.org/mxioonsd1/gildavatar.gif http://gifgifs.com/res/0916/57ebaeea6c7a9047727112.gif <cite>myzz7 posted [p:896309863] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>spudger posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KillCommunism posted...</cite> <quote>Acting like CNN isn't worse.</quote> Aaaand the deflection starts</quote> both are bad. nothing really controversial about saying that is there. should be common knowledge like water is wet and sky is blue.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ilovuuu 02/18/18 11:27:42 AM #7:	myzz7 posted... spudger posted... KillCommunism posted... Acting like CNN isn't worse. Aaaand the deflection starts both are bad. nothing really controversial about saying that is there. should be common knowledge like water is wet and sky is blue. fox is brain cancer CNN is hiv. like dude. stop deflecting. <cite>ilovuuu posted [p:896309894] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>myzz7 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>spudger posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KillCommunism posted...</cite> <quote>Acting like CNN isn't worse.</quote> Aaaand the deflection starts</quote> both are bad. nothing really controversial about saying that is there. should be common knowledge like water is wet and sky is blue.</quote> fox is brain cancer CNN is hiv. like dude. stop deflecting.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 02/18/18 11:28:12 AM #8:	KillCommunism posted... Acting like CNN isn't worse. whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 http://i.imgur.com/mPvcy.png <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:896309910] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>KillCommunism posted...</cite> <quote>Acting like CNN isn't worse.</quote> whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 02/18/18 11:29:46 AM #9:	So, is it ok or not for CNN to do the same thing? If not, then why single out Fox? --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:896309966] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote>So, is it ok or not for CNN to do the same thing? If not, then why single out Fox?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 02/18/18 11:31:51 AM #10:	Nomadic View posted... CNN Doom_Art posted... whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 http://i.imgur.com/mPvcy.png <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:896310042] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>CNN</quote> <cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Genocet_10-325 02/18/18 11:33:46 AM #11:	Nomadic View posted... So, is it ok or not for CNN to do the same thing? If not, then why single out Fox? The Republicans playbook Any criticism of Fox is to be responded to with criticism of CNN Any criticism of Trump is to be responded to with criticism of Hillary --- Formerly known as The_Great_Geno Conservatism is a plague on society. <cite>Genocet_10-325 posted [p:896310134] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>So, is it ok or not for CNN to do the same thing? If not, then why single out Fox?</quote> The Republicans playbook Any criticism of Fox is to be responded to with criticism of CNN Any criticism of Trump is to be responded to with criticism of Hillary</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 02/18/18 11:34:59 AM #12:	Doom_Art posted... Nomadic View posted... CNN Doom_Art posted... whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms Yeah, thats exactly what Im addressing. Why single out one side? If you have a problem with the practice then you have a problem with both sides Id assume. Whats the difference between the two? --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:896310188] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>CNN</quote> <cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms</quote></quote> Yeah, thats exactly what Im addressing. Why single out one side? If you have a problem with the practice then you have a problem with both sides Id assume. Whats the difference between the two?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DezDroppedFreak 02/18/18 11:36:05 AM #13:	Nomadic View posted... Doom_Art posted... Nomadic View posted... CNN Doom_Art posted... whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms Yeah, thats exactly what Im addressing. Why single out one side? If you have a problem with the practice then you have a problem with both sides Id assume. Whats the difference between the two? A more accurate comparison would be MSNBC --- DezCaughtIt AKA freakofnature30 Brockhampton makes me *saturate* <cite>DezDroppedFreak posted [p:896310227] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>CNN</quote> <cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms</quote></quote> Yeah, thats exactly what Im addressing. Why single out one side? If you have a problem with the practice then you have a problem with both sides Id assume. Whats the difference between the two?</quote> A more accurate comparison would be MSNBC</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 02/18/18 11:36:09 AM #14:	Genocet_10-325 posted... Nomadic View posted... So, is it ok or not for CNN to do the same thing? If not, then why single out Fox? The Republicans playbook Any criticism of Fox is to be responded to with criticism of CNN Any criticism of Trump is to be responded to with criticism of Hillary Well, is it ok or not? Do you only have a problem with the one side doing the practice or not? --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:896310230] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Genocet_10-325 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>So, is it ok or not for CNN to do the same thing? If not, then why single out Fox?</quote> The Republicans playbook Any criticism of Fox is to be responded to with criticism of CNN Any criticism of Trump is to be responded to with criticism of Hillary</quote> Well, is it ok or not? Do you only have a problem with the one side doing the practice or not?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Genocet_10-325 02/18/18 11:36:09 AM #15:	Nomadic View posted... Doom_Art posted... Nomadic View posted... CNN Doom_Art posted... whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms Yeah, thats exactly what Im addressing. Why single out one side? If you have a problem with the practice then you have a problem with both sides Id assume. Whats the difference between the two? Because this topic isn't about CNN, and pointing out that CNN sucks too does nothing to make Fox suck any less. --- Formerly known as The_Great_Geno Conservatism is a plague on society. <cite>Genocet_10-325 posted [p:896310231] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>CNN</quote> <cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms</quote></quote> Yeah, thats exactly what Im addressing. Why single out one side? If you have a problem with the practice then you have a problem with both sides Id assume. Whats the difference between the two?</quote> Because this topic isn't about CNN, and pointing out that CNN sucks too does nothing to make Fox suck any less.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ilovuuu 02/18/18 11:37:09 AM #16:	he goes to law school and this is the best he can do <cite>ilovuuu posted [p:896310266] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote>he goes to law school and this is the best he can do</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gravy 02/18/18 11:38:11 AM #17:	myzz7 posted... both are bad. nothing really controversial about saying that is there. should be common knowledge like water is wet and sky is blue. Yeah but how come your hair feels dry when you're completely underwater? Check mate, atheists. <cite>gravy posted [p:896310311] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>myzz7 posted...</cite> <quote> both are bad. nothing really controversial about saying that is there. should be common knowledge like water is wet and sky is blue.</quote> Yeah but how come your hair feels dry when you're completely underwater? Check mate, atheists.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 02/18/18 11:38:18 AM #18:	Genocet_10-325 posted... Nomadic View posted... Doom_Art posted... Nomadic View posted... CNN Doom_Art posted... whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms Yeah, thats exactly what Im addressing. Why single out one side? If you have a problem with the practice then you have a problem with both sides Id assume. Whats the difference between the two? Because this topic isn't about CNN, and pointing out that CNN sucks too does nothing to make Fox suck any less. It kinda does. Either the standard is abhorrent or it isnt. Singling our one side for a general practice while ignoring the other doesnt make sense. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:896310316] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Genocet_10-325 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>CNN</quote> <cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms</quote></quote> Yeah, thats exactly what Im addressing. Why single out one side? If you have a problem with the practice then you have a problem with both sides Id assume. Whats the difference between the two?</quote> Because this topic isn't about CNN, and pointing out that CNN sucks too does nothing to make Fox suck any less.</quote> It kinda does. Either the standard is abhorrent or it isnt. Singling our one side for a general practice while ignoring the other doesnt make sense.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NibeIungsnarf 02/18/18 11:38:42 AM #19:	Nomadic View posted... Genocet_10-325 posted... Nomadic View posted... So, is it ok or not for CNN to do the same thing? If not, then why single out Fox? The Republicans playbook Any criticism of Fox is to be responded to with criticism of CNN Any criticism of Trump is to be responded to with criticism of Hillary Well, is it ok or not? Do you only have a problem with the one side doing the practice or not? How do you ever have a conversation about an issue if any interjection of BUT SOMEONE ELSE DID IT TOO! is okay at any point of the dicussion? Because you can do that about literally anything. <cite>NibeIungsnarf posted [p:896310337] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Genocet_10-325 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>So, is it ok or not for CNN to do the same thing? If not, then why single out Fox?</quote> The Republicans playbook Any criticism of Fox is to be responded to with criticism of CNN Any criticism of Trump is to be responded to with criticism of Hillary</quote> Well, is it ok or not? Do you only have a problem with the one side doing the practice or not?</quote> How do you ever have a conversation about an issue if any interjection of BUT SOMEONE ELSE DID IT TOO! is okay at any point of the dicussion? Because you can do that about literally anything.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 02/18/18 11:40:32 AM #20:	NibeIungsnarf posted... Nomadic View posted... Genocet_10-325 posted... Nomadic View posted... So, is it ok or not for CNN to do the same thing? If not, then why single out Fox? The Republicans playbook Any criticism of Fox is to be responded to with criticism of CNN Any criticism of Trump is to be responded to with criticism of Hillary Well, is it ok or not? Do you only have a problem with the one side doing the practice or not? How do you ever have a conversation about an issue if any interjection of BUT SOMEONE ELSE DID IT TOO! is okay at any point of the dicussion? Because you can do that about literally anything. Its absolutely a valid argument if youre arguing that its abhorrent for one side, but not the other. If thats your criticism then it cuts both ways. At least explain what separates the two. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:896310413] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>NibeIungsnarf posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Genocet_10-325 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>So, is it ok or not for CNN to do the same thing? If not, then why single out Fox?</quote> The Republicans playbook Any criticism of Fox is to be responded to with criticism of CNN Any criticism of Trump is to be responded to with criticism of Hillary</quote> Well, is it ok or not? Do you only have a problem with the one side doing the practice or not?</quote> How do you ever have a conversation about an issue if any interjection of BUT SOMEONE ELSE DID IT TOO! is okay at any point of the dicussion? Because you can do that about literally anything.</quote> Its absolutely a valid argument if youre arguing that its abhorrent for one side, but not the other. If thats your criticism then it cuts both ways. At least explain what separates the two.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Genocet_10-325 02/18/18 11:40:39 AM #21:	Nomadic View posted... Genocet_10-325 posted... Nomadic View posted... Doom_Art posted... Nomadic View posted... CNN Doom_Art posted... whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms Yeah, thats exactly what Im addressing. Why single out one side? If you have a problem with the practice then you have a problem with both sides Id assume. Whats the difference between the two? Because this topic isn't about CNN, and pointing out that CNN sucks too does nothing to make Fox suck any less. It kinda does. Either the standard is abhorrent or it isnt. Singling our one side for a general practice while ignoring the other doesnt make sense. Say you're in court on trial for murdering someone. The evidence is insurmountable. The judge asks you to give your defense, so you say "But the 9/11 terrorists murdered 3000 people!" How do you see this scenario playing out for you --- Formerly known as The_Great_Geno Conservatism is a plague on society. <cite>Genocet_10-325 posted [p:896310420] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Genocet_10-325 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>CNN</quote> <cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms</quote></quote> Yeah, thats exactly what Im addressing. Why single out one side? If you have a problem with the practice then you have a problem with both sides Id assume. Whats the difference between the two?</quote> Because this topic isn't about CNN, and pointing out that CNN sucks too does nothing to make Fox suck any less.</quote> It kinda does. Either the standard is abhorrent or it isnt. Singling our one side for a general practice while ignoring the other doesnt make sense.</quote> Say you're in court on trial for murdering someone. The evidence is insurmountable. The judge asks you to give your defense, so you say "But the 9/11 terrorists murdered 3000 people!" How do you see this scenario playing out for you</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hexenherz 02/18/18 11:41:04 AM #22:	At least when it happens on CNN it's "because of technical difficulties" >_> Fox News intentionally invites guests on just to mock them and shut them out. I remember watching one segment where they had invited a few guests to talk, in turn, about events in Israel. I don't even remember who the first guest was. The second guest was pro-Hezbollah but his whole argument was "If people want to resolve the issues in Israel we have to include all parties including the Palestinians; it's not going to work if we exclude them from negotiations", and the host afterwards literally just spent the next five minutes berating him and calling him a terrorist. Then the final guest was some ultra conservative guy that basically just said Israel needs to nuke Hezbollah and Iran and of course they let him talk and treated him with respect. edit: It's all really transparent but unfortunately I guess regular viewers eat that shit up. --- RS3: UltimaSuende . On the quest to 99 WC. Currently at 98. <cite>Hexenherz posted [p:896310429] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote>At least when it happens on CNN it's "because of technical difficulties" >_> Fox News intentionally invites guests on just to mock them and shut them out. I remember watching one segment where they had invited a few guests to talk, in turn, about events in Israel. I don't even remember who the first guest was. The second guest was pro-Hezbollah but his whole argument was "If people want to resolve the issues in Israel we have to include all parties including the Palestinians; it's not going to work if we exclude them from negotiations", and the host afterwards literally just spent the next five minutes berating him and calling him a terrorist. Then the final guest was some ultra conservative guy that basically just said Israel needs to nuke Hezbollah and Iran and of course they let him talk and treated him with respect. edit: It's all really transparent but unfortunately I guess regular viewers eat that shit up.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NibeIungsnarf 02/18/18 11:41:29 AM #23:	Nomadic View posted... Its absolutely a valid argument if youre arguing that its abhorrent for one side, but not the other Nobody did that. You literally made that up to serve your position. <cite>NibeIungsnarf posted [p:896310446] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote> Its absolutely a valid argument if youre arguing that its abhorrent for one side, but not the other</quote> Nobody did that. You literally made that up to serve your position.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 02/18/18 11:46:05 AM #24:	Genocet_10-325 posted... Nomadic View posted... Genocet_10-325 posted... Nomadic View posted... Doom_Art posted... Nomadic View posted... CNN Doom_Art posted... whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms Yeah, thats exactly what Im addressing. Why single out one side? If you have a problem with the practice then you have a problem with both sides Id assume. Whats the difference between the two? Because this topic isn't about CNN, and pointing out that CNN sucks too does nothing to make Fox suck any less. It kinda does. Either the standard is abhorrent or it isnt. Singling our one side for a general practice while ignoring the other doesnt make sense. Say you're in court on trial for murdering someone. The evidence is insurmountable. The judge asks you to give your defense, so you say "But the 9/11 terrorists murdered 3000 people!" How do you see this scenario playing out for you Its obviously going to be irrelevant in a trial. However, thats not the point Im making. Im not trying to absolve Fox of the practice. Im trying to learn what the standard of acceptance for the practice is. No one argues that the 9/11 terror attacked werent a tragedy. Im just trying to get an answer if the practice itself is unacceptable or not. If so, is it unacceptable when anyone does it? --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:896310645] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Genocet_10-325 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Genocet_10-325 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>CNN</quote> <cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>whataboutism alarm goes off AAAAAAHHHHHHH HE DID THE THING flails arms</quote></quote> Yeah, thats exactly what Im addressing. Why single out one side? If you have a problem with the practice then you have a problem with both sides Id assume. Whats the difference between the two?</quote> Because this topic isn't about CNN, and pointing out that CNN sucks too does nothing to make Fox suck any less.</quote> It kinda does. Either the standard is abhorrent or it isnt. Singling our one side for a general practice while ignoring the other doesnt make sense.</quote> Say you're in court on trial for murdering someone. The evidence is insurmountable. The judge asks you to give your defense, so you say "But the 9/11 terrorists murdered 3000 people!" How do you see this scenario playing out for you</quote> Its obviously going to be irrelevant in a trial. However, thats not the point Im making. Im not trying to absolve Fox of the practice. Im trying to learn what the standard of acceptance for the practice is. No one argues that the 9/11 terror attacked werent a tragedy. Im just trying to get an answer if the practice itself is unacceptable or not. If so, is it unacceptable when anyone does it?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 02/18/18 11:48:49 AM #25:	NibeIungsnarf posted... Nomadic View posted... Its absolutely a valid argument if youre arguing that its abhorrent for one side, but not the other Nobody did that. You literally made that up to serve your position. Its absolutely happening in this topic. When someone makes the comparison that another network is doing the same practice its Dont talk about muh CNN! I just want a straight answer if its an acceptable practice either way. If its not, then I dont understand why the practice itself isnt the issue of the topic rather than a specific network doing it. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:896310757] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>NibeIungsnarf posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote> Its absolutely a valid argument if youre arguing that its abhorrent for one side, but not the other</quote> Nobody did that. You literally made that up to serve your position.</quote> Its absolutely happening in this topic. When someone makes the comparison that another network is doing the same practice its Dont talk about muh CNN! I just want a straight answer if its an acceptable practice either way. If its not, then I dont understand why the practice itself isnt the issue of the topic rather than a specific network doing it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 02/18/18 11:49:21 AM #26:	Nomadic View posted... So, is it ok or not for CNN to do the same thing? If not, then why single out Fox? Saying a thing happened doesn't mean that another thing doesn't happen, but that also isn't what the subject was about. One thing happening can be treated as being it's own thing as opposed to needing to show examples of it happening elsewhere, like that's some counterargument. If you're to suggest that there's a pattern of it happening in other places, that means you should be able to understand that there's a pattern that leads to that happening with the subject matter presented. And if it's a problem elsewhere, that should mean that the subject itself is a problem. So, you feel it's being singled out, but that doesn't change the object that's being talked about. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:896310783] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>So, is it ok or not for CNN to do the same thing? If not, then why single out Fox?</quote> Saying a thing happened doesn't mean that another thing doesn't happen, but that also isn't what the subject was about. One thing happening can be treated as being it's own thing as opposed to needing to show examples of it happening elsewhere, like that's some counterargument. If you're to suggest that there's a pattern of it happening in other places, that means you should be able to understand that there's a pattern that leads to that happening with the subject matter presented. And if it's a problem elsewhere, that should mean that the subject itself is a problem. So, you feel it's being singled out, but that doesn't change the object that's being talked about.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NibeIungsnarf 02/18/18 11:50:44 AM #27:	Nomadic View posted... Its absolutely happening in this topic. When someone makes the comparison that another network is doing the same practice its Dont talk about muh CNN! You're literally lying. Nomadic View posted... I just want a straight answer About something this topic isn't about, effectively asking for a derailment. <cite>NibeIungsnarf posted [p:896310843] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Its absolutely happening in this topic. When someone makes the comparison that another network is doing the same practice its Dont talk about muh CNN!</quote> You're literally lying. <cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>I just want a straight answer</quote> About something this topic isn't about, effectively asking for a derailment.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 02/18/18 11:51:47 AM #28:	Talking about specific incidents is completely fair game in singling out something, but that isnt what the topic stated. The topic was about the practice in general, and its implication that it wasnt common practice. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:896310887] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote>Talking about specific incidents is completely fair game in singling out something, but that isnt what the topic stated. The topic was about the practice in general, and its implication that it wasnt common practice.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Deadpool_18 02/18/18 11:52:11 AM #29:	spudger posted... KillCommunism posted... Acting like CNN isn't worse. Aaaand the deflection starts It always does. --- We're whalers on the moon, we carry a harpoon, but there ain't no whales, so we tell tall tales, and sing our whaling tune. <cite>Deadpool_18 posted [p:896310908] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>spudger posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KillCommunism posted...</cite> <quote>Acting like CNN isn't worse.</quote> Aaaand the deflection starts</quote> It always does.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NibeIungsnarf 02/18/18 11:53:48 AM #30:	Nomadic View posted... The topic was about the practice in general, and its implication that it wasnt common practice. You're literally lying. <cite>NibeIungsnarf posted [p:896310965] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>The topic was about the practice in general, and its implication that it wasnt common practice.</quote> You're literally lying.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 02/18/18 11:54:54 AM #31:	Nomadic View posted... Talking about specific incidents is completely fair game in singling out something, but that isnt what the topic stated. The topic was about the practice in general, and its implication that it wasnt common practice. I think the implication is that they go well beyond the average rate, not that no one else does similar things. Anyway, it's pretty easily observable. You yourself could provide some counterexamples of people being critical of Trump and not having what TC described happen if you're to expect him to do the same, especially considering that you're the one disagreeing with him. If you're just saying that there wasn't enough effort put into the post, then just say that instead of being so entrenched on this... EDIT: and now I see that you agreed. Well, thanks for being willing to agree to disagree. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:896311035] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Talking about specific incidents is completely fair game in singling out something, but that isnt what the topic stated. The topic was about the practice in general, and its implication that it wasnt common practice.</quote> I think the implication is that they go well beyond the average rate, not that no one else does similar things. Anyway, it's pretty easily observable. You yourself could provide some counterexamples of people being critical of Trump and not having what TC described happen if you're to expect him to do the same, especially considering that you're the one disagreeing with him. If you're just saying that there wasn't enough effort put into the post, then just say that instead of being so entrenched on this... EDIT: and now I see that you agreed. Well, thanks for being willing to agree to disagree.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 02/18/18 11:58:13 AM #32:	Kineth posted... Nomadic View posted... Talking about specific incidents is completely fair game in singling out something, but that isnt what the topic stated. The topic was about the practice in general, and its implication that it wasnt common practice. I think the implication is that they go well beyond the average rate, not that no one else does similar things. Thats absolutely a fair point! And thats all I was fishing for was some justification on why its different from one side to the other. Im not agreeing with you on that assertion, I believe to the contrary, but at least youre providing logic. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:896311185] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Talking about specific incidents is completely fair game in singling out something, but that isnt what the topic stated. The topic was about the practice in general, and its implication that it wasnt common practice.</quote> I think the implication is that they go well beyond the average rate, not that no one else does similar things.</quote> Thats absolutely a fair point! And thats all I was fishing for was some justification on why its different from one side to the other. Im not agreeing with you on that assertion, I believe to the contrary, but at least youre providing logic.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anteaterking 02/18/18 12:01:30 PM #33:	CNN is such a bad example of an anti-Fox News, because they go out of their way to have someone to defend for the other side no matter how dumb the issue is. Like they seriously brought on people to talk about how Ted Cruz's father MIGHT have killed JFK just so that it didn't seem like they were being biased against Trump. --- http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b136/Anteaterking/scan00021.jpg <cite>Anteaterking posted [p:896311363] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote>CNN is such a bad example of an anti-Fox News, because they go out of their way to have someone to defend for the other side no matter how dumb the issue is. Like they seriously brought on people to talk about how Ted Cruz's father MIGHT have killed JFK just so that it didn't seem like they were being biased against Trump.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
0TiamaT0 02/18/18 12:13:00 PM #34:	The real question is if TC actually cares about media censorship, or if he only cares that one particular group does it? Because singling out just one, immediately makes you look biased. Because if you want to talk Fox News over-talking guests - which they often do, why not this as well: CNNs well-documented technical difficulties: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zbyt6Dx1eH4 An old favorite from MSNBC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvBQDHqdCck --- https://youtu.be/JDHvYdi6Bu4 <cite>0TiamaT0 posted [p:896311901] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote>The real question is if TC actually cares about media censorship, or if he only cares that one particular group does it? Because singling out just one, immediately makes you look biased. Because if you want to talk Fox News over-talking guests - which they often do, why not this as well: CNNs well-documented technical difficulties: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zbyt6Dx1eH4 An old favorite from MSNBC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvBQDHqdCck</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Great Muta 22 02/18/18 12:17:51 PM #35:	0TiamaT0 posted... The real question is if TC actually cares about media censorship, or if he only cares that one particular group does it? Because singling out just one, immediately makes you look biased No, it doesn't do that at all. In fact your post screams of insecurity because FN got attacked and you for some reason feel the need to stick up for them --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXezjbuzh14 <cite>The Great Muta 22 posted [p:896312116] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>0TiamaT0 posted...</cite> <quote>The real question is if TC actually cares about media censorship, or if he only cares that one particular group does it? Because singling out just one, immediately makes you look biased</quote> No, it doesn't do that at all. In fact your post screams of insecurity because FN got attacked and you for some reason feel the need to stick up for them</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
E32005 02/18/18 12:19:55 PM #36:	Nomadic View posted... So, is it ok or not for CNN to do the same thing? If not, then why single out Fox? The president is a republican, republicans control congress. Trump has stated in his own tweets his considers Fox "legit news". --- http://i.imgur.com/LAvnefi.gif http://i.imgur.com/6kW9fXL.gif <cite>E32005 posted [p:896312206] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>So, is it ok or not for CNN to do the same thing? If not, then why single out Fox?</quote> The president is a republican, republicans control congress. Trump has stated in his own tweets his considers Fox "legit news".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Taharqa_ 02/18/18 12:22:36 PM #37:	Fox News is a propaganda arm of the Republican party. CNN is like the sensationalist middle man. --- "If you want to move fast, practice slowly...if you want to move like lightning, practice in stillness." <cite>Taharqa_ posted [p:896312350] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote>Fox News is a propaganda arm of the Republican party. CNN is like the sensationalist middle man.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ItsYourFault 02/18/18 12:24:24 PM #38:	Nomadic View posted... Kineth posted... Nomadic View posted... Talking about specific incidents is completely fair game in singling out something, but that isnt what the topic stated. The topic was about the practice in general, and its implication that it wasnt common practice. I think the implication is that they go well beyond the average rate, not that no one else does similar things. Thats absolutely a fair point! And thats all I was fishing for was some justification on why its different from one side to the other. Im not agreeing with you on that assertion, I believe to the contrary, but at least youre providing logic. xD. <cite>ItsYourFault posted [p:896312425] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>Talking about specific incidents is completely fair game in singling out something, but that isnt what the topic stated. The topic was about the practice in general, and its implication that it wasnt common practice.</quote> I think the implication is that they go well beyond the average rate, not that no one else does similar things.</quote> Thats absolutely a fair point! And thats all I was fishing for was some justification on why its different from one side to the other. Im not agreeing with you on that assertion, I believe to the contrary, but at least youre providing logic.</quote> xD.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlueBoy675 02/18/18 12:25:09 PM #39:	Is Nomadic View serious right now? Literally no one was saying that CNN isn't shit. We're just talking about how shit Fox News is right now. --- Hope rides alone <cite>BlueBoy675 posted [p:896312465] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote>Is Nomadic View serious right now? Literally no one was saying that CNN isn't shit. We're just talking about how shit Fox News is right now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spudger 02/18/18 12:25:40 PM #40:	0TiamaT0 posted... The real question is if TC actually cares about media censorship, or if he only cares that one particular group does it? why do YOU people on YOUR side always do this?!?!?! CAN ANY TRUMPETER NOT DEFLECT TO CNN? --- -Only dead fish swim with the current http://error1355.com/ce/spudger.html <cite>spudger posted [p:896312484] in Watching F... [t:76332269]...</cite> <quote><cite>0TiamaT0 posted...</cite> <quote>The real question is if TC actually cares about media censorship, or if he only cares that one particular group does it?</quote> why do YOU people on YOUR side always do this?!?!?! CAN ANY TRUMPETER NOT DEFLECT TO CNN?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Watching Fox News is an exercise in censorship (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Watching Fox News is an exercise in censorship