Current Events > "Resist white supremacy" sign prompts backlash at farm

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
ssj3vegeta2 02/14/18 10:52:25 AM #101:	Why is da admiral like dis? Do you think he learned all dis bad stuff from family relatives or fiends or maybe too much internet browsing? --- http://i.imgur.com/8YZ4i.jpg http://i.imgur.com/205g6FR.gifv http://h-7.abload.de/img/messi02-rm-ucl3ngb.gif http://i.imgur.com/IBJCH6O.jpg <cite>ssj3vegeta2 posted [p:896066307] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote>Why is da admiral like dis? Do you think he learned all dis bad stuff from family relatives or fiends or maybe too much internet browsing?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ammonitida 02/14/18 11:14:43 AM #102:	Darker Cheshire posted... The Admiral posted... Villain posted... Americans killed by the Alt Right/Nazis in 2017: So 0.058% of the murders in the U.S.? Is that the point you're trying to make? More people are killed in gang violence each day. CrimsonRage posted... No, see, conservative victimhood is different because..... Nah, you don't get to have it both ways. If liberals are going to endlessly scream that anyone who supports Trump is a white supremacist or alt-right, people are going to read into signs like this as being typical sour grapes over Trump. Don't like being called on it, don't use such melodramatic rhetoric all the time. So despite a noted uptick in violent crimes related to white supremacy, it's not worth looking into because it's a small portion of overall violent crimes? Can one ignore that it is, in ways, tied to the current politic climate along with the efforts of Richard Spencer and other noted white nationalists? But I suppose you're right. You can't have it both ways. You can't simultaneously say you're for racial profiling and say you're not racist. Any "uptick" based on such a small sample is insignificant. It could just be random fluctuation that one often sees with rare events. In fact, four of the murderers on that list were not even motivated by any alt-right ideology. That would be the Portland killer, Jeremy Christian, who called Trump supporters, "perckerwood hillbilly rednecks pretending they ain't racist". He hated all organized religion, including Christianity, because they "killed his Pagan ancestors". His hate for Islam stemmed from a different belief system (not the alt-right's "Muslims are all terrorists and a threat to Western civilization" rhetoric). The New Mexico school shooter, who killed for reasons not related to any alt-right beliefs. The murderer of Officer Parrish, who was just mental. "Villian" is padding the numbers by including any high profile murder case where the perp had expressed support for alt-right ideology on social media, disregarding the fact that their crimes were not directly related to these beliefs. One could also say there was an "uptick" in "alt-left" murders last year (if you compared the number to the year before). You had the Kansas City serial killer who murdered two people. You had the Fresno shooter who killed three. You had the murder of Jamie Urton. One could also pad this number by including the two cop killers who had left anti-cop and anti-white statements on social media before committing their crimes (though these killings were motivated by the suspects's desire to evade arrest for other crimes). <cite>Ammonitida posted [p:896067477] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darker Cheshire posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Villain posted...</cite> <quote>Americans killed by the Alt Right/Nazis in 2017:</quote> So 0.058% of the murders in the U.S.? Is that the point you're trying to make? More people are killed in gang violence each day. <cite>CrimsonRage posted...</cite> <quote>No, see, conservative victimhood is different because.....</quote> Nah, you don't get to have it both ways. If liberals are going to endlessly scream that anyone who supports Trump is a white supremacist or alt-right, people are going to read into signs like this as being typical sour grapes over Trump. Don't like being called on it, don't use such melodramatic rhetoric all the time.</quote> So despite a noted uptick in violent crimes related to white supremacy, it's not worth looking into because it's a small portion of overall violent crimes? Can one ignore that it is, in ways, tied to the current politic climate along with the efforts of Richard Spencer and other noted white nationalists? But I suppose you're right. You can't have it both ways. You can't simultaneously say you're for racial profiling and say you're not racist.</quote> Any "uptick" based on such a small sample is insignificant. It could just be random fluctuation that one often sees with rare events. In fact, four of the murderers on that list were not even motivated by any alt-right ideology. That would be the Portland killer, Jeremy Christian, who called Trump supporters, "perckerwood hillbilly rednecks pretending they ain't racist". He hated all organized religion, including Christianity, because they "killed his Pagan ancestors". His hate for Islam stemmed from a different belief system (not the alt-right's "Muslims are all terrorists and a threat to Western civilization" rhetoric). The New Mexico school shooter, who killed for reasons not related to any alt-right beliefs. The murderer of Officer Parrish, who was just mental. "Villian" is padding the numbers by including any high profile murder case where the perp had expressed support for alt-right ideology on social media, disregarding the fact that their crimes were not directly related to these beliefs. One could also say there was an "uptick" in "alt-left" murders last year (if you compared the number to the year before). You had the Kansas City serial killer who murdered two people. You had the Fresno shooter who killed three. You had the murder of Jamie Urton. One could also pad this number by including the two cop killers who had left anti-cop and anti-white statements on social media before committing their crimes (though these killings were motivated by the suspects's desire to evade arrest for other crimes).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RebelElite791 02/14/18 11:15:38 AM #103:	Nomadic View posted... Conflict posted... Nomadic View posted... shockthemonkey posted... The Admiral posted... Good. "Resist white supremacy" is not only nonsense, it's typically code by Antifa shitheads and far-leftists to support their violent tantrums. lmao Im so glad youre finally admitting that you have a problem with people who oppose white supremacy Thats not what he said. White supremacy is a red herring phrase for anyone that doesnt agree with far left radical nonsense. Lets say we assume that it is socially acceptable to attack anyone that is labeled a white supremacist. However, there are no rules or guidelines to slapping this label on anyone. So, it becomes a ticket to attack anyone you do not like or disagree with. Just justify the attack with he was a white supremacist! Its that mindset that Admiral opposes, not attacking the ideologies of dictionary definition white supremacists. If Im way off in my inference, let me know, @The_Admiral No that's just your dumbass disingenuous victimized interpretation of it. This sign is pretty straightforward. Would you rather it say "Resist white supremacy, as in the dictionary definition and not 'anyone who doesn't agree with far left radical nonsense'"? When people like Derick Blackman, Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin, Blaire White, and Larry Elder are all grouped in with white supremacists it loses it original meaning and becomes anyone I dont like is a white supremacist! If were talking about dictionary definition actual white supremacists, absolutely, Im right there with you. When when you use the term so broadly that it is basically used as a synonym for conservative then I just cant take the term seriously. What about people who link to the Daily Stormer? Are they white supremacists? --- http://i.imgur.com/MS5SvzN.gif https://i.imgur.com/ahQpG57.jpg <cite>RebelElite791 posted [p:896067531] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>Good. "Resist white supremacy" is not only nonsense, it's typically code by Antifa shitheads and far-leftists to support their violent tantrums.</quote> lmao Im so glad youre finally admitting that you have a problem with people who oppose white supremacy</quote> Thats not what he said. White supremacy is a red herring phrase for anyone that doesnt agree with far left radical nonsense. Lets say we assume that it is socially acceptable to attack anyone that is labeled a white supremacist. However, there are no rules or guidelines to slapping this label on anyone. So, it becomes a ticket to attack anyone you do not like or disagree with. Just justify the attack with he was a white supremacist! Its that mindset that Admiral opposes, not attacking the ideologies of dictionary definition white supremacists. If Im way off in my inference, let me know, @The_Admiral</quote> No that's just your dumbass disingenuous victimized interpretation of it. This sign is pretty straightforward. Would you rather it say "Resist white supremacy, as in the dictionary definition and not 'anyone who doesn't agree with far left radical nonsense'"?</quote> When people like Derick Blackman, Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin, Blaire White, and Larry Elder are all grouped in with white supremacists it loses it original meaning and becomes anyone I dont like is a white supremacist! If were talking about dictionary definition actual white supremacists, absolutely, Im right there with you. When when you use the term so broadly that it is basically used as a synonym for conservative then I just cant take the term seriously.</quote> What about people who link to the Daily Stormer? Are they white supremacists?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 02/14/18 11:16:44 AM #104:	RebelElite791 posted... Nomadic View posted... Conflict posted... Nomadic View posted... shockthemonkey posted... The Admiral posted... Good. "Resist white supremacy" is not only nonsense, it's typically code by Antifa shitheads and far-leftists to support their violent tantrums. lmao Im so glad youre finally admitting that you have a problem with people who oppose white supremacy Thats not what he said. White supremacy is a red herring phrase for anyone that doesnt agree with far left radical nonsense. Lets say we assume that it is socially acceptable to attack anyone that is labeled a white supremacist. However, there are no rules or guidelines to slapping this label on anyone. So, it becomes a ticket to attack anyone you do not like or disagree with. Just justify the attack with he was a white supremacist! Its that mindset that Admiral opposes, not attacking the ideologies of dictionary definition white supremacists. If Im way off in my inference, let me know, @The_Admiral No that's just your dumbass disingenuous victimized interpretation of it. This sign is pretty straightforward. Would you rather it say "Resist white supremacy, as in the dictionary definition and not 'anyone who doesn't agree with far left radical nonsense'"? When people like Derick Blackman, Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin, Blaire White, and Larry Elder are all grouped in with white supremacists it loses it original meaning and becomes anyone I dont like is a white supremacist! If were talking about dictionary definition actual white supremacists, absolutely, Im right there with you. When when you use the term so broadly that it is basically used as a synonym for conservative then I just cant take the term seriously. What about people who link to the Daily Stormer? Are they white supremacists? If done so intentionally, sure. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:896067576] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>Good. "Resist white supremacy" is not only nonsense, it's typically code by Antifa shitheads and far-leftists to support their violent tantrums.</quote> lmao Im so glad youre finally admitting that you have a problem with people who oppose white supremacy</quote> Thats not what he said. White supremacy is a red herring phrase for anyone that doesnt agree with far left radical nonsense. Lets say we assume that it is socially acceptable to attack anyone that is labeled a white supremacist. However, there are no rules or guidelines to slapping this label on anyone. So, it becomes a ticket to attack anyone you do not like or disagree with. Just justify the attack with he was a white supremacist! Its that mindset that Admiral opposes, not attacking the ideologies of dictionary definition white supremacists. If Im way off in my inference, let me know, @The_Admiral</quote> No that's just your dumbass disingenuous victimized interpretation of it. This sign is pretty straightforward. Would you rather it say "Resist white supremacy, as in the dictionary definition and not 'anyone who doesn't agree with far left radical nonsense'"?</quote> When people like Derick Blackman, Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin, Blaire White, and Larry Elder are all grouped in with white supremacists it loses it original meaning and becomes anyone I dont like is a white supremacist! If were talking about dictionary definition actual white supremacists, absolutely, Im right there with you. When when you use the term so broadly that it is basically used as a synonym for conservative then I just cant take the term seriously.</quote> What about people who link to the Daily Stormer? Are they white supremacists?</quote> If done so intentionally, sure.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spudger 02/14/18 11:17:43 AM #105:	The Admiral posted... Good. "Resist white supremacy" is not only nonsense, it's typically code by Antifa shitheads and far-leftists to support their violent tantrums. Conservatives do the same Shit Cmon addy --- -Only dead fish swim with the current http://error1355.com/ce/spudger.html <cite>spudger posted [p:896067623] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>Good. "Resist white supremacy" is not only nonsense, it's typically code by Antifa shitheads and far-leftists to support their violent tantrums.</quote> Conservatives do the same Shit Cmon addy</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NinjaBreakfast 02/14/18 11:18:16 AM #106:	I hate when I accidentally link to the daily stormer! Whoops, my finger slipped! --- http://i.imgur.com/nGZeEqw.png Do you really think you can beat me? <cite>NinjaBreakfast posted [p:896067656] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote>I hate when I accidentally link to the daily stormer! Whoops, my finger slipped!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#107	Post #107 was unavailable or deleted.
_Near_ 02/14/18 11:18:59 AM #108:	Antifar posted... Who, other than a white supremacist, would be offended by a message condemning white supremacy? --- https://i.imgur.com/WyFIJkF.gif This is America, where a lying, cheating degenerate can prosper. <cite>_Near_ posted [p:896067705] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>Who, other than a white supremacist, would be offended by a message condemning white supremacy? </quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_Near_ 02/14/18 11:19:19 AM #109:	ssj3vegeta2 posted... Why is da admiral like dis? Do you think he learned all dis bad stuff from family relatives or fiends or maybe too much internet browsing? he's just a troll --- https://i.imgur.com/WyFIJkF.gif This is America, where a lying, cheating degenerate can prosper. <cite>_Near_ posted [p:896067728] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>ssj3vegeta2 posted...</cite> <quote>Why is da admiral like dis? Do you think he learned all dis bad stuff from family relatives or fiends or maybe too much internet browsing?</quote> he's just a troll</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrisbeeDude 02/14/18 11:21:09 AM #110:	_Near_ posted... Antifar posted... Who, other than a white supremacist, would be offended by a message condemning white supremacy? Don't you get it?! It's code! Granted, the same people who see racism in this raise all sorts of hell when accusations of dogwhistle language are made of others, but when it's white people on the end of it, best believe they're on that! --- alt-right is not synonymous with "white supremacist" or "neo-Nazi,"- The Admiral <cite>FrisbeeDude posted [p:896067827] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>_Near_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>Who, other than a white supremacist, would be offended by a message condemning white supremacy? </quote></quote> Don't you get it?! It's code! Granted, the same people who see racism in this raise all sorts of hell when accusations of dogwhistle language are made of others, but when it's white people on the end of it, best believe they're on that!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NaNaYeeze 02/14/18 11:21:21 AM #111:	Resist Black Supremacy! Resist Antifa! ^_^-7 MAGA!!! --- What's new boss? <cite>NaNaYeeze posted [p:896067840] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote>Resist Black Supremacy! Resist Antifa! ^_^-7 MAGA!!!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#112	Post #112 was unavailable or deleted.
Esrac 02/14/18 11:23:12 AM #113:	Asherlee10 posted... I've scanned some posts in this topic and I'm not seeing what's so bad about this sign. I don't think anyone is talking about the sign anymore. --- http://steamcommunity.com/id/Esrac/wishlist/ <cite>Esrac posted [p:896067956] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote>I've scanned some posts in this topic and I'm not seeing what's so bad about this sign.</quote> I don't think anyone is talking about the sign anymore.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ilovuuu 02/14/18 11:23:47 AM #114:	Asherlee10 posted... I've scanned some posts in this topic and I'm not seeing what's so bad about this sign. why is asherlee always like this? <cite>ilovuuu posted [p:896067989] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote>I've scanned some posts in this topic and I'm not seeing what's so bad about this sign.</quote> why is asherlee always like this?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NinjaBreakfast 02/14/18 11:23:48 AM #115:	FrisbeeDude posted... _Near_ posted... Antifar posted... Who, other than a white supremacist, would be offended by a message condemning white supremacy? Don't you get it?! It's code! Granted, the same people who see racism in this raise all sorts of hell when accusations of dogwhistle language are made of others, but when it's white people on the end of it, best believe they're on that! Quite funny that they're objecting to this on that basis but the painfully and intentionally obtuse/incendiary "it's okay to be white!" faux victimhood stuff was met with responses like 'only racists could oppose this!!!' --- http://i.imgur.com/nGZeEqw.png Do you really think you can beat me? <cite>NinjaBreakfast posted [p:896067990] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>FrisbeeDude posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_Near_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>Who, other than a white supremacist, would be offended by a message condemning white supremacy? </quote></quote> Don't you get it?! It's code! Granted, the same people who see racism in this raise all sorts of hell when accusations of dogwhistle language are made of others, but when it's white people on the end of it, best believe they're on that!</quote> Quite funny that they're objecting to this on that basis but the painfully and intentionally obtuse/incendiary "it's okay to be white!" faux victimhood stuff was met with responses like 'only racists could oppose this!!!'</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#116	Post #116 was unavailable or deleted.
halomonkey1_3_5 02/14/18 11:27:00 AM #117:	ilovuuu posted... Asherlee10 posted... I've scanned some posts in this topic and I'm not seeing what's so bad about this sign. why is asherlee always like this? you mean why is a well adjusted adult making well adjusted posts instead of feeding into the typical CE shit slinging? idk --- Billy Mays: July 20, 1958 - June 28, 2009 The Greatest <cite>halomonkey1_3_5 posted [p:896068154] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>ilovuuu posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote>I've scanned some posts in this topic and I'm not seeing what's so bad about this sign.</quote> why is asherlee always like this?</quote> you mean why is a well adjusted adult making well adjusted posts instead of feeding into the typical CE shit slinging? idk</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#118	Post #118 was unavailable or deleted.
Esrac 02/14/18 11:28:13 AM #119:	Asherlee10 posted... Esrac posted... Asherlee10 posted... I've scanned some posts in this topic and I'm not seeing what's so bad about this sign. I don't think anyone is talking about the sign anymore. More about the existence of white supremacy, then? I think, at this point, it's just two sides raging at each other. --- http://steamcommunity.com/id/Esrac/wishlist/ <cite>Esrac posted [p:896068244] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Esrac posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote>I've scanned some posts in this topic and I'm not seeing what's so bad about this sign.</quote> I don't think anyone is talking about the sign anymore.</quote> More about the existence of white supremacy, then? </quote> I think, at this point, it's just two sides raging at each other.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ilovuuu 02/14/18 11:31:22 AM #120:	oh wow her brownnosers came out in full <cite>ilovuuu posted [p:896068440] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote>oh wow her brownnosers came out in full</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#121	Post #121 was unavailable or deleted.
#122	Post #122 was unavailable or deleted.
cjsdowg 02/14/18 11:35:55 AM #123:	Nomadic View posted... RebelElite791 posted... Nomadic View posted... Conflict posted... Nomadic View posted... shockthemonkey posted... The Admiral posted... Good. "Resist white supremacy" is not only nonsense, it's typically code by Antifa shitheads and far-leftists to support their violent tantrums. lmao Im so glad youre finally admitting that you have a problem with people who oppose white supremacy Thats not what he said. White supremacy is a red herring phrase for anyone that doesnt agree with far left radical nonsense. Lets say we assume that it is socially acceptable to attack anyone that is labeled a white supremacist. However, there are no rules or guidelines to slapping this label on anyone. So, it becomes a ticket to attack anyone you do not like or disagree with. Just justify the attack with he was a white supremacist! Its that mindset that Admiral opposes, not attacking the ideologies of dictionary definition white supremacists. If Im way off in my inference, let me know, @The_Admiral No that's just your dumbass disingenuous victimized interpretation of it. This sign is pretty straightforward. Would you rather it say "Resist white supremacy, as in the dictionary definition and not 'anyone who doesn't agree with far left radical nonsense'"? When people like Derick Blackman, Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin, Blaire White, and Larry Elder are all grouped in with white supremacists it loses it original meaning and becomes anyone I dont like is a white supremacist! If were talking about dictionary definition actual white supremacists, absolutely, Im right there with you. When when you use the term so broadly that it is basically used as a synonym for conservative then I just cant take the term seriously. What about people who link to the Daily Stormer? Are they white supremacists? If done so intentionally, sure. Elder wrote a book call dumb black men( or something to that effect) --- Bender: Well, everybody, I just saved a turtle. What have you done with your lives? <cite>cjsdowg posted [p:896068682] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Conflict posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>Good. "Resist white supremacy" is not only nonsense, it's typically code by Antifa shitheads and far-leftists to support their violent tantrums.</quote> lmao Im so glad youre finally admitting that you have a problem with people who oppose white supremacy</quote> Thats not what he said. White supremacy is a red herring phrase for anyone that doesnt agree with far left radical nonsense. Lets say we assume that it is socially acceptable to attack anyone that is labeled a white supremacist. However, there are no rules or guidelines to slapping this label on anyone. So, it becomes a ticket to attack anyone you do not like or disagree with. Just justify the attack with he was a white supremacist! Its that mindset that Admiral opposes, not attacking the ideologies of dictionary definition white supremacists. If Im way off in my inference, let me know, @The_Admiral</quote> No that's just your dumbass disingenuous victimized interpretation of it. This sign is pretty straightforward. Would you rather it say "Resist white supremacy, as in the dictionary definition and not 'anyone who doesn't agree with far left radical nonsense'"?</quote> When people like Derick Blackman, Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin, Blaire White, and Larry Elder are all grouped in with white supremacists it loses it original meaning and becomes anyone I dont like is a white supremacist! If were talking about dictionary definition actual white supremacists, absolutely, Im right there with you. When when you use the term so broadly that it is basically used as a synonym for conservative then I just cant take the term seriously.</quote> What about people who link to the Daily Stormer? Are they white supremacists?</quote> If done so intentionally, sure.</quote> Elder wrote a book call dumb black men( or something to that effect)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hollow_shrine 02/14/18 11:37:43 AM #124:	Esrac posted... She didn't change teams, she suggested having conversations instead of playing the "no-platform" game that just deepens divides. And the progressive side threw her in the pit. Because by juxtaposing these two things in the same conversation, she's essentially legitimizing it. She's putting them on equal footing, which those arguments don't deserve because they've not done the work. And the people who espouse those ideas never defend their positions, electing instead to move the goalposts and continue arguing. She knows that. She's got years of personal experience with it and she does it anyway. It's the same thing people give CNN shit for, and the reason John Stewart dragged them for years. It's every panel on global climate change you've ever seen, and we have done studies showing that these things don't improve people's understanding of the issues, but mostly complicate them. And she's getting money? Wat. Sis, not only are your theoretically ideological antagonists getting more out of this rhetorically than you, it very much looks like your selling you're platform out for money. --- Whatever happened to standards? Whatever happened to bare minimums? https://i.imgtc.com/7UnK3hx.jpg <cite>hollow_shrine posted [p:896068779] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Esrac posted...</cite> <quote>She didn't change teams, she suggested having conversations instead of playing the "no-platform" game that just deepens divides. And the progressive side threw her in the pit.</quote> Because by juxtaposing these two things in the same conversation, she's essentially legitimizing it. She's putting them on equal footing, which those arguments don't deserve because they've not done the work. And the people who espouse those ideas never defend their positions, electing instead to move the goalposts and continue arguing. She knows that. She's got years of personal experience with it and she does it anyway. It's the same thing people give CNN shit for, and the reason John Stewart dragged them for years. It's every panel on global climate change you've ever seen, and we have done studies showing that these things don't improve people's understanding of the issues, but mostly complicate them. And she's getting money? Wat. Sis, not only are your theoretically ideological antagonists getting more out of this rhetorically than you, it very much looks like your selling you're platform out for money.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ammonitida 02/14/18 11:39:58 AM #125:	hollow_shrine posted... Esrac posted... She didn't change teams, she suggested having conversations instead of playing the "no-platform" game that just deepens divides. And the progressive side threw her in the pit. Because by juxtaposing these two things in the same conversation, she's essentially legitimizing it. She's putting them on equal footing, which those arguments don't deserve because they've not done the work. And the people who espouse those ideas never defend their positions, electing instead to move the goalposts and continue arguing. She knows that. It's the same thing people give CNN shit for, and the reason John Stewart dragged them for years. It's every panel on global climate change you've ever seen, and we have done studies showing that these things don't improve people's understanding of the issues, but mostly complicate them. And she's getting money? Wat. Sis, not only are your theoretically ideological antagonists getting more out of this rhetorically than you, it very much looks like your selling you're platform out for money. I thought it was because she had sex with a guy who was anti-feminist. I remember her complaining about people "attacking" her on social media all because she got laid. <cite>Ammonitida posted [p:896068891] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>hollow_shrine posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Esrac posted...</cite> <quote>She didn't change teams, she suggested having conversations instead of playing the "no-platform" game that just deepens divides. And the progressive side threw her in the pit.</quote> Because by juxtaposing these two things in the same conversation, she's essentially legitimizing it. She's putting them on equal footing, which those arguments don't deserve because they've not done the work. And the people who espouse those ideas never defend their positions, electing instead to move the goalposts and continue arguing. She knows that. It's the same thing people give CNN shit for, and the reason John Stewart dragged them for years. It's every panel on global climate change you've ever seen, and we have done studies showing that these things don't improve people's understanding of the issues, but mostly complicate them. And she's getting money? Wat. Sis, not only are your theoretically ideological antagonists getting more out of this rhetorically than you, it very much looks like your selling you're platform out for money.</quote> I thought it was because she had sex with a guy who was anti-feminist. I remember her complaining about people "attacking" her on social media all because she got laid.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
coolboy11 02/14/18 11:42:59 AM #126:	are these the folks us POC are supposed to work with or nah? --- Sigs are boring <cite>coolboy11 posted [p:896069063] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote>are these the folks us POC are supposed to work with or nah?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ulyanyx 02/14/18 11:44:11 AM #127:	Aaron, a lesbian, had come out to them five years before the upheaval. what? --- Sober from Alcohol since August 4th 2017 <cite>Ulyanyx posted [p:896069153] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote>Aaron, a lesbian, had come out to them five years before the upheaval. what?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Paper_Okami 02/14/18 11:58:55 AM #128:	_Near_ posted... Antifar posted... Who, other than a white supremacist, would be offended by a message condemning white supremacy? this lmao imagine being mad at that message, it says a lot about the people who are. --- "Conceit, arrogance and egotism are the essentials of patriotism"- Emma Goldman "Wimmy Wham Wham Wozzle!" -Slurms MacKenzie <cite>Paper_Okami posted [p:896070005] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>_Near_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>Who, other than a white supremacist, would be offended by a message condemning white supremacy? </quote></quote> this lmao imagine being mad at that message, it says a lot about the people who are.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 02/14/18 12:00:09 PM #129:	Ulyanyx posted... Aaron, a lesbian, had come out to them five years before the upheaval. what? They had gotten into a controversy about rainbow flags. One of them had come out as lesbian five years prior. --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:896070091] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ulyanyx posted...</cite> <quote>Aaron, a lesbian, had come out to them five years before the upheaval. what?</quote> They had gotten into a controversy about rainbow flags. One of them had come out as lesbian five years prior.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 02/14/18 12:01:33 PM #130:	Imagine the type of person you'd have to be for this sign to be controversial. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.4 <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:896070152] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote>Imagine the type of person you'd have to be for this sign to be controversial.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hollow_shrine 02/14/18 12:02:17 PM #131:	Ammonitida posted... I thought it was because she had sex with a guy who was anti-feminist. I remember her complaining about people "attacking" her on social media all because she got laid. This would be the first I'm hearing of it, so I can't credibly dispute that. I have heard these other criticisms though from other video essayists within her ideological sphere. --- Whatever happened to standards? Whatever happened to bare minimums? https://i.imgtc.com/7UnK3hx.jpg <cite>hollow_shrine posted [p:896070192] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote>I thought it was because she had sex with a guy who was anti-feminist. I remember her complaining about people "attacking" her on social media all because she got laid.</quote> This would be the first I'm hearing of it, so I can't credibly dispute that. I have heard these other criticisms though from other video essayists within her ideological sphere.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Esrac 02/14/18 12:13:05 PM #132:	Ammonitida posted... hollow_shrine posted... Esrac posted... She didn't change teams, she suggested having conversations instead of playing the "no-platform" game that just deepens divides. And the progressive side threw her in the pit. Because by juxtaposing these two things in the same conversation, she's essentially legitimizing it. She's putting them on equal footing, which those arguments don't deserve because they've not done the work. And the people who espouse those ideas never defend their positions, electing instead to move the goalposts and continue arguing. She knows that. It's the same thing people give CNN shit for, and the reason John Stewart dragged them for years. It's every panel on global climate change you've ever seen, and we have done studies showing that these things don't improve people's understanding of the issues, but mostly complicate them. And she's getting money? Wat. Sis, not only are your theoretically ideological antagonists getting more out of this rhetorically than you, it very much looks like your selling you're platform out for money. I thought it was because she had sex with a guy who was anti-feminist. I remember her complaining about people "attacking" her on social media all because she got laid. She made a video about talking to the other side (anti-feminists and conservatives) and progressive assholes on social media threw a shit fit. Then it came out that she had started dating YouTuber Chris Ray Gun and they threw an even bigger shit fit and insinuated she doesn't get to date people like him who aren't down with their cause without being a traitor to LGBTQ, women, and PoC folks. On top of the doxxing, miscellaneous harassment, and character assassination they apparently threw at her. She made an appearance on This American Life recently and SJWs bombarded them on Twitter for giving a platform to an alt-right, white supremacist Neo-Nazi. --- http://steamcommunity.com/id/Esrac/wishlist/ <cite>Esrac posted [p:896070816] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hollow_shrine posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Esrac posted...</cite> <quote>She didn't change teams, she suggested having conversations instead of playing the "no-platform" game that just deepens divides. And the progressive side threw her in the pit.</quote> Because by juxtaposing these two things in the same conversation, she's essentially legitimizing it. She's putting them on equal footing, which those arguments don't deserve because they've not done the work. And the people who espouse those ideas never defend their positions, electing instead to move the goalposts and continue arguing. She knows that. It's the same thing people give CNN shit for, and the reason John Stewart dragged them for years. It's every panel on global climate change you've ever seen, and we have done studies showing that these things don't improve people's understanding of the issues, but mostly complicate them. And she's getting money? Wat. Sis, not only are your theoretically ideological antagonists getting more out of this rhetorically than you, it very much looks like your selling you're platform out for money.</quote> I thought it was because she had sex with a guy who was anti-feminist. I remember her complaining about people "attacking" her on social media all because she got laid.</quote> She made a video about talking to the other side (anti-feminists and conservatives) and progressive assholes on social media threw a shit fit. Then it came out that she had started dating YouTuber Chris Ray Gun and they threw an even bigger shit fit and insinuated she doesn't get to date people like him who aren't down with their cause without being a traitor to LGBTQ, women, and PoC folks. On top of the doxxing, miscellaneous harassment, and character assassination they apparently threw at her. She made an appearance on This American Life recently and SJWs bombarded them on Twitter for giving a platform to an alt-right, white supremacist Neo-Nazi.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Axiom 02/14/18 12:19:52 PM #133:	Intro2Logic posted... Antifar posted... The vitriol only intensified in the hours that followed, which baffled Aaron. Who, other than a white supremacist, would be offended by a message condemning white supremacy? Who, indeed? <cite>Axiom posted [p:896071261] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Intro2Logic posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>The vitriol only intensified in the hours that followed, which baffled Aaron. Who, other than a white supremacist, would be offended by a message condemning white supremacy? </quote> Who, indeed?</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hollow_shrine 02/14/18 12:22:27 PM #134:	Esrac posted... Then it came out that she had started dating YouTuber Chris Ray Gun and they threw an even bigger shit fit and insinuated she doesn't get to date people like him who aren't down with their cause without being a traitor to LGBTQ, women, and PoC folks. That's fair. How can you credibly claim to support a cause while carrying on a relationship with someone who actively opposes that cause? It's about as believable as Melania's anti-bullying initiative, or Scoot Pruitt's leadership of the EPA. I'm not condoning doxxing and further harassment, but their criticisms of her are reasonable and deserved. Pay them all dust. EDIT: Like, she does this video talking about intersectionality with Franchesca Ramsey that's really good at summarizing intersections 101, and how important considering those perspective are for making sure your progressive politics do the most good for the most people. How should one interpret this video in the light of her more current actions? These things can't coexist. It's like it's coming from a different person. --- Whatever happened to standards? Whatever happened to bare minimums? https://i.imgtc.com/7UnK3hx.jpg <cite>hollow_shrine posted [p:896071428] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Esrac posted...</cite> <quote>Then it came out that she had started dating YouTuber Chris Ray Gun and they threw an even bigger shit fit and insinuated she doesn't get to date people like him who aren't down with their cause without being a traitor to LGBTQ, women, and PoC folks.</quote> That's fair. How can you credibly claim to support a cause while carrying on a relationship with someone who actively opposes that cause? It's about as believable as Melania's anti-bullying initiative, or Scoot Pruitt's leadership of the EPA. I'm not condoning doxxing and further harassment, but their criticisms of her are reasonable and deserved. Pay them all dust. EDIT: Like, she does this video talking about intersectionality with Franchesca Ramsey that's really good at summarizing intersections 101, and how important considering those perspective are for making sure your progressive politics do the most good for the most people. How should one interpret this video in the light of her more current actions? These things can't coexist. It's like it's coming from a different person.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Esrac 02/14/18 12:42:49 PM #135:	hollow_shrine posted... Esrac posted... Then it came out that she had started dating YouTuber Chris Ray Gun and they threw an even bigger shit fit and insinuated she doesn't get to date people like him who aren't down with their cause without being a traitor to LGBTQ, women, and PoC folks. That's fair. How can you credibly claim to support a cause while carrying on a relationship with someone who actively opposes that cause? It's about as believable as Melania's anti-bullying initiative, or Scoot Pruitt's leadership of the EPA. I'm not condoning doxxing and further harassment, but their criticisms of her are reasonable and deserved. Pay them all dust. EDIT: Like, she does this video talking about intersectionality with Franchesca Ramsey that's really good at summarizing intersections 101, and how important considering those perspective are for making sure your progressive politics do the most good for the most people. How should one interpret this video in the light of her more current actions? These things can't coexist. It's like it's coming from a different person. That's bullshit. You can associate with, even date, people you don't entirely agree with on every subject. And a willingness to debate and converse with ideological opponents, even acknowledging that they might occasionally have a good point, doesn't mean you abandon your own political values. The fact that you can't see how someone can be in a relationship with someone they have political disagreements with is bizarre to me. --- http://steamcommunity.com/id/Esrac/wishlist/ <cite>Esrac posted [p:896072547] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>hollow_shrine posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Esrac posted...</cite> <quote>Then it came out that she had started dating YouTuber Chris Ray Gun and they threw an even bigger shit fit and insinuated she doesn't get to date people like him who aren't down with their cause without being a traitor to LGBTQ, women, and PoC folks.</quote> That's fair. How can you credibly claim to support a cause while carrying on a relationship with someone who actively opposes that cause? It's about as believable as Melania's anti-bullying initiative, or Scoot Pruitt's leadership of the EPA. I'm not condoning doxxing and further harassment, but their criticisms of her are reasonable and deserved. Pay them all dust. EDIT: Like, she does this video talking about intersectionality with Franchesca Ramsey that's really good at summarizing intersections 101, and how important considering those perspective are for making sure your progressive politics do the most good for the most people. How should one interpret this video in the light of her more current actions? These things can't coexist. It's like it's coming from a different person.</quote> That's bullshit. You can associate with, even date, people you don't entirely agree with on every subject. And a willingness to debate and converse with ideological opponents, even acknowledging that they might occasionally have a good point, doesn't mean you abandon your own political values. The fact that you can't see how someone can be in a relationship with someone they have political disagreements with is bizarre to me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ammonitida 02/14/18 12:50:50 PM #136:	Esrac posted... hollow_shrine posted... Esrac posted... Then it came out that she had started dating YouTuber Chris Ray Gun and they threw an even bigger shit fit and insinuated she doesn't get to date people like him who aren't down with their cause without being a traitor to LGBTQ, women, and PoC folks. That's fair. How can you credibly claim to support a cause while carrying on a relationship with someone who actively opposes that cause? It's about as believable as Melania's anti-bullying initiative, or Scoot Pruitt's leadership of the EPA. I'm not condoning doxxing and further harassment, but their criticisms of her are reasonable and deserved. Pay them all dust. EDIT: Like, she does this video talking about intersectionality with Franchesca Ramsey that's really good at summarizing intersections 101, and how important considering those perspective are for making sure your progressive politics do the most good for the most people. How should one interpret this video in the light of her more current actions? These things can't coexist. It's like it's coming from a different person. That's bullshit. You can associate with, even date, people you don't entirely agree with on every subject. And a willingness to debate and converse with ideological opponents, even acknowledging that they might occasionally have a good point, doesn't mean you abandon your own political values. The fact that you can't see how someone can be in a relationship with someone they have political disagreements with is bizarre to me. But were they even in a boyfriend/girlfriend type relationship? I recall it being strictly a sexual thing. You can hate-fuck someone too. Azealia Banks did it with white men. <cite>Ammonitida posted [p:896072996] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Esrac posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hollow_shrine posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Esrac posted...</cite> <quote>Then it came out that she had started dating YouTuber Chris Ray Gun and they threw an even bigger shit fit and insinuated she doesn't get to date people like him who aren't down with their cause without being a traitor to LGBTQ, women, and PoC folks.</quote> That's fair. How can you credibly claim to support a cause while carrying on a relationship with someone who actively opposes that cause? It's about as believable as Melania's anti-bullying initiative, or Scoot Pruitt's leadership of the EPA. I'm not condoning doxxing and further harassment, but their criticisms of her are reasonable and deserved. Pay them all dust. EDIT: Like, she does this video talking about intersectionality with Franchesca Ramsey that's really good at summarizing intersections 101, and how important considering those perspective are for making sure your progressive politics do the most good for the most people. How should one interpret this video in the light of her more current actions? These things can't coexist. It's like it's coming from a different person.</quote> That's bullshit. You can associate with, even date, people you don't entirely agree with on every subject. And a willingness to debate and converse with ideological opponents, even acknowledging that they might occasionally have a good point, doesn't mean you abandon your own political values. The fact that you can't see how someone can be in a relationship with someone they have political disagreements with is bizarre to me.</quote> But were they even in a boyfriend/girlfriend type relationship? I recall it being strictly a sexual thing. You can hate-fuck someone too. Azealia Banks did it with white men.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Esrac 02/14/18 12:52:13 PM #137:	Ammonitida posted... Esrac posted... hollow_shrine posted... Esrac posted... Then it came out that she had started dating YouTuber Chris Ray Gun and they threw an even bigger shit fit and insinuated she doesn't get to date people like him who aren't down with their cause without being a traitor to LGBTQ, women, and PoC folks. That's fair. How can you credibly claim to support a cause while carrying on a relationship with someone who actively opposes that cause? It's about as believable as Melania's anti-bullying initiative, or Scoot Pruitt's leadership of the EPA. I'm not condoning doxxing and further harassment, but their criticisms of her are reasonable and deserved. Pay them all dust. EDIT: Like, she does this video talking about intersectionality with Franchesca Ramsey that's really good at summarizing intersections 101, and how important considering those perspective are for making sure your progressive politics do the most good for the most people. How should one interpret this video in the light of her more current actions? These things can't coexist. It's like it's coming from a different person. That's bullshit. You can associate with, even date, people you don't entirely agree with on every subject. And a willingness to debate and converse with ideological opponents, even acknowledging that they might occasionally have a good point, doesn't mean you abandon your own political values. The fact that you can't see how someone can be in a relationship with someone they have political disagreements with is bizarre to me. But were they even in a boyfriend/girlfriend type relationship? I recall it being strictly a sexual thing. You can hate-fuck someone too. Azealia Banks did it with white men. Nah. They're dating. They've appeared in videos together several times. --- http://steamcommunity.com/id/Esrac/wishlist/ <cite>Esrac posted [p:896073073] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Esrac posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hollow_shrine posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Esrac posted...</cite> <quote>Then it came out that she had started dating YouTuber Chris Ray Gun and they threw an even bigger shit fit and insinuated she doesn't get to date people like him who aren't down with their cause without being a traitor to LGBTQ, women, and PoC folks.</quote> That's fair. How can you credibly claim to support a cause while carrying on a relationship with someone who actively opposes that cause? It's about as believable as Melania's anti-bullying initiative, or Scoot Pruitt's leadership of the EPA. I'm not condoning doxxing and further harassment, but their criticisms of her are reasonable and deserved. Pay them all dust. EDIT: Like, she does this video talking about intersectionality with Franchesca Ramsey that's really good at summarizing intersections 101, and how important considering those perspective are for making sure your progressive politics do the most good for the most people. How should one interpret this video in the light of her more current actions? These things can't coexist. It's like it's coming from a different person.</quote> That's bullshit. You can associate with, even date, people you don't entirely agree with on every subject. And a willingness to debate and converse with ideological opponents, even acknowledging that they might occasionally have a good point, doesn't mean you abandon your own political values. The fact that you can't see how someone can be in a relationship with someone they have political disagreements with is bizarre to me.</quote> But were they even in a boyfriend/girlfriend type relationship? I recall it being strictly a sexual thing. You can hate-fuck someone too. Azealia Banks did it with white men.</quote> Nah. They're dating. They've appeared in videos together several times.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
treewojima 02/14/18 12:53:27 PM #138:	I used to go to Cox Farms all the time as a kid, both for groceries and their annual Halloween festival. They're awesome. <cite>treewojima posted [p:896073136] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote>I used to go to Cox Farms all the time as a kid, both for groceries and their annual Halloween festival. They're awesome.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Villain 02/14/18 12:54:29 PM #139:	The Admiral posted... Villain posted... Americans killed by the Alt Right/Nazis in 2017: So 0.058% of the murders in the U.S.? Is that the point you're trying to make? More people are killed in gang violence each day. CrimsonRage posted... No, see, conservative victimhood is different because..... Nah, you don't get to have it both ways. If liberals are going to endlessly scream that anyone who supports Trump is a white supremacist or alt-right, people are going to read into signs like this as being typical sour grapes over Trump. Don't like being called on it, don't use such melodramatic rhetoric all the time. You were the one who brought up antifa and started to whine about them. --- http://i.imgur.com/ZWNgMXL.jpg Formerly known as Will VIIII <cite>Villain posted [p:896073199] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Villain posted...</cite> <quote>Americans killed by the Alt Right/Nazis in 2017:</quote> So 0.058% of the murders in the U.S.? Is that the point you're trying to make? More people are killed in gang violence each day. <cite>CrimsonRage posted...</cite> <quote>No, see, conservative victimhood is different because.....</quote> Nah, you don't get to have it both ways. If liberals are going to endlessly scream that anyone who supports Trump is a white supremacist or alt-right, people are going to read into signs like this as being typical sour grapes over Trump. Don't like being called on it, don't use such melodramatic rhetoric all the time.</quote> You were the one who brought up antifa and started to whine about them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NINExATExSEVEN 02/14/18 12:58:18 PM #140:	"Black people do not have the institutional power in our society to benefit from so-called black supremacy. It just doesnt work like that. I love this excuse. They act like black people can't be racist because they have no power. Do these people think that all white people have some form of power to oppress people? --- Listen to my story... This... May be our last chance... <cite>NINExATExSEVEN posted [p:896073400] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote>"Black people do not have the institutional power in our society to benefit from so-called black supremacy. It just doesnt work like that. I love this excuse. They act like black people can't be racist because they have no power. Do these people think that all white people have some form of power to oppress people?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ultimate reaver 02/14/18 12:58:19 PM #141:	How hopelessly out of touch do you have to be to think "white supremacy is bad" is a dogwhistle for some sort of evil scheme or violence? Jesus. --- butts <cite>ultimate reaver posted [p:896073402] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote>How hopelessly out of touch do you have to be to think "white supremacy is bad" is a dogwhistle for some sort of evil scheme or violence? Jesus.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hollow_shrine 02/14/18 1:15:38 PM #142:	Esrac posted... You can associate with, even date, people you don't entirely agree with on every subject. But it's not just 'every subject;' that's being dismissive. It's politics explicitly legitimizing the experiences of everyone who has been disenfranchised by society specifically because of who/what they are (woman, latinx, gay, neuro-atypical, TGNC, disabled, etc). Many of these questions and how they're treated inform our sense of ethics, civics, the responsibilities we have to our neighbors and ourselves, and what we want for our futures. You're talking like these or related politics don't influence several parts of your daily life, but they do. People enfranchised by the status quo can conveniently ignore it, that's their privilege should they choose to exercise it. The rest of us live in the double consciousness, aware of the status quo and ways we fall outside it. Ms. Green is trying to straddle the line between choosing that bubble and popping it, but it doesn't work that way. If she still wants to be seen as an advocate for these causes, she needs to walk the walk in addition to talking the talk. The bare minimum here is not shacking up with people who's political beliefs dehumanize or erase people like you. Ammonitida posted... But were they even in a boyfriend/girlfriend type relationship? I recall it being strictly a sexual thing. You can hate-fuck someone too. Azealia Banks did it with white men. Is Azealia Banks really the ruler by which we want to measure ourselves here, because that's a wake up call, sis. --- Whatever happened to standards? Whatever happened to bare minimums? https://i.imgtc.com/7UnK3hx.jpg <cite>hollow_shrine posted [p:896074344] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Esrac posted...</cite> <quote>You can associate with, even date, people you don't entirely agree with on every subject.</quote> But it's not just 'every subject;' that's being dismissive. It's politics explicitly legitimizing the experiences of everyone who has been disenfranchised by society specifically because of who/what they are (woman, latinx, gay, neuro-atypical, TGNC, disabled, etc). Many of these questions and how they're treated inform our sense of ethics, civics, the responsibilities we have to our neighbors and ourselves, and what we want for our futures. You're talking like these or related politics don't influence several parts of your daily life, but they do. People enfranchised by the status quo can conveniently ignore it, that's their privilege should they choose to exercise it. The rest of us live in the double consciousness, aware of the status quo and ways we fall outside it. Ms. Green is trying to straddle the line between choosing that bubble and popping it, but it doesn't work that way. If she still wants to be seen as an advocate for these causes, she needs to walk the walk in addition to talking the talk. The bare minimum here is not shacking up with people who's political beliefs dehumanize or erase people like you. <cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote>But were they even in a boyfriend/girlfriend type relationship? I recall it being strictly a sexual thing. You can hate-fuck someone too. Azealia Banks did it with white men.</quote> Is Azealia Banks really the ruler by which we want to measure ourselves here, because that's a wake up call, sis.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Esrac 02/14/18 1:46:25 PM #143:	hollow_shrine posted... Esrac posted... You can associate with, even date, people you don't entirely agree with on every subject. But it's not just 'every subject;' that's being dismissive. It's politics explicitly legitimizing the experiences of everyone who has been disenfranchised by society specifically because of who/what they are (woman, latinx, gay, neuro-atypical, TGNC, disabled, etc). Many of these questions and how they're treated inform our sense of ethics, civics, the responsibilities we have to our neighbors and ourselves, and what we want for our futures. You're talking like these or related politics don't influence several parts of your daily life, but they do. People enfranchised by the status quo can conveniently ignore it, that's their privilege should they choose to exercise it. The rest of us live in the double consciousness, aware of the status quo and ways we fall outside it. Ms. Green is trying to straddle the line between choosing that bubble and popping it, but it doesn't work that way. If she still wants to be seen as an advocate for these causes, she needs to walk the walk in addition to talking the talk. The bare minimum here is not shacking up with people who's political beliefs dehumanize or erase people like you. I'm being dismissive because your position hasn't been worth anything beyond dismissal. We get it, you want to police who a woman can have a relationship with if the person they want to date isn't on your political side. As if they can't have personal qualities beyond their political positions. You don't get to decide what counts as the bare minimum. Who she decides to date has no bearing on whether or not she can support or advocate for social justice causes and willingness to debate or converse with anti-sjw, anti-pc types doesn't detract from that. Maybe we should disengage from this conversation for a bit. I'm trying to keep it civil, but I'm having an increasingly difficult time not being openly hostile toward you and I'd rather not get so antagonistic. You're probably not trying to, but the message I keep getting from you in regard to her harassment is "she deserves it for associating with the anti-sjw crowd" and it irks me how often the Left will turn a blind eye to other progressive folks behaving badly. Trying not to get too riled up, you see. --- http://steamcommunity.com/id/Esrac/wishlist/ <cite>Esrac posted [p:896076195] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>hollow_shrine posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Esrac posted...</cite> <quote>You can associate with, even date, people you don't entirely agree with on every subject.</quote> But it's not just 'every subject;' that's being dismissive. It's politics explicitly legitimizing the experiences of everyone who has been disenfranchised by society specifically because of who/what they are (woman, latinx, gay, neuro-atypical, TGNC, disabled, etc). Many of these questions and how they're treated inform our sense of ethics, civics, the responsibilities we have to our neighbors and ourselves, and what we want for our futures. You're talking like these or related politics don't influence several parts of your daily life, but they do. People enfranchised by the status quo can conveniently ignore it, that's their privilege should they choose to exercise it. The rest of us live in the double consciousness, aware of the status quo and ways we fall outside it. Ms. Green is trying to straddle the line between choosing that bubble and popping it, but it doesn't work that way. If she still wants to be seen as an advocate for these causes, she needs to walk the walk in addition to talking the talk. The bare minimum here is not shacking up with people who's political beliefs dehumanize or erase people like you. </quote> I'm being dismissive because your position hasn't been worth anything beyond dismissal. We get it, you want to police who a woman can have a relationship with if the person they want to date isn't on your political side. As if they can't have personal qualities beyond their political positions. You don't get to decide what counts as the bare minimum. Who she decides to date has no bearing on whether or not she can support or advocate for social justice causes and willingness to debate or converse with anti-sjw, anti-pc types doesn't detract from that. Maybe we should disengage from this conversation for a bit. I'm trying to keep it civil, but I'm having an increasingly difficult time not being openly hostile toward you and I'd rather not get so antagonistic. You're probably not trying to, but the message I keep getting from you in regard to her harassment is "she deserves it for associating with the anti-sjw crowd" and it irks me how often the Left will turn a blind eye to other progressive folks behaving badly. Trying not to get too riled up, you see.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 02/14/18 1:48:20 PM #144:	The Admiral posted... Good. "Resist white supremacy" is not only nonsense, it's typically code by Antifa shitheads and far-leftists to support their violent tantrums. While that can be true, the take-away message is that the person found it "not inclusive"... uh... I could see if they stuck to "we don't want to see any signs" or something, but the logic is flawed. --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:896076311] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>Good. "Resist white supremacy" is not only nonsense, it's typically code by Antifa shitheads and far-leftists to support their violent tantrums.</quote> While that can be true, the take-away message is that the person found it "not inclusive"... uh... I could see if they stuck to "we don't want to see any signs" or something, but the logic is flawed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mustang90 02/14/18 1:48:58 PM #145:	Its about time red hats are controlled. <cite>mustang90 posted [p:896076355] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote>Its about time red hats are controlled.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 02/14/18 1:57:02 PM #146:	mustang90 posted... Its about time red hats are controlled. Oh great, ROD is back. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:896076849] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>mustang90 posted...</cite> <quote>Its about time red hats are controlled.</quote> Oh great, ROD is back.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Paper_Okami 02/14/18 2:10:01 PM #147:	lmao imagine getting mad about that sign. --- "Conceit, arrogance and egotism are the essentials of patriotism"- Emma Goldman "Wimmy Wham Wham Wozzle!" -Slurms MacKenzie <cite>Paper_Okami posted [p:896077659] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote>lmao imagine getting mad about that sign.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bishop9800 02/14/18 2:16:47 PM #148:	Paper_Okami posted... lmao imagine getting mad about that sign. Looks like the usual suspects are. --- I don't have to insult you. I have proven that you are a hypocrite and a fool. That's not insulting you, that's exposing you. PSN-Bishop9800 <cite>Bishop9800 posted [p:896078032] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>Paper_Okami posted...</cite> <quote>lmao imagine getting mad about that sign.</quote> Looks like the usual suspects are.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sktgamer_13dude 02/14/18 2:31:13 PM #149:	Oh look, Admiral race baiting, hating on minorities, backing up white supremacy, and shitposting. Must be a day ending in -y. --- http://i.imgur.com/jWVrg9U.gif http://i.imgur.com/g2efUtT.jpg http://i.imgur.com/5dOwhaP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/LVdqu8J.gif Go Cougs and M's #DI4B <cite>sktgamer_13dude posted [p:896078893] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote>Oh look, Admiral race baiting, hating on minorities, backing up white supremacy, and shitposting. Must be a day ending in -y.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 02/14/18 2:42:29 PM #150:	sktgamer_13dude posted... Oh look, Admiral race baiting, hating on minorities, backing up white supremacy, and shitposting. Must be a day ending in -y. Oh look, sktgamer_13yo_dude failing at reading comprehension again. Must be a day ending in -y. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:896079575] in "Resi... [t:76317871]...</cite> <quote><cite>sktgamer_13dude posted...</cite> <quote>Oh look, Admiral race baiting, hating on minorities, backing up white supremacy, and shitposting. Must be a day ending in -y.</quote> Oh look, sktgamer_13yo_dude failing at reading comprehension again. Must be a day ending in -y.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Current Events > "Resist white supremacy" sign prompts backlash at farm (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > "Resist white supremacy" sign prompts backlash at farm