Board 8 > Another hollywood scumbag exposed for sexual assault

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://twitter.com/i/moments/952390120157601792

https://babe.net/2018/01/13/aziz-ansari-28355

A self-proclaimed "feminist"... Not surprising in the slightest. If you are warped about some things, you will usually be warped about other, scarier ones, too.
---

If you have money or notoriety, sexual assault charges are being brought up.

Sadly this whole movement is caught on to the quick buck people who want those settlements. Or want to mess with someone politically.
And that undermines the real cases.
---

Man does Bulgaria get its news 24 hours later or something?
---

Although I'm surprised you think it's assault. I'm pretty sure the situation she described is exactly how you wooed the future Mrs Vlado.
---

TheRock1525 posted...

how you wooed the future Mrs Vlado.

Did Vlado get divorced?
---

Stop posting topics that already exist
---

Does Vlado keep going with the scumbag Hollywood globalist angle or does he change tracks to calling out women for making up sexual assault charges because society hates men

Either way it's a win for freedom
---

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-15/fbi-probe-russian-uranium-bribes-concealed-obama-doj-mueller-mccabe-rosenstein

The fire rises...
---

And here's how crazy the "Russian hackers!!!!!!" people are:

https://www.rt.com/news/416007-chelsea-manning-russia-claims/

Remember, some of you literally believe in these people's fanfiction.
---

ClyTheCool posted...

Does Vlado keep going with the scumbag Hollywood globalist angle or does he change tracks to calling out women for making up sexual assault charges because society hates men

Either way it's a win for freedom

Hollywood is higher up the chain of evil for alt-righters. Too many Jewish people.
---

I'm impressed how fast this topic turned into Russia.
---

OliviaTremor posted...

I'm impressed how fast this topic turned into Russia.

Probably because his fellow nationalists told him "no we're on Aziz's side."
---

Vlado posted...

And here's how crazy the "Russian hackers!!!!!!" people are:

https://www.rt.com/news/416007-chelsea-manning-russia-claims/

Remember, some of you literally believe in these people's fanfiction.

is rt exclusively articles about random peoples' tweets

But McKew isnt alone in her bold statements. A person by the name of Josh Manning, whose Twitter account says he is a civil rights investigator and something to do with Army intel, seems to believe the same.

this is such a nothing story that even the author is downplaying the significance of his second example... this is just some completely irrelevant dude

it almost seems like Russia Today has an agenda to make people critical of Russia seem crazy
---

MoogleKupo141 posted...

random peoples' tweets

lmfao, suuuuuuuuure. Totally "random" deep state agents - both a bigwig democrat and a neocon, at that. Another proof that the two party establishments actually play on the same team and the election charades since at least the 80s and up until Trump came along were just to fool people like you.

TheRock1525 posted...

Probably because his fellow nationalists told him "no we're on Aziz's side."

Nope. We do not support sexual assault.
---

Good thing Ansari wasn't accused of sexual assault then.

It is hilarious to see Vlado link to Babe.com though.
---

Lightning Strikes posted...

wasn't accused of sexual assault

lmfao, another semantic warrior? Never thought I'd see a partner for Lasa spawn here.
---

ANOTHER hollywood pedo exposed!

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/01/14/eliza-dushku-true-lies-stunt-coordinator-joel-kramer-molested-me-when-was-12.html

Lasa/LS: "That's not a pedo, that's an ephoebephile!" (because it's REAAAAAAAALLLY important to use the most specific term possible when condemning sexual and child molesters)
---

using incorrect terms is always wrong, yes. not sure why this isn't the case when condemning sexual and child molesters.
---

If I say "a dog" instead of "a golden retriever," that's not wrong, genius.
---

uh, that's totally different. it's more like saying "a golden retriever" instead of "a bulldog."
---

Uh, no. A pedo is still a pedo if he targets a 12-year-old. Deal with it.
---

well yeah, if you're attracted to 12 year olds you are a pedo. ephebophilia is attraction to people aged 15-19.

still doesn't mean you should use the word "pedophile" when you're talking about ephebophiles, though.
---

What if they're 14 years and 364 days old?
---

obviously "ages 15-19" is a rough approximation. if an adult guy is attracted to a girl who is 14 but looks 16 he'd probably qualify as an ephebophile, even if he's technically a pedophile.
---

Vlado posted...

What if they're 14 years and 364 days old?

Then you're president of the united states
---

Vlado posted...

Nope.

Yup. The anti-#metoo movement is largely fueled by conservative groups on your side. They use this article as damning against the entire movement.
---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

obviously "ages 15-19" is a rough approximation. if an adult guy is attracted to a girl who is 14 but looks 16 he'd probably qualify as an ephebophile, even if he's technically a pedophile.

Pedophilia stops at 13.
---

Pedophilia stops at puberty. Man it's like you guys haven't even looked deeply into the actual legality of this for the sake of avoiding as much jail time as possible.
---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

obviously "ages 15-19" is a rough approximation. if an adult guy is attracted to a girl who is 14 but looks 16 he'd probably qualify as an ephebophile, even if he's technically a pedophile.

lel, so you're only incredibly strict and specific when it comes to condemning the pedos. If it's about defending them, you're all lax.

TheRock1525 posted...

Vlado posted...

Nope.

Yup. The anti-#metoo movement is largely fueled by conservative groups on your side. They use this article as damning against the entire movement.

Don't try to lump me in with any scumbags calling themselves "conservative." Do I look like I'm on the same camp with neocon warmongers, for example? Nope, that would be the clinton cabal "democrats" you worship.

TheRock1525 posted...

Mr Lasastryke posted...

obviously "ages 15-19" is a rough approximation. if an adult guy is attracted to a girl who is 14 but looks 16 he'd probably qualify as an ephebophile, even if he's technically a pedophile.

Pedophilia stops at 13.

lel, fight it out.
---

Vlado posted...

Don't try to lump me in with any scumbags calling themselves "conservative."

So Breitbart is full of neocons, too? Cause they're attacking the woman as much as Aziz, saying Aziz didn't do anything wrong but saying he deserved it because he's a liberal.
---

If you defended Roy Moore and claimed the accusations against him were false, partisan attacks, you shouldnt be calling anyone ELSE out for defending pedophiles.
---

Vlado's kids can explain to him what pedophilia is
---

Vlado posted...

lel, so you're only incredibly strict and specific when it comes to condemning the pedos. If it's about defending them, you're all lax.

what the fuck are you even talking about? i'm always the same amount of strict or specific or lax. to use the inversed version of my previous example, if an adult guy is attracted to a 16 year old girl who looks 12, he could very well be a pedophile.
---

lmfao, suuuuuuuuure. Totally "random" deep state agents - both a bigwig democrat and a neocon, at that. Another proof that the two party establishments actually play on the same team and the election charades since at least the 80s and up until Trump came along were just to fool people like you.

random in the sense that they're nobodies who almost no one reading the article would have heard of before. Some dude with 7,000 twitter follower's opinion on a thing is not news.
---

Espeon posted...

If you defended Roy Moore and claimed the accusations against him were false, partisan attacks, you shouldnt be calling anyone ELSE out for defending pedophiles.

If you believe accusations popping up 30 years after the alleged event and right in the middle of a campaign, against one of the candidates, are real, then lmfao. No wonder you believe the "Russian hackers" idiocy.
---

and yeah, pedophilia does end at 13. i didn't put much thought into the "15-19" thing, just said it to explain the incredibly simple concept of there indeed being a difference between pedophilia and ephebophilia (apparently it's still too difficult for vlado to grasp, though).
---

It's not "difficult to grasp." "Ephoebephiles" are a subset of pedos.
---

did roy moore deny that he dated a 14 year old girl when he was an adult?
---

Vlado posted...

Espeon posted...

If you defended Roy Moore and claimed the accusations against him were false, partisan attacks, you shouldnt be calling anyone ELSE out for defending pedophiles.

If you believe accusations popping up 30 years after the alleged event and right in the middle of a campaign, against one of the candidates, are real, then lmfao. No wonder you believe the "Russian hackers" idiocy.

all of the Hollywood accusations are coming out years after the fact too, but you seem to have no problem believing them.
What's the practical difference between 30 years for Moore and like 30 years for Eliza Dushku accusing the stunt guy? They're both coming out now because a larger movement has given women the confidence to publicly call out their assailants.
---

Vlado posted...

Espeon posted...

If you defended Roy Moore and claimed the accusations against him were false, partisan attacks, you shouldnt be calling anyone ELSE out for defending pedophiles.

If you believe accusations popping up 30 years after the alleged event and right in the middle of a campaign, against one of the candidates, are real, then lmfao. No wonder you believe the "Russian hackers" idiocy.

So the Seth Rich assassination accusations in the middle of the presidential campaign against Hillary Clinton were fake then?

More importantly, Alabama is one of the reddest, most conservative strongholds in America. Why exactly do you think it would be worth it to fake accusations against the Republican candidate in a state like that? Seriously, if youre gonna fake allegations, why not try it in Montana or South Carolina, where the Democratic candidate wasnt automatically considered dead in the water? Your logic only works if Democrats are both stupid AND masterminds at the same time. Its like the accusation of voter fraud by the millions in a state Hillary was guaranteed to win. Its just nonsense to keep people like you from questioning your own beliefs.
---

Vlado posted...

It's not "difficult to grasp." "Ephoebephiles" are a subset of pedos.

apparently it is because you're still not getting it.

pedophilia = sexual attraction to children
ephebophilia = sexual attraction to mid-to-late adolescents

so again, ephebophilia is not a "subset" of anything. pedophilia = golden retrievers, ephebophilia = bulldogs.

seriously, this is so simple. how the fuck are not getting it? i can't imagine someone graduating from college and having this much trouble with a concept that's as simple as 1+1=2.

also, lol at you misspelling ephebophilia and putting it in quotation marks, as if it's just some stupid thing i made up. you get that it's an existing word that you can look up in the dictionary, right?
---

Vlado posted...

Lightning Strikes posted...

wasn't accused of sexual assault

lmfao, another semantic warrior? Never thought I'd see a partner for Lasa spawn here.

Read the article.

I fully support people coming out against their abusers but this ain't it.
---

Pedos are people attracted to children. Just because a child turns 13 or whatever arbitrary age you set does not suddenly make a person attracted to that child not a pedo.

MoogleKupo141 posted...

What's the practical difference between 30 years for Moore and like 30 years for Eliza Dushku accusing the stunt guy?

One just happened to be in the middle of a political campaign. What a "coincidence." lmfao
---

What do you think of Roy Moore saying America's peak was during slavery?
---

Isn't the age of consent like 14 in Bulgaria

Seginustemple posted...

Isn't the age of consent like 14 in Bulgaria

Yup.
---

MoogleKupo141 posted...

Vlado posted...

Espeon posted...

If you defended Roy Moore and claimed the accusations against him were false, partisan attacks, you shouldnt be calling anyone ELSE out for defending pedophiles.

If you believe accusations popping up 30 years after the alleged event and right in the middle of a campaign, against one of the candidates, are real, then lmfao. No wonder you believe the "Russian hackers" idiocy.

all of the Hollywood accusations are coming out years after the fact too, but you seem to have no problem believing them.
What's the practical difference between 30 years for Moore and like 30 years for Eliza Dushku accusing the stunt guy? They're both coming out now because a larger movement has given women the confidence to publicly call out their assailants.

Practical difference: the Hollywood guy isnt a pedophile that Vlado agrees with, politically.
---

Vlado posted...

Pedos are people attracted to children. Just because a child turns 13 or whatever arbitrary age you set does not suddenly make a person attracted to that child not a pedo.

MoogleKupo141 posted...

What's the practical difference between 30 years for Moore and like 30 years for Eliza Dushku accusing the stunt guy?

One just happened to be in the middle of a political campaign. What a "coincidence." lmfao

the movement and the campaign are a coincidence, the accusers coming out during the campaign aren't. If you see the guy who pedophiled you on national tv trying to attain a position of power, it's reasonable to speak up then to say "hey don't elect this guy, he pedophiled me".
---

To Vlado, all accusations of impropriety are true, unless directed at people he supports.
---

They were fake accusations fabricated in order to hurt the guy's chances of election.
---