Board 8 > Another hollywood scumbag exposed for sexual assault

(+) Yeah! (+)

Vlado posted...

BTW, here's a nice response from an educated man destroying the "science!!!!!!!" religious fanatics:

...are you calling people who believe in science "religious fanatics"?
---

foolm0r0n posted...

Woah, Vlado is actually acknowledging and defending Trump's pro-globalism?

it's not that great because he's still arguing that trump doesn't WANT to be pro-globalism but he has no choice, as if he'd immediately die if he didn't do pro-globalism stuff or something.

it's like how stefan molyneux states that trump isn't fighting the deep state hard enough, but this is because "his supporters aren't supporting him enough" and "a king without an army can't do anything." the trump worshipers recognize that trump is doing stuff they dislike, but since trump is perfect it's always someone else's fault that he's doing this stuff.
---

Oh yeah, it's a bad argument and he's casting Trump as the same kind of weak establishment politician that he supposedly hates. But at least it's a real argument from his own brain.
---

Vlado posted...

It's not about "being afraid," it's about not attacking those who occasionally help you, however little. Especially in the face of antagonism from every other media, simply because he won on a message of anti-globalism.

He ran on a message of racism and xenophobia. His answer to everything was "believe me, I'll fix it" despite giving absolutely no indication he had a plan to fix whatever it was he was talking about, that he understood the problem and all its complexities, or even that there was a reason to believe him on any topic.
---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

...are you calling people who believe in science "religious fanatics"?

Read the article. The "people" who blindly believe in "science" and do not realise the simple fact that to engage in science means to constantly doubt, and that new facts change established theories daily, are religious fanatics, yes. They simply think they're edgy having "rejected" God, but they're still human so they still have an innermost need to believe in something blindly. Since they have "rejected" God, they turn to science. Not realising that science is not a God.

Neither is "equality," by the way.

Mr Lasastryke posted...

it's like how stefan molyneux states that trump isn't fighting the deep state hard enough, but this is because "his supporters aren't supporting him enough" and "a king without an army can't do anything." the trump worshipers recognize that trump is doing stuff they dislike, but since trump is perfect it's always someone else's fault that he's doing this stuff.

It's not about the "supporters," as in people who voted for him. It's about senators, congressmen, alphabet agencies, the military. You know, people with actual power. Trump needs to win a critical mass of those over in order to carry out actual change. ACTUAL power is the only way to carry out actual change, and being president of the US alone is far from enough ACTUAL power for that.

Not_an_Owl posted...

He ran on a message of racism and xenophobia.

You're not worth talking to. Bye.
---

Vlado posted...

You're not worth talking to. Bye.

Don't end sentences with prepositions, you ESL kid.
---

Vlado posted...

You're not worth talking to. Bye.

Please explain how "we're going to build a bigass wall on the border to keep out those scary, scary, murdering, rapist immigrants" is not a xenophobic plan.
---

Vlado posted...

It's not about the "supporters," as in people who voted for him. It's about senators, congressmen, alphabet agencies, the military. You know, people with actual power.

uh, in the video i was referencing molyneux specifically angrily calls out the people who are watching him for not supporting trump enough. pretty sure that means he's talking about trump's supporters, unless he's megalomaniacal enough to believe that senators and congressmen are watching his videos (not out of the question, i guess).
---

Dikembe Mutumbo
---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

Vlado posted...

It's not about the "supporters," as in people who voted for him. It's about senators, congressmen, alphabet agencies, the military. You know, people with actual power.

uh, in the video i was referencing molyneux specifically angrily calls out the people who are watching him for not supporting trump enough. pretty sure that means he's talking about trump's supporters, unless he's megalomaniacal enough to believe that senators and congressmen are watching his videos (not out of the question, i guess).

That's Molyneux's problem. You were saying I meant the same thing. I explained that you were wrong, and I meant people with power.
---

i didn't mean to imply you were arguing the exact same thing as molyneux. the arguments are only tangentially related.
---

Vlado posted...

You're not worth talking to. Bye.

Who here is worth talking to?
---