Current Events > Ted Cruz MAKES FUN of "Snowflake" net neutrality supporter!!

Topic List	Page List: 1
Damn_Underscore 12/15/17 10:11:17 PM #1:	Do you agree with Ted Cruz? Yes No View Results --- Shenmue II = best game of all time Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:892300918] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote> Do you agree with Ted Cruz? Yes No View Results </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kolibri X 12/15/17 10:36:58 PM #2:	Propaganda from the giant golden boy tech corporations that support NN, too. You know, that ones that have been throttling traffic, prioritizing paid advertisements in search results, blacklisting websites and users for undesirable opinions. Because THEY know what's best for the internet. They've done such a fantastic job of making the internet so open and free and fair, huh. Also, fuck Cruz. --- Platinum GameFAQs Member http://i.imgur.com/VgwI8qO.gif <cite>Kolibri X posted [p:892302097] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>Propaganda from the giant golden boy tech corporations that support NN, too. You know, that ones that have been throttling traffic, prioritizing paid advertisements in search results, blacklisting websites and users for undesirable opinions. Because THEY know what's best for the internet. They've done such a fantastic job of making the internet so open and free and fair, huh. Also, fuck Cruz.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/15/17 10:38:29 PM #3:	Literal senator posting literal strawman on literal Twitter --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:892302179] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>Literal senator posting literal strawman on literal Twitter</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Phantom_Nook 12/15/17 10:39:55 PM #4:	I hope Texas votes out Cruz next year. --- When a girl has sex with a bunch of guys, they call her a slut, but when a guy does it, they call him gay. ~ Antifar <cite>Phantom_Nook posted [p:892302251] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>I hope Texas votes out Cruz next year.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sayoria 12/15/17 10:43:04 PM #5:	Ted Snooze: Uhhh, what's Title I --- Japanese Crack: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5pzggr <cite>Sayoria posted [p:892302405] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>Ted Snooze: Uhhh, what's Title I</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 12/15/17 10:44:10 PM #6:	Who's less likable: Comcast or Ted Cruz? --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:892302459] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>Who's less likable: Comcast or Ted Cruz?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
foreveraIone 12/15/17 10:46:24 PM #7:	Antifar posted... Who's less likable: Comcast or Ted Cruz? cruz at least has a punchable face --- http://i.imgtc.com/qieELu9.jpg Always. Edgy. <cite>foreveraIone posted [p:892302560] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>Who's less likable: Comcast or Ted Cruz?</quote> cruz at least has a punchable face</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sayoria 12/15/17 10:46:48 PM #8:	Antifar posted... Who's less likable: Comcast or Ted Cruz? Damn.... well.... I'll say Comcast, only because only one state has to deal with Cruz. All states deal with Comcrap. --- Japanese Crack: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5pzggr <cite>Sayoria posted [p:892302575] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>Who's less likable: Comcast or Ted Cruz?</quote> Damn.... well.... I'll say Comcast, only because only one state has to deal with Cruz. All states deal with Comcrap.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 12/15/17 11:07:08 PM #9:	Video gamers grew up without micro transactions just fine but now they are a blight on the gaming industry. --- No sig. <cite>creativerealms posted [p:892303433] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>Video gamers grew up without micro transactions just fine but now they are a blight on the gaming industry.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CommonStar 12/15/17 11:08:08 PM #10:	https://i.redd.it/ocqak9q470401.png <cite>CommonStar posted [p:892303477] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>https://i.redd.it/ocqak9q470401.png</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 12/15/17 11:08:15 PM #11:	Lol, he talks to snowflakes. What a dumbass. Theyre not even alive. #toomuchfrostycartoon --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:892303485] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>Lol, he talks to snowflakes. What a dumbass. Theyre not even alive. #toomuchfrostycartoon</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 12/15/17 11:08:47 PM #12:	creativerealms posted... Video gamers grew up without micro transactions just fine but now they are a blight on the gaming industry. Or you know, you could just play an actual game like Dark Souls or Vanquish --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:892303510] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote>Video gamers grew up without micro transactions just fine but now they are a blight on the gaming industry.</quote> Or you know, you could just play an actual game like Dark Souls or Vanquish</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 12/15/17 11:13:07 PM #13:	Tropicalwood posted... creativerealms posted... Video gamers grew up without micro transactions just fine but now they are a blight on the gaming industry. Or you know, you could just play an actual game like Dark Souls or Vanquish It was a joke. Still what if there were rumors of companies wanting to start things like micro transactions and some regulating third party stepped in and stopped them? Just food for thought. It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never. --- No sig. <cite>creativerealms posted [p:892303716] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote>Video gamers grew up without micro transactions just fine but now they are a blight on the gaming industry.</quote> Or you know, you could just play an actual game like Dark Souls or Vanquish</quote> It was a joke. Still what if there were rumors of companies wanting to start things like micro transactions and some regulating third party stepped in and stopped them? Just food for thought. It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RighteousTip 12/15/17 11:17:51 PM #14:	It's telling, seeing how uninformed he is. --- https://i.imgur.com/bUl7fAv.jpg <cite>RighteousTip posted [p:892303931] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>It's telling, seeing how uninformed he is.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
boxington 12/15/17 11:19:16 PM #15:	imagine a middle-aged dude talking like that --- b-bb-box <cite>boxington posted [p:892304001] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>imagine a middle-aged dude talking like that</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 12/15/17 11:19:52 PM #16:	creativerealms posted... It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never. It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:892304032] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote>It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never.</quote> It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Axiom 12/15/17 11:23:10 PM #17:	Tropicalwood posted... creativerealms posted... It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never. It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them. No what's more likely is they'll do things similar to what they did in the past which is this <cite>Axiom posted [p:892304151] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote>It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never.</quote> It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them.</quote> No what's more likely is they'll do things similar to what they did in the past which is this </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
tremain07 12/15/17 11:30:52 PM #18:	God these people are so fucking stupid and evil not because they don't know what happened in the past, they know full will about that, they just love petting their stupid ass bullshit to more dumb fuckers who believe it so they can be ripped off even more. There's no greater evil in this world than intentionally spreading ignorance under the guise of truth. --- I got nothing <cite>tremain07 posted [p:892304464] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>God these people are so fucking stupid and evil not because they don't know what happened in the past, they know full will about that, they just love petting their stupid ass bullshit to more dumb fuckers who believe it so they can be ripped off even more. There's no greater evil in this world than intentionally spreading ignorance under the guise of truth.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
joe_stalin518 12/15/17 11:31:02 PM #19:	Ted Cruz always looks like he just sniffed soiled briefs. pompous cocksucker --- how does super mario world work without updates? Relax I know what I'm doing,I been killing topics since 1987 <cite>joe_stalin518 posted [p:892304470] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>Ted Cruz always looks like he just sniffed soiled briefs. pompous cocksucker</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RighteousTip 12/15/17 11:31:02 PM #20:	Tropicalwood posted... creativerealms posted... It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never. It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them. No. This is exactly what is going to happen. And with what? 3 major ISPs now, Netflix doesn't have much room to stand on --- https://i.imgur.com/bUl7fAv.jpg <cite>RighteousTip posted [p:892304471] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote>It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never.</quote> It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them.</quote> No. This is exactly what is going to happen. And with what? 3 major ISPs now, Netflix doesn't have much room to stand on</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 12/15/17 11:35:05 PM #21:	Ted Cruz looks like the super religious guy from Beavis and Butthead. He was only in a few episodes. --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:892304651] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>Ted Cruz looks like the super religious guy from Beavis and Butthead. He was only in a few episodes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Prestoff 12/15/17 11:35:26 PM #22:	Antifar posted... Who's less likable: Comcast or Ted Cruz? This is a conundrum alright. --- It's what all true warriors strive for! <cite>Prestoff posted [p:892304662] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>Who's less likable: Comcast or Ted Cruz?</quote> This is a conundrum alright.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
joe_stalin518 12/15/17 11:39:10 PM #23:	TheCyborgNinja posted... Ted Cruz looks like the super religious guy from Beavis and Butthead. He was only in a few episodes. Sinners and fornicators --- how does super mario world work without updates? Relax I know what I'm doing,I been killing topics since 1987 <cite>joe_stalin518 posted [p:892304801] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote>Ted Cruz looks like the super religious guy from Beavis and Butthead. He was only in a few episodes.</quote> Sinners and fornicators</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
realnifty1 12/15/17 11:39:46 PM #24:	Tropicalwood posted... creativerealms posted... It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never. It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them. Do you understand the internet? Netflix already has to pay for their bandwidth. NN means that when I go hey ISP fetch me some content from Netflix they have to treat that request the same as anyone else making any other request for any type of thing. <cite>realnifty1 posted [p:892304826] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote>It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never.</quote> It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them.</quote> Do you understand the internet? Netflix already has to pay for their bandwidth. NN means that when I go hey ISP fetch me some content from Netflix they have to treat that request the same as anyone else making any other request for any type of thing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 12/16/17 12:28:05 AM #25:	realnifty1 posted... Tropicalwood posted... creativerealms posted... It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never. It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them. Do you understand the internet? Netflix already has to pay for their bandwidth. NN means that when I go hey ISP fetch me some content from Netflix they have to treat that request the same as anyone else making any other request for any type of thing. Netflix chews up an insane amount of the bandwidth in NA, about 30-40% during peak hours actually. Don't try and tell me Netflix doesn't gain something from ISPs not being able to tell them to pay up for their fast lanes. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:892306643] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>realnifty1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote>It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never.</quote> It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them.</quote> Do you understand the internet? Netflix already has to pay for their bandwidth. NN means that when I go hey ISP fetch me some content from Netflix they have to treat that request the same as anyone else making any other request for any type of thing.</quote> Netflix chews up an insane amount of the bandwidth in NA, about 30-40% during peak hours actually. Don't try and tell me Netflix doesn't gain something from ISPs not being able to tell them to pay up for their fast lanes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Life Sympathy 12/16/17 12:29:04 AM #26:	He does know why that reclassification happened in 2015 right? --- We're surrounding you. We see you, but you probably don't see us. And if you see us, we're not letting on that we see you. <cite>Life Sympathy posted [p:892306665] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>He does know why that reclassification happened in 2015 right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JustAndrew88 12/16/17 12:29:49 AM #27:	And a response to Ted Snowflake: https://i.redd.it/8m4sykxpw3401.png --- You don't understand. Edgar is the one in the hole. <cite>JustAndrew88 posted [p:892306687] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>And a response to Ted Snowflake: https://i.redd.it/8m4sykxpw3401.png</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GeneralZhao 12/16/17 12:31:15 AM #28:	Antifar posted... Who's less likable: Comcast or Ted Cruz? holy shit. I legit can't decide. If I was being held at gunpoint, I'd probably pick Cruz --- https://imgur.com/a/f52rH <cite>GeneralZhao posted [p:892306733] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>Who's less likable: Comcast or Ted Cruz?</quote> holy shit. I legit can't decide. If I was being held at gunpoint, I'd probably pick Cruz</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Unsugarized_Foo 12/16/17 12:31:21 AM #29:	http://oi66.tinypic.com/351zbc8.jpg --- "All I have is my balls and my word, and I don't break them for anyone!"-Tony Montana <cite>Unsugarized_Foo posted [p:892306736] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>http://oi66.tinypic.com/351zbc8.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Prestoff 12/16/17 1:37:38 AM #30:	Unsugarized_Foo posted... http://oi66.tinypic.com/351zbc8.jpg Fucking lol --- It's what all true warriors strive for! <cite>Prestoff posted [p:892309082] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>Unsugarized_Foo posted...</cite> <quote>http://oi66.tinypic.com/351zbc8.jpg</quote> Fucking lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
realnifty1 12/16/17 11:27:59 AM #31:	Tropicalwood posted... realnifty1 posted... Tropicalwood posted... creativerealms posted... It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never. It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them. Do you understand the internet? Netflix already has to pay for their bandwidth. NN means that when I go hey ISP fetch me some content from Netflix they have to treat that request the same as anyone else making any other request for any type of thing. Netflix chews up an insane amount of the bandwidth in NA, about 30-40% during peak hours actually. Don't try and tell me Netflix doesn't gain something from ISPs not being able to tell them to pay up for their fast lanes. So let me explain the problem to you in an oversimplified manner. An ISP sells 100 packages to customers telling them that their internet connection allows a rate of 10 requests per second. That would mean that if everyone was using their internet fully they would be making 1000 requests per second of the ISP. However the ISP can only actually handle 500 requests per second, they sold this way because before things like streaming video average requests were below 1 per second. Now NetFlix has created a service needing to transmit content at 8 requests per second. This service has proved popular and now more and more ISP customers are increasing their requests per second averages. So the ISP's are unable to deliver on the contract they have formed with their customers because customers have started to use more of what was promised to them. This is NetFlix's fault how? <cite>realnifty1 posted [p:892323112] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>realnifty1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote>It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never.</quote> It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them.</quote> Do you understand the internet? Netflix already has to pay for their bandwidth. NN means that when I go hey ISP fetch me some content from Netflix they have to treat that request the same as anyone else making any other request for any type of thing.</quote> Netflix chews up an insane amount of the bandwidth in NA, about 30-40% during peak hours actually. Don't try and tell me Netflix doesn't gain something from ISPs not being able to tell them to pay up for their fast lanes.</quote> So let me explain the problem to you in an oversimplified manner. An ISP sells 100 packages to customers telling them that their internet connection allows a rate of 10 requests per second. That would mean that if everyone was using their internet fully they would be making 1000 requests per second of the ISP. However the ISP can only actually handle 500 requests per second, they sold this way because before things like streaming video average requests were below 1 per second. Now NetFlix has created a service needing to transmit content at 8 requests per second. This service has proved popular and now more and more ISP customers are increasing their requests per second averages. So the ISP's are unable to deliver on the contract they have formed with their customers because customers have started to use more of what was promised to them. This is NetFlix's fault how?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
luigi13579 12/16/17 11:40:49 AM #32:	Coming from the guy who coined 'Obamacare for the internet', his word on this matter means precisely fuck all. On the substance of the argument, the FCC took action against violations of net neutrality before 2015. It's just that ISPs challenged their authority in court and won, and in response, the FCC reclassified broadband internet under Title II. Plus, the internet has changed. When dial-up was the predominant flavor of internet, it operated under net neutrality as it used phone lines (which fall under Title II). And back then, many internet services were offered by your ISP (AOL, chat rooms, email, etc.), while nowadays, we almost exclusively use third-party services like Google, YouTube, Wikipedia, Facebook, Twitter, Netflix, Steam, etc. <cite>luigi13579 posted [p:892323635] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>Coming from the guy who coined 'Obamacare for the internet', his word on this matter means precisely fuck all. On the substance of the argument, the FCC took action against violations of net neutrality before 2015. It's just that ISPs challenged their authority in court and won, and in response, the FCC reclassified broadband internet under Title II. Plus, the internet has changed. When dial-up was the predominant flavor of internet, it operated under net neutrality as it used phone lines (which fall under Title II). And back then, many internet services were offered by your ISP (AOL, chat rooms, email, etc.), while nowadays, we almost exclusively use third-party services like Google, YouTube, Wikipedia, Facebook, Twitter, Netflix, Steam, etc.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DKFjalfe 12/16/17 11:42:33 AM #33:	boxington posted... imagine a middle-aged dude talking like that <cite>DKFjalfe posted [p:892323711] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>boxington posted...</cite> <quote>imagine a middle-aged dude talking like that</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#34	Post #34 was unavailable or deleted.
Tropicalwood 12/16/17 11:47:19 AM #35:	realnifty1 posted... Tropicalwood posted... realnifty1 posted... Tropicalwood posted... creativerealms posted... It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never. It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them. Do you understand the internet? Netflix already has to pay for their bandwidth. NN means that when I go hey ISP fetch me some content from Netflix they have to treat that request the same as anyone else making any other request for any type of thing. Netflix chews up an insane amount of the bandwidth in NA, about 30-40% during peak hours actually. Don't try and tell me Netflix doesn't gain something from ISPs not being able to tell them to pay up for their fast lanes. So let me explain the problem to you in an oversimplified manner. An ISP sells 100 packages to customers telling them that their internet connection allows a rate of 10 requests per second. That would mean that if everyone was using their internet fully they would be making 1000 requests per second of the ISP. However the ISP can only actually handle 500 requests per second, they sold this way because before things like streaming video average requests were below 1 per second. Now NetFlix has created a service needing to transmit content at 8 requests per second. This service has proved popular and now more and more ISP customers are increasing their requests per second averages. So the ISP's are unable to deliver on the contract they have formed with their customers because customers have started to use more of what was promised to them. This is NetFlix's fault how? You're just being ridiculous, an ISP cannot make money off packages because they simply won't be there after a month or two and they'd make a hell of a lot more money keeping track of what people do on the internet and selling said data to advertisers. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:892323894] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>realnifty1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>realnifty1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote>It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never.</quote> It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them.</quote> Do you understand the internet? Netflix already has to pay for their bandwidth. NN means that when I go hey ISP fetch me some content from Netflix they have to treat that request the same as anyone else making any other request for any type of thing.</quote> Netflix chews up an insane amount of the bandwidth in NA, about 30-40% during peak hours actually. Don't try and tell me Netflix doesn't gain something from ISPs not being able to tell them to pay up for their fast lanes.</quote> So let me explain the problem to you in an oversimplified manner. An ISP sells 100 packages to customers telling them that their internet connection allows a rate of 10 requests per second. That would mean that if everyone was using their internet fully they would be making 1000 requests per second of the ISP. However the ISP can only actually handle 500 requests per second, they sold this way because before things like streaming video average requests were below 1 per second. Now NetFlix has created a service needing to transmit content at 8 requests per second. This service has proved popular and now more and more ISP customers are increasing their requests per second averages. So the ISP's are unable to deliver on the contract they have formed with their customers because customers have started to use more of what was promised to them. This is NetFlix's fault how?</quote> You're just being ridiculous, an ISP cannot make money off packages because they simply won't be there after a month or two and they'd make a hell of a lot more money keeping track of what people do on the internet and selling said data to advertisers.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JustAndrew88 12/16/17 11:48:55 AM #36:	Tropicalwood posted... You're just being ridiculous, an ISP cannot make money off packages because they simply won't be there after a month or two. Are you trying to say they won't show up that soon or that the ISP would go out of business trying it? If the latter that's definitely not true, as many people across the country often have only 1 option and in that situation it's either "have internet or don't" and these days it's almost impossible to go without. School/work often rely on it. --- You don't understand. Edgar is the one in the hole. <cite>JustAndrew88 posted [p:892323961] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote>You're just being ridiculous, an ISP cannot make money off packages because they simply won't be there after a month or two.</quote> Are you trying to say they won't show up that soon or that the ISP would go out of business trying it? If the latter that's definitely not true, as many people across the country often have only 1 option and in that situation it's either "have internet or don't" and these days it's almost impossible to go without. School/work often rely on it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 12/16/17 11:59:29 AM #37:	JustAndrew88 posted... Tropicalwood posted... You're just being ridiculous, an ISP cannot make money off packages because they simply won't be there after a month or two. Are you trying to say they won't show up that soon or that the ISP would go out of business trying it? If the latter that's definitely not true, as many people across the country often have only 1 option and in that situation it's either "have internet or don't" and these days it's almost impossible to go without. School/work often rely on it. I'm saying that your whole EA treatment style DLC crap is asinine because you're implying that sites will still be there after no visits them, it's a stupid idea and it limits your information that can be gathered and sold, not to mention advertisers would be pissed. Still waiting for my boss to be asking my ISP for my internet history like I was told at the beginning of the year. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:892324416] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>JustAndrew88 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote>You're just being ridiculous, an ISP cannot make money off packages because they simply won't be there after a month or two.</quote> Are you trying to say they won't show up that soon or that the ISP would go out of business trying it? If the latter that's definitely not true, as many people across the country often have only 1 option and in that situation it's either "have internet or don't" and these days it's almost impossible to go without. School/work often rely on it.</quote> I'm saying that your whole EA treatment style DLC crap is asinine because you're implying that sites will still be there after no visits them, it's a stupid idea and it limits your information that can be gathered and sold, not to mention advertisers would be pissed. Still waiting for my boss to be asking my ISP for my internet history like I was told at the beginning of the year.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DifferentialEquation 12/16/17 12:02:34 PM #38:	--- There's no business to be taxed. <cite>DifferentialEquation posted [p:892324535] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheAnthraxBunny 12/16/17 12:07:36 PM #39:	Hes not even using snowflake correctly lmao. --- Syrobonkus! <cite>TheAnthraxBunny posted [p:892324740] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>Hes not even using snowflake correctly lmao.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
--kresnik-- 12/16/17 12:08:55 PM #40:	Fucking Rekt by Ted Cruz. If he could manage to run without accepting money from big business, he would make a good candidate (after Trump's eight years). --- USA #1 Ajit Pai #1 <cite>--kresnik-- posted [p:892324787] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>Fucking Rekt by Ted Cruz. If he could manage to run without accepting money from big business, he would make a good candidate (after Trump's eight years).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
realnifty1 12/16/17 1:58:41 PM #41:	Tropicalwood posted... realnifty1 posted... Tropicalwood posted... realnifty1 posted... Tropicalwood posted... creativerealms posted... It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never. It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them. Do you understand the internet? Netflix already has to pay for their bandwidth. NN means that when I go hey ISP fetch me some content from Netflix they have to treat that request the same as anyone else making any other request for any type of thing. Netflix chews up an insane amount of the bandwidth in NA, about 30-40% during peak hours actually. Don't try and tell me Netflix doesn't gain something from ISPs not being able to tell them to pay up for their fast lanes. So let me explain the problem to you in an oversimplified manner. An ISP sells 100 packages to customers telling them that their internet connection allows a rate of 10 requests per second. That would mean that if everyone was using their internet fully they would be making 1000 requests per second of the ISP. However the ISP can only actually handle 500 requests per second, they sold this way because before things like streaming video average requests were below 1 per second. Now NetFlix has created a service needing to transmit content at 8 requests per second. This service has proved popular and now more and more ISP customers are increasing their requests per second averages. So the ISP's are unable to deliver on the contract they have formed with their customers because customers have started to use more of what was promised to them. This is NetFlix's fault how? You're just being ridiculous, an ISP cannot make money off packages because they simply won't be there after a month or two and they'd make a hell of a lot more money keeping track of what people do on the internet and selling said data to advertisers. Yet again, do you even understand the internet? You're argument has nothing to do with anything. Net Neutrality is dying because ISP's oversold their networks and now that services exist where their customers want to make use of what they are contractually promised ISP's don't want to foot the bill for upgrading their network and instead are going to try and push that cost to everyone else instead meeting their contractual requirements. <cite>realnifty1 posted [p:892329722] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>realnifty1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>realnifty1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote>It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never.</quote> It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them.</quote> Do you understand the internet? Netflix already has to pay for their bandwidth. NN means that when I go hey ISP fetch me some content from Netflix they have to treat that request the same as anyone else making any other request for any type of thing.</quote> Netflix chews up an insane amount of the bandwidth in NA, about 30-40% during peak hours actually. Don't try and tell me Netflix doesn't gain something from ISPs not being able to tell them to pay up for their fast lanes.</quote> So let me explain the problem to you in an oversimplified manner. An ISP sells 100 packages to customers telling them that their internet connection allows a rate of 10 requests per second. That would mean that if everyone was using their internet fully they would be making 1000 requests per second of the ISP. However the ISP can only actually handle 500 requests per second, they sold this way because before things like streaming video average requests were below 1 per second. Now NetFlix has created a service needing to transmit content at 8 requests per second. This service has proved popular and now more and more ISP customers are increasing their requests per second averages. So the ISP's are unable to deliver on the contract they have formed with their customers because customers have started to use more of what was promised to them. This is NetFlix's fault how?</quote> You're just being ridiculous, an ISP cannot make money off packages because they simply won't be there after a month or two and they'd make a hell of a lot more money keeping track of what people do on the internet and selling said data to advertisers.</quote> Yet again, do you even understand the internet? You're argument has nothing to do with anything. Net Neutrality is dying because ISP's oversold their networks and now that services exist where their customers want to make use of what they are contractually promised ISP's don't want to foot the bill for upgrading their network and instead are going to try and push that cost to everyone else instead meeting their contractual requirements.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#42	Post #42 was unavailable or deleted.
Miz_iZ_AwSOme_X 12/16/17 2:03:21 PM #43:	a snowflake calling other people snowflake it take one to know one right teddy? --- PSN xJokerLastLaughx Currently playing MKXL SF5 Xenoverse 2 AC4 Black Flag Watchdogs 2 Ghost Recon Wildlands WWE 2K17 Advance Warfare exo zombies only. <cite>Miz_iZ_AwSOme_X posted [p:892329946] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>a snowflake calling other people snowflake it take one to know one right teddy?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
uwnim 12/16/17 2:03:28 PM #44:	So Cruz is an idiot, what else is new? --- I want a pet Lavos Spawn. [Order of the Cetaceans: Phocoena dioptrica] <cite>uwnim posted [p:892329950] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>So Cruz is an idiot, what else is new?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 12/16/17 2:15:29 PM #45:	realnifty1 posted... Tropicalwood posted... realnifty1 posted... Tropicalwood posted... realnifty1 posted... Tropicalwood posted... creativerealms posted... It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never. It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them. Do you understand the internet? Netflix already has to pay for their bandwidth. NN means that when I go hey ISP fetch me some content from Netflix they have to treat that request the same as anyone else making any other request for any type of thing. Netflix chews up an insane amount of the bandwidth in NA, about 30-40% during peak hours actually. Don't try and tell me Netflix doesn't gain something from ISPs not being able to tell them to pay up for their fast lanes. So let me explain the problem to you in an oversimplified manner. An ISP sells 100 packages to customers telling them that their internet connection allows a rate of 10 requests per second. That would mean that if everyone was using their internet fully they would be making 1000 requests per second of the ISP. However the ISP can only actually handle 500 requests per second, they sold this way because before things like streaming video average requests were below 1 per second. Now NetFlix has created a service needing to transmit content at 8 requests per second. This service has proved popular and now more and more ISP customers are increasing their requests per second averages. So the ISP's are unable to deliver on the contract they have formed with their customers because customers have started to use more of what was promised to them. This is NetFlix's fault how? You're just being ridiculous, an ISP cannot make money off packages because they simply won't be there after a month or two and they'd make a hell of a lot more money keeping track of what people do on the internet and selling said data to advertisers. Yet again, do you even understand the internet? You're argument has nothing to do with anything. Net Neutrality is dying because ISP's oversold their networks and now that services exist where their customers want to make use of what they are contractually promised ISP's don't want to foot the bill for upgrading their network and instead are going to try and push that cost to everyone else instead meeting their contractual requirements. Last I checked, my ISP was dropping several lines over the course of several miles (they've been doing this for months), not their fault big cities are a cluttered mess of cables, pipes and concrete and thus a major construction job to replace. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:892330482] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote><cite>realnifty1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>realnifty1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>realnifty1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>creativerealms posted...</cite> <quote>It is quite possible that ISPs won't try to package the internet for more money. Maybe this fear is for nothing. I can't see the future only the past. When have companies ever had the best interests of consumers in mind? Never.</quote> It's more likely that the ISPs will tell netflix to start paying for their outrageous bandwidth use so they aren't pushing shit on to the consumers and can profit off having more just subscribed to them.</quote> Do you understand the internet? Netflix already has to pay for their bandwidth. NN means that when I go hey ISP fetch me some content from Netflix they have to treat that request the same as anyone else making any other request for any type of thing.</quote> Netflix chews up an insane amount of the bandwidth in NA, about 30-40% during peak hours actually. Don't try and tell me Netflix doesn't gain something from ISPs not being able to tell them to pay up for their fast lanes.</quote> So let me explain the problem to you in an oversimplified manner. An ISP sells 100 packages to customers telling them that their internet connection allows a rate of 10 requests per second. That would mean that if everyone was using their internet fully they would be making 1000 requests per second of the ISP. However the ISP can only actually handle 500 requests per second, they sold this way because before things like streaming video average requests were below 1 per second. Now NetFlix has created a service needing to transmit content at 8 requests per second. This service has proved popular and now more and more ISP customers are increasing their requests per second averages. So the ISP's are unable to deliver on the contract they have formed with their customers because customers have started to use more of what was promised to them. This is NetFlix's fault how?</quote> You're just being ridiculous, an ISP cannot make money off packages because they simply won't be there after a month or two and they'd make a hell of a lot more money keeping track of what people do on the internet and selling said data to advertisers.</quote> Yet again, do you even understand the internet? You're argument has nothing to do with anything. Net Neutrality is dying because ISP's oversold their networks and now that services exist where their customers want to make use of what they are contractually promised ISP's don't want to foot the bill for upgrading their network and instead are going to try and push that cost to everyone else instead meeting their contractual requirements.</quote> Last I checked, my ISP was dropping several lines over the course of several miles (they've been doing this for months), not their fault big cities are a cluttered mess of cables, pipes and concrete and thus a major construction job to replace.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Inferno Dive Dragoon 12/16/17 3:18:38 PM #46:	Well, I'm convinced ~~that this man was in fact the Zodiac Killer~~. --- Les aristocrates a la lanterne! Les aristocrates on les pendra! <cite>Inferno Dive Dragoon posted [p:892333313] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>Well, I'm convinced that this man was in fact the Zodiac Killer.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NadYobWoc 12/16/17 3:20:34 PM #47:	I'm surprised the Zodiac Killer posts so openly on Twitter. --- Cowboy Dan's a major player in the cowboy scene <cite>NadYobWoc posted [p:892333404] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>I'm surprised the Zodiac Killer posts so openly on Twitter.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Polycosm 12/16/17 3:22:03 PM #48:	I've been seeing this talking point repeated everywhere recently... "the internet was fine before Obama imposed regulations in 2015." It's an aggressively uninformed argument. --- BKSheikah owned me so thoroughly in the 2017 guru contest, I'd swear he used the Lens of Truth to pick his bracket. (thengamer.com/guru) <cite>Polycosm posted [p:892333468] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>I've been seeing this talking point repeated everywhere recently... "the internet was fine before Obama imposed regulations in 2015." It's an aggressively uninformed argument.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ultimate reaver 12/16/17 3:31:18 PM #49:	i cant believe mal fet is ted cruz --- butts <cite>ultimate reaver posted [p:892333899] in Ted Cruz M... [t:76103956]...</cite> <quote>i cant believe mal fet is ted cruz</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Ted Cruz MAKES FUN of "Snowflake" net neutrality supporter!! (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Ted Cruz MAKES FUN of "Snowflake" net neutrality supporter!!