Current Events > it appears, 16 years ago Suadi govt paid people to carry out the 9\11 attacks

(+) Yeah! (+)

and today they are still an ally of our nation


http://nypost.com/2017/09/09/saudi-government-allegedly-funded-a-dry-run-for-911/

Fresh evidence submitted in a major 9/11 lawsuit moving forward against the Saudi Arabian government reveals its embassy in Washington may have funded a “dry run” for the hijackings carried out by two Saudi employees, further reinforcing the claim that employees and agents of the kingdom directed and aided the 9/11 hijackers and plotters.

Two years before the airliner attacks, the Saudi Embassy paid for two Saudi nationals, living undercover in the US as students, to fly from Phoenix to Washington “in a dry run for the 9/11 attacks,” alleges the amended complaint filed on behalf of the families of some 1,400 victims who died in the terrorist attacks 16 years ago.

The court filing provides new details that paint “a pattern of both financial and operational support” for the 9/11 conspiracy from official Saudi sources, lawyers for the plaintiffs say. In fact, the Saudi government may have been involved in underwriting the attacks from the earliest stages — including testing cockpit security.

https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/world/2017/09/10/report-saudi-arabia-may-have-funded-911-%E2%80%98dry-run/105474892/


http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/09/saudi-embassy-funded-911-dry-run-report-170909223532351.html

During the flight in November 1999, the Saudis are reported to have attempted to get into the plane's cockpit to test security. The pilots made an emergency landing because of the incident, and the men were interrogated by the FBI, which eventually let them go.

The law, which was originally vetoed by former President Barack Obama, allows survivors and relatives of victims to pursue cases against foreign governments in US federal court and to demand compensation if such governments are proved to bear some responsibility for attacks on American soil.

---

To the surprise of no one. Not that anyone will actually do anything about it.
---

Fake news doe
---

Thanks Obama!
---

Invasion of Saudi Arabia when?
---

Doe posted...

Invasion of Saudi Arabia when?

if they ever stop selling us oil
---

those damned emails!
---

That's literally war starting shit.

Like if we knew right at 9/11 that Saudi Arabia had literally deliberately murdered 3000 of no less we would have been very justified in going to war with them.
---

Yeah but they give us a good deal on oil, so rich white people will turn the other way LOL

pikachupwnage posted...

That's literally war starting shit.

Like if we knew right at 9/11 that Saudi Arabia had literally deliberately murdered 3000 of no less we would have been very justified in going to war with them.

Not even 2001 USA would have gone to war with SA.
---

Were_Wyrm posted...

Thanks Obama!

he tried to veto the law that lets Saudi government be sued and didn't want to tell the public about all this

Bush also has blood on his hands in the same vein
---

pikachupwnage posted...

That's literally war starting shit.

Like if we knew right at 9/11 that Saudi Arabia had literally deliberately murdered 3000 of no less we would have been very justified in going to war with them.

We wouldn't have, because they sell us good oil for cheap. If they nationalized their oil like Iraq then you can bet we'd be bombing them at the very least
---

pikachupwnage posted...

That's literally war starting shit.

Like if we knew right at 9/11 that Saudi Arabia had literally deliberately murdered 3000 of no less we would have been very justified in going to war with them.

the government did know

but Bush is buddies with the Saudi Royals
---

If this turns out to be the demonstrable truth, I can't say that I'd object if Trump nuked Mecca.
---

Anarchy_Juiblex posted...

I can't say that I'd object if Trump nuked Mecca.

No one should want to nuke anything.

And in this case Mecca isn't even the capital or anything. You'd just radicalize every Muslim on the planet solely to be vindictive.
---

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/05/politics/28-pages-saudi-prince-bandar-9-11/index.html

The revelation about Bandar's indirect ties to the al Qaeda operative was one of the few pieces of new information contained in the declassified documents.

The CIA and FBI concluded that there was no evidence anyone from the Saudi royal family knowingly provided support for the 9/11 attacks.

But Graham said the indirect connection to the respected former Saudi ambassador was "one of the most stunning parts of the investigation" and worthy of pursuing further.

Bandar was the Saudi ambassador to the United States from 1983 to 2005, during the Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. He later served as secretary general of Saudi Arabia's National Security Council and head of Saudi Arabia's General Intelligence Presidency, the equivalent of the CIA, until last year.

Bandar "is probably the most effective ambassador in Washington ever. Full stop," said former CIA analyst Bruce Riedel. "He was highly regarded by every president."

Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Obama, all buddies with this guy it seems
---

darkphoenix181 posted...

Were_Wyrm posted...

Thanks Obama!

he tried to veto the law that lets Saudi government be sued and didn't want to tell the public about all this

Bush also has blood on his hands in the same vein

Or because it would set precedence for foreign nationals to sue the US for bombing hospitals and stuff. And we don't have much power over SA since we don't really give them foreign aid.
---

Well at least we know it wasn't bush.
---

https://twitter.com/tinyrevolution/status/907313408206413824
---

KILBOTz posted...

Or because it would set precedence for foreign nationals to sue the US for bombing hospitals and stuff. And we don't have much power over SA since we don't really give them foreign aid.

unless they can prove U.S. Soldiers deliberately shot at them, they have no case

paying people to Hijack a plane is a bit different then shit technology having a margin of error

also drone striking a cafe with several terrorists in it but also innocents is different than blowing up a tower with no military personnel in it at all

LittleRoyal posted...

Well at least we know it wasn't bush.

we don't
he knew about this but blamed Afghanistan instead which is suspicious
---

Former tallest buildings:Twin Towers (until 2001)
Current tallest building:Burj Dubai (in Saudi Arabia)

Former fastest roller coaster (Kingda Ka, New Jersey, 128 MPH until 2010)
Current fastest roller coaster (Formula Rossa, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 155MPH)

Focus on the WoT - Oil
Most likely the place with the most oil.....Saudi Arabia...

Hijackers on 9/11-Saudi Arabian Descent
---

MI4 REAL posted...

Former tallest buildings:Twin Towers (until 2001)
Current tallest building:Burj Dubai (in Saudi Arabia)

this is actually interesting tbh...

still...isn't the Burj taller than the old trade towers?
---

So sick of people saying "it's just politics."

It is a disgrace that we call them an ally.
---

The Burj Dubai is in Dubai. Dubai is in the UAE
---

Well, it still probably wasn't Bush honestly
---

DrizztLink posted...

darkphoenix181 posted...

alleges the amended complaint filed on behalf of the families of some 1,400 victims who died in the terrorist attacks 16 years ago.

That, uh.

That number's off by like 1500.

not all 3000 are part of the suit is what they are saying I believe
---

darkphoenix181 posted...

DrizztLink posted...

darkphoenix181 posted...

alleges the amended complaint filed on behalf of the families of some 1,400 victims who died in the terrorist attacks 16 years ago.

That, uh.

That number's off by like 1500.

not all 3000 are part of the suit is what they are saying I believe

Yeah, my bad, got that after I posted.
---

It wasn't bush
I don't believe it was an inside job either way, but if it was, it still wasn't bush. There's others in government with their own motives, and many of them certainly took advantage of 9/11 for their own benefit and to drag us into conflicts in the middle east like the vile opportunists they are
---

Why is Al Jazeera reporting this?
Something doesn't seem right here.

Questionmarktarius posted...

Why is Al Jazeera reporting this?

What do you think Al Jazeera is?
---

it's wrong to hate saudi arabia because of a few bad apples
---

Questionmarktarius posted...

Why is Al Jazeera reporting this?
Something doesn't seem right here.

I think Qatar owns Al Jazeera and they hate Saudi Arabia atm
---

Antifar posted...

Questionmarktarius posted...

Why is Al Jazeera reporting this?

What do you think Al Jazeera is?

A news network based in Qatar.

Antifar posted...

Questionmarktarius posted...

Why is Al Jazeera reporting this?

What do you think Al Jazeera is?

It has an A-rab sounding name so they MUST be terrorists.
---

Questionmarktarius posted...

A news network based in Qatar.

Correct. Qatar and Saudi Arabia do not care for each other at this moment in time.
---

Antifar posted...

Questionmarktarius posted...

A news network based in Qatar.

Correct. Qatar and Saudi Arabia do not care for each other at this moment in time.

Ah. That's explains it then.

But anyways, you're all missing the big picture, which is that obviously Putin did 9/11
https://twitter.com/b_ofrights/status/907231418153136128
---

Antifar posted...

But anyways, you're all missing the big picture, which is that obviously Putin did 9/11
https://twitter.com/b_ofrights/status/907231418153136128

is this liberal or conservative conspiracy theorists?
---

darkphoenix181 posted...

KILBOTz posted...Or because it would set precedence for foreign nationals to sue the US for bombing hospitals and stuff. And we don't have much power over SA since we don't really give them foreign aid.unless they can prove U.S. Soldiers deliberately shot at them, they have no casepaying people to Hijack a plane is a bit different then shit technology having a margin of erroralso drone striking a cafe with several terrorists in it but also innocents is different than blowing up a tower with no military personnel in it at all

why would that be the level necessary? Wrongful death through negligence could open the US to liability if US citizens are able to sue foreign governments. Once you pierce the veil of foreign sovereignty you are opening up pandoras box for potential lawsuits against the US.
---

ArchiePeck posted...

Yeah but they give us a good deal on oil, so rich white people will turn the other way LOL

if we invade them, the oil becomes ours for free. we fucked up by not doing it right after 9/11 when the world was behind us

Such lovely allies
---