Current Events > why dont americans want their minimum wage to be livable and raise with expenses

Topic List
Page List: 1, 2, 3
BGleason22
06/17/17 1:14:24 AM
#52:


lderivedx posted...
The entire "people should spend 50% of their time at the service of their employers but they still don't deserve a reasonably comfortable standard of living" group is completely disgusting.


I'd expect to live fairly comfortably if I were to work 84 hours a week. Is there a group of people doing this that are struggling?
... Copied to Clipboard!
Bad_Mojo
06/17/17 1:14:30 AM
#53:


*Didn't read anything in the topic. Just read the question in the Topic Title*

My only comment is why would anyone care if it goes up or not. If the min goes up, then the price of everything else goes up, so you just end up in the same place. I don't see much of a point to it.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
tremain07
06/17/17 1:15:51 AM
#54:


BGleason22 posted...
lderivedx posted...
The entire "people should spend 50% of their time at the service of their employers but they still don't deserve a reasonably comfortable standard of living" group is completely disgusting.


I'd expect to live fairly comfortably if I were to work 84 hours a week. Is there a group of people doing this that are struggling?

Yeah, irresponsible trash that has kids or spends money on shit they don't need.
---
I got nothing
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude
06/17/17 1:16:47 AM
#55:


BGleason22 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...
In one sentence you say people should be able to work 40 hours and pay their bills, in the next you say they should also have spare money to buy things they want....

With a MINIMUM effort.

.....

40 hours a week is above minimum effort, even if they are flipping burgers


Oh. My. God.

Do people seriously think this?

it's more effort than working part time or casually, are you denying this?


Good luck in life. You'll see.

That's about all the time this back and forth is worth.

I'm doing quite well actually, but whatever. Keep pretending 40 hours a week isnt worth a roof over your head, enough food to live and something to keep you entertained.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
lderivedx
06/17/17 1:20:39 AM
#56:


BGleason22 posted...
I'd expect to live fairly comfortably if I were to work 84 hours a week. Is there a group of people doing this that are struggling?


You don't have to sleep?
... Copied to Clipboard!
BGleason22
06/17/17 1:20:40 AM
#57:


tremain07 posted...
BGleason22 posted...
lderivedx posted...
The entire "people should spend 50% of their time at the service of their employers but they still don't deserve a reasonably comfortable standard of living" group is completely disgusting.


I'd expect to live fairly comfortably if I were to work 84 hours a week. Is there a group of people doing this that are struggling?

Yeah, irresponsible trash that has kids or spends money on shit they don't need.


At 84 hours per week and the Department of Labor laws about overtime, wouldn't you say they were at the very least, fairly compensated for their time at work?

Hell, if you worked 84 hours in a week even at min wage you'd be making $40,000 a year..... with kids we're talking about a 2 income family, so $80,000 a year. I'm pretty sure you'd survive.
... Copied to Clipboard!
BGleason22
06/17/17 1:21:22 AM
#58:


lderivedx posted...
BGleason22 posted...
I'd expect to live fairly comfortably if I were to work 84 hours a week. Is there a group of people doing this that are struggling?


You don't have to sleep?

Person I quoted said they give their employers 50% of their time. Thanks for slowly picking up the point.
... Copied to Clipboard!
BGleason22
06/17/17 1:23:03 AM
#59:


Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...
In one sentence you say people should be able to work 40 hours and pay their bills, in the next you say they should also have spare money to buy things they want....

With a MINIMUM effort.

.....

40 hours a week is above minimum effort, even if they are flipping burgers


Oh. My. God.

Do people seriously think this?

it's more effort than working part time or casually, are you denying this?


Good luck in life. You'll see.

That's about all the time this back and forth is worth.

I'm doing quite well actually, but whatever. Keep pretending 40 hours a week isnt worth a roof over your head, enough food to live and something to keep you entertained.


at an entry level job?

Tell me, what would motivate ANYONE to advance?

Do you seriously not see how this is EXTREMELY detrimental to society?
... Copied to Clipboard!
REMercsChamp
06/17/17 1:25:47 AM
#60:


If minimum wage guarantees you a comfortable living along with a few luxuries like entertainment, then what do people like me making >$30 an hour salary equivalent deserve? A Ferrari? A mansion?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude
06/17/17 1:26:11 AM
#61:


BGleason22 posted...

Tell me, what would motivate ANYONE to advance?

professional development? entry level doesnt mean mcdonalds. it means something like helpdesk, book keeping, etc. tell me, why wouldnt someone be motivated to advance their career?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude
06/17/17 1:27:05 AM
#62:


REMercsChamp posted...
If minimum wage guarantees you a comfortable living along with a few luxuries like entertainment, then what do people like me making >$30 an hour salary equivalent deserve? A Ferrari? A mansion?

a family?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
lderivedx
06/17/17 1:28:12 AM
#63:


BGleason22 posted...
Tell me, what would motivate ANYONE to advance?


Yeah, why do people who have a decent standard of living already want to advance their careers?
... Copied to Clipboard!
#64
Post #64 was unavailable or deleted.
Tmaster148
06/17/17 1:28:39 AM
#65:


BGleason22 posted...
at an entry level job?

Tell me, what would motivate ANYONE to advance?

Do you seriously not see how this is EXTREMELY detrimental to society?


Well someone could want to buy more things or afford a new shiny gadget that is much more expensive than what they could normally afford.

Just, because someone can live comfortable and buy a few extra things on the side working full time on a min wage job, doesn't mean they have no longer have any reason to want more money.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Spiritlittle
06/17/17 1:29:32 AM
#66:


ThyCorndog posted...
because the upper classes want to keep the lower classes exactly where they are to continue exploiting them

This. This so much.
---
Official Raven of the Injustice 2 boards
Official Jill Valentine of the Marvel vs Capcom Infinite boards
... Copied to Clipboard!
BGleason22
06/17/17 1:35:14 AM
#67:


Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...

Tell me, what would motivate ANYONE to advance?

professional development? entry level doesnt mean mcdonalds. it means something like helpdesk, book keeping, etc. tell me, why wouldnt someone be motivated to advance their career?



Would the motivation to advance in a profession be greater or less if the entry level position afforded you the ability to pay your mortgage, pay your bills, afford entertainment? Would that be better or worse for society as a whole?
... Copied to Clipboard!
sktgamer_13dude
06/17/17 1:35:14 AM
#68:


Republicans want the poor to stay poor. Democrats want to raise the minimum wage.

Republicans believe that if you're not an executive on a board that you shouldn't be able to afford anything.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148
06/17/17 1:36:14 AM
#69:


BGleason22 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...

Tell me, what would motivate ANYONE to advance?

professional development? entry level doesnt mean mcdonalds. it means something like helpdesk, book keeping, etc. tell me, why wouldnt someone be motivated to advance their career?



Would the motivation to advance in a profession be greater or less if the entry level position afforded you the ability to pay your mortgage, pay your bills, afford entertainment? Would that be better or worse for society as a whole?


So you wouldn't take an opportunity to make more money if what you were currently earning was adequate?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude
06/17/17 1:37:25 AM
#70:


BGleason22 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...

Tell me, what would motivate ANYONE to advance?

professional development? entry level doesnt mean mcdonalds. it means something like helpdesk, book keeping, etc. tell me, why wouldnt someone be motivated to advance their career?



Would the motivation to advance in a profession be greater or less if the entry level position afforded you the ability to pay your mortgage, pay your bills, afford entertainment? Would that be better or worse for society as a whole?

greater because they would want more money and more things. do you think more motivated people would be better for the economy? I do.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Annihilated
06/17/17 1:37:25 AM
#71:


Spiritlittle posted...
ThyCorndog posted...
because the upper classes want to keep the lower classes exactly where they are to continue exploiting them

This. This so much.

sktgamer_13dude posted...
Republicans want the poor to stay poor. Democrats want to raise the minimum wage.

Republicans believe that if you're not an executive on a board that you shouldn't be able to afford anything.


If only those baristas just made a few more dollars per hour, then they could join in with the executive country clubs and dinner parties! It's a conspiracy!

lmao, you clowns can't even villainize properly. I already explained how raising the minimum wage was more sinister than leaving it or even lowering it.
... Copied to Clipboard!
BGleason22
06/17/17 1:39:21 AM
#72:


Captain_Qwark posted...
BGleason22 posted...
Tell me, what would motivate ANYONE to advance?


a basic, livable income doesn't mean you'll be able to support family, which most people want. That's a pretty good reason


I've already stated multiple times this is exactly my stance. MINIMUM wage does not equal = BGleason22 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...

Tell me, what would motivate ANYONE to advance?

professional development? entry level doesnt mean mcdonalds. it means something like helpdesk, book keeping, etc. tell me, why wouldnt someone be motivated to advance their career?



Would the motivation to advance in a profession be greater or less if the entry level position afforded you the ability to pay your mortgage, pay your bills, afford entertainment? Would that be better or worse for society as a whole?


lderivedx posted...
BGleason22 posted...
Tell me, what would motivate ANYONE to advance?


Yeah, why do people who have a decent standard of living already want to advance their careers?


at an entry level job?

Tell me, what would motivate ANYONE to advance?

Do you seriously not see how this is EXTREMELY detrimental to society?
>


There is the whole quote, so you don't take my words out of context next time.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude
06/17/17 1:41:03 AM
#73:


BGleason22 posted...

Tell me, what would motivate ANYONE to advance?

more money? a family? a more meaningful job?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
lderivedx
06/17/17 1:41:17 AM
#74:


I guess the only people wanting to advance their careers are those living below a reasonable level of comfort.
... Copied to Clipboard!
BGleason22
06/17/17 1:41:28 AM
#75:


Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...

Tell me, what would motivate ANYONE to advance?

professional development? entry level doesnt mean mcdonalds. it means something like helpdesk, book keeping, etc. tell me, why wouldnt someone be motivated to advance their career?



Would the motivation to advance in a profession be greater or less if the entry level position afforded you the ability to pay your mortgage, pay your bills, afford entertainment? Would that be better or worse for society as a whole?

greater because they would want more money and more things. do you think more motivated people would be better for the economy? I do.


Explain why that isn't the case now. Your Logic states it should be even greater with a lower min wage
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude
06/17/17 1:48:38 AM
#76:


BGleason22 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...

Tell me, what would motivate ANYONE to advance?

professional development? entry level doesnt mean mcdonalds. it means something like helpdesk, book keeping, etc. tell me, why wouldnt someone be motivated to advance their career?



Would the motivation to advance in a profession be greater or less if the entry level position afforded you the ability to pay your mortgage, pay your bills, afford entertainment? Would that be better or worse for society as a whole?

greater because they would want more money and more things. do you think more motivated people would be better for the economy? I do.


Explain why that isn't the case now. Your Logic states it should be even greater with a lower min wage

they are more focused on surviving paycheck to paycheck than improving themselves
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude
06/17/17 1:51:36 AM
#77:


i think bgi is trolling or something. why would only people currently unable to survive on their income be motivated to improve themselves, not anyone else?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
BGleason22
06/17/17 1:54:07 AM
#78:


Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...

Tell me, what would motivate ANYONE to advance?

professional development? entry level doesnt mean mcdonalds. it means something like helpdesk, book keeping, etc. tell me, why wouldnt someone be motivated to advance their career?



Would the motivation to advance in a profession be greater or less if the entry level position afforded you the ability to pay your mortgage, pay your bills, afford entertainment? Would that be better or worse for society as a whole?

greater because they would want more money and more things. do you think more motivated people would be better for the economy? I do.


Explain why that isn't the case now. Your Logic states it should be even greater with a lower min wage

they are more focused on surviving paycheck to paycheck than improving themselves


Does someone surviving paycheck to paycheck have more or less incentive to improve their financial situation compared to someone living comfortably?
... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148
06/17/17 1:54:07 AM
#79:


Rika_Furude posted...
i think bgi is trolling or something. why would only people currently unable to survive on their income be motivated to improve themselves, not anyone else?


He also never answered my question if he would take an opportunity to make more money if he was currently was making enough already.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
sktgamer_13dude
06/17/17 1:54:25 AM
#80:


Republicans believe raising minimum wages will make them poor and the poor rich.

When in actuality, it'll make the poor able to actually afford to live and it'll make them (the rich Republicans who hate raising minimum wage) have to wait 2 years to buy their private jet instead of 1 year.

Boo fucking hoo.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148
06/17/17 1:55:40 AM
#81:


sktgamer_13dude posted...
Republicans believe raising minimum wages will make them poor and the poor rich.

When in actuality, it'll make the poor able to actually afford to live and it'll make them (the rich Republicans who hate raising minimum wage) have to wait 2 years to buy their private jet instead of 1 year.

Boo fucking hoo.


Hell it might even make business owners make more money as people will be afford to buy things that they couldn't before. But Republicans aren't well known for their long term thinking.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Annihilated
06/17/17 1:57:30 AM
#82:


Tmaster148 posted...
sktgamer_13dude posted...
Republicans believe raising minimum wages will make them poor and the poor rich.

When in actuality, it'll make the poor able to actually afford to live and it'll make them (the rich Republicans who hate raising minimum wage) have to wait 2 years to buy their private jet instead of 1 year.

Boo fucking hoo.


Hell it might even make business owners make more money as people will be afford to buy things that they couldn't before. But Republicans aren't well known for their long term thinking.


Holy shit, the stupid is spreading. Not only do we have one person who actually literally unironically believes that republicans all have islands and private jets (seriously, LMFAO how fucking stupid can you be), but we have a second person actually chiming in with more faux economics bullshit.
... Copied to Clipboard!
BGleason22
06/17/17 1:58:39 AM
#83:


Rika_Furude posted...
i think bgi is trolling or something. why would only people currently unable to survive on their income be motivated to improve themselves, not anyone else?


I've stated multiple times that people SHOULD be able to SURVIVE on min wage. I have never said that people should not be able to survive, so why are you putting words in my mouth?

Edit - Not trolling Rika - I'm trying to get you to understand the extreme flaw in your own logic, by questioning it and making you think about it
... Copied to Clipboard!
BGleason22
06/17/17 1:59:55 AM
#84:


Tmaster148 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
i think bgi is trolling or something. why would only people currently unable to survive on their income be motivated to improve themselves, not anyone else?


He also never answered my question if he would take an opportunity to make more money if he was currently was making enough already.


Are you serious?

I expect to be compensated based on my effort. As should every single person. Which is why I believe MINIMUM wage should not afford a single person to afford to live comfortably.

If you give MINIMUM effort, you should be paid MINIMUM wage, and survive on MINIMUM.

Do you understand what that word means?
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude
06/17/17 2:05:17 AM
#85:


BGleason22 posted...
Tmaster148 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
i think bgi is trolling or something. why would only people currently unable to survive on their income be motivated to improve themselves, not anyone else?


He also never answered my question if he would take an opportunity to make more money if he was currently was making enough already.


Are you serious?

I expect to be compensated based on my effort. As should every single person. Which is why I believe MINIMUM wage should not afford a single person to afford to live comfortably.

If you give MINIMUM effort, you should be paid MINIMUM wage, and survive on MINIMUM.

Do you understand what that word means?

minimum wage doesnt imply minimum effort, troll

you still never answered my question
Rika_Furude posted...
i think bgi is trolling or something. why would only people currently unable to survive on their income be motivated to improve themselves, not anyone else?

---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148
06/17/17 2:07:20 AM
#86:


BGleason22 posted...
Tmaster148 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
i think bgi is trolling or something. why would only people currently unable to survive on their income be motivated to improve themselves, not anyone else?


He also never answered my question if he would take an opportunity to make more money if he was currently was making enough already.


Are you serious?

I expect to be compensated based on my effort. As should every single person. Which is why I believe MINIMUM wage should not afford a single person to afford to live comfortably.

If you give MINIMUM effort, you should be paid MINIMUM wage, and survive on MINIMUM.

Do you understand what that word means?


You didn't answer the question. Also Min Wage != Min Effort. A lot of people earning min wage jobs might be a harder working then you as many of them work 2+ jobs due to most min wage jobs being part time work(I.E. Wal-Mart and McDonald's).

But I guess you would rather work full time at McDonald's then working a higher paying job if the McDonald's job could pay for your basic living and some extra.

Annihilated posted...
Holy shit, the stupid is spreading. Not only do we have one person who actually literally unironically believes that republicans all have islands and private jets (seriously, LMFAO how fucking stupid can you be), but we have a second person actually chiming in with more faux economics bullshit.


Actually it's pretty simply. If people don't have money to buy things demand for things will fall. As demand falls companies will have to offset costs by laying people off or cutting salaries/hours. Which is a feedback loop.

Demand will only increase if people have money to buy things. If they start buying things a company might need to hire more employees to match new demand thus hiring more people.

If you want a good economy, people need to be able to buy stuff.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Annihilated
06/17/17 2:09:39 AM
#87:


Tmaster148 posted...
Actually it's pretty simply. If people don't have money to buy things demand for things will fall. As demand falls companies will have to offset costs by laying people off or cutting salaries/hours. Which is a feedback loop.

Demand will only increase if people have money to buy things. If they start buying things a company might need to hire more employees to match new demand thus hiring more people.

If you want a good economy, people need to be able to buy stuff.


Then you CREATE jobs instead of taking them away. What's the point in making more per hour if you make the same every week because you got your hours cut or got laid off and have to compete with even more people for even fewer jobs?
... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148
06/17/17 2:15:44 AM
#88:


Annihilated posted...
Tmaster148 posted...
Actually it's pretty simply. If people don't have money to buy things demand for things will fall. As demand falls companies will have to offset costs by laying people off or cutting salaries/hours. Which is a feedback loop.

Demand will only increase if people have money to buy things. If they start buying things a company might need to hire more employees to match new demand thus hiring more people.

If you want a good economy, people need to be able to buy stuff.


Then you CREATE jobs instead of taking them away. What's the point in making more per hour if you make the same every week because you got your hours cut or got laid off and have to compete with even more people for even fewer jobs?


You can't create jobs out of thin air. If there's no demand for that job, you will only get laid off anyways and we're back where we started.

If you want to create new jobs, you to create a demand for the job. You create a demand by people spending money. People can spend more money if they make more money.

Raising min wage won't cause people to lose their jobs unless the increase is too high. Cut hours is a slightly different problem and there really isn't a way to tell if raising min wage will cause people to lose hours considering min wage has increased before back in 2009 and people didn't end up losing hours AFAIK.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
BGleason22
06/17/17 2:16:25 AM
#89:


FYI Tmaster - McDonalds and Walmart don't pay minimum wage.

Hard workers earn promotions. Promotions = pay increases.

System works.

Thanks for proving the point.

.Actually it's pretty simply. If people don't have money to buy things demand for things will fall. As demand falls companies will have to offset costs by laying people off or cutting salaries/hours. Which is a feedback loop.


Actual unemployment is at an all time low. The DOW is at record highs. Remind me, where in the supply-demand spectrum lies the current problem?
... Copied to Clipboard!
BGleason22
06/17/17 2:21:08 AM
#90:


Rika_Furude posted...
theres still the fact that minimum wage should be enough for 1 person to survive on given full time hours of work, along with some comforts like entertainment


Reminder.

This is the point under contention
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude
06/17/17 2:23:55 AM
#91:


BGleason22 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
theres still the fact that minimum wage should be enough for 1 person to survive on given full time hours of work, along with some comforts like entertainment


Reminder.

This is the point under contention

and i'm not wrong
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
BGleason22
06/17/17 2:28:36 AM
#92:


Rika_Furude posted...
BGleason22 posted...
Rika_Furude posted...
theres still the fact that minimum wage should be enough for 1 person to survive on given full time hours of work, along with some comforts like entertainment


Reminder.

This is the point under contention

and i'm not wrong


Fact = a thing that is indisputably the case.

Opinion = a view or judgment formed about something

theres still the fact that minimum wage should be enough for 1 person to survive on given full time hours of work, along with some comforts like entertainment


Rika_Furude posted...
and i'm not wrong



Hmmmmm......
... Copied to Clipboard!
donkeyjack
06/17/17 2:28:38 AM
#93:


It messes the economy up and prevents 10 to 17 years old kids to get jobs. It's simple as that.
---
Your style is fake snake, well-dramatize/You might as well be a singer but ain't harmonize (Harmin' Nas)
http://imgur.com/tyElXOs http://imgur.com/Mxpx3aN
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude
06/17/17 2:32:53 AM
#94:


donkeyjack posted...
It messes the economy up and prevents 10 to 17 years old kids to get jobs. It's simple as that.

why doesnt it happen in any other country where the minimum wage is livable?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148
06/17/17 2:33:57 AM
#95:


BGleason22 posted...
FYI Tmaster - McDonalds and Walmart don't pay minimum wage.

Hard workers earn promotions. Promotions = pay increases.

System works.

Thanks for proving the point.


No point was really proven as pay doesn't correlate how hard a job is, just the value of the job.

BGleason22 posted...
Actual unemployment is at an all time low. The DOW is at record highs. Remind me, where in the supply-demand spectrum lies the current problem?


And unemployment doesn't always factor people not looking for work. DOW is at record highs largely due to promises made by the current president that are favorable to businesses. Stock Markets are largely an indicator to the profits of companies and companies can make better profits without selling more goods or services.

Plus wages have been stagnated for a while now. Poor and Middle class workers should actually be being paid more than they currently are and if this continues we will face another depression as a super poor class and a super wealthly class does not create a good economy.

Anyways since you haven't answered my question about whether or not you would take a better paying job over a full time job at McDonald's if the job at McDonald's was enough to pay for a basic standard of living + some extra I have no reason to continue this discussion.

You believe that people being paid min wage aren't hard workers and don't deserve to earn a decent standard of living, because you feel threaten by those min wage workers earning more money.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
BGleason22
06/17/17 2:47:36 AM
#96:


Tmaster148 posted...
BGleason22 posted...
FYI Tmaster - McDonalds and Walmart don't pay minimum wage.

Hard workers earn promotions. Promotions = pay increases.

System works.

Thanks for proving the point.


No point was really proven as pay doesn't correlate how hard a job is, just the value of the job.

BGleason22 posted...
Actual unemployment is at an all time low. The DOW is at record highs. Remind me, where in the supply-demand spectrum lies the current problem?


And unemployment doesn't always factor people not looking for work. DOW is at record highs largely due to promises made by the current president that are favorable to businesses. Stock Markets are largely an indicator to the profits of companies and companies can make better profits without selling more goods or services.

Plus wages have been stagnated for a while now. Poor and Middle class workers should actually be being paid more than they currently are and if this continues we will face another depression as a super poor class and a super wealthly class does not create a good economy.

Anyways since you haven't answered my question about whether or not you would take a better paying job over a full time job at McDonald's if the job at McDonald's was enough to pay for a basic standard of living + some extra I have no reason to continue this discussion.

You believe that people being paid min wage aren't hard workers and don't deserve to earn a decent standard of living, because you feel threaten by those min wage workers earning more money.


I have answered your question. I expect to be compensated based on my effort. As should anyone. People that are working MIN wage jobs, for a length of time that they expect to be able to survive on those wages, aren't those hard workers. If they were, like we've already agreed on, they'd get promoted and get better wages.

I've also stated, I think 5 times now, that I think MIN wage should be increased.


And why is it McDonalds? Shouldn't your example be a job that currently pays $15 (if that's the magic dollar amount that everyone agrees on is fair, if not $15, insert the number you think is fair)

Remember, if you increase min wage, you increase all wages across all industries.
... Copied to Clipboard!
FL81
06/17/17 2:49:03 AM
#97:


>wonders why American min wage is low
>complains about high Australian prices

wew
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Sativa_Rose
06/17/17 2:52:35 AM
#98:


I'd rather have the difference be made up by the government. That way you don't have the issue of people not being able to find work because their labor is worth less than the minimum wage. You won't get hired at $15/hr if an employer cannot find a way to make more than $15/hr out of your work.
---
I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude
06/17/17 2:54:35 AM
#99:


FL81 posted...
>wonders why American min wage is low
>complains about high Australian prices

wew

because its literal gouging, but logic is alien to you.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
BGleason22
06/17/17 3:04:53 AM
#100:


Sativa_Rose posted...
I'd rather have the difference be made up by the government. That way you don't have the issue of people not being able to find work because their labor is worth less than the minimum wage. You won't get hired at $15/hr if an employer cannot find a way to make more than $15/hr out of your work.



This is exactly what I think a lot of people don't understand.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude
06/17/17 3:10:59 AM
#101:


BGleason22 posted...
Sativa_Rose posted...
I'd rather have the difference be made up by the government. That way you don't have the issue of people not being able to find work because their labor is worth less than the minimum wage. You won't get hired at $15/hr if an employer cannot find a way to make more than $15/hr out of your work.



This is exactly what I think a lot of people don't understand.

If no job exists, of course nobody will be hired.
---
Posted with GameRaven 3.2
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1, 2, 3