LogFAQs > #986469225

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Democratic leaders will support resolution honoring Charlie Kirk
Takuya_Lee 09/19/25 6:57:09 PM #53:	bobbyrk posted... 95 voted in agreement. 58 voted against it. 38 voted present, and 22 simply didn't vote (joined by four Republicans). Not voting in this, or voting present when they could have joined their 58 colleagues in voting against it, is tantamount to voting for it, so yes, if 95 voted yes on this, 58 voted no and another 60 didn't bother actually voting for or against it, those 60 essentially said they're fine with it or otherwise don't have the will or donor support to vote against it. No it is not voting for it if they voted present or didn't vote. Sit down they have their reasons. Focus on the 95 that actually voted yes --- Narutaki was right. This is all Decade's fault. <cite>Takuya_Lee posted [p:986469225] in Democratic... [t:81043001]...</cite> <quote>bobbyrk posted... </cite><quote>95 voted in agreement. 58 voted against it. 38 voted present, and 22 simply didn't vote (joined by four Republicans).Not voting in this, or voting present when they could have joined their 58 colleagues in voting against it, is tantamount to voting for it, so yes, if 95 voted yes on this, 58 voted no and another 60 didn't bother actually voting for or against it, those 60 essentially said they're fine with it or otherwise don't have the will or donor support to vote against it.</quote>No it is not voting for it if they voted present or didn't vote. Sit down they have their reasons. Focus on the 95 that actually voted yes --- Narutaki was right. This is all Decade's fault.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1