LogFAQs > #982001068

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Which of these aged worse?
Far-Queue 09/05/24 11:47:28 AM #1:	Which of these fashion trends has aged worse? - Results (2 votes) Saggy pants (Pants where the waistline is below the buttocks, often generously showcasing the wearer's undergarments) 0% (0 votes) 0 Extremely worn jeans (Jeans with excessively large tears/wear in the fabric) 0% (0 votes) 0 Saggy pants are okay, but extremely worn jeans are stupid. 0% (0 votes) 0 Extremely worn jeans are okay, but saggy pants look dumb. 0% (0 votes) 0 They're both equally moronic. 50% (1 vote) 1 They're both perfectly fine fashion trends, you're just out of step with the current trends Far-Queue you boomer piece of shit. 0% (0 votes) 0 I don't give a fuck I just came into this topic to vote this option because this option is here to let Far-Queue know his mom has a "reputation". 0% (0 votes) 0 Stop picking on Far-Queue he's a great poster and a greater dude-pffffftt!! Hahaha I can't say it with a straight face fr Far-Queue fucking sucks fuck that guy. 50% (1 vote) 1 I don't care for either of them. Saw someone with tears in their jeans today literally from mid-thigh way down to mid-shin on both legs. Basically no front to the pants. What's the fucking point here? That said, I think they look ridiculous but they don't really bother me. --- What's better than roses on your piano? Tulips on your organ. <cite>Far-Queue posted [p:982001068] in Which of t... [t:80841236]...</cite> <quote> Which of these fashion trends has aged worse? - Results (2 votes) Saggy pants (Pants where the waistline is below the buttocks, often generously showcasing the wearer's undergarments) 0% (0 votes) 0 Extremely worn jeans (Jeans with excessively large tears/wear in the fabric) 0% (0 votes) 0 Saggy pants are okay, but extremely worn jeans are stupid. 0% (0 votes) 0 Extremely worn jeans are okay, but saggy pants look dumb. 0% (0 votes) 0 They're both equally moronic. 50% (1 vote) 1 They're both perfectly fine fashion trends, you're just out of step with the current trends Far-Queue you boomer piece of shit. 0% (0 votes) 0 I don't give a fuck I just came into this topic to vote this option because this option is here to let Far-Queue know his mom has a "reputation". 0% (0 votes) 0 Stop picking on Far-Queue he's a great poster and a greater dude-pffffftt!! Hahaha I can't say it with a straight face fr Far-Queue fucking sucks fuck that guy. 50% (1 vote) 1 Show Voting Form I don't care for either of them. Saw someone with tears in their jeans today literally from mid-thigh way down to mid-shin on both legs. Basically no front to the pants. What's the fucking point here?That said, I think they look ridiculous but they don't really bother me. --- What's better than roses on your piano? Tulips on your organ.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1