LogFAQs > #980129668

cjsdowg posted...

it's about more than that. It's about the principle of the thing.

deoxxys posted...

True if it's good it's good but it's more so the principal of the matter.

Give them an inch and they'll take a mile.

Agreed. The outfit changes I've seen don't bother me at all, they seem minor at best and the outfits are still sexy. If they were the originals and the "pre-censored" versions never existed, then no one would be complaining right now. But you're right, it's about the principle. Censorship is bad, and lying about not having censorship and then implementing it after a lot of people have already bought the game is a scumbag move.

Plus, there's still the blatant double standard when it comes to Japanese games compared to western games. Players can literally have sex with a bear in Baldur's Gate 3, Sony was like "sure that's cool", and game journalists were praising the game for how horny it was. But as soon as a Japanese-made game so much as shows a little too much cleavage, suddenly Sony says "nope change it", and game journalists are ripping the game for being too sexualized and calling the fans degenerates and coomers. How is that fair? If Sony really wants to be puritans over this stuff, then at least be consistent with it.