LogFAQs > #980009854

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	With the rule changes i might start posting here again more often
adjl 04/20/24 2:10:21 PM #39:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... Without going into specifics, it wasn't a ToS violation when something of the same nature was posted in support of the other side. This is true of many matters. To invoke Godwin's Law, it's not a ToS violation to say that Hitler was a bad guy who did bad things. It is a ToS violation to say that Hitler was a great guy who did nothing bad. It's not a ToS violation to say that murdering all gay people would be bad. It is a ToS violation to say that murdering all gay people would be good. It's not a ToS violation to say that the American slave trade was bad. It is a ToS violation to say that black Americans should be enslaved again. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. That does not, however, extend to being welcomed to express any opinion in any given context. Certain opinions are not welcome on GameFAQs, for the sake of creating an environment that's comfortable and enjoyable for a broader range of people. This has always been the case and will always be the case, even as the specifics of that policy's application evolve according to the current cultural zeitgeist. It's not GameFAQs' job to be "fair" and let "both sides" of every issue have a voice. Some sides just suck and can be treated accordingly without losing anything of value (often, in fact, gaining quite a bit of value for their absence). Again, you said something in support of the false narrative that widespread election fraud cost Trump the 2020 election. That's not something you're allowed to say, given that it is false, has cost several people their lives, and has resulted in legal trouble for a platform that promoted it. It's not "unfair" to not also ban people from saying that there's no evidence that fraud took place on a sufficient scale to give Biden the win, because that's just the truth and nobody's going to be hurt by allowing that truth to be expressed. That was your violation, plain and simply. You can insist that it wasn't a ToS violation if you want, but you can also insist that 2+2=5 if you want. Either way, you're going to be wrong. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:980009854] in With the r... [t:80750237]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite><quote>Without going into specifics, it wasn't a ToS violation when something of the same nature was posted in support of the other side.</quote>This is true of many matters. To invoke Godwin's Law, it's not a ToS violation to say that Hitler was a bad guy who did bad things. It is a ToS violation to say that Hitler was a great guy who did nothing bad. It's not a ToS violation to say that murdering all gay people would be bad. It is a ToS violation to say that murdering all gay people would be good. It's not a ToS violation to say that the American slave trade was bad. It is a ToS violation to say that black Americans should be enslaved again.Everyone is entitled to their opinion. That does not, however, extend to being welcomed to express any opinion in any given context. Certain opinions are not welcome on GameFAQs, for the sake of creating an environment that's comfortable and enjoyable for a broader range of people. This has always been the case and will always be the case, even as the specifics of that policy's application evolve according to the current cultural zeitgeist. It's not GameFAQs' job to be "fair" and let "both sides" of every issue have a voice. Some sides just suck and can be treated accordingly without losing anything of value (often, in fact, gaining quite a bit of value for their absence).Again, you said something in support of the false narrative that widespread election fraud cost Trump the 2020 election. That's not something you're allowed to say, given that it is false, has cost several people their lives, and has resulted in legal trouble for a platform that promoted it. It's not "unfair" to not also ban people from saying that there's no evidence that fraud took place on a sufficient scale to give Biden the win, because that's just the truth and nobody's going to be hurt by allowing that truth to be expressed. That was your violation, plain and simply. You can insist that it wasn't a ToS violation if you want, but you can also insist that 2+2=5 if you want. Either way, you're going to be wrong. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1