LogFAQs > #979948775

Wanglicious posted...

i mean i can't blame him for starting to collapse if he's actually engaging with people because it's an untenable position. even by its own framework, definitions purposefully don't exist and explanations, unfortunately, keep the parts people are talking about vague and with unknown standards. you can't actually argue for the rule when the rule doesn't actually exist in any clear way and is admitted to having no reasonable definition that can apply, you can only shove it through. argument and conversation demand reason, the new rule explicitly lacks it.

tbh I almost sympathize with him as a person on this whole mess and having to be the sacrificial damage control lamb.

But he's getting paid for it so nah not actually.