LogFAQs > #979603749

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The government can get warrants for the data of anyone who viewed Youtube videos
Bandit_Keith 03/28/24 5:07:51 AM #32:	Revelation34 posted... No they didn't. Read the article slowly and more carefully. What they actually did is entrapment. I read the article. I am not sure what you are getting at. In conversations with the user in early January, undercover agents sent links of YouTube tutorials for mapping via drones and augmented reality software, then asked Google for information on who had viewed the videos That isn't entrapment. They sent the links to elonmuskwhm. They were after him because they believed he was selling Bitcoins for cash. The videos aren't the crime. Nor are the videos trying to get him to commit a crime. They are trying to ID him off this information. I don't think it would ultimately work, and I still say it should not be allowed. But not due to entrapment or anything of the like. Please, highlight what you think I am missing from the article. I reread the entire thing, and you didn't give me anything specific to go by, so I can't correct any error I may have snagged. --- http://i.imgur.com/nq0Fn6a.jpg <cite>Bandit_Keith posted [p:979603749] in The govern... [t:80728499]...</cite> <quote>Revelation34 posted... </cite><quote>No they didn't. Read the article slowly and more carefully.What they actually did is entrapment.</quote>I read the article. I am not sure what you are getting at.<quote>In conversations with the user in early January, undercover agents sent links of YouTube tutorials for mapping via drones and augmented reality software, then asked Google for information on who had viewed the videos</quote>That isn't entrapment. They sent the links to elonmuskwhm. They were after him because they believed he was selling Bitcoins for cash. The videos aren't the crime. Nor are the videos trying to get him to commit a crime. They are trying to ID him off this information. I don't think it would ultimately work, and I still say it should not be allowed. But not due to entrapment or anything of the like.Please, highlight what you think I am missing from the article. I reread the entire thing, and you didn't give me anything specific to go by, so I can't correct any error I may have snagged. --- http://i.imgur.com/nq0Fn6a.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1