LogFAQs > #979099285

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTrump Trials General Part 9
Kradek
02/28/24 6:37:34 PM
#208:


ThePieReborn posted...
This is where I'm at. I don't think this is something that the Court would want to not thoroughly address. I'd love to say "dismantle" instead of "address," but an affirmance is not carved in stone despite all historical traditions indicating otherwise.

The problem with this is Smith already sent his arguments against it to them weeks if not a month ago and the USSC intentionally put the case on hold so that 2 months from now they'll start deliberations on the case. Smith tried to save time in case they did take it up and they faxed him back a middle finger.

They're clearly stalling for Trump's benefit as the new timelines would likely place the trial too close to the election for DOJ's comfort, when if not for their fuckery it would have been happening in summer.

They could have already been hearing this case 3 weeks ago, they took their time to respond AND THEN added a 2 month wait to proceed.

I've also been hearing people of the legal world saying it indicates they want to agree and disagree with some of his argument as they didn't just wholly dismiss it.

Clearly corrupt sacks of shit on the court.

---
My metal band, Ivory King, has 2 songs out now - allmylinks.com/ivorykingtx (all of our links there so you can choose which one you'd prefer to use)
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1