LogFAQs > #970440651

LinkPizza posted...

Which if you say that, then there was nothing said that was wrong But just saying first doctor (without establishing parameters) would be wrong

"It's like bringing back Tom Baker in the original series, I stopped watching after him for along time cause the new doctors couldn't compare.

If you bring back tennant, you make it much harder to have a doctor that compares well against him. You could have had many doctors that would compare well to Jodie, heck the first doctor (eckleslie?) compares well to her, and you could have transitioned to a doctor like him well, drawn fans back etc."

Literally in the previous statement I mentioned the original series, obviously meaning that I was talking about the new series in the next paragraph. So I did basically say the first doctor of the new series (or more specifically first doctor in the non-original series).

Could I have been a bit more specific? Sure, but it wasn't needed to get my point across, and honestly don't think it needed to be corrected. *shrug*