LogFAQs > #964589258

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicJohnny Depp v. Amber Heard Trial
Corrik7
04/26/22 3:44:31 PM
#194:


PrivateBiscuit1 posted...
What you're asking for, Corrik, is an impossibility. What exactly can he do to prove he never, ever, ever hit her? It's pretty obvious all he can do is use the mountains of facts and eye witness testimony to prove that Amber is absolutely dishonest and that the situations she said she was hit by him, he never did so. It's up to the jury to decide if it's more likely Amber lied entirely and he never hit her, or if she was telling the truth and that maybe Johnny hit her once. I've never said he needs to definitively prove he never did so, because that's just impossible. A lot of civil cases aren't open and shut like that.

The jury will deliberate on whether or not they made a good enough of a job proving it's likely he never did so. It's unlikely that everyone will collectively will consider it to the degree you're speaking, and there will be debate on whether or not they did a good enough job proving their case.

And I think it's pretty clear I'm biased in this case. I'm not presenting otherwise, because I have watched this entire thing happen and have a strong idea of what's coming ahead. I think I've done a pretty decent job articulating how this works though and why I feel like Depp is currently proving his case exceptionally well.
I actually think the case is unwinnable by Depp, yes.

---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1