LogFAQs > #964588653

PrivateBiscuit1 posted...

also helps that there is overwhelming evidence of Johnny being the one being abused

Just wanna nitpick your wording choice.

There is no evidence really that can be shown to say that he was the only one abused. And it's basically impossible to prove this beyond hearsay and circumstantial evidence. It's important that both are considered innocent if they weren't proven to be guilty. And, yes, neither Heard or Depp are guilty of a crime (right now). But, this case isn't really centered around guilt, since it is civil. The onus would be on Depp to be able to prove he never abused Heard, which he can't, if he can even proven Heard directly even was naming him (which maybe he can).

One thing I noticed in the Rittenhouse case and this one, not to attack you but just muse, is that I think you decide what is the correct side and kind of tailor what you say sometimes to that result.

Your wording you use sometimes is the issue. I think many took you that way in the Rittenhouse case with your wording you used there also.