LogFAQs > #964588582

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicJohnny Depp v. Amber Heard Trial
PrivateBiscuit1
04/26/22 3:23:00 PM
#190:


most_games_r_ok posted...
Just watched the live stream of that. Thr whole thing was so fucking dumb. Was that actually Heard's team? How did they get careers in law?
They have horrible facts. I think Rottenborn is actually a good lawyer otherwise. But Elaine here is actually completely awful. They asked two questions on re-direct and made her entire questioning look ridiculous.

When Elaine was describing what people who are gaslit by false accusations of domestic abuse and just named off everything that Johnny Depp was going through, I actually could not believe it. She was actively making the argument for Depp's team.

Also, Amber Heard being told that a highly sophisticated test determined that she had histrionic personality disorder and bipolar disorder and she was rolling her eyes exaggeratedly and checking her nails. That was quality stuff.

red sox 777 posted...
Often when an attorney is sounding dumb what it means is that their client is being unreasonable and is insisting on them taking unreasonable positions.
This is also true. That's why I can't talk too much shit about Rottenborn. Elaine, however, is terrible and even if she's told to do a lot of what she's doing, she presents herself horribly and comes across as so bumbling and impossible to take seriously. I can elaborate later on that.

---
I stream sometimes. Check it out!
www.twitch.tv/heroicbiz/
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1