LogFAQs > #964581646

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard Trial
PrivateBiscuit1 04/26/22 10:54:33 AM #178:	HeroDelTiempo17 posted... So assuming the jury believes the article is about Depp, what is the standard of belief for it not to be libel? Does Heard need to definitively prove abuse or just need to show a credible enough claim? By a matter of law, they need to prove that she did not knowingly lie. Which is easy, because she knows whether or not she had been a victim of domestic abuse or not because she lived it. It's up to the jury to decide whether or not she was. I just don't think there's enough here to prove Johnny Depp ever laid a hand on her though, just judging by the UK information. Also, today starts with tech issues with a Zoom testimony. lol Additionally, thanks everyone for the kind words as I detail this mess. --- I stream sometimes. Check it out! www.twitch.tv/heroicbiz/ <cite>PrivateBiscuit1 posted [p:964581646] in Johnny Dep... [t:79993106]...</cite> <quote>HeroDelTiempo17 posted... </cite> <quote>So assuming the jury believes the article is about Depp, what is the standard of belief for it not to be libel? Does Heard need to definitively prove abuse or just need to show a credible enough claim?</quote>By a matter of law, they need to prove that she did not knowingly lie. Which is easy, because she knows whether or not she had been a victim of domestic abuse or not because she lived it. It's up to the jury to decide whether or not she was. I just don't think there's enough here to prove Johnny Depp ever laid a hand on her though, just judging by the UK information. Also, today starts with tech issues with a Zoom testimony. lol Additionally, thanks everyone for the kind words as I detail this mess. --- I stream sometimes. Check it out! www.twitch.tv/heroicbiz/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1