LogFAQs > #964487903

A few things about Amber's "evidence" of abuse.

In the UK trial, she had nothing. All of her stories of abuse are contradicted, and she has changed what has happened in multiple of them.

When she claims to have been beaten or abused, nobody can recall seeing her bruised, marked up, or swollen. And she's had appearances literally the day after she said she had a busted nose or busted lip and she's on TV looking perfectly fine.

To that effect, none of her friends who she saw constantly and confided with are set to be witnesses for her. And if they could corroborate with what Amber said, they would be. Only her sister is a witness of the people who were closest to her.

They have had Johnny Depp on cross-examination for over a day and they haven't provided a shred of evidence that he's ever struck her or admitted to striking her.

She claimed to have pictures and images of her bruises and marks from being hit on her phone, absolutely refused to produce her phone and those images for such a long time and they had to do multiple Motions to Compel to get them, and then eventually produced doctored images with the metadata wiped.

I'm saying there is next to nothing they have to prove abuse, whereas there is plenty of Johnny being able to produce he was abused. I frankly don't foresee them coming up with anything at this point if they couldn't on cross-examination yet. I just don't see it being mutual at all here.