LogFAQs > #961638388

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	armored core is (might be) back baby
Bulbasaur 01/10/22 4:20:31 PM #26:	Entity13 posted... No, I'm bringing up what happened in one case, which is a modern trend with multiple companies than just the one in which games are sacrificed their content or joy for heavy monetization. I was bringing up an example of why not to get hopes up until you know for certain a new Armored Core game will be a full-on game. Do not disregard a fair warning just because, "Oh, it's a different company, so it'll be different!" square remade ff7 and it was excellent, therefore fromsoft making a new armored core means it's gonna be awesome see how stupid your argument is. --- i wanna go eighty-five, drive off a bridge and die. <cite>Bulbasaur posted [p:961638388] in armored co... [t:79845285]...</cite> <quote>Entity13 posted... </cite> <quote>No, I'm bringing up what happened in one case, which is a modern trend with multiple companies than just the one in which games are sacrificed their content or joy for heavy monetization. I was bringing up an example of why not to get hopes up until you know for certain a new Armored Core game will be a full-on game. Do not disregard a fair warning just because, "Oh, it's a different company, so it'll be different!"</quote>square remade ff7 and it was excellent, therefore fromsoft making a new armored core means it's gonna be awesome see how stupid your argument is. --- i wanna go eighty-five, drive off a bridge and die.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1