LogFAQs > #958077317

LinkPizza posted...

PunishedOni has me blocked, but here is something I found about condom slippage...

So, I mean, it happens to men already. And can still happen... It's not super common or anything, but happens enough...

Yep, it's part of why condoms are terribly unreliable as a sole method of birth control. If you experience it frequently, you should consider switching to a brand with a smaller nominal width, since that does suggest you're using too big a condom, but it's certainly not impossible and doesn't indicate anything absolute about dick size. At the other end, breakage is also not that uncommon, especially when dealing with longer sessions. I'd end up breaking one pretty much every time I went for more than half an hour with my girlfriend before we gave up on that and just switched to putting one on for me to finish in (she's got an IUD, so the condom is just extra insurance).

Mostly, just don't rely on condoms. 85% is just not good enough for something as important as birth control.

jiffdiff posted...

I'm really curious about the typically part. If someone has a penis and a uterus doesn't that make them biologically intersex not biologically male?

That was mostly just a sarcastic understatement in response to Zeus saying something really dumb. I'm sure exceptions exist somehow, but I don't personally know of any and I can't think of a hypothetical example.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Fairly sure this is covered under other laws, so likely just virtue signalling

It's less a matter of virtue signalling (that is, saying you care about something purely for the sake of looking like a better person) and more a matter of emphasizing that it's a bad thing and removing any ambiguity in existing laws that could be used to get away with it. There's practical value in that, though as pretty much everyone has said, this is going to be hard to enforce.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.