LogFAQs > #956641306

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicCDC to again recommend everyone mask up in crowded public areas
adjl
07/31/21 12:24:33 PM
#117:


agesboy posted...
this is a total non-sequitur tangent, but fun fact, a displayed 99% chance to hit in most fire emblem games is actually a 99.99% chance to hit, because the game rolls two random numbers instead of one. the average of the combined rolls is considered, and the end result out of this is that higher percentages hit more often than expected and lower percentages miss more than expected. to get a true hit rate of 99%, the displayed hit rate would have to be around 90%!

the more you know

Yeah, I went into that in more detail in another post. And then Fates used some weird system that meant true hit was still higher/lower than the displayed value (for above/below 50, respectively), but didn't have quite as pronounced an effect as the 2RN system did. Knowing that really just makes all those 99% misses even more infuriating.

---
This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1