LogFAQs > #950320950

agesboy posted...

i don't want to financially support anyone who thinks january 6th was a false flag orchestrated by antifa by giving them views or discussion when they use their position of renown to spread that misinformation

tax evasion's fine so i'll still read log horizon, supporting violent terrorists is a bit more serious than "personal and/or political views"

hell i'm still fine with Gate despite it being very clear pro-JSDF/Japanese imperial superiority propaganda

Considering that you likely pirate that shit, it's not like you're supporting them anyway. Otherwise it comes back to the same issue: Are you going to fuck yourself to maybe possibly fuck somebody else the tiniest of bits? Because that's just stupid. Not to mention that this is the weirdest of places to draw the line.

agesboy posted...

supporting violent terrorists is a bit more serious than "personal and/or political views"

lolwut? No matter how many times I follow the loop on that circular logic, I can't find the endpoint because it's completely contrary to what you're trying to claim. If the guy is disavowing and denouncing the capitol riot as the work of antifa (by the way, "false flag" and antifa don't work together anyway, unless the argument is that antifa is working for the government), then he's doing the exact opposite of supporting the rioters who stormed the capitol. It'd be one thing if he believed the rioters were in the right and was taking peoples' money to pay for their legal defense fund, but all you're claiming is that he's "supporting" the riot by criticizing the riot (albeit by advancing a conspiracy theory, but criticizing it all the same), which makes no fucking sense.


---

(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.