LogFAQs > #947572186

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicZeus is warned.
Zeus
11/24/20 10:05:11 PM
#193:


MabinogiFan posted...
Tbh I would be in favor of just nuking the forums off of GameFaqs entirely, but that would kill this site so that'll never happen.

It's pretty much all Gamefaqs really has left any more. The boards have been useful for answering game questions and building specific game knowledge.

likehelly posted...
no, it's not. hence why i said citation needed.

Yes, it is. I've been very upfront and, again, some of those practices have allowed people to impersonate me.

likehelly posted...
you have no idea what transparency means if you think it means not actually saying what something is

No, the problem is you have no idea what transparency is and that fundamental misunderstanding is what leads you to rather wrongly question me. And, for the record, my disclosures almost certainly exceed yours.

likehelly posted...
just like you completely ignored several things i said, even after quoting them

Not everything you post is worth responding to or even requires a response, which is different from completely missing an entire post.

likehelly posted...
wrong. polls can end, while the topic is still there. you're the only one referencing whoever the hell toto is, whereas everyone here, myself included, are referencing the most recent one done by winter.

And the fact that you're citing winter's IP-less poll is why you're absolutely fucking wrong on every conceivable level and your statement is so bewilderingly stupid that it boggles imagination, leaving me to conclude that you're just trolling right now.

Polls "end" in two ways: Either the TC closes the poll (which Winter didn't) or the poll's results are posted in the next topic in the series (something Toto did, but Winter didn't). Neither condition was true here. The poll only "ended" because mods deleted the topic, and as such it'd be impossible for you to screencap not voting in a topic that no longer existed. So instead you did exactly what I accused you of doing: You took a screencap on one or two accounts *before* voting then voted. And then you voted on your countless other accounts because, again, there was no IP lock.

I'm not accusing you of being responsible for all of the hundreds of extra votes, but we both know you were responsible for a lot of them. I'm sure Aculo/Clark picked up a lot of the slack.

likehelly posted...
you literally said it was ip locked, and then by your own admission said it wasn't ip locked.

literally the only possible way you could know either is if you tried voting multiple times. i never voted, i have no way of knowing if it was or wasn't.

but you sure seem to know.

Which disproves your claims completely. Because by first making a statement -- which, again, was an assumption on my part -- that turns out to be wrong, clearly I couldn't have known at all because otherwise I would noted it correctly. But you clearly knew because you had been doing it.

likehelly posted...
...busted about what? that no one likes you? you still never tagged anyone to have them come in here and verify they like you. you bring up the polls as if they mean something but you never have had anyone actually say they like you.

you still have yet to have people come in to prove you're liked, you still have yet to name a recent alt of mine that you've seen. i have so many alts, it should be painfully obvious to point at least one out, and you never ever do.

i might as well let you in on the joke. back when people were claiming you were janners or indignation, it was done as a joke. then you then got incredibly angry about and started accusing other people of having alts, hundreds of them for some inane reason with no evidence or proof to support it (you still do this, for some reason, despite still having no evidence). you were so angry trying to deny it that it made people actually think they were your alts. that, combined with the fact that you started pulling alt after alt out after claimed repeatedly that you didn't have any, further cemented the idea.

All of which is fucking wrong, considering that you were in the topic and saw people publicly support me. And hearing you of all people -- who are right next to Erik in terms of personality -- talk about somebody else being disliked is laughable. Multiple times now you've tried to troll by claiming that somebody is disliked only for it to blow up in your face. Otherwise all you've done with your post is admit that you just do shit to troll. In fact, the next time we're arguing about something, you're probably going to confess to using all of your alts to rig those polls just to annoy me and then probably claim that you haven't been doing the new thing you've been doing.

And, by the way, the reason I "accuse" you of having a lot of fucking alts is because you have a lot of fucking alts. If I created an alt a day, I'm not sure I could ever catch up to you.

---
(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1